Sidsel Tveiten
Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied Sciences
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Sidsel Tveiten.
Psychosis | 2015
Arnhild Lauveng; Sidsel Tveiten; Tor-Johan Ekeland; Torleif Ruud
This study focuses on how adults diagnosed with severe and persistent mental illnesses experience their lives and relationships and their own engagement in these relations in two different environmental conditions. Participants include 14 patients in psychiatric treatment in Norway and 15 students at schools for adults with mental illnesses in Denmark. All participants were diagnosed with severe mental disorders persisting for a minimum of two years and with pronounced impact on daily living. Data were collected through qualitative interviews on two occasions 6–8 months apart for most participants. The findings and interpretations showed that the two groups of informants described their lives quite differently. Patients described a focus on receiving treatment for their disease, few stable and mutual relations, and a generally low quality of life, whereas students described a focus on social relations, interests and personal growth. Students also described a higher quality of life, little loneliness and greater satisfaction with life. This suggests that the main problem for many patients struggling with persistent and severe mental illness might not be the illness itself, but a lack of environmental conditions supporting personal development.
Global Qualitative Nursing Research | 2018
Elin Thove Willassen; Inger Lise Smith Jacobsen; Sidsel Tveiten
The use of World Health Organization’s (WHO’s) Safe Surgery checklist is an established practice worldwide and contributes toward ensuring patient safety and collaborative teamwork. The aim of this study was to elucidate operating room nurses’ and operating room nursing students’ experiences and opinions about execution of and compliance with checklists. We chose a qualitative design with semistructured focus group discussions. Qualitative content analysis was conducted. Two main themes were identified; the Safe Surgery checklists have varied influence on teamwork and patient safety, and taking responsibility for executing the checks on the Safe Surgery checklist entails practical and ethical challenges. The experiences and opinions of operating room nurses and their students revealed differences of practices and attitudes toward checklist compliance and the intentions of checklist procedures. These differences are related to cultural and professional distances between team members and their understanding of the Safe Surgery checklists as a tool for patient safety.
Tidsskrift for Den Norske Laegeforening | 2017
Sidsel Natland; Sidsel Tveiten; Ingrid Ruud Knutsen
User participation was introduced as a key public instrument in Report no. 41 (1987 – 88) to the Storting, Health policy towards the year 2000: National health plan. The health policy goals included increased democratisation, user empowerment and legal safeguards. Questions regarding how services could be developed to meet patients with respect and empathy were highlighted, giving rise to a need to collect user experiences. In turn, this helped acknowledge user experiences as valuable knowledge for the health services, and included the patients’ subjective knowledge, their perspectives and perceptions of reality. In medical and health research, this may help supplement the perspectives of clinicians and researchers. This has led to new forms of knowledge production: participantbased research, user-involving research, co-research, collaborative research, usercontrolled research. Instead of undertaking research on or about patients, research is undertaken jointly with them (1). We feel, however, that there is a need to discuss what this kind of knowledge production implies at the level of philosophy of science. By way of an introduction, we will therefore elucidate some viewpoints regarding where and how such knowledge is produced. We will then proceed to discuss how user participation may affect knowledge production.
Social Work in Mental Health | 2017
Arnhild Lauveng; Sidsel Tveiten; Tor-Johan Ekeland; Torleif Ruud
ABSTRACT Patients with severe mental illness may have needs different from those of patients with more limited illnesses and might benefit from other types of intervention than traditional treatment. We interviewed health care professionals from two open, short-term psychiatric wards and teachers from two schools for adults with psychiatric diagnoses. The focus was to explore how differences in contextual factors such as time, tasks, and organizational demands might affect the actions and attitudes of health care professionals and teachers, as well as the potential consequences for patients and students. Data were collected through qualitative interviews. Participants included 14 health care professionals and 14 teachers. The informants worked with patients and students with similar diagnoses and illness durations. All interviews were conducted during the informants’ work time. Findings and interpretations showed that both teachers and health care professionals were engaged in their work and in the wellbeing of students and patients. However, they described marked differences in practice, including the amount of time spent with students/patients, the organization of their work, main tasks, amount of control over their tasks, and social structure. These differences seemed to affect relationships with students/patients, attitudes toward students/patients, norms and values, and opportunities for patient empowerment. Our findings suggest that while existing psychiatric health care might be appropriate for limited short-term problems such as single-episode depression, a model with a supportive environment, based on stable relations and possibility for learning, may improve personal development and mental health for persons with severe mental illness and disturbances in self-experience.
Nordic journal of nursing research | 2015
Sidsel Tveiten; Ragnhild Flittie Onstad; Magne Haukland
The aim of this study was to develop knowledge of health care professionals’ interpretation of and experience of empowerment in psychiatric care. Patient participation is described as a central strategy in the health services according to the Norwegian political health reform White Papers. However, implementing patient participation is complicated especially in psychiatric practice. Twenty-nine health care professionals were selected to participate in four focus group discussions. Qualitative content analysis was used to analyse the transcript data. Two main categories were identified; system based legitimizing and discipline-based legitimizing, that describe two aspects that contribute to patient empowerment according to health care professionals. The complexity regarding practicing empowerment requires further research.
Archive | 2013
Dag Willy Tallaksen; Kirsten Bråten; Sidsel Tveiten
The aim of this study was to develop knowledge about the significance of the Applied Suicide Intervention Skills Training workshop (equal to “Vivat — Førstehjelp ved selvmordsfare”) to Public Health Nurses ‘practice with suicidal adolescents. Data was gathered through three focus groups, which were interviewed twice. The empirical material was processed using qualitatively content analysis. The main findings and interpretations were that the Public Health Nurses reports that the workshop has increased their professional mastery, their proficiency in actions and their dialogue competency. This has expanded their professional repertoire and probably improved the quality of their care.
Journal of Nursing Management | 2005
Sidsel Tveiten
International Nursing Review | 2005
Sidsel Tveiten; Elisabeth Severinsson
Journal of Nursing Management | 2009
Sidsel Tveiten; Ingrid Meyer
Journal of Nursing Management | 2006
Sidsel Tveiten; Elisabeth Severinsson
Collaboration
Dive into the Sidsel Tveiten's collaboration.
Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied Sciences
View shared research outputsOslo and Akershus University College of Applied Sciences
View shared research outputs