Sigbjørn Berentsen

Favourable response to therapy with the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab in primary chronic cold agglutinin disease

The ‘primary’ form of chronic cold agglutinin disease is a clonal B‐cell lymphoproliferative disorder that is notoriously difficult to treat with drugs, including corticosteroids, alkylating agents, alpha‐interferon and purine analogues. We performed a small, open, uncontrolled, prospective study to evaluate the effect of therapy with the monoclonal anti‐CD20 antibody rituximab. Six patients with clonal CD20+κ+ B‐cell proliferation received seven courses of rituximab 375 mg/m2, d 1, 8, 15, and 22. One patient achieved a complete response. Four partial responses were observed, including a response to re‐treatment in one patient. Two patients were categorized as non‐responders. Haemoglobin levels increased by a median of 4·1 g/dl in the total group and 4·7 g/dl in the responders, who also experienced a substantial improvement of clinical symptoms. The treatment was well tolerated. We discuss the effect of rituximab therapy compared with other treatment options, and try to explain why two individual patients did not respond. Despite the small numbers, the results are very encouraging. Further studies of rituximab therapy for chronic cold agglutinin disease are warranted.

High response rate and durable remissions following fludarabine and rituximab combination therapy for chronic cold agglutinin disease

Most patients diagnosed with primary chronic cold agglutinin disease (CAD) have a clonal lymphoproliferative bone marrow disorder. Treatment with rituximab is the only well-documented effective therapy, leading to 45%-60% partial responses (PR). Complete responses (CR) are rare, and median response duration is only 11 months. In a prospective multicenter trial, 29 patients received rituximab 375 mg/m(2) on days 1, 29, 57 and 85; and fludarabine orally, 40 mg/m(2) on days 1-5, 29-34, 57-61 and 85-89. Twenty-two patients (76%) responded, 6 (21%) achieving CR and 16 (55%) PR. Among 10 patients nonresponsive to rituximab monotherapy, 1 achieved CR and 6 PR. Median increase in hemoglobin level was 3.1 g/dL among the responders and 4.0 g/dL in those who achieved CR. Lower quartile of response duration was not reached after 33 months. Estimated median response duration was more than 66 months. Grade 3-4 hematologic toxicity occurred in 12 patients (41%). In conclusion, fludarabine and rituximab combination therapy is very efficient in patients with CAD. Toxicity may be a concern, and benefits should be carefully weighed against risks in very old and comorbid patients. It remains to be established whether the combination should be first-line or an efficient second-line therapy in CAD patients requiring treatment.

Diagnosis and treatment of cold agglutinin mediated autoimmune hemolytic anemia

Exact diagnosis of the subtype has essential therapeutic consequences in autoimmune hemolytic anemia. Cold-antibody types include primary chronic cold agglutinin disease (CAD) and rare cases of cold agglutinin syndrome (CAS) secondary to cancer or acute infection. Primary CAD is a clonal lymphoproliferative disorder. Not all patients require pharmacological therapy, but treatment seems indicated more often than previously thought. Corticosteroids should not be used to treat primary CAD. Half of the patients respond to rituximab monotherapy; median response duration is 11 months. The most efficient treatment to date is fludarabine and rituximab in combination, resulting in responses in 75%, complete responses in 20% and median response duration of more than 66 months. Toxicity may be a concern, and an individualized approach is discussed. Erythrocyte transfusions can be given provided specific precautions are undertaken. No evidence-based therapy exists in secondary CAS, but optimal treatment of the underlying disorder is essential when feasible.

Primary chronic cold agglutinin disease: An update on pathogenesis, clinical features and therapy

Abstract Chronic cold agglutinin disease (CAD) is a subgroup of autoimmune hemolytic anemia. Primary CAD has traditionally been defined by the absence of any underlying or associated disease. The results of therapy with corticosteroids, alkylating agents and interferon-α have been poor. Cold reactive immunoglobulins against erythrocyte surface antigens are essential to pathogenesis of CAD. These cold agglutinins are monoclonal, usually IgMκ autoantibodies with heavy chain variable regions encoded by the VH4-34 gene segment. By flowcytometric and immunohistochemical assessments, a monoclonal CD20+κ+B-lymphocyte population has been demonstrated in the bone marrow of 90% of the patients, and lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma is a frequent finding. Novel attempts at treatment for primary CAD have mostly been directed against the clonal B-lymphocytes. Phase 2 studies have shown that therapy with the chimeric anti-CD20 antibody rituximab produced partial response rates of more than 50% and occasional complete responses. Median response duration, however, was only 11 months. In this review, we discuss the clinical and pathogenetic features of primary CAD, emphasizing the more recent data on its close association with clonal lymphoproliferative bone marrow disorders and implications for therapy. We also review the management and outline some perspectives on new therapy modalities.

How I manage cold agglutinin disease

Primary chronic cold agglutinin disease (CAD) is a clonal lymphoproliferative disorder accounting for 13–15% of autoimmune haemolytic anaemias. Significant advances have been made in treatment, which was largely unsuccessful until recently. The essential clinical, immunological and pathological features are reviewed, focusing on their relevance for therapy. Non‐pharmacological management still seems sufficient in some patients. With the recent improvements, however, drug therapy seems indicated more often than previously thought. Corticosteroids should not be used to treat CAD. Half of the patients respond to rituximab monotherapy; median response duration is 11 months. Fludarabine‐rituximab combination therapy is very effective, resulting in 75% response rate, complete remissions in about 20%, and more than 66 months estimated response duration. Toxicity is a concern, and benefits should be carefully weighed against risks. An individualized approach is discussed regarding the choice of fludarabine‐rituximab combination versus rituximab monotherapy. Patients requiring treatment should be considered for prospective trials.

Clinical immunology of chronic cold agglutinin disease

We studied clinical and immunological characteristics of 15 patients with chronic cold agglutinin disease (CAD). Mean age at disease debut was 68 years for female and 67 years for male patients. The patients had no signs of other autoimmune diseases. All patients had VH4–34 encoded IgM kappa cold agglutinins (CA) in high titre. In five patients IgM increased significantly with advancing disease. Seven patients had reduced concentrations of lymphocytes, largely of CD4 and CD8 T cells. Percentages of NK cells (CD56) and B cells (CD19) were increased in seven and three patients, respectively. In six out of nine patients a clonal expansion of kappa positive B cells was found. Serum C3 was decreased in nine patients and C4 was decreased in 11 patients, six of whom had reduced CH50. Such data indicate that patients with CAD experience a continuous low‐grade complement consumption. Five patients had experienced increased haemolysis during infections. After addition of active complement to patient sera in vitro, six sera showed increased haemolytic activity. Our results indicate that some patients with CAD have a relative deficit of complement in their serum and that an increase of complement production occurs during an acute phase reaction which enhances haemolysis. Our data also indicate that both CA titre and thermal amplitude are important characteristics when predicting complement activation and clinical course in CAD.

Chronic cold agglutinin disease of the “idiopathic” type is a premalignant or low-grade malignant lymphoproliferative disease

We investigated the clinical, pathological, and immunological features of “idiopathic” cold agglutinin disease (CAD) in a population‐based study. Fourteen patients were studied, giving a prevalence of about 14 per million with a mean age of 75 years. Haemolysis was present in all cases, but only eight patients had clinical symptoms of peripheral haemagglutination. Serum electrophoresis, immunofixation, morphological bone marrow evaluation, and flow cytometric immunophenotyping were used to detect any monoclonal lymphoproliferative disorder. Flow cytometry seemed to be a sensitive way to demonstrate a clonal B‐cell proliferation. Some evidence of clonality was found in 13 patients, and a clonal lymphoproliferative disease was documented by flow cytometry or biopsy in 10 out of 11 patients. We conclude that CAD is a symptom‐producing monoclonal lymphoproliferative disorder in nearly all patients.

Primary cold agglutinin-associated lymphoproliferative disease: a B-cell lymphoma of the bone marrow distinct from lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma

Primary chronic cold agglutinin disease is a rare hemolytic disease mediated by monoclonal IGHV4-34-encoded cold agglutinins with a predominant specificity for the blood group antigen I. Bone marrow from 54 patients was studied to type the underlying lymphoproliferative disorder better. Bone marrow biopsies showed circumscribed intra-parenchymatous nodules with small monotonous monoclonal B cells in 40/54 patients (median infiltration: 10% of marrow cells) with a CD20+, IgMs+, IgDs+, CD27+, CD5−/+, CD11c−, CD23−, CD38− immunophenotype. Neither plasmacytoid cytological features nor expression of plasma cell differentiation-associated transcription factors MUM1, XBP1 and BLIMP1 were noted in these B cells. However, a limited number of mature monoclonal IgM+, IgD− plasma cells were present outside the lymphoid nodules and were diffusely scattered throughout the marrow. Of interest, the MYD88 L265P mutation, typical of lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma, was not detected (17/17 cases). Somatically mutated monoclonal IGHV4-34 gene rearrangement was demonstrated in eight patients with frozen samples (mean sequence homology 95.4%). However, mutations of BCL6 intron 1 were not demonstrated, except in one patient, suggesting that the lymphoma cells had not matured in the germinal center. In conclusion, cold agglutinin-associated lymphoproliferative disease displays homogeneous histological and immunophenotypic features. The absence of plasmacytoid cells, the presence of plasma cells predominantly outside the nodular lymphoid infiltrates, IGHV4-34 restriction and absence of MYD88 L265P mutation strongly suggest that cold agglutinin-associated lymphoproliferative disease is a distinct entity that is different from lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma.

Acute phase haemolysis in chronic cold agglutinin disease.

We previously described a paradoxical form of chronic cold agglutinin disease (CAD) in which haemolysis occurred during episodes of fever but only marginally during exposure to colds. In order to investigate the molecular basis for this response we performed a 12‐month prospective study of a patient with CAD and paradoxical haemolysis. Blood samples were collected monthly during health, and daily following hospitalization owing to hip fracture. During health we observed decreased levels of C3, undetectable C4, a non‐functional classical pathway and a normal alternative pathway. Increased concentrations of C1‐INH/C1rs complexes indicated continuous formation of C1‐antibody‐antigen complexes. There was a low‐grade temperature‐dependent fluctuating haemolysis as evidenced from measurements of lactate dehydrogenase. Following the hip fracture, the haemolysis increased. Levels of interleukin (IL)‐1β, IL‐6, interferon (IFN)‐γ and tumour necrosis factor (TNF)‐α increased as did C1‐INH, C3, C4, CRP, and lactate dehydrogenase. The results support our hypothesis stating that paradoxical haemolysis in CAD is controlled by the availability of early classical pathway complement molecules and that haemolysis following acute phase responses occurs as a consequence of increased complement synthesis.

Red Blood Cell Destruction in Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia: Role of Complement and Potential New Targets for Therapy

Autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) is a collective term for several diseases characterized by autoantibody-initiated destruction of red blood cells (RBCs). Exact subclassification is essential. We provide a review of the respective types of AIHA with emphasis on mechanisms of RBC destruction, focusing in particular on complement involvement. Complement activation plays a definitive but limited role in warm-antibody AIHA (w-AIHA), whereas primary cold agglutinin disease (CAD), secondary cold agglutinin syndrome (CAS), and paroxysmal cold hemoglobinuria (PCH) are entirely complement-dependent disorders. The details of complement involvement differ among these subtypes. The theoretical background for therapeutic complement inhibition in selected patients is very strong in CAD, CAS, and PCH but more limited in w-AIHA. The optimal target complement component for inhibition is assumed to be important and highly dependent on the type of AIHA. Complement modulation is currently not an evidence-based therapy modality in any AIHA, but a number of experimental and preclinical studies are in progress and a few clinical observations have been reported. Clinical studies of new complement inhibitors are probably not far ahead.