Silvana Bartoli

In vivo and in vitro binding of 1,2-dibromoethane and 1,2-dichloroethane to macromolecules in rat and mouse organs

SummaryThe comparative interaction of equimolar amounts of 1,2-dichloroethane and 1,2-dibromoethane with rat and mouse nucleic acids was studied in both in vivo (liver, lung, kidney and stomach) and in vitro (liver microsomal and/or cytosolic fractions) systems. In vivo, liver and kidney DNA showed the highest labeling, whereas the binding to lung DNA was barely detectable. Dibromoethane was more highly reactive than dichloroethane in both species. With dichloroethane, mouse DNA labeling was higher than rat DNA labeling whatever the organ considered: the opposite was seen for the bioactivation of dibromoethane. RNA and protein labelings were higher than DNA labeling, with no particular pattern in terms of organ or species involvement. In vitro, in addition to a low chemical reactivity towards nucleic acids shown by haloethanes per se, both compounds were bioactivated by either liver microsomes and cytosolic fractions to reactive forms capable of binding to DNA and polynucleotides. UV irradiation did not photoactivate dibromoethane and dichloroethane. The in vitro interaction with DNA mediated by enzymatic fractions was PB-inducible (one order of magnitude, using rat microsomes). In vitro bioactivation of haloethanes was mainly performed by microsomes in the case of dichloroethane and by cytosolic fractions in the case of dibromoethane. When microsomes plus cytosol were used, rat enzymes were more efficient than mouse enzymes in inducing a dibromoethane-DNA interaction: the opposite situation occurred for dichloroethane-DNA interaction, and this is in agreement with the in vivo pattern. In the presence of both metabolic pathways, addition or synergism occurred. Dibromoethane was always more reactive than dichloroethane. An indication of the presence of a microsomal GSH transferase was achieved for the activation of dibromoethane. No preferential binding in vitro to a specific polynucleotide was found. Polynucleotide labeling was higher than (or equal to) DNA binding. The labeling of microsomal RNA and proteins and of cytosolic proteins was many times lower than that of DNA or polynucleotides. The in vivo and in vitro data reported above give an unequivocal indication of the relative reactivity of the haloethanes examined with liver macromolecules from the two species and agree, on the whole, with the relative genotoxicity (DNA repair induction ability, mutagenicity and carcinogenicity) of the chemicals.

The different genotoxicity of P-dichlorobenzene in mouse and rat: Measurement of the in vivo and in vitro covalent interaction with nucleic acids

Twenty-two hours after i.p. injection to male Wistar rats and BALB/c mice para-dichlorobenzene (p-DCB) is bound covalently to DNA from liver, kidney, lung and stomach of mice but not of rats. DNA adducts in mouse liver are repaired in seventy-two hours. The covalent binding index value, calculated on the labelling of mouse liver DNA, classifies p-DCB as a weak initiator with an oncogenic activity lower than that of chlorobenzene. The labelling of RNA and proteins from the different organs of both species is, however, low. In vitro interaction with calf thymus DNA mediated by mouse and rat microsomes from liver and lung did occur. Binding extent was strongly reduced by addition of 2-diethylaminoethyl-2,2-diphenylvalerate hydrochloride (SKF 525-A) to the microsomal standard incubation mixture, whereas it was enhanced by adding GSH. Cytosolic fractions from kidney and lung were able to induce binding of p-DCB to DNA to a lower extent with respect to microsome-mediated binding. These results indicate that microsomal mixed function oxidase system and microsomal GSH-transferases can be involved in overall activating metabolism whereas cytosolic GSH-transferases play a minor role. This study, which is a part of a structure-activity relationship approach on benzene and its haloderivatives, provides the first evidence of genotoxicity of p-DCB in mammalian cell. It allows to partly explain variations of susceptibility of different species to hepatocarcinogenesis and of hepatotoxicity of different isomers.

Chloroform bioactivation leading to nucleic acids binding.

Chloroform was bound covalently to DNA, RNA and proteins of rat and mouse organs in vivo after i.p. injection. Covalent Binding Index values of rat and mouse liver DNA classify chloroform as a weak initiator. Labelings of RNA and proteins from various organs of both species were higher than that of DNA. In an in vitro cell-free system, chloroform was bioactivated by cytochrome P450-dependent microsomal fractions, by cytosolic GSH-transferases from rat and mouse liver, and particularly by the latter enzymes from mouse lung. This observation suggests that GSH plays a role In the binding of chloroform metabolites to DNA. The presence of both microsomal and cytosolic enzymatic systems in the standard incubation mixture generally led to an additive or synergistic bioactivating effect for rat and mouse, respectively.

Initiating activity of 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane in two-stage BALB/c 3T3 cell transformation

By using in vitro two-stage BALB/c 3T3 cell transformation assay, we have tested the effect of promoting treatment with tetradecanoylphorbol acetate (TPA) on transformation induced by 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane (1,1,2,2-TTCE). Cells were treated with subeffective or transforming concentrations of 1,1,2,2-TTCE in the presence of an S9-mix activating system, followed by TPA promoting treatment. The transforming activity of 1,1,2,2-TTCE is evident only by reseeding confluent cells and allowing additional rounds of cell replications in the amplification test. Treatment with TPA leads to a marked transformation yield in all plates scored even at the lowest assayed dosage of 1,1,2,2-TTCE, without performing amplification of transformation.

In Vivo and in Vitro Interaction of 1,2-Dichlorobenzene with Nucleic Acids and Proteins of Mice and Rats

Twenty-two hours after i.p. injection into male Wistar rats and BALB/c mice, 1,2-dichlorobenzene (1,2-DCB) was covalently bound to DNA, RNA, and proteins of liver, kidney, lung and stomach. The covalent binding index to liver DNA was typical of carcinogens classified as weak initiators. The enzyme-mediated in vitro interaction of 1,2-DCB with calf thymus DNA or synthetic polyribonucleotides was carried out by a microsomal mixed-function oxidase system and microsomal GSH-transferases, which seemed to be effective only in liver and lung of rat and mouse. Cytosolic GSH-transferases played a minor role in 1-2-DCB bioactivation. The latter finding provides the first evidence of 1,2-DCB genotoxicity in mammalian cells. The type of halide, the number of halosubsti-tuents and their spatial dispostion on the benzene ring are the major determinants of halobenzenes activability to intermediate(s) capable of interacting covalently with DNA and other macromolecules in biologic systems.

1,2-Dibromoethane as an Initiating Agent for Cell Transformation

The two‐stage transformation assay increases the sensitivity of cells to chemicals and permits detection of carcinogens acting as initiating agents. 1,2‐Dibromoethane, a representative halogenated aliphatic, has been tested in the two‐stage BALB/c 3T3 cells transformation test at dosages from 16 μM to 128 μM. This dose range is much lower than those previously found efficient in transforming BALB/c 3T3 cells. Apart from the lowest dose, which induced borderline effects, all the other assayed dosages appeared to induce heritable changes in the traget cells. The initiated cells were revealed as fully transformed foci both in the combination with a chronic promoting treatment and also by allowing cells to perform more rounds of cell replication. The results clearly show that 1,2‐dibromo‐ethane can act as an initiator of cell transformation.

GENOTOXICITY OF CHLOROETHANES AND STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIPS

Chloroethanes are widely produced and utilized compounds and have extensive human exposure. All of them are recognized as being toxic causing damage to the major parenchymous tissues, such as liver, kidney and central nervous system1. Some of them exert mutagenic activity in short-term tests in vitro but their carcinogenicity has not always been adequately evidenced2,3. These compounds require bioactivation to the proximate toxin or carcinogen via metabolism by cytochrome P450-dependent enzymatic systems forming adducts with the genetic material. In some instances, metabolism results in detoxication or inactivation of the bioactive metabolite to innocuous compound, generally through conjugation with GSH4. The aim of this study is to better identify the genotoxic activity of chloroethanes in in vivo and in vitro systems, also in an attempt to validate a cell-free system as a short-term test for carcinogenicity prediction of initiating compounds, and to find structure-activity relationships among compounds belonging to the same chemical class.

Covalent binding of 1,1,1,2‐tetrachloroethane to nucleic acids as evidence of genotoxic activity

Twenty-two hours after ip administration to male Wistar rats and BALB/c mice, 1,1,1,2-tetrachloroethane (1,1,1,2-TTCE) is bound covalently to DNA, RNA, and proteins of liver, lung, kidney, and stomach. The in vivo reactivity leads to binding values to DNA generally higher in mouse organs than in rat organs. The covalent binding index (CBI) values (82 in mouse liver DNA and 40 in rat liver DNA) classify 1,1,1,2-TTCE as a weak to moderate initiator. Both microsomal and cytosolic enzymatic systems from rat and mouse organs are capable of bioactivating 1,1,1,2-TTCE in vitro. Liver fractions are the most effective. When the activating systems are simultaneously present in the incubation mixture a synergistic effect is observed. Unlike the related chemical 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane (1,1,2,2-TTCE), which is bioactivated only through an oxidative route, 1,1,1,2-TTCE metabolism is carried on by oxidative and reductive pathways, both dependent on cytochrome P-450. 1,1,1,2-TTCE is also bioactivated by microsomal GSH-transferases from liver and lung. These data further confirm that correlations exist between structure and genotoxic activity of halocompounds.

The covalent interaction of 1,4-dibromobenzene with rat and mouse nucleic acids: in vivo and in vitro studies

1,4-Dibromobenzene (1,4-DBB) was covalently bound to DNA from liver, kidney, lung and stomach of mice after intraperitoneal administration. The covalent binding index (CBI) value (23 in mouse liver) was typical of weak initiators. On the contrary, no interaction with DNA from rat organs was observed (CBI detection limit: 1.3-2.6). The in vitro interaction of 1,4-DBB with calf thymus DNA was mediated mainly by microsomes, especially those from liver of both species and from mouse lung. Mouse subcellular fractions were more active then rat subcellular fractions. Unlike liver cytosol, subcellular cytosolic fractions from lung, kidney and stomach were capable of bioactivating 1,4-DBB, although to a lesser extent than liver microsomes. Both cytochrome P-450 and GSH-transferases are involved in 1,4-DBB bioactivation.