Sigal Gottlieb
University of Massachusetts Dartmouth
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Sigal Gottlieb.
Siam Review | 2001
Sigal Gottlieb; Chi-Wang Shu; Eitan Tadmor
In this paper we review and further develop a class of strong stability-preserving (SSP) high-order time discretizations for semidiscrete method of lines approximations of partial differential equations. Previously termed TVD (total variation diminishing) time discretizations, these high-order time discretization methods preserve the strong stability properties of first-order Euler time stepping and have proved very useful, especially in solving hyperbolic partial differential equations. The new developments in this paper include the construction of optimal explicit SSP linear Runge--Kutta methods, their application to the strong stability of coercive approximations, a systematic study of explicit SSP multistep methods for nonlinear problems, and the study of the SSP property of implicit Runge--Kutta and multistep methods.
Mathematics of Computation | 1998
Sigal Gottlieb; Chi-Wang Shu
In this paper we further explore a class of high order TVD (total variation diminishing) Runge-Kutta time discretization initialized in Shu& Osher (1988), suitable for solving hyperbolic conservation laws with stable spatial discretizations. We illustrate with numerical examples that non-TVD but linearly stable Runge-Kutta time discretization can generate oscillations even for TVD (total variation diminishing) spatial discretization, verifying the claim that TVD Runge-Kutta methods are important for such applications. We then explore the issue of optimal TVD Runge-Kutta methods for second, third and fourth order, and for low storage Runge-Kutta methods.
Archive | 2007
Jan S. Hesthaven; Sigal Gottlieb; David Gottlieb
Reference EPFL-BOOK-190435doi:10.1017/CBO9780511618352 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618352 Record created on 2013-11-12, modified on 2017-05-12
Archive | 2007
Jan S. Hesthaven; Sigal Gottlieb; David Gottlieb
Reference EPFL-BOOK-190435doi:10.1017/CBO9780511618352 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618352 Record created on 2013-11-12, modified on 2017-05-12
Journal of Scientific Computing | 2009
Sigal Gottlieb; David I. Ketcheson; Chi-Wang Shu
Strong stability preserving (SSP) high order time discretizations were developed to ensure nonlinear stability properties necessary in the numerical solution of hyperbolic partial differential equations with discontinuous solutions. SSP methods preserve the strong stability properties—in any norm, seminorm or convex functional—of the spatial discretization coupled with first order Euler time stepping. This paper describes the development of SSP methods and the connections between the timestep restrictions for strong stability preservation and contractivity. Numerical examples demonstrate that common linearly stable but not strong stability preserving time discretizations may lead to violation of important boundedness properties, whereas SSP methods guarantee the desired properties provided only that these properties are satisfied with forward Euler timestepping. We review optimal explicit and implicit SSP Runge–Kutta and multistep methods, for linear and nonlinear problems. We also discuss the SSP properties of spectral deferred correction methods.
Archive | 2011
Sigal Gottlieb; David I. Ketcheson; Chi-Wang Shu
This book captures the state-of-the-art in the field of Strong Stability Preserving (SSP) time stepping methods, which have significant advantages for the time evolution of partial differential equations describing a wide range of physical phenomena. This comprehensive book describes the development of SSP methods, explains the types of problems which require the use of these methods and demonstrates the efficiency of these methods using a variety of numerical examples. Another valuable feature of this book is that it collects the most useful SSP methods, both explicit and implicit, and presents the other properties of these methods which make them desirable (such as low storage, small error coefficients, large linear stability domains). This book is valuable for both researchers studying the field of time-discretizations for PDEs, and the users of such methods.
Journal of Scientific Computing | 2005
Sigal Gottlieb
Strong stability preserving (SSP) high order time discretizations were developed for solution of semi-discrete method of lines approximations of hyperbolic partial differential equations. These high order time discretization methods preserve the strong stability properties–in any norm or seminorm—of the spatial discretization coupled with first order Euler time stepping. This paper describes the development of SSP methods and the recently developed theory which connects the timestep restriction on SSP methods with the theory of monotonicity and contractivity. Optimal explicit SSP Runge–Kutta methods for nonlinear problems and for linear problems as well as implicit Runge–Kutta methods and multi step methods will be collected
Journal of Scientific Computing | 2003
Sigal Gottlieb; Lee-Ad Gottlieb
Strong stability preserving (SSP) high order Runge–Kutta time discretizations were developed for use with semi-discrete method of lines approximations of hyperbolic partial differential equations, and have proven useful in many other applications. These high order time discretization methods preserve the strong stability properties of first order explicit Euler time stepping. In this paper we analyze the SSP properties of Runge Kutta methods for the ordinary differential equation ut=Lu where L is a linear operator. We present optimal SSP Runge–Kutta methods as well as a bound on the optimal timestep restriction. Furthermore, we extend the class of SSP Runge–Kutta methods for linear operators to include the case of time dependent boundary conditions, or a time dependent forcing term.
SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis | 2011
David I. Ketcheson; Sigal Gottlieb; Colin B. Macdonald
We investigate the strong stability preserving (SSP) property of two-step Runge-Kutta (TSRK) methods. We prove that all SSP TSRK methods belong to a particularly simple subclass of TSRK methods, in which stages from the previous step are not used. We derive simple order conditions for this subclass. Whereas explicit SSP Runge-Kutta methods have order at most four, we prove that explicit SSP TSRK methods have order at most eight. We present explicit TSRK methods of up to eighth order that were found by numerical search. These methods have larger SSP coefficients than any known methods of the same order of accuracy and may be implemented in a form with relatively modest storage requirements. The usefulness of the TSRK methods is demonstrated through numerical examples, including integration of very high order weighted essentially non-oscillatory discretizations.
Journal of Scientific Computing | 2006
Sigal Gottlieb; Steven J. Ruuth
In the field of strong-stability-preserving time discretizations, a number of researchers have considered using both upwind and downwind approximations for the same derivative, in order to guarantee that some strong stability condition will be preserved. The cost of computing both the upwind and downwind operator has always been assumed to be double that of computing only one of the two. However, in this paper we show that for the weighted essentially non-oscillatory method it is often possible to compute both these operators at a cost that is far below twice the cost of computing only one. This gives rise to the need for optimal strong-stability-preserving time-stepping schemes which take into account the different possible cost increments. We construct explicit linear multistep schemes up to order six and explicit Runge–Kutta schemes up to order four which are optimal over a range of incremental costs