Shoji Takada
Japan Atomic Energy Agency
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Shoji Takada.
Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology | 2014
Kuniyoshi Takamatsu; Daisuke Tochio; Shigeaki Nakagawa; Shoji Takada; Xing L. Yan; Kazuhiro Sawa; Nariaki Sakaba; Kazuhiko Kunitomi
In a safety demonstration test involving the loss of both reactor reactivity control and core cooling, the high-temperature engineering test reactor (HTTR) demonstrates spontaneous stabilization of the reactor power. The test and analytical results of tripping one or two out of three gas circulators without reactor scram have already been reported. Moreover, the pre-analytical result of tripping all three gas circulators without reactor scram has been presented. On the other hand, the test and analytical results of tripping all three gas circulators without reactor scram are shown in this paper. About experiments, at an initial reactor power of 30% (9 MW), when all three gas circulators were tripped without reactor scram to reduce the coolant flow rate to zero, the fuel temperature did not show a large increase because the large heat capacity of the graphite core could absorb heat from the fuel in a short period. Moreover, the decay heat could be transferred through the graphite core and the reactor pressure vessel (RPV), emitted by thermal radiation from its outer surface and removed to the active vessel cooling system; therefore, the core at 9 MW was never exposed to the danger of a core melt, and the reactor power was stabilized spontaneously. About analyses, the reactivity performance is important for predicting the converging level of reactor power that affects the fuel temperature during a loss of forced cooling (LOFC) without reactor scram. With regard to thermal hydraulics, the performances of graphite heat conduction in the reactor core and thermal radiation from the RPV surface to the reactor cavity cooling system are crucial for predicting the temperature behavior of the fuel and RPV in the LOFC condition. It was confirmed that reactor kinetics coupled with heat transfer could be applied to reactor safety and accident analysis based on the comparison between the experiments and the analyses.
Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology | 2017
Yosuke Shimazaki; Hiroaki Sawahata; Masanori Shinohara; Yoshinori Yanagida; Taiki Kawamoto; Shoji Takada
ABSTRACT The high-temperature engineering test reactor (HTTR) has three neutron startup sources (NSs) in the reactor core, each of which consists of 252Cf with 3.7 GBq, installed in NS holder and subsequently in a control rod guide block (CR block). The NSs are exchanged at the interval of approximately seven years. The NS holders are transported from the dealers hot cell to the HTTR using a transportation container. The loading work of NS holders to the CR blocks is subsequently carried out in the fuel handling machine maintenance pit of HTTR. Technical issues, which are the reduction and prevention of radiation exposure of workers and the exclusion of falling of NS holder, were extracted from the experiences in the past two exchange works of NSs to develop a safety handling procedure. Then, a new transportation container special to the NSs of HTTR was developed to solve the technical issues while keeping the cost as low as that for overhaul of conventional container. As a result, the NS handling work using the new transportation container was safely accomplished by developing the new transportation container which can reduce the risks of radiation exposure dose of workers and exclude the falling of NS holder.
Volume 2: Plant Systems, Construction, Structures and Components; Next Generation Reactors and Advanced Reactors | 2013
Kazuhiko Iigaki; Masato Ono; Yosuke Shimazaki; Daisuke Tochio; Atsushi Shimizu; Hiroyuki Inoi; Shoji Takada; Kazuhiro Sawa
On March 11th, 2011, the 2011 Tohoku Earthquake which is one of the largest earthquakes in japan occurred and the maximum acceleration in observed seismic wave in the HTTR exceeded the design value in a part of input seismic motions. Therefore, a visual inspection, a seismic analysis and a performance confirmation test of facilities were carried out in order to confirm the integrity of facility after the earthquake. The seismic analysis was carried out for the reactor core structures by using the response magnification factor method. As the results of the evaluation, the generated stress in the graphite blocks in the reactor core at the earthquake were well below the allowable values of safety criteria, and thus the structural integrity of the reactor core was confirmed. The integrity of reactor core was also supported by the visual inspections of facilities and the operation without reactor power in cold conditions of HTTR.Copyright
Volume 2: Plant Systems, Construction, Structures and Components; Next Generation Reactors and Advanced Reactors | 2013
Daisuke Tochio; Yosuke Shimazaki; Kazuhiko Iigaki; Shigeaki Nakagawa; Shoji Takada; Nariaki Sakaba; Kazuhiro Sawa
JAEA has designed and developed a commercial very high temperature reactor hydrogen cogeneration system named GTHTR300C. JAEA has investigated that a hydrogen production facility is treated as not a reactor grade facility but a general industrial plant grade facility. The reactor plant system should be designed absorbing the disturbance under AOO and becoming to steady state in the case that thermal-load of the facility is fluctuated or lost. Also, high-accuracy plant dynamics code should be developed to design the GTHTR300C.In order to demonstrate continuing the reactor operation in if the AOO is occurred in the hydrogen production facility and to obtain the validation data for high-accuracy plant dynamics code, the thermal-load fluctuation tests were planned using the HTTR in JAEA. In this study, it is concluded that the thermal-load fluctuation tests can be carried out without reactor scram and without modification of the HTTR facility and that the test data for validation of the code can be obtained sufficiently.Copyright
Volume 2: Plant Systems, Construction, Structures and Components; Next Generation Reactors and Advanced Reactors | 2013
Shoji Takada; Shunki Yanagi; Kazuhiko Iigaki; Masanori Shinohara; Daisuke Tochio; Yosuke Shimazaki; Masato Ono; Kazuhiro Sawa
HTTR is a helium gas cooled graphite-moderated HTGR with the rated power 30 MWt and the maximum reactor outlet coolant temperature 950°C. The vessel cooling system (VCS), which is composed of thermal reflector plates, cooling panel composed of fins connected between adjacent water cooling tubes, removes decay heat from reactor core by heat transfer of thermal radiation, conduction and natural convection in case of loss of forced cooling (LOFC). The metallic supports are embedded in the biological shielding concrete to support the fins of VCS. To verify the inherent safety features of HTGR, the LOFC test is planned by using HTTR with the VCS inactive from an initial reactor power of 9 MWt under the condition of LOFC while the reactor shut-down system disabled. In this test, the temperature distribution in the biological shielding concrete is prospected locally higher around the support because of thermal conduction in the support. A 2-dimensional symmetrical model was improved to simulate the heat transfer to the concrete through the VCS support in addition to the heat transfer thermal radiation and natural convection. The model simulated the water cooling tubes setting horizontally at the same pitch with actual configuration. The numerical results were verified in comparison with the measured data acquired from the test, in which the RPV was heated up to around 110 °C without nuclear heating with the VCS inactive, to show that the temperature is locally high but kept sufficiently low around the support in the concrete due to sufficient thermal conductivity to the cold temperature region.Copyright
Nuclear Engineering and Design | 2006
Hirofumi Ohashi; Yoshitomo Inaba; Tetsuo Nishihara; Tetsuaki Takeda; Koji Hayashi; Shoji Takada; Yoshiyuki Inagaki
Nuclear Engineering and Design | 2014
Atsushi Shimizu; Taiki Kawamoto; Daisuke Tochio; Kenji Saito; Hiroaki Sawahata; Fumitaka Honma; Takayuki Furusawa; Akio Saikusa; Shoji Takada; Masayuki Shinozaki
Nuclear Engineering and Design | 2014
Shimpei Hamamoto; Yosuke Shimazaki; Takayuki Furusawa; Takahiro Nemoto; Hiroyuki Inoi; Shoji Takada
Annals of Nuclear Energy | 2017
Hai Quan Ho; Yuki Honda; Minoru Goto; Shoji Takada
Annals of Nuclear Energy | 2018
Hai Quan Ho; Yuki Honda; Minoru Goto; Shoji Takada