Shuzheng Lu
Capital Medical University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Shuzheng Lu.
Jacc-cardiovascular Interventions | 2014
Yaling Han; Bo Xu; Quanmin Jing; Shuzheng Lu; Lixia Yang; Kai Xu; Yi Li; Jing Li; Changdong Guan; Ajay J. Kirtane; Yang Y; I-Love-It Investigators
OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to investigate the hypothesis that a novel biodegradable polymer-coated, cobalt-chromium (CoCr), sirolimus-eluting stent (BP-SES) is noninferior in safety and efficacy outcomes compared with a durable polymer (DP)-SES. BACKGROUND No randomized trials have the compared safety and efficacy of BP-SES versus DP-SES on similar CoCr platforms, thereby isolating the effect of the polymer type. METHODS In this prospective, single-blind, randomized trial conducted at 32 Chinese sites, 2,737 patients eligible for coronary stenting were treated with BP- or DP-SES in a 2:1 ratio. The primary endpoint was 12-month target lesion failure (TLF), a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or clinically indicated target lesion revascularization. Secondary endpoints included TLF components, and definite/probable stent thrombosis. RESULTS At 12 months, the difference in the primary endpoint of TLF between BP-SES (6.3%) and DP-SES (6.1%) groups was 0.25% (95% confidence interval: -1.67% to 2.17%, p for noninferiority = 0.0002), demonstrating noninferiority of BP-SES to DP-SES. Individual TLF components of cardiac death (0.7% vs. 0.6%, p = 0.62), target vessel myocardial infarction (3.6% vs. 4.3%, p = 0.39), and clinically indicated target lesion revascularization (2.6% vs. 2.2%, p = 0.50) were similar, as were low definite/probable stent thrombosis rates (0.4% vs. 0.6%, p = 0.55). CONCLUSIONS In this large-scale real-world trial, BP-SES was noninferior to DP-SES for 1-year TLF. (Evaluate Safety and Effectiveness of the Tivoli ® DES and the Firebird ® DES for Treatment of Coronary Revascularization; NCT01681381).
Eurointervention | 2014
Bo Xu; Yang Y; Yaling Han; Shuzheng Lu; Bao Li; Qiang Liu; Guoying Zhu; Junyu Cui; Lang Li; Yelin Zhao; Ajay J. Kirtane
AIMS The SYNTAX score has been proposed as a valuable tool to characterise coronary anatomy prospectively based on its complexity. This study evaluated the prognostic value on adverse outcomes of the residual SYNTAX score (rSS) in patients with complex lesions treated with an everolimus-eluting stent (EES). METHODS AND RESULTS One thousand eight hundred and fifty-one patients with small vessel (reference diameter <2.75 mm), long lesion (length >25 mm), or multivessel (>2 target vessels) disease who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with EES in the prospective SEEDS (A Registry To Evaluate Safety And Effectiveness Of Everolimus Drug Eluting Stent For Coronary Revascularization) trial were categorised into low (<6), mid (>6-<12) and high (>12) baseline SYNTAX score (bSS) groups, and into low (=0), mid (>0-<5) and high (>5) rSS groups. Mean bSS and rSS were 10.87±7.26 and 2.18±3.97, respectively; 64% of patients had complete revascularisation (rSS=0). At 12 months the primary outcome of ischaemia-driven target vessel failure (TVF, composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction and ischaemia-driven target vessel revascularisation) was significantly higher in the high bSS and rSS groups than in the respective lower groups (p<0.01 for both). In multivariable analysis, rSS was an independent predictor of TVF (hazard ratio: 1.403, 95% confidence interval: 1.081 to 1.820, p=0.01). CONCLUSIONS Twelve-month TVF was significantly higher in the highest rSS group; rSS with a cut-off of 5 might therefore allow the risk stratification of patients with complex lesions treated with a second-generation drug-eluting stent (Clinical-Trials.gov identifier: NCT 01157455).
Chinese Medical Journal | 2015
Yao-Jun Zhang; Yelin Zhao; Bo Xu; Yaling Han; Bao Li; Qiang Liu; Xi Su; Si Pang; Shuzheng Lu; Xiao-Feng Guo; Yang Y
Background:Studies have suggested that use of prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) following new generation drug-eluting stent implantation may increase costs and potential bleeding events. This study aimed to investigate the association of DAPT status with clinical safety in patients undergoing everolimus-eluting stent (EES) implantation in the SEEDS study (A Registry to Evaluate Safety and Effectiveness of Everolimus Drug-eluting Stent for Coronary Revascularization) at 2-year follow-up. Methods:The SEEDS study is a prospective, multicenter study, where patients (n = 1900) with small vessel, long lesion, or multi-vessel diseases underwent EES implantation. Detailed DAPT status was collected at baseline, 6-month, 1- and 2-year. DAPT interruption was defined as any interruption of aspirin and/or clopidogrel more than 14 days. The net adverse clinical events (NACE, a composite endpoint of all-cause death, all myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, definite/probable stent thrombosis (ST), and major bleeding (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium II-V)) were investigated according to the DAPT status at 2-year follow-up. Results:DAPT was used in 97.8% of patients at 6 months, 69.5% at 12 months and 35.4% at 2 years. It was observed that the incidence of NACE was low (8.1%) at 2 years follow-up, especially its components of all-cause death (0.9%), stroke (1.1%), and definite/probable ST (0.7%). DAPT was not an independent predictor of composite endpoint of all-cause death/MI/stroke (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.693, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.096–4.980, P = 0.715) and NACE (HR: 1.041, 95% CI: 0.145–7.454, P = 0.968). Of 73 patients who had DAPT interruption, no patient had ST at 12-month, and only 1 patient experienced ST between 1- and 2-year (1.4%). There was a high frequency of major bleeding events (53/65, 82.5%) occurred in patients receiving DAPT treatment. Conclusions:Prolonged DAPT use was not associated with improved clinical safety. The study emphasized that duration of DAPT needs to be shortened in Chinese patients following EES implantation (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT 01157455).
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions | 2018
Lei Song; Jing Li; Changdong Guan; Quanmin Jing; Shuzheng Lu; Lixia Yang; Kai Xu; Yang Y; Bo Xu; Yaling Han
We aimed to compare the long‐term outcomes of the novel biodegradable polymer cobalt‐chromium sirolimus‐eluting stent (BP‐SES) versus the durable polymer sirolimus‐eluting stent (DP‐SES) in the I‐LOVE‐IT2 trial.
International Journal of Cardiology | 2008
Runlin Gao; Bo Xu; Shuzheng Lu; Chen Jl; Yaling Han; Chen J; Lu-yue Gai; Junbo Ge; Weimin Wang; Zhimin Du; Yong Huo; Lefeng Wang; Wei Gao; Jiyan Chen; Ben He; Guo-liang Jia; Zhijian Yang; Kejiang Cao; Wei-Min Li; Wei-feng Shen; Zheng Wan; De-jia Huang; Guoying Zhu
Chinese Medical Journal | 2002
Shuzheng Lu; Jianyan Wen; Jh Li; Fengdan Wang
International Heart Journal | 2012
Min Zhang; Shuzheng Lu; XiaoFan Wu; Yundai Chen; Xiantao Song; Zening Jin; Hong Li; Yujie Zhou; Fang Chen; Yong Huo
Chinese Medical Journal | 2002
Shuzheng Lu; Jieshou Li; Zhang Y; Jianyan Wen; Fengdan Wang
Journal of the American College of Cardiology | 2012
Bo Xu; Yang Y; Yaling Han; Bao Li; Qiang Liu; Guoying Zhu; Junyu Cui; Lang Li; Shuzheng Lu
Journal of the American College of Cardiology | 2013
Bo Xu; Yang Y; Yaling Han; Bao Li; Qiang Liu; Guoying Zhu; Junyu Cui; Lang Li; Yelin Zhao; Shuzheng Lu