Silva Lerbs-Mache

Quantitative phase tomography of Arabidopsis seeds reveals intercellular void network

We used quantitative phase tomography with synchrotron radiation to elucidate the 3D structure of Arabidopsis seeds in their native state. The cells are clearly distinguished, and their internal structure is revealed through local variations in electron density. We visualized a 3D network of intercellular air space that might allow immediate gas exchange for energy supply during germination and/or serve for rapid water uptake and distribution during imbibition.

Functional Analysis of Two Maize cDNAs Encoding T7-like RNA Polymerases

We have characterized two maize cDNAs, rpoTm and rpoTp, that encode putative T7-like RNA polymerases. In vivo cellular localization experiments using transient expression of the green fluorescent protein suggest that their encoded proteins are targeted exclusively to mitochondria and plastids, respectively. An antibody raised against the C terminus of the rpoTp gene product identified mitochondrial polypeptides of ~100 kD. Their presence was correlated with RNA polymerase activity, and the antibody inhibited mitochondrial in vitro transcription activity. Together, these results strongly suggest that the product of rpoTm is involved in maize mitochondrial transcription. By contrast, immunoblot analysis and an antibody-linked polymerase assay indicated that rpoTp specifies a plastid RNA polymerase component. A quantitative reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction assay was used to study the transcription of rpoTp and rpoTm in different tissues and under different environmental conditions. Although both genes were constitutively expressed, rpoTm transcripts were generally more prevalent in nonphotosynthetic tissues, whereas an increase in rpoTp transcripts paralleled chloroplast development. We suggest that these two genes encode constitutive components of the organelle transcription machinery but that their expression is nonetheless subject to modulation during plant development.

Function of plastid sigma factors in higher plants: regulation of gene expression or just preservation of constitutive transcription?

Plastid gene expression is rather complex. Transcription is performed by three different RNA polymerases, two of them are nucleus-encoded, monomeric, of the phage-type (named RPOTp and RPOTmp) and one of them is plastid-encoded, multimeric, of the eubacterial-type (named PEP). The activity of the eubacterial-type RNA polymerase is regulated by up to six nucleus-encoded transcription initiation factors of the sigma-type. This complexity of the plastid transcriptional apparatus is not yet well understood and raises the question of whether it is subject to any regulation or just ensures constitutive transcription of the plastid genome. On the other hand, considerable advances have been made during the last years elucidating the role of sigma factors for specific promoter recognition and selected transcription of some plastid genes. Sigma-interacting proteins have been identified and phosphorylation-dependent functional changes of sigma factors have been revealed. The present review aims to summarize these recent advances and to convince the reader that plastid gene expression is regulated on the transcriptional level by sigma factor action.

Characterization of Arabidopsis plastid sigma-like transcription factors SIG1, SIG2 and SIG3

The plastid genome is transcribed by nucleus-encoded (NEP) and plastid-encoded (PEP) RNA polymerases. PEP is a prokaryotic-type enzyme whose activity is regulated by σ-like transcription initiation factors that are nucleus-encoded. cDNAs coding for six different potential σ-like factors have been cloned and sequenced recently. However, functional analyses of these factors are still limited. We have used an anti-sense approach in order to study the function of SIG1, SIG2 and SIG3. Only SIG2 anti-sense plants show a visible phenotype characterized by chlorophyll deficiency. Surprisingly, this phenotype is different from the phenotype of SIG2 knockout plants in that the chlorophyll deficiency is limited to cotyledons. In later developmental stages, the SIG2 anti-sense plants can overcome SIG2mRNA under-expression by adjusting SIG2 protein levels to that of wild-type plants, suggesting that SIG2 expression is also regulated at the post-transcriptional level. The efficient recovery of the wild-type phenotype could also be supported by partial take-over of SIG2 function by one of the six other σ factors. A good candidate for such substitution of SIG2 function represents SIG3. SIG3 is constitutively expressed during plant development and its specificity in promoter discrimination is less pronounced than that of SIG1 and SIG2. Finally, SIG3 protein is enhanced in SIG2 anti-sense plants when compared to wild-type plants. SIG2 is present as a soluble factor while SIG3 is partly attached to the plastid membranes. We suggest that membrane localization is necessary for efficient SIG3 function. Therefore, SIG3 cannot substitute for SIG2 function in early chloroplast biogenesis, when plastid membranes are not yet made up.

Specific function of a plastid sigma factor for ndhF gene transcription

The complexity of the plastid transcriptional apparatus (two or three different RNA polymerases and numerous regulatory proteins) makes it very difficult to attribute specific function(s) to its individual components. We have characterized an Arabidopsis T-DNA insertion line disrupting the nuclear gene coding for one of the six plastid sigma factors (SIG4) that regulate the activity of the plastid-encoded RNA polymerase PEP. This mutant shows a specific diminution of transcription of the plastid ndhF gene, coding for a subunit of the plastid NDH [NAD(P)H dehydrogenase] complex. The absence of another NDH subunit, i.e. NDHH, and the absence of a chlorophyll fluorescence transient previously attributed to the activity of the plastid NDH complex indicate a strong down-regulation of NDH activity in the mutant plants. Results suggest that plastid NDH activity is regulated on the transcriptional level by an ndhF-specific plastid sigma factor, SIG4.

Regulation of plastid rDNA transcription by interaction of CDF2 with two different RNA polymerases

The plastid genome is known to be transcribed by a plastid‐encoded prokaryotic‐type RNA polymerase (PEP) and by a nucleus‐encoded phage‐type RNA polymerase (NEP). The spinach plastid rrn operon promoter region harbours three different, overlapping promoters. Two of them are of the prokaryotic type. The third promoter is a non‐consensus‐type NEP promoter. We separated three different transcriptional activities from spinach chloroplasts: PEP, the phage‐type RNA polymerase NEP‐1, and a third, hitherto undescribed transcriptional activity (NEP‐2). NEP‐2 specifically transcribes the rrn operon in the presence of the transcription factor CDF2. CDF2 was previously shown to recruit PEP to the rrn promoter to repress transcription. Together, our results suggest the existence of a third RNA polymerase in plastids and a mechanism of rDNA transcriptional regulation that is based on the interaction of the transcription factor CDF2 with two different transcriptional systems.

Nucleus-encoded plastid sigma factor SIG3 transcribes specifically the psbN gene in plastids

We have investigated the function of one of the six plastid sigma-like transcription factors, sigma 3 (SIG3), by analysing two different Arabidopsis T-DNA insertion lines having disrupted SIG3 genes. Hybridization of wild-type and sig3 plant RNA to a plastid specific microarray revealed a strong reduction of the plastid psbN mRNA. The microarray result has been confirmed by northern blot analysis. The SIG3-specific promoter region has been localized on the DNA by primer extension and mRNA capping experiments. Results suggest tight regulation of psbN gene expression by a SIG3-PEP holoenzyme. The psbN gene is localized on the opposite strand of the psbB operon, between the psbT and psbH genes, and the SIG3-dependent psbN transcription produces antisense RNA to the psbT–psbH intergenic region. We show that this antisense RNA is not limited to the intergenic region, i.e. it does not terminate at the end of the psbN gene but extends as antisense transcript to cover the whole psbT coding region. Thus, by specific transcription initiation at the psbN gene promoter, SIG3-PEP holoenzyme could also influence the expression of the psbB operon by producing psbT antisense RNA.

Building Up of the Plastid Transcriptional Machinery during Germination and Early Plant Development

The plastid genome is transcribed by three different RNA polymerases, one is called plastid-encoded RNA polymerase (PEP) and two are called nucleus-encoded RNA polymerases (NEPs). PEP transcribes preferentially photosynthesis-related genes in mature chloroplasts while NEP transcribes preferentially housekeeping genes during early phases of plant development, and it was generally thought that during plastid differentiation the building up of the NEP transcription system precedes the building up of the PEP transcription system. We have now analyzed in detail the establishment of the two different transcription systems, NEP and PEP, during germination and early seedling development on the mRNA and protein level. Experiments have been performed with two different plant species, Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) and spinach (Spinacia oleracea). Results show that the building up of the two different transcription systems is different in the two species. However, in both species NEP as well as PEP are already present in seeds, and results using Tagetin as a specific inhibitor of PEP activity demonstrate that PEP is important for efficient germination, i.e. PEP is already active in not yet photosynthetically active seed plastids.

Phage-Type RNA Polymerase RPOTmp Transcribes the rrn Operon from the PC Promoter at Early Developmental Stages in Arabidopsis

The plastid genome of higher plants is transcribed by two different types of RNA polymerases named nucleus encoded RNA polymerase (NEP) and plastid encoded RNA polymerase. Plastid encoded RNA polymerase is a multimeric enzyme comparable to eubacterial RNA polymerases. NEP enzymes represent a small family of monomeric phage-type RNA polymerases. Dicotyledonous plants harbor three different phage-type enzymes, named RPOTm, RPOTp, and RPOTmp. RPOTm is exclusively targeted to mitochondria, RPOTp is exclusively targeted to plastids, and RPOTmp is targeted to plastids as well as to mitochondria. In this article, we have made use of RPOTp and RPOTmp T-DNA insertion mutants to answer the question of whether both plastid-located phage-type RNA polymerases have overlapping or specific functions in plastid transcription. To this aim, we have analyzed accD and rpoB messenger RNAs (mRNA; transcribed from type I NEP promoters), clpP mRNA (transcribed from the −59 type II NEP promoter), and the 16S rRNA (transcribed from the exceptional PC NEP promoter) by primer extension. Results suggest that RPOTp represents the principal RNA polymerase for transcribing NEP-controlled mRNA genes during early plant development, while RPOTmp transcribes specifically the rrn operon from the PC promoter during seed imbibition.

The plastid division proteins, FtsZ1 and FtsZ2, differ in their biochemical properties and sub-plastidial localization

Plastid division in higher plants is morphologically similar to bacterial cell division, with a process termed binary fission involving constriction of the envelope membranes. FtsZ proteins involved in bacterial division are also present in higher plants, in which the ftsZ genes belong to two distinct families: ftsZ1 and ftsZ2. However, the roles of the corresponding proteins FtsZ1 and FtsZ2 in plastid division have not been determined. Here we show that the expression of plant FtsZ1 and FtsZ2 in bacteria has different effects on cell division, and that distinct protein domains are involved in the process. We have studied the assembly of purified FtsZ1 and FtsZ2 using a chemical cross-linking approach followed by PAGE and electron microscopy analyses of the resulting polymers. This has revealed that FtsZ1 is capable of forming long rod-shaped polymers and rings similar to the bacterial FtsZ structures, whereas FtsZ2 does not form any organized polymer. Moreover, using purified sub-plastidial fractions, we show that both proteins are present in the stroma, and that a subset of FtsZ2 is tightly bound to the purified envelope membranes. These results indicate that FtsZ2 has a localization pattern distinct from that of FtsZ1, which can be related to distinct properties of the proteins. From the results presented here, we propose a model for the sequential topological localization and functions of green plant FtsZ1 and FtsZ2 in chloroplast division.