Shyam Bhaskaran
California Institute of Technology
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Shyam Bhaskaran.
AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference and Exhibit | 2002
Shyam Bhaskaran; Joseph E. Riedel; Brian Kennedy; Tseng-Chan Wang
The navigation challenges posed by Deep Space 1s flyby of comet Borrelly were considerable due to the uncertainty in the knowledge of the comets ephemeris, as well as difficulty in determining the spacecrafts ephemeris caused by relatively large non-gravitational forces acting on the comet. The challenges were met by using a combination of radio, optical, and interferometric data types to obtain a final fly by accuracy of less than 10 km.
Journal of Geophysical Research | 1993
Shyam Bhaskaran; Gary S. E. Lagerloef; George H. Born; William J. Emery; Robert R. Leben
Satellite altimetry was used to examine annual and interannual variability in the Gulf of Alaska region. Crossover data from the Geosat Geodetic Mission (GM) and collinear data from the Exact Repeat Mission (ERM) were processed separately to form sea surface height anomalies at grid points. The time series from the GM and ERM were then combined to produce a 3.75-year data set. The time series from the ERM data set agreed fairly well with hydrographic dynamic heights at several locations, with an average correlation of 0.70 between the two data sets. The combined and ERM altimetric data sets were analyzed using empirical orthogonal functions (EOFs). These revealed variability that occurs primarily on annual and interannual time scales. A comparison with EOF analysis of the atmospheric pressure field during the same time periods showed that the annual variation in pressure seemed to be reflected in both the combined and ERM altimetric data sets. The amplitude time series of the first mode in the combined data set was very similar to the North Pacific pressure index during the 1985–1989 time frame. The maximum correlation was at a lag of 250 days. Finally, an interannual mode was present in all three data sets which was closely linked to the baroclinic variations measured by the hydrographic data.
Journal of The Astronautical Sciences | 2011
Shyam Bhaskaran; Sumita Nandi; Mark Wallace; L. Alberto Cangahuala; Corwin Olson
Spacecraft landings on small bodies (asteroids and comets) present special challenges from a navigation perspective as the size of the bodies is relatively small, with the resultant accuracy requirement to target landing areas fairly tight. Because the accuracies obtainable from ground-based navigation processes may not be sufficient, onboard navigation techniques are needed. Recent developments in deep space navigation capability include a self-contained autonomous navigation system (used in flight on three missions) and a landmark tracking system (used experimentally on the Japanese Hayabusa mission). The merging of these two technologies forms a methodology to perform autonomous onboard navigation around small bodies. This article presents an overview of these systems, as well as the results from Monte Carlo studies to quantify the achievable landing accuracies by using these methods. Two cases are presented, a landing on a small asteroid and on a mid-size comet.
AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit | 2006
Joseph E. Riedel; Shyam Bhaskaran; Dan B. Eldred; Robert A. Gaskell; Christopher A. Grasso; Brian Kennedy; Daniel Kubitscheck; Nickolaos Mastrodemos; Stephen P. Synnott; Andrew Vaughan; Robert A. Werner
The success of JPLs AutoNav system at comet Tempel-1 on July 4, 2005, demonstrated the power of autonomous navigation technology for the Deep Impact Mission. This software is being planned for use as the onboard navigation, tracking and rendezvous system for a Mars Sample Return Mission technology demonstration, and several mission proposals are evaluating its use for rendezvous with, and landing on asteroids. Before this however, extensive re-engineering of AutoNav will take place. This paper describes the AutoNav systems-engineering effort in several areas: extending the capabilities, improving operability, utilizing new hardware elements, and demonstrating the new possibilities of AutoNav in simulations.
Journal of Field Robotics | 2007
Daniel G. Kubitschek; Nickolaos Mastrodemos; Robert A. Werner; Stephen P. Synnott; Shyam Bhaskaran; Joseph E. Riedel; Brian Kennedy; George W. Null; Andrew Vaughan
On July 4, 2005 at 05:44:34 UTC the Impactor spacecraft (s/c) impacted comet 9P/Tempel 1 with a relative speed of more than 10 km/s. The Flyby s/c captured the impact event, using both the medium resolution imager and the high resolution imager, and tracked the impact site for the entire observing period following impact. The objective of the Impactor s/c was to impact in an illuminated area viewable from the Flyby s/c and telemeter high-resolution context images of the impact site prior to impact. The Flyby s/c had two primary objectives: (1) capture the impact event in order to observe the ejecta plume expansion dynamics and (2) track the impact site for at least 800 s to observe the crater formation and capture high-resolution images of the fully developed crater. All of these objectives were met by estimating the trajectory of each spacecraft relative to 9P/Tempel 1 using the autonomous navigation system, precise attitude information from the attitude determination and control subsystem, and allowing each spacecraft to independently select the same impact site. This paper describes the challenges of targeting and tracking comet 9P/Tempel 1.
SpaceOps 2012 | 2012
Matthew Abrahamson; Brian A. Kennedy; Shyam Bhaskaran
On November 4, 2010, the EPOXI spacecraft performed a 700-km flyby of the comet Hartley 2 as follow-on to the successful 2005 Deep Impact prime mission. EPOXI, an extended mission for the Deep Impact Flyby spacecraft, returned a wealth of visual and infrared data from Hartley 2, marking the fifth time that high-resolution images of a cometary nucleus have been captured by a spacecraft. The highest resolution science return, captured at closest approach to the comet nucleus, was enabled by use of an onboard autonomous navigation system called AutoNav. AutoNav estimates the comet-relative spacecraft trajectory using optical measurements from the Medium Resolution Imager (MRI) and provides this relative position information to the Attitude Determination and Control System (ADCS) for maintaining instrument pointing on the comet. For the EPOXI mission, AutoNav was tasked to enable continuous tracking of a smaller, more active Hartley 2, as compared to Tempel 1, through the full encounter while traveling at a higher velocity. To meet the mission goal of capturing the comet in all MRI science images, position knowledge accuracies of ± 3.5 km (3-σ) cross track and ± 0.3 seconds (3-σ) time of flight were required. A flight-code-in-the-loop Monte Carlo simulation assessed AutoNav’s statistical performance under the Hartley 2 flyby dynamics and determined optimal configuration. The AutoNav performance at Hartley 2 was successful, capturing the comet in all of the MRI images. The maximum residual between observed and predicted comet locations was 20 MRI pixels, primarily influenced by the center of brightness offset from the center of mass in the observations and attitude knowledge errors. This paper discusses the Monte Carlo-based analysis that led to the final AutoNav configuration and a comparison of the predicted performance with the flyby performance.
Icarus | 2013
Peter C. Thomas; Michael F. A’Hearn; Michael J. S. Belton; D. E. Brownlee; Brian T. Carcich; Brendan Hermalyn; Kenneth P. Klaasen; S. Sackett; Peter H. Schultz; J. Veverka; Shyam Bhaskaran; D. Bodewits; S. R. Chesley; B. C. Clark; Tony L. Farnham; Olivier Groussin; Alan W. Harris; J. Kissel; J.-Y. Li; Karen J. Meech; J. Melosh; A. Quick; James E. Richardson; Jessica M. Sunshine; Dennis D. Wellnitz
Icarus | 2013
J. Veverka; Kenneth P. Klaasen; Michael F. A’Hearn; Michael J. S. Belton; D. E. Brownlee; S. R. Chesley; B. C. Clark; Thanasis E. Economou; R. Farquhar; Simon F. Green; Olivier Groussin; Alan W. Harris; J. Kissel; J.-Y. Li; Karen J. Meech; J. Melosh; James E. Richardson; Peter H. Schultz; J. Silén; Jessica M. Sunshine; Peter C. Thomas; Shyam Bhaskaran; D. Bodewits; Brian T. Carcich; A. R. Cheuvront; Tony L. Farnham; S. Sackett; Dennis D. Wellnitz; A. Wolf
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2004
Peter Tsou; D. E. Brownlee; John D. Anderson; Shyam Bhaskaran; A. R. Cheuvront; Benton C. Clark; T. C. Duxbury; Thanasis E. Economou; Simon F. Green; Martha S. Hanner; Friedrich Hörz; J. Kissel; J. A. M. McDonnell; Ray L. Newburn; Robert E. Ryan; Scott A. Sandford; Zdenek Sekanina; Anthony J. Tuzzolino; J. M. Vellinga; Michael E. Zolensky
ieee aerospace conference | 1998
Shyam Bhaskaran; Joseph E. Riedel; Stephen P. Synnott