Siamak Shahabi

Sequential comparison of low dose rate and hyperfractionated high dose rate endobronchial radiation for malignant airway occlusion

A pilot trial (S2) was conducted at the University of Wisconsin to determine the feasibility, efficacy, and toxicity of hyperfractionated high dose rate endobronchial radiation. To avoid multiple bronchoscopies, an optimized hyperfractionated schema was derived from the linear-quadratic model. Utilizing a single bronchoscopy, 31 patients with malignant airway occlusion received 4 Gy x 4 fractions over 2 days at 2 cm from source center using a high dose rate remote afterloader. Response and morbidity were compared to a previous trial (S1) in which 66 patients were treated with conventional low dose rate endobronchial radiation. Response was assessed by change in performance status, symptom resolution, percent of lifetime rendered symptom-free or improved, and radiographic reaeration. These parameters were highly comparable between the two groups. The mean ECOG performance status improved from 2.2 to 1.8 for S1 and 2.1 to 1.6 for S2; symptom improvement or resolution was noted in 78% for S1 and 79% for S2; lifetime rendered symptom-free or improved was 54% for S1 and 57% for S2; and the overall radiographic response rate was 78% for S1 and 85% for S2. The overall incidence of fistulae was 7/101. We conclude that endobronchial radiation is an effective and safe modality for palliation, and hyperfractionated high dose rate endobronchial radiation achieves responses similar to low dose rate endobronchial radiation with a similar complication rate.

High dose rate intracavitary brachytherapy for carcinoma of the cervix: the madison system: II. Procedural and physical considerations

The loss in therapeutic ratio accompanying a conversion from low dose-rate (LDR) to high dose-rate (HDR) intracavitary brachytherapy (ICR) requires increased attention to the precision and accuracy of dose distribution calculations and treatment delivery. While the HDR-ICR treatment unit allows better custom-tailored dose distributions compared to LDR, it also requires more attention to detail to achieve the distribution desired. Because the relative biological effectiveness of different isodose levels in a dose distribution varies with the absolute dose (as described in Part 1 of this article), the relative dose distribution used with LDR must be modified for HDR to produce the same expected biological effect. Because of the difference in the radiobiology and physical positioning, simply duplicating applications as performed with LDR misses opportunities for dose distribution improvement as well as opens possibilities for significant complications. Due to differences in positioning the applicator (e.g., retraction of the cervix low in the pelvis instead of packing the applicator high), traditional definitions of points of interest (such as point A) apply poorly with HDR-ICR, compelling new systems of dose specification. With HDR-ICR, irreparable mistakes can happen very quickly, and quality assurance for the treatment plan and calculated dwell times prove much more important than with LDR. Key features of the dose distribution and constant relationships involving doses and dwell times help screen planned treatments for mistakes. This paper details the procedural and physical consideration of the Madison system for HDR-ICR brachytherapy for carcinoma of the cervix.

On the cause of the variation in tissue‐maximum ratio values with source‐to‐detector distance

While tissue-maximum ratios (TMR) for 60cobalt treatment units have been shown to be independent of source-to-axis distance (SAD), high-energy photon beams demonstrate variations in their TMR as a function of SAD. Some authors have asserted that the distance dependence of the TMR stems from electron contamination in the beams, while others have suggested low-energy, scattered photons as the cause. Using a magnet to sweep contaminant electrons out of the photon treatment beam eliminates any variation in TMR with distance. Thus, electron contamination accounts for all of the distance dependence, and any low-energy, scattered photons behave indistinguishably like the high-energy photons.

A practical alternative to conventional 5-field irradiation post-mastectomy for locally advanced breast cancer

A combination of electron and photon beams has been used as an alternative for the conventional five-field method to irradiate patients postmastectomy for locally advanced breast cancer. Anterior and posterior opposed photon beams treat in continuity the lateral chest wall, axilla, and supraclavicular lymph nodes. An adjacent anterior electron beam is used at an energy matched to the depth of the internal mammary nodes. It includes the anterior chest wall, but bolus is used in the lateral aspect to spare underlying lung. This electron beam eliminates the diverging junction between the internal mammary and medial tangential fields used in the conventional five-field technique. Overlaps along the junction between the photon and electron beams are minimized by placing the center of the photon field along its medial border. Measurements with an Alderson-Rando phantom show dose-distribution advantages for this technique over the conventional five-field approach. There is less chance of underdosing tumor cells or of overdosing normal tissue along beam junctions. Clinical studies on 29 patients treated by this technique between July 1985 and December 1989 show increased rates of acute skin reactions, but otherwise similar side effects compared with 57 breast cancer patients treated with the five-field technique over the same time period. Local recurrence rates and patient survival rates were similar for the two groups. Given the dose-distribution advantages of this technique and its simple adaptation to accommodate unusual surgical scars or cancer recurrences, its use should be considered for postmastectomy patients with locally advanced breast cancer in well-equipped cancer treatment centers.