Shinya Sanpei

Patterns of bilateral agenesis of maxillary third molars and agenesis of other teeth

The purpose of this study was to investigate the patterns of bilateral agenesis of maxillary third molars and other tooth agenesis in Japanese orthodontic patients. A group of 262 subjects with bilateral agenesis of maxillary third molars (group A) was divided into three subgroups: group 1A consisting of 114 subjects without agenesis of mandibular third molars; group 2A, 31 subjects with unilateral agenesis of mandibular third molars; and group 3A, 117 subjects with agenesis of all third molars. As controls, 926 other subjects without third molar agenesis were selected (group C). Panoramic radiographs were mainly used to examine for tooth agenesis. The Chi square test and odds ratio were used to make statistical comparisons. The prevalence rates of agenesis of maxillary lateral incisors, mandibular incisors and maxillary and mandibular second premolars, and bilateral agenesis of maxillary lateral incisors and second premolars were significantly higher in any one of the third molar agenesis groups than in the control group. Characteristically, no significant increase in occurrence of bilateral agenesis of mandibular second premolars was demonstrated by the subjects with bilateral agenesis of maxillary third molars. Irrespective of whether unilateral or bilateral agenesis of mandibular third molars is present or not, the Japanese orthodontic patients with bilateral agenesis of maxillary third molars exhibited a significantly increased occurrence of unilateral or bilateral agenesis of maxillary lateral incisors, mandibular incisors and maxillary and mandibular second premolars, except for bilateral agenesis of mandibular incisors and second premolars.

Symmetrical agenesis of the mandibular third molars and agenesis of other teeth in a Japanese orthodontic population.

This study was conducted to investigate the association between symmetrical agenesis of the mandibular third molars and agenesis of other teeth in Japanese orthodontic patients. A sample of 64 patients with symmetrical agenesis of the mandibular third molars and without agenesis of the maxillary third molars was selected as the third molar agenesis group. In addition, 585 patients with all 4 third molars were selected as controls. The main materials examined for diagnosis of tooth agenesis were panoramic radiographs. The prevalence rate of tooth agenesis was compared between the groups using the chi-squared or Fishers test, and the odds ratio. Significantly increased occurrence of overall agenesis of the maxillary lateral incisors, and overall and symmetrical agenesis of other teeth including the maxillary and mandibular second premolars and mandibular first molars were observed in the patients with symmetrical agenesis of the mandibular third molars and without agenesis of the maxillary third molars. Irrespective of the presence or absence of symmetrical agenesis of the mandibular third molars, no significant differences in the prevalence rates of overall or symmetrical agenesis of other teeth and specific teeth were noted between the sexes or between the right and left sides of the jaws in the patients without maxillary third molar agenesis. (J Oral Sci 58, 171-176, 2016).

Effects of long-term repeated topical fluoride applications and adhesion promoter on shear bond strengths of orthodontic brackets

Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of long-term repeated topical application of fluoride before bonding and an adhesion promoter on the bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Materials and Methods: A total of 76 bovine incisors were collected and divided equally into four groups. In group 1, the brackets were bonded without topical fluoride application or adhesion promoter. In group 2, before bonding, the adhesion promoter was applied to nonfluoridated enamel. In group 3, the brackets were bonded without the application of the adhesion promoter to enamel, which had undergone long-term repeated topical fluoride treatments. Teeth in group 4 received the long-term repeated topical applications of fluoride, and the brackets were bonded using the adhesion promoter. All the brackets were bonded using BeautyOrtho Bond self-etching adhesive. The shear bond strength was measured and the bond failure modes were evaluated with the use of the adhesive remnant index (ARI) after debonding. Results: The mean shear bond strength was significantly lower in group 3 than in groups 1, 2, and 4, and there were no significant differences between the groups except for group 3. There were significant differences in the distribution of ARI scores between groups 2 and 3, and between groups 3 and 4. Conclusions: The adhesion promoter can recover the bond strength reduced by the long-term repeated topical applications of fluoride to the prefluoridation level and had a significantly great amount of adhesives left on either fluoridated or nonfluoridated enamel.

The way children look at the upright photograph of a male dentist's face —Analysis using non-contact type of eye movement measuring apparatus FreeView ® —

Abstract We investigated how child patients take in information from a dentists face and whether there is any age difference in the way of scanning the face. For this purpose, we used a non-contact type of eye movement measuring apparatus tradenamed FreeView ® and an upright photograph of a male dentists face as the test image. The subjects consisted of a total of 90 children between the ages of 2 years 11 months and 12 years 11 months. The subjects were divided into three age groups-group A (below 7 years), group B (7–9 years) and group C (10 years or above), and their eye movements were measured and analyzed. Our findings are as follows. 1.The saccadic movements to the background of the photo and the fixation points in the background decreased most in group C, followed by group B and group A, in that order. 2.The overlapping of saccadic movements to the features of the face (the eyes, nose and mouth) was remarkably in all age groups. However, the subjects did not scan the whole of the appearance of the face (the hair, forehead, cheeks, ears and chin). 3.The fixation points on the appearance of the face were unevenly distributed. Many fixation points were found close to the features of the face. This peculiarity was common to all the groups. 4.The fixation points on the features of the face increased most in group C, followed by group B and group A, in that order.