Shinpei Doi

Multicenter retrospective study of endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage for malignant biliary obstruction in Japan

Endoscopic ultrasound‐guided biliary drainage (EUS‐BD) is considered to be an effective salvage procedure for failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with unresectable malignant biliary obstruction. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of EUS‐BD.

Use of Samples From Endoscopic Ultrasound–Guided 19-Gauge Fine-Needle Aspiration in Diagnosis of Autoimmune Pancreatitis

BACKGROUND & AIMS Histologic techniques are used to distinguish autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) from pancreatic malignancies and to confirm the etiology of pancreatitis. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is a well-established technique used in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. However, it is unclear whether specimens obtained from pancreatic lesions by EUS-FNA are adequate for the histologic diagnosis of AIP, because the evaluation of tissue architecture and immunostaining assays usually require larger samples. METHODS We evaluated samples collected by EUS-FNA with a conventional 19-gauge needle by histologic analysis, looking for features of AIP. We analyzed data from 44 patients who were diagnosed with AIP and underwent EUS-FNA with a 19-gauge needle from January 2004 to September 2010. The FNA specimens were reviewed by histologic analysis; AIP was diagnosed based on the presence of lymphoplasmacytic sclerosing pancreatitis or immunoglobulin (Ig)G4-positive plasma cells in the infiltrate. RESULTS The specimen amount was inadequate from 3 patients. Among the remaining 41 patients, histopathologic analysis revealed lymphoplasmacytic sclerosing pancreatitis in 17 samples and IgG4-positive plasma cells in 5 (3 samples were positive for both); no samples had granulocytic epithelial lesions. Therefore, 19 patients (43%) were diagnosed with AIP based on histologic analysis. One patient had temporary abdominal pain. CONCLUSIONS EUS-FNA, with a 19-gauge needle, is a safe and reliable procedure for obtaining pancreatic samples for the histologic analysis of AIP. Although it does not have a high diagnostic yield, it might be useful in patients without typical features of AIP because it would allow patients to avoid surgery.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided celiac ganglia neurolysis vs. celiac plexus neurolysis: a randomized multicenter trial

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS No prospective comparison of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided direct celiac ganglia neurolysis (EUS - CGN) vs. EUS-guided celiac plexus neurolysis (EUS - CPN) has been reported. The aim of the current study was to compare the effectiveness of EUS - CGN and EUS - CPN in providing pain relief from upper abdominal cancer pain in a multicenter randomized controlled trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with upper abdominal cancer pain were randomly assigned to treatment using either EUS - CGN or EUS - CPN. Evaluation was performed at Day 7 postoperatively using a pain scale of 0 to 10. Patients for whom pain decreased to ≤ 3 were considered to have a positive response, and those experiencing a decrease in pain to ≤ 1 were considered to be completely responsive. Comparison between the two groups was performed using intention-to-treat analysis. The primary endpoint was the difference in treatment response rates between EUS - CGN and EUS - CPN at postoperative Day 7. Secondary endpoints included differences in complete response rates, pain scores, duration of pain relief, and incidence of adverse effects. RESULTS A total of 34 patients were assigned to each group. Visualization of ganglia was possible in 30 cases (88 %) in the EUS - CGN group. The positive response rate was significantly higher in the EUS - CGN group (73.5 %) than in the EUS - CPN group (45.5 %; P = 0.026). The complete response rate was also significantly higher in the EUS - CGN group (50.0 %) than in the EUS - CPN group (18.2 %; P = 0.010). There was no difference in adverse events or duration of pain relief between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS EUS - CGN is significantly superior to conventional EUS - CPN in cancer pain relief. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index.htm (ID: UMIN-000002536).

Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy for Diagnosis of Lymphoproliferative Disorders: Feasibility of Immunohistological, Flow Cytometric, and Cytogenetic Assessments

OBJECTIVES:In addition to morphology, immunophenotype and genetic abnormalities should be assessed during diagnosis and subclassification of lymphoproliferative disorders. The objective of this study was to evaluate the yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy (EUS-FNAB) using a standard 19-gauge needle for diagnosis and subclassification of lymphoma, assessing the feasibility of immunohistological, flow cytometric, and cytogenetic assessments.METHODS:Two hundred forty patients with suspected lymphoma were referred for EUS-FNAB to our quaternary EUS center between June 2005 and December 2010. EUS-FNAB using a conventional 19-gauge needle was attempted for all patients, followed by histological assessments including immunohistological staining, flow cytometry, and cytogenetic analysis (G-band karyotyping). Among the patients, 152 were ultimately diagnosed with lymphoma. The primary outcome measure of this study was the sensitivity of histological assessment, including immunohistological staining, flow cytometry, and G-band karyotyping, for diagnosis and subclassification of lymphoma.RESULTS:Among the 152 patients ultimately diagnosed with lymphoma, 147 patients (96.7%) were diagnosed by EUS-FNAB, and classification in accordance with the WHO (World Health Organization) system was also possible for 135 patients (88.8%) on the basis of histological findings, including immunohistological staining. Flow cytometry showed abnormal or unusual cell populations in 121 (79.6%) of the 152 patients diagnosed with lymphoma, and in 114 (90.5%) of the 126 patients diagnosed with B-cell lymphoma. Specific cytogenetic abnormalities were detected in 21 (13.8%) of the lymphoma patients.CONCLUSIONS:EUS-FNAB using a standard 19-gauge needle has high diagnostic value for lymphoma. Immunophenotyping is usually possible, while cytogenetic abnormalities can be identified in a relatively limited number of patients.

Needle tract implantation on the esophageal wall after EUS-guided FNA of metastatic mediastinal lymphadenopathy

Tumor seeding along a needle tract is a potential but unlikely complication of EUS-guided FNA (EUS-FNA). We are aware of only 2 previous cases. In these cases, the tumor seeding occurred in the gastric wall after transgastric FNA. The current report describes the first case of needle tract implantation on the esophageal wall after EUS-FNA for metastatic mediastinal lymphadenopathy of gastric cancer.

Combined endobronchial and endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for mediastinal nodal staging of lung cancer

BACKGROUND Recently, transesophageal endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) has been evaluated for mediastinal nodal staging (N staging) of lung cancer, as this technique is less invasive than mediastinoscopy and possibly more accurate than 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with computed tomography (PET-CT). However, EUS-FNA does not provide access to pretracheal and hilar lymph nodes. More recently, endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) has been introduced as a novel technique for accessing pretracheal and hilar lymph nodes. Although the combined endoscopic approach of EUS-FNA and EBUS-TBNA is presumably more accurate than PET-CT, only a few reports have quantitatively evaluated its diagnostic ability. Therefore, we prospectively assessed the diagnostic yield of this combined endoscopic approach for mediastinal N staging of lung cancer. METHODS A consecutive series of 120 patients with suspected resectable lung cancer on CT findings underwent PET-CT and combined EUS-FNA/EBUS-TBNA. The accuracy and other diagnostic indices of the combined approach in mediastinal N staging were compared with those of PET-CT. RESULTS Among the enrolled patients, a final pathological N stage was established in 110 patients. The accuracy of the combined approach using EUS-FNA and EBUS-TBNA was significantly higher than that of PET-CT (90.0 % vs. 73.6 %; P < 0.0001). The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were respectively 71.8 %, 100 %, 100 %, and 86.6 % for the combined approach vs. 47.4 %, 87.5 %, 66.7 %, and 75.9 % for PET-CT. CONCLUSIONS The combined endoscopic approach using EUS-FNA and EBUS-TBNA provided excellent diagnostic performance. Therefore, this approach is strongly recommended before surgery or mediastinoscopy to avoid futile thoracotomy and surgical intervention.

Endoscopic hemostasis using covered metallic stent placement for uncontrolled post-endoscopic sphincterotomy bleeding

Severe bleeding following endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy (EBS) can sometimes be difficult to manage, resulting in the need for an invasive intervention. The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of endoscopic hemostasis using covered self-expandable metallic stents (SEMSs) for severe post- EBS bleeding. Eleven patients with bile duct stones underwent standard EBS using a standard sphincterotome-based technique at 4 endoscopic units of a university-affiliated hospital and a general hospital. Monotherapy or combined therapy were used to achieve hemostasis with either balloon tamponade, hypertonic saline epinephrine injection, or endoclip placement. When active bleeding could not be controlled, covered SEMSs were placed across the major papilla. Emergency endoscopy was performed on the day of admission or the subsequent day (ranging from 6 to 35 h after admission). Bleeding was classified as mild in 6 cases (54.5 %) and moderate in 5 (45.5 %). A covered SEMS 10mm in diameter and 6 cm long was placed across the papilla. After placement, complete hemostasis was achieved. The mean duration of stent placement was 8.2 days (range 5–10 days), and the SEMS was successfully removed in all cases. Although the present study has the limitations of a small sample size and lack of control patients, covered SEMS placement for endoscopic hemostasis may be useful in selected patients with uncontrolled post-EBS bleeding.

PREDICTIVE FACTORS FOR PAIN RELIEF AFTER ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASOUND-GUIDED CELIAC PLEXUS NEUROLYSIS

Background:  Celiac plexus neurolysis (CPN) is an established treatment for upper abdominal cancer pain. Recently, endoscopic ultrasound‐guided CPN (EUS‐CPN) was introduced and has enabled the performance of CPN under real‐time imaging guidance, thereby making this technique much safer and easier. However, this procedure is not always efficacious, and a limited number of patients benefit from it. It should not be recommended for patients suspected of having unfavorable outcomes. We determined the predictive factors for response to EUS‐CPN in order to enable rational selection of the therapeutic strategy.

Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Antegrade Treatments for Biliary Disorders in Patients with Surgically Altered Anatomy

IntroductionEndoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with surgically altered anatomy is challenging. Several endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided biliary access techniques have been reported as effective alternatives. EUS-guided antegrade treatments (AG) have been developed more recently but have not yet been studied well.AimsTo evaluate the feasibility and safety of EUS-AG for biliary disorders in patients with surgically altered anatomies.MethodsWe retrospectively identified all the patients who underwent EUS-AG. The left intrahepatic bile duct (IHBD) was initially punctured from the intestine followed by cholangiography, antegrade guidewire manipulation, and bougie dilation of the fistula. Either antegrade biliary stenting (ABS) or antegrade balloon dilation (ABD) was performed depending on the biliary disorders. In stone cases, the stones were antegradely pushed out using a balloon. After ABD, a nasobiliary drainage tube was placed to prevent possible bile leak and to keep an access route for any possible repeat procedures.ResultsEUS-AG was attempted in seven patients including choledocholithiasis in five, malignant biliary obstruction in one, and bilioenteric anastomosis stricture in one. EUS-AG was not performed in one patient because EUS-cholangiography did not indicate the presence of stones. In the remaining six patients, the IHBD was successfully punctured, followed by cholangiography, guidewire insertion, and bougie dilation. ABS and ABD were successfully performed in one and five patients, respectively. Antegrade procedures with ABD were repeated twice in one patient. Mild complications were observed in two patients.ConclusionsEUS-AG for biliary disorders in patients with surgically altered anatomy is feasible. Further studies are warranted.

Preoperative routine evaluation of bilateral adrenal glands by endoscopic ultrasound and fine-needle aspiration in patients with potentially resectable lung cancer.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS The aim of the current study was to assess the detection rate of the right adrenal gland and the diagnostic ability of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and fine-needle aspiration (FNA) for the diagnosis of adrenal metastasis in potentially resectable lung cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS This retrospective cohort study included a consecutive series of 150 patients undergoing EUS/EUS - FNA for staging of lung cancer. The detection rate of the right adrenal gland by EUS and the diagnostic accuracies of computed tomography (CT), positron emission tomography-CT (PET-CT), and EUS/EUS - FNA for the diagnosis of adrenal metastasis were evaluated. RESULTS The right adrenal gland was visualized by EUS in 131 patients (87.3 %); the left adrenal gland was visualized in all patients. Findings suggestive of metastasis in either one of the adrenal glands or in both were observed in 6 patients (4.0 %) by CT, in 5 patients (3.3 %) by PET-CT, and in 11 patients (7.3 %) by EUS. EUS - FNA was performed simultaneously in the 11 patients, and in 4 patients the diagnosis of metastasis was established. The accuracy for the diagnosis of adrenal metastasis was 100 % for EUS/EUS - FNA, 96.0 % for CT, and 97.0 % for PET-CT (P = 0.1146). CONCLUSIONS As well as the left adrenal gland, the right adrenal gland was also usually visible by EUS. EUS/EUS - FNA provided an accurate diagnosis of adrenal metastasis, although the prevalence of adrenal metastasis was relatively low in these patients with potentially resectable lung cancer.