Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Shoji Itakura is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Shoji Itakura.


Psychological Science | 2005

Synchrony in the Onset of Mental-State Reasoning Evidence From Five Cultures

Tara C. Callaghan; Philippe Rochat; Angeline S. Lillard; Mary Louise Claux; Hal Odden; Shoji Itakura; Sombat Tapanya; Saraswati Singh

Over the past 20 years, developmental psychologists have shown considerable interest in the onset of a theory of mind, typically marked by childrens ability to pass false-belief tasks. In Western cultures, children pass such tasks around the age of 5 years, with variations of the tasks producing small changes in the age at which they are passed. Knowing whether this age of transition is common across diverse cultures is important to understanding what causes this development. Cross-cultural studies have produced mixed findings, possibly because of varying methods used in different cultures. The present study used a single procedure to measure false-belief understanding in five cultures: Canada, India, Peru, Samoa, and Thailand. With a standardized procedure, we found synchrony in the onset of mentalistic reasoning, with children crossing the false-belief milestone at approximately 5 years of age in every culture studied. The meaning of this synchrony for the origins of mental-state understanding is discussed.


Journal of Comparative Psychology | 1998

Use of experimenter-given cues during object-choice tasks by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), an orangutan (Pongo pygmaeus), and human infants (Homo sapiens).

Shoji Itakura; Masayuki Tanaka

In a series of experiments, chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), an orangutan (Pongo pygmaeus), and human infants (Homo sapiens) were investigated as to whether they used experimenter-given cues when responding to object-choice tasks. Five conditions were used in different phases: the experimenter tapping on the correct object, gazing plus pointing, gazing closely, gazing alone, and glancing without head orientation. The 3 subject species were able to use all of the experimenter-given cues, in contrast to previous reports of limited use of such cues by monkeys.


industrial and engineering applications of artificial intelligence and expert systems | 2004

Development of an android robot for studying human-robot interaction

Takashi Minato; Michihiro Shimada; Hiroshi Ishiguro; Shoji Itakura

One of the difficulties of using Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) to estimate atmospheric temperature is the large number of potential input variables available. In this study, four different feature extraction methods were used to reduce the input vector to train four networks to estimate temperature at different atmospheric levels. The four techniques used were: genetic algorithms (GA), coefficient of determination (CoD), mutual information (MI) and simple neural analysis (SNA). The results demonstrate that of the four methods used for this data set, mutual information and simple neural analysis can generate networks that have a smaller input parameter set, while still maintaining a high degree of accuracy.


Developmental Science | 1999

Chimpanzee Use of Human and Conspecific Social Cues to Locate Hidden Food

Shoji Itakura; Bryan Agnetta; Brian Hare; Michael Tomasello

Two studies are reported in which chimpanzees attempted to use social cues to locate hidden food in one of two possible hiding places. In the first study four chimpanzees were exposed to a local enhancement cue (the informant approached and looked to the location where food was hidden and then remained beside it) and a gaze=point cue (the informant gazed and manually pointed towards the location where the food was hidden). Each cue was given by both a human informant and a chimpanzee informant. In the second study 12 chimpanzees were exposed to a gaze direction cue in combination with a vocal cue (the human informant gazed to the hiding location and produced one of two different vocalizations: a ‘food-bark’ or a human word-form). The results were: (i) all subjects were quite skillful with the local enhancement cue, no matter who produced it; (ii) few subjects were skillful with the gaze=point cue, no matter who produced it (most of these being individuals who had been raised in infancy by humans); and (iii) most subjects were skillful when the human gazed and vocalized at the hiding place, with little difference between the two types of vocal cue. Findings are discussed in terms of chimpanzees’ apparent need for additional cues, over and above gaze direction cues, to indicate the presence of food.


Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology | 2006

CULTURAL DISPLAY RULES DRIVE EYE GAZE DURING THINKING

Anjanie McCarthy; Kang Lee; Shoji Itakura; Darwin W. Muir

The authors measured the eye gaze displays of Canadian, Trinidadian, and Japanese participants as they answered questions for which they either knew, or had to derive, the answers. When they knew the answers, Trinidadians maintained the most eye contact, whereas Japanese maintained the least. When thinking about the answers to questions, Canadians and Trinidadians looked up, whereas Japanese looked down. Thus, for humans, gaze displays while thinking are at least in part culturally determined.


Journal of Experimental Child Psychology | 2009

Development of Cultural Strategies of Attention in North American and Japanese Children.

Sean Duffy; Rie Toriyama; Shoji Itakura; Shinobu Kitayama

Recent studies suggest that North American adults exhibit a focused strategy of attention that emphasizes focal information about objects, whereas Japanese adults exhibit a divided strategy of attention that emphasizes contextual information about objects. The current study investigated whether 4- and 5-, 6- to 8-, and 9- to 13-year-old North American and Japanese children exhibit these divergent attention strategies. Two experiments suggest that those older than 6 years of age exhibit measurable cultural differences in attention, whereas 4- to 6-year-olds do not. We suggest that sociocognitive development and socialization experiences that occur around 5 to 7 years of age may foster the development of cultural strategies of attention.


Primates | 1987

Mirror guided behavior in Japanese monkeys (Macaca fuscata fuscata)

Shoji Itakura

Two male Japanese monkeys were trained to use a mirror to reach an object that could not be seen directly. Training to use a mirror in this way proceeded, step-by-step, from reaching a piece of apple to key-tracking. In Experiment 1 the monkeys were trained to use the mirror to locate a desired object, a piece of apple in a box facing the mirror, which could be seen only by looking into the mirror. The apple, once located, however, could be grasped without further reference to the mirror. This behavior is referred to as mirror mediated object discrimination. In subsequent experiments the monkeys could not reach the goal object except by observing it and his hand movement in the mirror. In Experiment 2 the target was a piece of apple visible in the mirror, in Experiment 3 an illuminated key and in Experiment 4 a series of keys which were illuminated sequentially. Mirror guided behavior such as shown in Experiment 2, 3, and 4 has not previously been demonstrated in monkeys.


International Journal of Psychophysiology | 2003

Natural imitation induced by joint attention in Japanese monkeys

Mari Kumashiro; Hidetoshi Ishibashi; Yukari Uchiyama; Shoji Itakura; Akira Murata; Atsushi Iriki

To examine whether joint attention enables Japanese monkeys to imitate human actions, we presented an oral action and manual actions directed towards targets to three monkeys who had joint attention through communicative eye-gaze and pointing gestures and to one monkey who had incomplete joint attention and who had acquired imperative pointing but not the use of eye-gaze gestures. Two of the monkeys who were already capable of joint attention were also able to imitate naturally, while the monkey who did not previously show joint attention was not able to imitate until acquiring joint attention capacity. We suggest that joint attention induces natural imitation during interaction between different species--in this case, between monkeys and humans--while individuals not showing joint attention but only attention to a target or movement are only able to follow motion. The monkey may be endowed by nature with motion-following capacity. We speculate that motion-following capacity is developed and controlled through joint attention, and is connected with natural imitation.


Developmental Science | 2013

East-West cultural differences in context-sensitivity are evident in early childhood.

Toshie Imada; Stephanie M. Carlson; Shoji Itakura

Accumulating evidence suggests that North Americans tend to focus on central objects whereas East Asians tend to pay more attention to contextual information in a visual scene. Although it is generally believed that such culturally divergent attention tendencies develop through socialization, existing evidence largely depends on adult samples. Moreover, no past research has investigated the relation between context-sensitivity and other domains of cognitive development. The present study examined children in the United States and Japan (N = 175, age 4-9 years) to investigate the developmental pattern in context-sensitivity and its relation to executive function. The study found that context-sensitivity increased with age across cultures. Nevertheless, Japanese children showed significantly greater context-sensitivity than American children. Also, context-sensitivity fully mediated the cultural difference in a set-shifting executive function task, which might help explain past findings that East Asian children outperformed their American counterparts on executive function.


Infancy | 2008

How to Build an Intentional Android: Infants' Imitation of a Robot's Goal-Directed Actions

Shoji Itakura; Hiraku Ishida; Takayuki Kanda; Yohko Shimada; Hiroshi Ishiguro; Kang Lee

This study examined whether young children are able to imitate a robots goal-directed actions. Children (24–35 months old) viewed videos showing a robot attempting to manipulate an object (e.g., putting beads inside a cup) but failing to achieve its goal (e.g., beads fell outside the cup). In 1 video, the robot made eye contact with a human before and after it failed the action. In another video, the robot did not make eye contact with the human adult. Only in the former condition did children “imitate” the robots “intended” but unconsummated actions (e.g., putting beads inside a cup). When the robot did not make eye contact, children performed poorly, at the baseline level. These results suggest that human-like gaze behaviors, not human-like morphology, may play an important role in young childrens imitation of a nonhuman agents goal-directed behaviors.

Collaboration


Dive into the Shoji Itakura's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Kang Lee

University of Toronto

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Michiteru Kitazaki

Toyohashi University of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge