Shuji Tachibanaki

Rod and cone photoreceptors: molecular basis of the difference in their physiology.

Vertebrate retinal photoreceptors consist of two types of cells, the rods and cones. Rods are highly light-sensitive but their flash response time course is slow, so that they can detect a single photon in the dark but are not good at detecting an object moving quickly. Cones are less light-sensitive and their flash response time course is fast, so that cones mediate daylight vision and are more suitable to detect a moving object than rods. The phototransduction mechanism was virtually known by the mid 80s, and detailed mechanisms of the generation of a light response are now understood in a highly quantitative manner at the molecular level. However, most of these studies were performed in rods, but not in cones. Therefore, the mechanisms of low light-sensitivity or fast flash response time course in cones have not been known. The major reason for this slow progress in the study of cone phototransduction was due to the inability of getting a large quantity of purified cones to study them biochemically. We succeeded in its purification using carp retina, and have shown that each step responsible for generation of a light response is less effective in cones and that the reactions responsible for termination of a light response are faster in cones. Based on these findings, we speculated a possible mechanism of evolution of rods that diverged from cones.

Low amplification and fast visual pigment phosphorylation as mechanisms characterizing cone photoresponses

Vertebrate cone photoreceptors are known to show lower light sensitivity and briefer photoresponses than rod photoreceptors. To understand the molecular mechanisms characterizing cone photoresponses, we compared some of the reactions in the phototransduction cascade between rods and cones. For this purpose, rods and cones were obtained in quantities large enough to do biochemical studies. The cells were purified from the retina of carp (Cyprinus carpio) with a stepwise Percoll gradient. The purified rod fraction contained almost no other kinds of cells besides rods, and the purified cone fraction contained a mixture of red-, green-, and blue-sensitive cones in the ratio 3:≈1:≈1. We prepared membrane preparations from the rod and the cone fraction, and in these membranes, we measured activation efficiencies of the reactions in the phototransduction cascade. The results showed that the signal amplification is lower in the cone membranes, which accounts for the lower light sensitivity in cones. Furthermore, we measured the time courses of visual pigment phosphorylation. The result showed that the phosphorylation is much faster in the cone membranes, which also explains the lower light sensitivity and, in addition, the briefer photoresponse in cones.

High cGMP synthetic activity in carp cones

Cones show briefer light responses than rods and do not saturate even under very bright light. Using purified rod and cone homogenates, we measured the activity of guanylate cyclase (GC), an enzyme responsible for cGMP synthesis and therefore recovery of a light response. The basal GC activity was 36 times higher in cones than in rods: It was mainly caused by higher expression levels of GC in cones (GC-C) than in rods (GC-R). With identification and quantification of GC-activating protein (GCAP) subtypes expressed in rods and cones together with determination of kinetic parameters of GC activation in the presence and absence of GCAP, we estimated the in situ GC activity in rods and cones at low and high Ca2+ concentrations. It was revealed that the GC activity would be >10 times higher in cones than in rods in both the dark-adapted and the light-adapted states. Electrophysiological estimation of the GC activity measured in the truncated preparations of rod and cone outer segments gave consistent results. Our estimation of the in situ GC activity reasonably explained the rapid recovery and nonsaturating behavior of cone light responses.

Highly efficient retinal metabolism in cones

After bleaching of visual pigment in vertebrate photoreceptors, all-trans retinal is reduced to all-trans retinol by retinol dehydrogenases (RDHs). We investigated this reaction in purified carp rods and cones, and we found that the reducing activity toward all-trans retinal in the outer segment (OS) of cones is >30 times higher than that of rods. The high activity of RDHs was attributed to high content of RDH8 in cones. In the inner segment (IS) in both rods and cones, RDH8L2 and RDH13 were found to be the major enzymes among RDH family proteins. We further found a previously undescribed and effective pathway to convert 11-cis retinol to 11-cis retinal in cones: this oxidative conversion did not require NADP+ and instead was coupled with reduction of all-trans retinal to all-trans retinol. The activity was >50 times effective than the oxidizing activity of RDHs that require NADP+. These highly effective reactions of removal of all-trans retinal by RDH8 and production of 11-cis retinal by the coupling reaction are probably the underlying mechanisms that ensure effective visual pigment regeneration in cones that function under much brighter light conditions than rods.

Selective activation of G‐protein subtypes by vertebrate and invertebrate rhodopsins

We have quantitatively investigated specificities in activating G‐protein subtype by bovine and squid rhodopsins to examine whether or not the phototransduction cascade in each of the photoreceptor cells is determined by the colocalization of a large amount of G‐protein subtype (Gt or Gq). In contrast to the efficient activation of respective Gt and Gq, bovine and squid rhodopsins scarcely activated G‐protein counterparts. Exchange of α‐ and βγ‐subunits of Gt and Gq indicated the critical role of the α‐subunit in specific binding to respective rhodopsins. Thus the specific recognition of G‐protein subtype by each rhodopsin is a major mechanism in determining the phototransduction cascade.

Molecular Mechanisms Characterizing Cone Photoresponses

In the vertebrate retina, rods mediate twilight vision and cones mediate daylight vision. Their photoresponse characteristics are different. The light‐sensitivity of a cone is 102–103 times lower than that of a rod. In addition, the photoresponse time course is much faster in cones. The mechanism characterizing cone photoresponses has not been known mainly because of the difficulty in isolating cones in large quantities to perform biochemistry. Recently, we developed a method to purify cones from carp retina using a density gradient, which made it possible to analyze the differences in the molecular mechanism of phototransduction between rods and cones. The results showed that signal amplification in cones is less effective, which explains the lower light‐sensitivity of cones. The results also showed that visual pigment phosphorylation, a quenching mechanism of light‐activated visual pigment, is much more rapid in cones than in rods. The rapid phosphorylation in cones is attributed to a very high total kinase activity in cones. Because of this high activity, cone pigment is readily phosphorylated even at very high bleaching levels, which probably explains why cone photoresponses recover quickly. Based on these findings, the molecular mechanisms of the differences in the photoresponse characteristics between rods and cones are outlined.

Identification of a new intermediate state that binds but not activates transducin in the bleaching process of bovine rhodopsin

Using time‐resolved low‐temperature spectroscopy, we have examined whether or not bovine rhodopsin has a unique transducin‐binding state, meta Ib, previously detected from chicken rhodopsin. Unlike chicken meta Ib, bovine meta Ib was detected only by detailed kinetics analysis of the bleaching process, but it was stabilized by transducin and visualized in the observed spectral changes. From the effect of GTPγS, it was revealed that meta Ib induced no GDP‐GTP exchange reaction in transducin. Thus meta Ib is a common intermediate of vertebrate rhodopsin and transducin is activated in two steps by meta Ib and meta II.

Low Activation and Fast Inactivation of Transducin in Carp Cones

Background: Cones show lower light-sensitivity and briefer light responses than rods. Results: The rate of transducin activation is lower, and its inactivation is much faster in cones than in rods. Conclusion: Lower light-sensitivity and briefer light responses in carp cones are, at least in part, determined at the level of transducin. Significance: Two of the molecular bases of the functional differences between carp rods and cones are explained. Cone photoreceptors show lower light sensitivity and briefer light responses than rod photoreceptors. The light detection signal in these cells is amplified through a phototransduction cascade. The first step of amplification in the cascade is the activation of a GTP-binding protein, transducin (Tr), by light-activated visual pigment (R*). We quantified transducin activation by measuring the binding of GTPγS in purified carp rod and cone membrane preparations with the use of a rapid quench apparatus and found that transducin activation by an R* molecule is ∼5 times less efficient in cones than in rods. Transducin activation terminated in less than 1 s in cones, more quickly than in rods. The rate of GTP hydrolysis in Tr*, and thus the rate of Tr* inactivation, was ∼25 times higher in cones than in rods. This faster inactivation of Tr* ensures briefer light responses in cones. The expression level of RGS9 was found to be ∼20 times higher in cones than in rods, which explains higher GTP hydrolytic activity and, thus, faster Tr* inactivation in cones than in rods. Although carp rods and cones express rod- or cone-versions of visual pigment and transducin, these molecules themselves do not seem to induce the differences significantly in the transducin activation and Tr* inactivation in rods and cones. Instead, the differences seem to be brought about in a rod or cone cell-type specific manner.

Larger inhibition of visual pigment kinase in cones than in rods

J. Neurochem. (2010) 115, 259–268.

Amino acid residues in GRK1/GRK7 responsible for interaction with S-modulin/recoverin.

GRK1 is a visual pigment kinase in rods and is essential for inactivation of light‐activated rhodopsin. The GRK1 activity is inhibited by binding of the Ca2+‐bound form of S‐modulin/recoverin. We previously identified the S‐modulin/recoverin site to interact with GRK1. In the present study, we identified its counterpart in GRK1. We synthesized 29 of GRK1 or GRK7 partial peptides that cover the entire sequence of GRK1/GRK7, and examined whether these peptides inhibit S‐modulin/recoverin activity most probably by preoccupying the binding site for GRK1. The inhibition was the greatest with the N‐terminal peptide (p1, aa 3–23 in GRK7). On mutation of each of eight amino acid residues highly conserved in the p1 region of more than 10 orthologs, the inhibition was significantly reduced in the mutation of Leu6, Asn12 and Tyr15. We further examined the binding of the peptides, including mutated ones, to S‐modulin/recoverin with a resonance mirror biosensor. The binding correlated well with the degree of the inhibition by a peptide. The inhibition, therefore, seemed to be due to a direct binding of the kinase peptide to the binding site of active S‐modulin/recoverin. A GRK1 region close to its C‐terminus also seemed to be the binding site for S‐modulin/recoverin.