Sigrun Erkens-Schulze
Erasmus University Rotterdam
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Sigrun Erkens-Schulze.
International Journal of Cancer | 2005
Rute B. Marques; Sigrun Erkens-Schulze; Corrina M.A. de Ridder; Karin G. Hermans; Kati K. Waltering; Tapio Visakorpi; Jan Trapman; Johannes C. Romijn; Wytske M. van Weerden; Guido Jenster
To study the mechanisms whereby androgen‐dependent tumors relapse in patients undergoing androgen blockade, we developed a novel progression model for prostate cancer. The PC346C cell line, established from a transurethral resection of a primary tumor, expresses wild‐type (wt) androgen receptor (AR) and secretes prostate‐specific antigen (PSA). Optimal proliferation of PC346C requires androgens and is inhibited by the antiandrogen hydroxyflutamide. Orthotopic injection in the dorsal‐lateral prostate of castrated athymic nude mice did not produce tumors, whereas fast tumor growth occurred in sham‐operated males. Three androgen‐independent sublines were derived from PC346C upon long‐term in vitro androgen deprivation: PC346DCC, PC346Flu1 and PC346Flu2. PC346DCC exhibited androgen‐insensitive growth, which was not inhibited by flutamide. AR and PSA were detected at very low levels, coinciding with background AR activity in a reporter assay, which suggests that these cells have bypassed the AR pathway. PC346Flu1 and PC346Flu2 were derived by culture in steroid‐stripped medium supplemented with hydroxyflutamide. PC346Flu1 strongly upregulated AR expression and showed 10‐fold higher AR activation than the parental PC346C. PC346Flu1 proliferation was inhibited in vitro by R1881 at 0.1 nM concentration, consistent with a slower tumor growth rate in intact males than in castrated mice. PC346Flu2 carries the well‐known T877A AR mutation, causing the receptor to become activated by diverse nonandrogenic ligands including hydroxyflutamide. Array‐based comparative genomic hybridization revealed little change between the various PC346 lines. The common alterations include gain of chromosomes 1, 7 and 8q and loss of 13q, which are frequently found in prostate cancer. In conclusion, by in vitro hormone manipulations of a unique androgen‐dependent cell line expressing wtAR, we successfully reproduced common AR modifications observed in hormone‐refractory prostate cancer: downregulation, overexpression and mutation.
PLOS ONE | 2010
Rute B. Marques; Natasja Dits; Sigrun Erkens-Schulze; Wytske M. van Weerden; Guido Jenster
Background Prostate cancer is initially dependent on androgens for survival and growth, making hormonal therapy the cornerstone treatment for late-stage tumors. However, despite initial remission, the cancer will inevitably recur. The present study was designed to investigate how androgen-dependent prostate cancer cells eventually survive and resume growth under androgen-deprived and antiandrogen supplemented conditions. As model system, we used the androgen-responsive PC346C cell line and its therapy-resistant sublines: PC346DCC, PC346Flu1 and PC346Flu2. Methodology/Principal Findings Microarray technology was used to analyze differences in gene expression between the androgen-responsive and therapy-resistant PC346 cell lines. Microarray analysis revealed 487 transcripts differentially-expressed between the androgen-responsive and the therapy-resistant cell lines. Most of these genes were common to all three therapy-resistant sublines and only a minority (∼5%) was androgen-regulated. Pathway analysis revealed enrichment in functions involving cellular movement, cell growth and cell death, as well as association with cancer and reproductive system disease. PC346DCC expressed residual levels of androgen receptor (AR) and showed significant down-regulation of androgen-regulated genes (p-value = 10−7). Up-regulation of VAV3 and TWIST1 oncogenes and repression of the DKK3 tumor-suppressor was observed in PC346DCC, suggesting a potential AR bypass mechanism. Subsequent validation of these three genes in patient samples confirmed that expression was deregulated during prostate cancer progression. Conclusions/Significance Therapy-resistant growth may result from adaptations in the AR pathway, but androgen-independence may also be achieved by alternative survival mechanisms. Here we identified TWIST1, VAV3 and DKK3 as potential players in the bypassing of the AR pathway, making them good candidates as biomarkers and novel therapeutical targets.
Scientific Reports | 2015
Emma Davies; Meng Dong; Matthias Gutekunst; Katja Närhi; Hanneke J. A. A. van Zoggel; Sami Blom; A. Nagaraj; Tauno Metsalu; Eva Oswald; Sigrun Erkens-Schulze; Juan A. Delgado San Martin; Riku Turkki; Stephen R. Wedge; Taija af Hällström; Julia Schueler; Wytske M. van Weerden; Emmy W. Verschuren; Simon T. Barry; Heiko van der Kuip; John A. Hickman
Precision-cut slices of in vivo tumours permit interrogation in vitro of heterogeneous cells from solid tumours together with their native microenvironment. They offer a low throughput but high content in vitro experimental platform. Using mouse models as surrogates for three common human solid tumours, we describe a standardised workflow for systematic comparison of tumour slice cultivation methods and a tissue microarray-based method to archive them. Cultivated slices were compared to their in vivo source tissue using immunohistochemical and transcriptional biomarkers, particularly of cellular stress. Mechanical slicing induced minimal stress. Cultivation of tumour slices required organotypic support materials and atmospheric oxygen for maintenance of integrity and was associated with significant temporal and loco-regional changes in protein expression, for example HIF-1α. We recommend adherence to the robust workflow described, with recognition of temporal-spatial changes in protein expression before interrogation of tumour slices by pharmacological or other means.
European Urology | 2006
Rute B. Marques; Wytske M. van Weerden; Sigrun Erkens-Schulze; Corrina M.A. de Ridder; Chris H. Bangma; Jan Trapman; Guido Jenster
Poster Presentation: Translational Research | 2018
W Zhang; W.M. van Weerden; Sigrun Erkens-Schulze; Roland Kanaar; D Van Gent; Julie Nonnekens
European Urology Supplements | 2018
A. Van Hemelryk; Wilma Teubel; Sigrun Erkens-Schulze; Lisanne Mout; M.E. van Royen; W.M. van Weerden
The Journal of Urology | 2013
Jinpei Kumagai; Moll Matthijs J; Robert van R. J. Soest; Sigrun Erkens-Schulze; Natasja F.J. Ditsa; Guido Jenster; Chris H. Bangma; Yukio Homma; Wytske M. van Weerden
European Journal of Cancer | 2012
Jinpei Kumagai; Sigrun Erkens-Schulze; Natasja Dits; R. de Wit; W.M. van Weerden
European Urology Supplements | 2011
Jinpei Kumagai; J. Hofland; Sigrun Erkens-Schulze; Natasja Dits; Guido Jenster; Chris H. Bangma; Yukio Homma; F.H. de Jong; W.M. van Weerden
European Urology Supplements | 2003
Rute B. Marques; Sigrun Erkens-Schulze; Karin G. Hermans; Jan Trapman; Johannes C. Romijn; W.M. van Weerden; Guido Jenster