Sigrid Nyberg

Patients with Premenstrual Syndrome Have a Different Sensitivity to a Neuroactive Steroid during the Menstrual Cycle Compared to Control Subjects

We have evaluated the functional sensitivity to a neuroactive steroid in 12 women with and 12 women without premenstrual syndrome (PMS) at two stages of the menstrual cycle, by comparing the effects of three increasing doses of intravenous pregnanolone (3α-hydroxy-5β-pregnan-20-one) on saccadic eye velocity (SEV) and self-rated sedation. Control subjects in the follicular and luteal phase showed a significant reduction in SEV after pregnanolone injections compared to vehicle. In PMS patients, pregnanolone injections induced a significant dose-related decrease in SEV compared to vehicle only in the follicular phase, not in the luteal phase. After pregnanolone injections, sedation scores increased significantly from vehicle among control subjects in the luteal phase but not among PMS patients in either cycle phase. High-severity PMS patients responded with less decrease in SEV and less increase in sedation scores following pregnanolone injections compared to low-severity patients. Control subjects increased their SEV response to pregnanolone in the luteal phase compared to the follicular phase, whereas PMS patients did not. These findings are compatible with a decreased GABAA-receptor sensitivity in brain areas controlling saccadic eye movements among PMS patients in the late luteal phase.

The Role of Hormones and Hormonal Treatments in Premenstrual Syndrome

Premenstrual syndrome (PMS) is a menstrual cycle-linked condition with both mental and physical symptoms. Most women of fertile age experience cyclical changes but consider them normal and not requiring treatment. Up to 30% of women feel a need for treatment. The aetiology is still unclear, but sex steroids produced by the corpus luteum of the ovary are thought to be symptom provoking, as the cyclicity disappears in anovulatory cycles when a corpus luteum is not formed. Progestogens and progesterone together with estrogen are able to induce similar symptoms as seen in PMS. Symptom severity is sensitive to the dosage of estrogen. The response systems within the brain known to be involved in PMS symptoms are the serotonin and GABA systems. Progesterone metabolites, especially allopregnanolone, are neuroactive, acting via the GABA system in the brain. Allopregnanolone has similar effects as benzodiazepines, barbiturates and alcohol; all these substances are known to induce adverse mood effects at low osages in humans and animals. SSRIs and substances inhibiting ovulation, such as gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists, have proven to be effective treatments. To avoid adverse effects when high dosages of GnRH agonists are sed, add-back hormone replacement therapy is recommended. Spironolactone also has a beneficial effect, although not as much as SSRIs and GnRH agonists

Pathogenesis in menstrual cycle-linked CNS disorders.

Abstract: That 3alpha‐hydroxy‐5alpha/beta‐pregnane steroids (GABA steroids) have modulatory effects on the GABA‐A receptor is well known. In behavioral studies in animals high exogenous dosages give concentrations not usually reached in the brain under physiological conditions. Animal and human studies show that GABA‐A receptor‐positive modulators like barbiturates, benzodiazepines, alcohol, and allopregnanolone have a bimodal effect. In pharmacological concentrations they are CNS depressants, anesthetic, antiepileptic, and anxiolytic. In low dosages and concentrations, reached endogenously, they can induce adverse emotional reactions in up to 20% of individuals. GABA steroids can also induce tolerance to themselves and similar substances, and rebound occurs at withdrawal. Menstrual cycle‐linked disorders can be understood by the concept that they are caused by the action of endogenously produced GABA‐steroids through three mechanisms: (a) direct action, (b) tolerance induction, and (c) withdrawal effect. Examples of symptoms and disorders caused by the direct action of GABA steroids are sedation, memory and learning disturbance, clumsiness, increased appetite, worsening of petit mal epilepsy, negative mood as tension, irritability and depression during hormone treatments, and the premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD). A continuous exposure to GABA steroids causes tolerance, and women with PMDD are less sensitive to GABA‐A modulators. A malfunctioning GABA‐A receptor system is related to stress sensitivity, concentration difficulties, loss of impulse control, irritability, anxiety, and depression. An example of withdrawal effect is “catamenial epilepsy,” when seizures increase during menstruation after the withdrawal of GABA steroids. Similar phenomena occur at stress since the adrenals produce GABA steroids during stress.

Patients with premenstrual syndrome have reduced sensitivity to midazolam compared to control subjects

Premenstrual syndrome (PMS) depends on gonadal hormones produced by the corpus luteum. Given the facilitory actions on GABAergic inhibitory neurotransmission excerted by certain progesterone metabolites, further studies on the GABAA receptor system in premenstrual syndrome are warranted. This study evaluated the benzodiazepine sensitivity in PMS patients and control subjects, using saccadic eye velocity (SEV) and visual analogue ratings of sedation as dependent measures. PMS patients displayed a significantly reduced SEV responsiveness to benzodiazepines compared to control subjects in the follicular phase, whereas there was no difference between groups in the luteal phase. In the luteal phase, the sedation response to benzodiazepines was significantly reduced in PMS patients compared to control subjects. There was also an influence of PMS symptom severity on these measures, as high-severity PMS patients displayed blunted SEV and sedation responses to benzodiazepines compared to low-severity patients. These results indicate that PMS patients have a reduced functional sensitivity at the GABAA/benzodiazepine receptor complex throughout the menstrual cycle.

Sex steroid induced negative mood may be explained by the paradoxical effect mediated by GABAA modulators.

UNLABELLED Certain women experience negative mood symptoms as a result of progesterone during the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle, progestagens in hormonal contraceptives, or the addition of progesterone or progestagens in sequential hormone therapy (HT). This phenomenon is believed to be mediated via the action of the progesterone metabolites on the GABA(A) system, which is the major inhibitory system in the mammalian CNS. The positive modulators of the GABA(A) receptor include allopregnanolone and pregnanolone, both neuroactive metabolites of progesterone, as well as benzodiazepines, barbiturates, and alcohol. Studies on the effect of GABA(A) receptor modulators have shown contradictory results; although human and animal studies have revealed beneficial properties such as anaesthesia, sedation, anticonvulsant effects, and anxiolytic effects, recent reports have also indicated adverse effects such as anxiety, irritability, and aggression. It has actually been suggested that several GABA(A) receptor modulators, including allopregnanolone, have biphasic effects, in that low concentrations increase an adverse, anxiogenic effect whereas higher concentrations decrease this effect and show beneficial, calming properties. The allopregnanolone increase during the luteal phase in fertile women, as well as during the addition of progesterone in HT, has been shown to induce adverse mood in women. The severity of these mood symptoms is related to the allopregnanolone serum concentrations in a manner similar to an inverted U-shaped curve. Negative mood symptoms occur when the serum concentration of allopregnanolone is similar to endogenous luteal phase levels, while low and high concentrations have less effect on mood. It has also been shown that progesterone/allopregnanolone treatment in women increases the activity in the amygdala (as measured with functional magnetic resonance imaging) in a similar way to the changes seen during anxiety reactions. However, it is evident that only certain women experience adverse mood during progesterone or GABA(A) receptor modulator treatments. Women with premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD) have severe luteal phase related symptoms; in this phase, they show changes in GABA(A) receptor sensitivity and GABA concentrations that are related to the severity of the condition. These findings suggest that negative mood symptoms in women with PMDD are caused by the paradoxical effect of allopregnanolone mediated via the GABA(A) receptor. CONCLUSION Progesterone and progestagens induce negative mood, most probably via their GABA(A) receptor active metabolites. In postmenopausal women treated with progesterone and animals treated with allopregnanolone, there is a bimodal association between serum allopregnanolone concentration and adverse mood, resembling an inverted U-shaped curve. In humans, the maximal effective concentration of allopregnanolone for producing negative mood is within the range of physiological luteal phase serum concentrations.

Treatment of premenstrual syndrome with gonadotropin‐releasing hormone agonist in a low dose regimen

BACKGROUND GnRH agonists constitute a well-documented treatment for premenstrual syndrome (PMS). However, the hypo-estrogenic state induced by the treatment renders it less suitable for long-term clinical use. The aim of the current study was to investigate the efficacy of a low dose GnRH agonist with respect to its ability to relieve premenstrual symptoms and maintain regular ovulatory cycles. METHODS The effect of a low dose GnRH agonist (buserelin) on luteal phase symptomatology was evaluated in 27 women with severe premenstrual syndrome. The design was doubleblind, placebo-controlled and cross-over. Patients were randomized to either GnRH-agonist intranasally in a dosage of 100 microg once daily for two months or placebo for two months before the cross-over was made. The primary outcome measure consisted of daily symptom ratings for mood and physical symptoms made by the patients throughout the study. Adverse events and hormone concentrations were assessed at visits every second week. RESULTS Premenstrual irritability and depression were significantly relieved by low dose GnRH agonist. Positive symptoms such as friendliness and cheerfulness were also improved during the premenstrual week. Likewise physical symptoms of swelling and headache displayed a significant improvement during buserelin treatment, whereas breast tenderness scores were unaffected by the treatment. The low dose GnRH agonist treatment regimen induced anovulation in as much as 56% of patients, but these subjects were significantly older than those women who maintained ovulatory cycles throughout the study. CONCLUSION GnRH treatment significantly reduced premenstrual depression and irritability. However, low dose GnRH therapy is prone to induce anovulation, particularly with increasing age.

Relationship between allopregnanolone and negative mood in postmenopausal women taking sequential hormone replacement therapy with vaginal progesterone

OBJECTIVE To compare severity of negative mood and physical symptoms between women with different progesterone, allopregnanolone, and pregnanolone plasma concentrations during sequential Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT) with vaginal progesterone suppositories. DESIGN A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover study. METHOD Postmenopausal women (n=36) with climacteric symptoms were treated with 2mg estradiol daily during three 28-day cycles. Vaginal progesterone suppositories with 400, 800 mg/day or placebo were added sequentially for 14 days per cycle. Daily symptom ratings using a validated rating scale were kept. Blood samples for progesterone, allopregnanolone, and pregnanolone radioimmunoassays were collected during each treatment cycle. RESULTS Women were divided into three groups (low, medium, and high) based on plasma allopregnanolone concentration during progesterone treatment. The concentration of allopregnanolone in the medium group corresponds to the concentration seen during the mid luteal phase of the menstrual cycle. Within women with medium allopregnanolone concentration significantly more negative mood and physical symptoms were rated during progesterone treatment compared to treatment with unopposed estrogen or placebo. Between women significantly more negative mood symptoms were seen during progesterone treatment cycles with medium allopregnanolone concentration compared to cycles with low concentration. Plasma progesterone, allopregnanolone, and pregnanolone concentrations increased with increasing progesterone dose. Progesterone and allopregnanolone plasma concentrations increased 2h after vaginal administration of progesterone at 400 and 800 mg/day. CONCLUSION Vaginal progesterone in sequential HRT causes negative mood, most likely mediated via allopregnanolone.

Paradoxical effects of GABA-A modulators may explain sex steroid induced negative mood symptoms in some persons

Some women have negative mood symptoms, caused by progestagens in hormonal contraceptives or sequential hormone therapy or by progesterone in the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle, which may be attributed to metabolites acting on the GABA-A receptor. The GABA system is the major inhibitory system in the adult CNS and most positive modulators of the GABA-A receptor (benzodiazepines, barbiturates, alcohol, GABA steroids), induce inhibitory (e.g. anesthetic, sedative, anticonvulsant, anxiolytic) effects. However, some individuals have adverse effects (seizures, increased pain, anxiety, irritability, aggression) upon exposure. Positive GABA-A receptor modulators induce strong paradoxical effects including negative mood in 3%-8% of those exposed, while up to 25% have moderate symptoms. The effect is biphasic: low concentrations induce an adverse anxiogenic effect while higher concentrations decrease this effect and show inhibitory, calming properties. The prevalence of premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD) is also 3%-8% among women in fertile ages, and up to 25% have more moderate symptoms of premenstrual syndrome (PMS). Patients with PMDD have severe luteal phase-related symptoms and show changes in GABA-A receptor sensitivity and GABA concentrations. Findings suggest that negative mood symptoms in women with PMDD are caused by the paradoxical effect of allopregnanolone mediated via the GABA-A receptor, which may be explained by one or more of three hypotheses regarding the paradoxical effect of GABA steroids on behavior: (1) under certain conditions, such as puberty, the relative fraction of certain GABA-A receptor subtypes may be altered, and at those subtypes the GABA steroids may act as negative modulators in contrast to their usual role as positive modulators; (2) in certain brain areas of vulnerable women the transmembrane Cl(-) gradient may be altered by factors such as estrogens that favor excitability; (3) inhibition of inhibitory neurons may promote disinhibition, and hence excitability. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Neuroactive Steroids: Focus on Human Brain.

Allopregnanolone and mood disorders

UNLABELLED Certain women experience negative mood symptoms during the menstrual cycle and progesterone addition in estrogen treatments. In women with PMDD increased negative mood symptoms related to allopregnanolone increase during the luteal phase of ovulatory menstrual cycles. In anovulatory cycles no symptom or sex steroid increase occurs. This is unexpected as positive modulators of the GABA-A receptor are generally increasing mood. This paradoxical effect has brought forward a hypothesis that the symptoms are provoked by allopregnanolone the GABA-A receptor system. GABA-A is the major inhibitory system in the brain. Positive modulators of the GABA-A receptor include the progesterone metabolites allopregnanolone and pregnanolone, benzodiazepines, barbiturates, and alcohol. GABA-A receptor modulators are known, in low concentrations to induce adverse, anxiogenic effects whereas in higher concentrations show beneficial, calming properties. Positive GABA-A receptor modulators induce strong paradoxical effects e.g. negative mood in 3-8% of those exposed, while up to 25% have moderate symptoms thus similar as the prevalence of PMDD, 3-8% among women in fertile ages, and up to 25% have moderate symptoms of premenstrual syndrome (PMS). The mechanism behind paradoxical reaction might be similar among them who react on positive GABA-A receptor modulators and in women with PMDD. In women the severity of these mood symptoms are related to the allopregnanolone serum concentrations in an inverted U-shaped curve. Negative mood symptoms occur when the serum concentration of allopregnanolone is similar to endogenous luteal phase levels, while low and high concentrations have less effect on mood. Low to moderate progesterone/allopregnanolone concentrations in women increases the activity in the amygdala (measured with fMRI) similar to the changes seen during anxiety reactions. Higher concentrations give decreased amygdala activity similar as seen during benzodiazepine treatment with calming anxiolytic effects. Patients with PMDD show decreased sensitivity in GABA-A receptor sensitivity to diazepam and pregnanolone while increased sensitivity to allopregnanolone. This agrees with findings in animals showing a relation between changes in alpha4 and delta subunits of the GABA-A receptor and anxiogenic effects of allopregnanolone. CONCLUSION These findings suggest that negative mood symptoms in women with PMDD are caused by the paradoxical effect of allopregnanolone mediated via the GABA-A receptor.

The impact of different doses of medroxyprogesterone acetate on mood symptoms in sequential hormonal therapy

The aim of this study was to compare adverse mood effects of two different doses of medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) during postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in women with and without a history of premenstrual syndrome (PMS). The study was designed as a randomized double-blind cross-over study and included 36 postmenopausal women at three health care areas in northern Sweden. The women received 2 mg estradiol continuously during five 28-day cycles and 10 mg or 20 mg MPA sequentially for 12 days during each cycle. The main outcome measures were mood and physical symptoms noted on a daily rating scale. We found that physical symptoms did not differ between 10 and 20 mg MPA. Both women with a history of PMS and women without responded with more negative mood symptoms with the lower dose of MPA. In women with previous PMS the higher dose of MPA enhanced positive mood symptoms. With respect to mood and physical symptoms, the aim to lower MPA doses in HRT is unwarranted.