Shuko Hirabayashi

Papillary dilation vs sphincterotomy in endoscopic removal of bile duct stones. A randomized trial with manometric function.

To circumvent the long-term effects of papillary ablation for extracting common bile duct stones (<12 mm in diameter) in endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST), endoscopic papillary dilation (EPD) was attempted in 20 patients. To evaluate papillary function before and after the procedures, manometry of the sphincter of Oddi was carried out in 13 with EPD and 10 of 20 patients with EST. Extraction of all stones was successful (100%) in both groups at an equal rate. Repeated numbers of procedures were common in both groups. However, the mean duration of the procedure was high in EPD compared to EST (63 min vs 42 min,P<NS). Adjunctive therapies like mechanical lithotripsy (ML), nasobiliary drainage, and choledochoscopy were included in EPD, while EST required a basket catheter and ML. There was no significant difference on manometry before and after the procedures (P=NS), although papillary function was found to have decreased after the EPD. In contrast, all patients in the EST group lost papillary function after the procedure. Thirty-day morbidity and mortality rate were absent in both groups. Immediate and 2.5-year follow up complications were uncommon in both groups. As a simple method, EPD may be an effective and safe alternative to EST in the management of patients with bile duct stones who require maintenance of papillary function.

Usefulness of single and repetitive percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder aspiration for the treatment of acute cholecystitis

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and usefulness of single and repetitive percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder aspiration (PTGBA) for the treatment of acute cholecystitis.MethodsPTGBA was performed in patients with acute cholecystitis who showed no improvement after treatment with broad-spectrum antibiotics. PTGBA was carried out at bedside. When the bile was too thick to be aspirated through a 21-gauge needle, an 18-gauge needle was used. Aspiration of the gallbladder contents and injection of antibiotics into the gallbladder were performed without the placement of a drainage catheter. When improvement was not observed after the first attempt, PTGBA was repeated.ResultsSingle PTGBA achieved improvement in 32 of 45 patients. In 11 of the remaining 13 patients, the second PTGBA was effective. In the remaining two patients, repetitive PTGBA was not carried out because of advanced cancer. In two of 45 patients, 18-gauge needles were necessary for PTGBA because of the high viscosity of the bile. PTGBA was carried out in three patients with blockage of the cystic duct by a stent, and it was effective in all three. Two patients whose conditions improved with a single PTGBA experienced a recurrence at 4 and 31 months, respectively, after PTGBA. No other severe complications related to PTGBA were observed in any patients.ConclusionsFor the treatment of acute cholecystitis that does not react to conservative therapies, PTGBA is a safe, simple, and effective treatment modality that can be performed at bedside without any severe complications.

The Double Contrast Method by Endoscopic Transpapillary Catheterization in the Gallbladder

Abstract: Endoscopic transpapillary catheterization in the gallbladder was attempted in 18 cases and double contrast images of the gallbladder was successfully obtained in 10 cases. In a case with a polypoid lesion, its edge and surface were nicely delineated by this method, but it was still hard to distinguish it from malignant lesions. Precise identification of tiny stones which will be easily missed by conventional ERC was made using this method. As for technology obtaining good cholecystgrams, sufficient aspiration of bile was considered to be important. Our experience with this quite new technique suggested that this method is effective in making an accurate diagnosis of gallbladder diseases. We named it double contrast images of the gallbladder by endoscopic transpapillary catheterization in the gallbladder (ETCG).

Direct dissolution of gallstones with methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) via endoscopic transpapillary catheterization in the gallbladder (ETCG)

In a pilot study of direct dissolution therapy of gallstones with methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE), endoscopic transpapillary catheterization in the gallbladder (ETCG) was performed. Complete dissolution was seen in 8 out of 12 (66%) patients and partial dissolution was seen in 2 (16%) patients. In one of the 8 complete dissolution patients, combined extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) and dissolution therapy was carried out successfully. These 8 patients were followed up for 12–20 months with regular ultrasonography. During this period, 1 patient underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy due to stone recurrence. Thickening of the gallbladder wall was seen in 2 patients, but there were no other complications. Using Tsuchiyas classification based on ultrasound, complete dissolution was seen in type Ia stones. This pilot study suggests that the direct dissolution of gallstones with MTBE via ETCG might be a useful and safe non-invasive treatment in patients with cholesterol stones in preserved gallbladders.

Evaluation of Endoscopic Naso-biliary Drainage Established without Endoscopic Sphincterotomy for Malignant Obstructive Jaundice

Abstract: Endoscopic naso‐biliary drainage (ENBD) without endoscopic sphincterotoyny (ES) was carried out using 7.2 Fr naso‐biliary tubes in 36 patients with malignant obstructive jaundice. The success rate of this method was SO .4% (37/16 cases). The effectiveness of ENBD without ES in terms of lowering total bilirubin values was good or excellent in 24 out of 29 cases (82.8%). Complications were observed in 1 out of 37 cases (10.8%);fortunately, none were as severe as perforation or bleeding. After ENBD established without ES serum amylase levels increased makcdly in 7 cases (17.9%), but these increases were transient and decveased vapidly.

ENDOSCOPIC TRANSPAPILLARY CATHETERIZATION INTO THE GALLBLADDER FOR DIAGNOSIS OF GALLBLADDER CARCINOMA

It is often difficult to determine the precise nature of lesions in the gallbladder by radiographic, endoscopic and ultrasonographic methods. The approach to the gallbladder by a percutaneous transhepatic route has been reported. However, there is a possibility of seeding tumor cells into the peritoneal cavity and liver in a percutaneous procedure. On the contrary, transpapillary route can be performed without a possibility of seeding. The double‐contrast cholecystography, intragallbladder sonography, direct biopsy of gallbladder lesions and cytology using gallbladder bile have been performed by the procedure of the transpapillary catheterization into the gallbladder. Confirming malignancy by histopathological diagnosis is desirous for determining therapeutic strategy in gallbladder carcinoma. Gathering gallbladder bile is comparatively easier than biopsy of the lesion using the transpapillary catheterization into the gallbladder. Examination of telomerase‐related molecules is useful for diagnosis of pancreatic carcinoma. Usefulness of combination assay of human telomerase reverse transcriptase mRNA (hTERT mRNA) and cytology using gallbladder bile obtained by transpapillary catheterization is reported here. However, it would appear that hTERT mRNA is less important in the diagnosis of gallbladder carcinoma than in that of pancreatic carcinoma. When the molecular biological substances with higher sensitivity are found, the reliance of the combination assay of the molecular biological substances and cytology will be established.