Shozo Kaneko

Prevalence and mechanism of rotor activation identified during atrial fibrillation by noncontact mapping: Lack of evidence for a role in the maintenance of atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND It remains unclear whether atrial fibrillation (AF) is maintained by the rotor. OBJECTIVE We evaluated the role of the rotor and examined its mechanism. METHODS Among 75 patients with AF (60 paroxysmal, 15 persistent AF) who underwent 3-dimensional noncontact left atrial mapping during AF, we examined the prevalence and location of rotor activation and elucidated its mechanism. Catheter ablation was performed in a stepwise fashion (linear roof lesion and complex fractionated atrial electrogram ablation after pulmonary vein [PV) isolation) until AF termination. RESULTS Rotor activation was observed in 11 patients (14.7%; 10 paroxysmal and 1 persistent AF) (tachycardia cycle length 160.0 ± 19.8 ms). Rotors were observed transiently (duration 6128 ± 9094 ms) during AF at the roof (n = 5), septum (n = 3), and ostium of the left superior PV (n = 3). Five rotors circulated in clockwise and 6 in counterclockwise directions. The length of the block line at the center of the rotor was 15.2 ± 6.9 mm. The electrograms at the block line showed low-amplitude multiple deflections (n = 7) or double potentials (n = 4), and the amplitudes during rotor activation were significantly lower than those during sinus rhythm (0.27 ± 0.18 mV vs 1.22 ± 0.92 mV; P < .01). No conduction disturbances were found during sinus rhythm, suggesting that the central line of block was formed functionally. AF was terminated by PV isolation alone without additional lesions in patients with rotors. CONCLUSION Functionally formed rotor activation was observed during AF in a limited number of patients. These rotor activations may not be related to AF maintenance, but rather may reflect a transient organization of random propagation.

Difference in the maintenance mechanism of atrial fibrillation perpetuated after pulmonary vein isolation between paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation: Effects of subsequent stepwise ablation.

BACKGROUND Neither the atrial fibrillation (AF) maintenance mechanism after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) nor the mechanism of AF termination via stepwise ablation is clearly understood. METHODS Among 226 consecutive AF patients (154 paroxysmal (P-AF) and 72 persistent AF (Per-AF) patients), left atrial endocardial non-contact mapping was performed after PVI in the initial 10 P-AF and 16 Per-AF patients to define the AF maintenance mechanism. Subsequently, effect of stepwise catheter ablation (linear roof lesion and complex fractionated atrial electrogram (CFAE) following PVI) was evaluated in all patients. RESULTS After PVI, AF was maintained by the activation around isolated PV/mitral annulus, focal discharge and disorganized activations mostly observed over residual CFAE region (pivoting activation, wave break and fusion). CFAE region in P-AF was smaller than Per-AF after PVI (1.6 ± 2.1 vs. 7.7 ± 2.5 cm(2), p<0.0001). The frequency of pivoting activation, wave break and fusion in P-AF were lower than those in Per-AF (1.9 ± 2.0 vs. 11.8 ± 5.0 times/s; p<0.0001, 0.1 ± 0.3 vs. 3.6 ± 2.5 times/s; p<0.001, 5.8 ± 3.6 vs. 9.8 ± 3.2 times/s; p<0.01). AF termination was more frequent in P-AF than Per-AF (94.8% vs 81.9%, p=0.0019). AF termination by PVI alone was more frequent in P-AF than Per-AF (85.6% vs. 18.6%, p<0.0001). However, AF termination via roof line and/or CFAE ablation was less frequent in P-AF than Per-AF (14.4 vs. 81.4%, p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS Disorganized activations after PVI, more prominent in Per-AF, were associated with residual CFAE region. Most P-AF was terminated by PVI alone, however additional roof line lesion and CFAE ablation were necessary to terminate Per-AF, consistent with mapping results.