Shinichiro Sakurai
Aichi Medical University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Shinichiro Sakurai.
Journal of Cardiology | 2015
Hiroaki Takashima; Katsuhisa Waseda; Masahiko Gosho; Akiyoshi Kurita; Hirohiko Ando; Shinichiro Sakurai; Kazuyuki Maeda; Soichiro Kumagai; Akihiro Suzuki; Tetsuya Amano
BACKGROUND Although functional ischemia identification is important when determining revascularization, angiographic assessment alone is challenging in intermediate coronary stenosis. Previous studies have reported that lesion-specific characteristics affected the fractional flow reserve (FFR). However, the relationship between morphological lesion complexity and FFR has not yet been fully evaluated. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of morphological lesion complexity on FFR in intermediate coronary stenosis. METHODS A total of 109 consecutive patients with 136 intermediate coronary stenoses (visually estimated diameter stenosis: 40-70%) were assessed via quantitative coronary angiography, lesion-specific characteristics, and FFR. Indexed lesions were assessed according to 6 morphological lesion characteristics: eccentricity, bend, irregularity, calcification, bifurcation, and diffuse. The lesions were then classified into 3 groups according to the morphological severity count represented by the number of present characteristics (mild-complex: 0-1, moderate-complex: 2-3, and severe-complex: 4-6), and their functional severities were evaluated. Lesions with an FFR <0.80 were considered functionally significant coronary stenoses. RESULTS Of the 136 lesions, 51% were located in the left anterior descending artery (LAD) and 47% had an FFR <0.80. The FFR differed significantly among the 3 lesion complexity groups (0.84±0.10 vs. 0.79±0.10 vs. 0.73±0.07, for mild-, moderate-, and severe-complex, respectively; p<0.01). In a multivariate logistic analysis, LAD lesions, moderate- and severe-complex, and diameter stenosis were independently associated with an FFR <0.80 [odds ratio (OR): 5.65, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.50-12.80, p<0.01; OR: 2.96, 95% CI: 1.30-6.72, p<0.01; OR: 7.11, 95% CI: 1.25-40.37, p=0.03, and OR: 2.65, 95% CI: 1.04-6.72, p=0.04, respectively]. CONCLUSIONS Both indexed vessels and the degree of diameter stenosis affected the FFR. In addition, the severity of morphological lesion complexity correlated with the degree of functional severity in intermediate coronary stenosis.
Circulation | 2018
Masahiro Shimoda; Hirohiko Ando; Kazuhiro Naito; Akihiro Suzuki; Shinichiro Sakurai; Yusuke Nakano; Akiyoshi Kurita; Katsuhisa Waseda; Hiroaki Takashima; Kenta Murotani; Tadayuki Uetani; Tetsuya Amano
BACKGROUND Despite the revolution of coronary stents, there remain concerns about the risk of stent thrombosis, especially in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The present study compared early vascular healing as a contributing factor to reducing stent thrombosis between Xience everolimus-eluting stents (X-EES) and Synergy everolimus-eluting stents (S-EES) in patients with STEMI. Methods and Results: The present study included 47 patients with STEMI requiring primary percutaneous coronary intervention with X-EES (n=25) or S-EES (n=22). Optical coherence tomography (OCT) assessments of the stented lesions were performed 2 weeks and 4 months after stent implantation. Neointimal strut coverage, malapposition and the frequency of thrombus formation were evaluated. In the 2-week OCT analysis, the proportion of covered struts in S-EES (42.4±15.4%) was significantly higher than in X-EES (26.3±10.1%, P<0.001). In the 4-month OCT analysis, the proportion of covered struts in S-EES (72.2±17.9%) was still significantly higher than in X-EES (62.0±14.9%, P=0.04). CONCLUSIONS Compared with X-EES, S-EES showed a higher proportion of covered struts in the early phase after stent implantation for STEMI patients.
American Heart Journal | 2016
Hirohiko Ando; Hiroaki Takashima; Akihiro Suzuki; Shinichiro Sakurai; Soichiro Kumagai; Akiyoshi Kurita; Katsuhisa Waseda; Tetsuya Amano
BACKGROUND Poststent fractional flow reserve (FFR) is a useful indicator of optimal percutaneous coronary intervention, and higher poststent FFR is associated with favorable long-term clinical outcome. However, little is known about the factors influencing poststent FFR. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of lesion characteristics on poststent FFR. METHODS For patients who had scheduled stent implantation for stable angina, FFR measurements at maximum hyperemia were performed before and after coronary stent implantation. As one of lesion characteristics, the FFR pressure drop pattern was evaluated and classified as either an abrupt or a gradual pattern according to the pullback curve of FFR. RESULTS A total of 205 lesions with physiological significant stenosis were evaluated. Fractional flow reserve value increased from 0.67±0.10 to 0.87±0.07 after stent implantation. Optimal poststent FFR was achieved in 75 lesions (36.6%). Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that optimal poststent FFR was positively correlated with an abrupt pressure drop pattern (hazard ratio [HR] 2.11, 95% CI 1.06-4.15, P=.03) and prestent FFR (HR 1.04, 95% CI 1.03-2.04, P=.03; per 0.1 increase), and negatively correlated with lesion localization to the left anterior descending artery (HR 0.18, 95% CI 0.09-0.36, P<.0001). The c statistic for predicting optimal poststent FFR was 0.763 (95% CI 0.702-0.819). CONCLUSION Abrupt pressure drop patterns, prestent FFR, and lesion localization to the left anterior descending artery were independent predictors of optimal poststent FFR.
Journal of the American College of Cardiology | 2012
Daiki Kato; Hiroaki Takashima; Akiyoshi Kurita; Shinichiro Sakurai; Tomofumi Mizuno; Kenji Asai; Yasuo Kuroda; Takashi Kosaka; Yasushi Kuhara; Hirohiko Ando; Kazuyuki Maeda; Yusuke Nakano; Toru Niwa; Kentaro Mukai; Shigeko Sato; Masahiro Takeshita; Masanobu Fujimoto; Katsuhisa Waseda; Tetsuya Amano
Withdrawn
Heart and Vessels | 2015
Daiki Kato; Hiroaki Takashima; Katsuhisa Waseda; Akiyoshi Kurita; Yasuo Kuroda; Takashi Kosaka; Yasushi Kuhara; Hirohiko Ando; Kazuyuki Maeda; Soichiro Kumagai; Shinichiro Sakurai; Akihiro Suzuki; Yukiko Toda; Atsushi Watanabe; Shigeko Sato; Masanobu Fujimoto; Tomofumi Mizuno; Tetsuya Amano
International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging | 2015
Shinichiro Sakurai; Hiroaki Takashima; Katsuhisa Waseda; Masahiko Gosho; Akiyoshi Kurita; Hirohiko Ando; Kazuyuki Maeda; Akihiro Suzuki; Masanobu Fujimoto; Tetsuya Amano
International Journal of Cardiology | 2014
Shinichiro Sakurai; Hiroaki Takashima; Katsuhisa Waseda; Hirohiko Ando; Akiyoshi Kurita; Tetsuya Amano
Heart and Vessels | 2017
Hirohiko Ando; Akihiro Suzuki; Shinichiro Sakurai; Soichiro Kumagai; Akiyoshi Kurita; Katsuhisa Waseda; Hiroaki Takashima; Tetsuya Amano
International Journal of Cardiology | 2014
Hiroaki Takashima; Shinichiro Sakurai; Katsuhisa Waseda; Akiyoshi Kurita; Hirohiko Ando; Soichiro Kumagai; Tetsuya Amano
Journal of the American College of Cardiology | 2018
Shinichiro Sakurai; Hiroaki Takashima; Akihiro Suzuki; Hiroaki Sawada; Hirohiko Ando; Yuki Saka; Katsuhisa Waseda