Shivaram Prasad Singh
Rajendra Agricultural University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Shivaram Prasad Singh.
Journal of clinical and experimental hepatology | 2015
Ajay Duseja; Shivaram Prasad Singh; Vivek A. Saraswat; Subrat K. Acharya; Yogesh Chawla; Subhankar Chowdhury; Radha K. Dhiman; Rv Jayakumar; Kaushal Madan; Sri Prakash Misra; Hrudananda Mishra; Sunil K. Modi; Arumugam Muruganathan; Banshi Saboo; Rakesh Sahay; Rajesh Upadhyay
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is closely associated with metabolic syndrome. Prevalence of metabolic risk factors including diabetes mellitus, obesity, etc. is rapidly increasing in India putting this population at risk for NAFLD. Patients with NAFLD are at increased risk for liver-related morbidity and mortality and also cardiovascular disease risk and increased incidence of diabetes mellitus on long-term follow-up. Management of patients with NAFLD may require a multi-disciplinary approach involving not only the hepatologists but also the internists, cardiologists, and endocrinologists. This position paper which is a combined effort of the Indian National Association for Study of the Liver (INASL), Endocrine Society of India (ESI), Indian College of Cardiology (ICC) and the Indian Society of Gastroenterology (ISG) defines the spectrum of NAFLD and the association of NAFLD with insulin resistance and metabolic syndrome besides suggesting preferred approaches for the diagnosis and management of patients with NAFLD in the Indian context.
Journal of clinical and experimental hepatology | 2014
Radha K. Dhiman; Vivek A. Saraswat; D. Valla; Yogesh Chawla; Arunanshu Behera; Vibha Varma; Swastik Agarwal; Ajay Duseja; Pankaj Puri; Naveen Kalra; Chittapuram Srinivasan Rameshbabu; Vikram Bhatia; Malay Sharma; Manoj Kumar; Subhash Gupta; Sunil Taneja; Leileshwar Kaman; Showkat Ali Zargar; Samiran Nundy; Shivaram Prasad Singh; Subrat K. Acharya; J. B. Dilawari
Portal cavernoma cholangiopathy (PCC) is defined as abnormalities in the extrahepatic biliary system including the cystic duct and gallbladder with or without abnormalities in the 1st and 2nd generation biliary ducts in a patient with portal cavernoma. Presence of a portal cavernoma, typical cholangiographic changes on endoscopic or magnetic resonance cholangiography and the absence of other causes of these biliary changes like bile duct injury, primary sclerosing cholangitis, cholangiocarcinoma etc are mandatory to arrive a diagnosis. Compression by porto-portal collateral veins involving the paracholedochal and epicholedochal venous plexuses and cholecystic veins and ischemic insult due to deficient portal blood supply or prolonged compression by collaterals bring about biliary changes. While the former are reversible after porto-systemic shunt surgery, the latter are not. Majority of the patients with PCC are asymptomatic and approximately 21% are symptomatic. Symptoms in PCC could be in the form of long standing jaundice due to chronic cholestasis, or biliary pain with or without cholangitis due to biliary stones. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography has no diagnostic role because it is invasive and is associated with risk of complications, hence it is reserved for therapeutic procedures. Magnetic resonance cholangiography and portovenography is a noninvasive and comprehensive imaging technique, and is the modality of choice for mapping of the biliary and vascular abnormalities in these patients. PCC is a progressive condition and symptoms develop late in the course of portal hypertension only in patients with severe or advanced changes of cholangiopathy. Asymptomatic patients with PCC do not require any treatment. Treatment of symptomatic PCC can be approached in a phased manner, coping first with biliary clearance by nasobiliary or biliary stent placement for acute cholangitis and endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy for biliary stone removal; second, with portal decompression by creating portosystemic shunt; and third, with persistent biliary obstruction by performing second-stage biliary drainage surgery such as hepaticojejunostomy or choledochoduodenostomy. Patients with symptomatic PCC have good prognosis after successful endoscopic biliary drainage and after successful shunt surgery.
Journal of clinical and experimental hepatology | 2014
Ashish Kumar; Subrat K. Acharya; Shivaram Prasad Singh; Vivek A. Saraswat; Anil Arora; Ajay Duseja; Goenka Mk; Deepali Jain; Premashish Kar; Manoj Kumar; Vinay Kumaran; Kunisshery Mallath Mohandas; D. K. Panda; Shashi Bala Paul; Hariharan Ramesh; P.N. Rao; Samir Shah; Hanish Sharma; Ragesh Babu Thandassery
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the major causes of morbidity, mortality and healthcare expenditure in patients with chronic liver disease. There are no consensus guidelines on diagnosis and management of HCC in India. The Indian National Association for Study of the Liver (INASL) set up a Task-Force on HCC in 2011, with a mandate to develop consensus guidelines for diagnosis and management of HCC, relevant to disease patterns and clinical practices in India. The Task-Force first identified various contentious issues on various aspects of HCC and these issues were allotted to individual members of the Task-Force who reviewed them in detail. The Task-Force used the Oxford Center for Evidence Based Medicine-Levels of Evidence of 2009 for developing an evidence-based approach. A 2-day round table discussion was held on 9th and 10th February, 2013 at Puri, Odisha, to discuss, debate, and finalize the consensus statements. The members of the Task-Force reviewed and discussed the existing literature at this meeting and formulated the INASL consensus statements for each of the issues. We present here the INASL consensus guidelines (The Puri Recommendations) on prevention, diagnosis and management of HCC in India.
Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility | 2013
Manas Kumar Panigrahi; Sanjib Kumar Kar; Shivaram Prasad Singh; Uday C. Ghoshal
Background/Aims Data on normal stool form and frequency, which are important for defining constipation, are scanty; hence, we studied these in an eastern Indian population. Methods One thousand and two hundred apparently healthy asymptomatic subjects were evaluated for predominant stool form (Bristol chart with descriptor) and frequency. Data on demographic and life-style (diet and physical activity) were collected. Results Of 1,200 subjects (age 42 ± 14.5 years, 711, 59% male), most passed predominantly Bristol type IV stool (699 [58.2%]; other forms were: type I (23 [1.9%]), type II (38 [3.2%]), type III (99 [8.2%]), type V (73 [6%]), type VI (177 [14.7%]), type VII (7 [0.6%]) and an irregular combination (84 [7%]). Weekly stool frequency was 12.1 ± 4.7 (median 14, range 2-42). Less than 3 stools/week was noted in 32/1,200 (2.6%). Female subjects (n = 489) passed stools less frequently than males (n = 711) (11.1 ± 5.6/week vs. 12.8 ± 3.8/week, P < 0.001) and tended to pass harder forms (type I: 17, type II: 20, type III: 39 vs. 6, 18 and 60, respectively, P = 0.061). Vegetarians (n = 252) and physically active (n = 379) subjects tended to pass stool more frequently than occasional (n = 553) and regular non-vegetarian (n = 395) (11.8 ± 4.5 and 12.8 ± 4.7 vs. 11.3 ± 4.7; P < 0.05) and sedentary (n = 464) and intermediately active (n = 357) subjects (13.4 ± 4.0 and 12.3 ± 4.5 vs. 10.9 ± 5.1, P = 0.080) in different age groups, respectively. Older age was associated with less frequent stool, particularly among female population. Female gender and age > 35 years were significant on multivariate analysis. Conclusions Median stool frequency in the studied population was 14/week (range 2-42) and predominant form was Bristol type IV. Older age was associated with lesser stool frequency, particularly among female subjects.
Journal of clinical and experimental hepatology | 2014
Pankaj Puri; Anil C. Anand; Vivek A. Saraswat; Subrat K. Acharya; Shiv Kumar Sarin; Radha K. Dhiman; Rakesh Aggarwal; Shivaram Prasad Singh; Deepak Amarapurkar; Anil Arora; Mohinish Chhabra; Kamal Chetri; Gourdas Choudhuri; Vinod Kumar Dixit; Ajay Duseja; Ajay K. Jain; Dharmesh Kapoor; Premashis Kar; Abraham Koshy; Ashish Kumar; Kaushal Madan; Sri Prakash Misra; Mohan V.G. Prasad; Aabha Nagral; Amarendra S. Puri; R. Jeyamani; Sanjiv Saigal; Samir Shah; Praveen K. Sharma; Ajit Sood
The estimated prevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in India is between 0.5 and 1.5% with hotspots showing much higher prevalence in some areas of northeast India, in some tribal populations and in certain parts of Punjab. Genotype 3 is the most prevalent type of infection. Recent years have seen development of a large number of new molecules that are revolutionizing the treatment of hepatitis C. Some of the new directly acting agents (DAAs) like sofosbuvir have been called game-changers because they offer the prospect of interferon-free regimens for the treatment of HCV infection. These new drugs have not yet been approved in India and their cost and availability is uncertain at present. Till these drugs become available at an affordable cost, the treatment that was standard of care for the whole world before these newer drugs were approved should continue to be recommended. For India, cheaper options, which are as effective as the standard-of-care (SOC) in carefully selected patients, are also explored to bring treatment within reach of poorer patients. It may be prudent to withhold treatment at present for selected patients with genotype 1 or 4 infection and low levels of fibrosis (F1 or F2), and for patients who are non-responders to initial therapy, interferon intolerant, those with decompensated liver disease, and patients in special populations such as stable patients after liver and kidney transplantation, HIV co-infected patients and those with cirrhosis of liver.
Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology | 2016
Vivek A. Saraswat; Shivaram Prasad Singh; Ajay Duseja; Akash Shukla; C. E. Eapen; Dharmendra Kumar; Gaurav Pandey; Jayanti Venkataraman; Pankaj Puri; Krishnasamy Narayanswami; Radha K. Dhiman; Sandeep Thareja; Sandeep Nijhawan; Shobna Bhatia; Uday Zachariah; Ujjwal Sonika; Thomas Varghese; Subrat K. Acharya
The aim of this study was to analyze etiologies and frequency of hepatic and extrahepatic organ failures (OFs) and outcome of acute‐on‐chronic liver failure (ACLF) at 10 tertiary centers in India.
Journal of clinical and experimental hepatology | 2016
Pankaj Puri; Vivek A. Saraswat; Radha K. Dhiman; Anil C Anand; Subrat K. Acharya; Shivaram Prasad Singh; Yogesh Chawla; Deepak Amarapurkar; Ajay Kumar; Anil Arora; Vinod Kumar Dixit; Abraham Koshy; Ajit Sood; Ajay Duseja; Dharmesh Kapoor; Kaushal Madan; Anshu Srivastava; Ashish Kumar; Swastik Agrawal
India contributes significantly to the global burden of HCV. While the nucleoside NS5B inhibitor sofosbuvir became available in the Indian market in March 2015, the other directly acting agents (DAAs), Ledipasvir and Daclatasvir, have only recently become available in the India. The introduction of these DAA in India at a relatively affordable price has led to great optimism about prospects of cure for these patients as not only will they provide higher efficacy, but combination DAAs as all-oral regimen will result in lower side effects than were seen with pegylated interferon alfa and ribavirin therapy. Availability of these newer DAAs has necessitated revision of INASL guidelines for the treatment of HCV published in 2015. Current considerations for the treatment of HCV in India include the poorer response of genotype 3, nonavailability of many of the DAAs recommended by other guidelines and the cost of therapy. The availability of combination DAA therapy has simplified therapy of HCV with decreased reliance of evaluation for monitoring viral kinetics or drug related side effects.
Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology | 2016
Shalimar; Vivek A. Saraswat; Shivaram Prasad Singh; Ajay Duseja; Akash Shukla; C. E. Eapen; Dharmendra Kumar; Gaurav Pandey; Jayanti Venkataraman; K Narayanswami; Pankaj Puri; R. K. Dhiman; Sandeep Thareja; Sandeep Nijhawan; Shobna Bhatia; Uday Zachariah; Ujjwal Sonika; Varghese Thomas; Subrat K. Acharya
The aim of this study was to analyze etiologies and frequency of hepatic and extrahepatic organ failures (OFs) and outcome of acute‐on‐chronic liver failure (ACLF) at 10 tertiary centers in India.
Hepatitis B Annual | 2009
Bijay Misra; C Panda; Haribhakti Seba Das; Kinshuk Chandra Nayak; Shivaram Prasad Singh
Background: Hepatitis B is a major health problem in India. To prevent transmission and progression of the disease in the community, proper community awareness about the disease, including prevention, is necessary. Our objective was to study the awareness amongst the general population about hepatitis B virus, including knowledge regarding vaccine. Materials and Methods: The study was conducted in Department of Gastroenterology of SCB Medical College. The patients attending the OPD and their attendants were subjected to a questionnaire about different aspects of hepatitis B. Binary logistic regression analysis (SPSS 16) was employed to assess the statistical importance of the observations. Results: In all, 682 individuals (65% patients, 35% non-patients) were studied; 78% were males while 22% were females. Majority were in the age group of 31-40 years. 65% hailed from rural area; 65% were poor. About half of the subjects attended state run medical centers for medical attention; only 17% preferred medical colleges. Awareness about the disease and the vaccine among the subjects was 38% and 32%, respectively. 50% of those who were aware had no knowledge about route of transmission, infectivity, or importance of vaccination. Educated individuals were more aware about hepatitis B vaccine (P Conclusions: Only about one-third of the population in coastal Eastern India are aware about hepatitis B and its vaccine. Less than a third of the population are vaccinated for hepatitis B. The educated, especially those who read newspapers and listened to radio, were more aware about the disease/vaccine. The government health agencies and physicians should work together to educate the masses about hepatitis B and its vaccine.
Indian Journal of Gastroenterology | 2015
Balakrishnan S. Ramakrishna; Govind K. Makharia; Vineet Ahuja; Uday C. Ghoshal; Venkataraman Jayanthi; Benjamin Perakath; Philip Abraham; Deepak K. Bhasin; Shobna Bhatia; Gourdas Choudhuri; Sunil Dadhich; Devendra Desai; Bhaba Dev Goswami; Sk Issar; Ajay K. Jain; Rakesh Kochhar; Goundappa Loganathan; Sri Prakash Misra; C. Ganesh Pai; Sujoy Pal; Mathew Philip; Anna B. Pulimood; Amarender Singh Puri; Gautam Ray; Shivaram Prasad Singh; Ajit Sood; Venkatraman Subramanian
In 2012, the Indian Society of Gastroenterology’s Task Force on Inflammatory Bowel Diseases undertook an exercise to produce consensus statements on Crohn’s disease (CD). This consensus, produced through a modified Delphi process, reflects our current recommendations for the diagnosis and management of CD in India. The consensus statements are intended to serve as a reference point for teaching, clinical practice, and research in India.
Collaboration
Dive into the Shivaram Prasad Singh's collaboration.
Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences
View shared research outputsPost Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research
View shared research outputs