Silvano Costa

Evaluation of visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA), Lugol's iodine (VILI), cervical cytology and HPV testing as cervical screening tools in Latin America: This report refers to partial results from the LAMS (Latin AMerican Screening) study

Objectives: To assess the performance indicators of visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) and visual inspection with Lugols iodine (VILI) in four Latin American centres participating in the ongoing Latin AMerican Screening (LAMS) study, in settings with moderate incidence of cervical disease and with poorly to moderately well-organized cervical cancer screening. Setting: Three Brazilian centres (São Paulo, Campinas and Porto Alegre) and one Argentine centre (Buenos Aires) recruited a total of 11,834 healthy women to undergo VIA, VILI, conventional Pap smear and Hybrid Capture II (HCII). Methods: Women who had a positive result from any of these tests were subjected to colposcopy and biopsies (if necessary), and women with high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) were properly treated. To control for verification bias, 5% of women with normal tests were referred for colposcopy, as were 20% of HCII-negative women. Results: Data on VIA (n=11,834), VILI (n=2994), conventional Pap smear (n=10,138) and HCII (n=4195) were available for test comparisons, calculating sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values. Overall test positivity was 11.6% for VIA, 23.0% for VILI, 2.2% for Pap smear (LSIL threshold), 1.1% for Pap smear (HSIL threshold) and 17.1% for HCII. VIA was positive in 61.8% of the women with CIN 1, 57.0% of those with CIN 2, 35.0% of women with CIN 3 and in 21 of 28 (75%) of women with cancer. Approximately 10% of women with no detectable disease had an abnormal VIA. Regarding VILI, 83.3% of women diagnosed with CIN 1 and 62.5% of those with CIN 3 had an abnormal test. VILI failed to detect one of three cases of cancer. Both the sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value of VIA and VILI in detecting CIN 2 or CIN 3 could be significantly improved depending on the combination with Pap smear or HCII (sensitivity up to 100.0% and specificity up to 99.8%). Conclusions: The LAMS study failed to reproduce the performance figures obtained with VIA and VILI (as stand-alone tests) in some other settings, where the prevalence of cervical disease was higher. However, a combined use of VIA or VILI with the Pap test or HCII allowed specific detection of cervical abnormalities.

Factors predicting human papillomavirus clearance in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia lesions treated by conization

OBJECTIVE The objective was to identify the factors, if any, that may predict long-term results of CIN treatment and HPV clearance/persistence after locally excisional therapy. METHODS A series of 252 women with CIN lesions treated by conization were subjected to sequential HPV detection by repeated PCR during the prospective posttreatment follow-up. Factors predicting viral clearance during the follow-up (10.26 months) were elaborated using univariate and multivariate statistical techniques applied on epidemiological, clinical and biological data of the lesions. RESULTS Sensitivity of the PAP test in detecting high-grade lesions was 93.9%, and specificity 27.3%. Odds ratio for having CIN 3/Stage IA1 squamous cervical cancer in the cone with HSIL PAP test was 5.69; 77.8 and 22.2% residual disease were found among PCR-positive and -negative cases, respectively. HPV DNA was negative in 74/252 (29.8%) samples at the first PCR. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that HPV 16 was an independent explanatory factor for high-grade CIN (P = 0.0001). HPV clearance increased to 63.5% at completion of the follow-up, corresponding to the monthly clearance rate of 5.27%. In Kaplan-Meier analysis, the highly significant (P = 0.0001) predictors of HPV clearance/persistence were age, lesion grade in the biopsy, lesion grade in the cone, volume of the cone, length of active sexual life, and involvement of endocervical margin (P = 0.0013). In chi-square tests, high-risk HPV type (P = 0.001) was such a predictor. In multivariate (Cox) model, the significant independent predictors of HPV clearance were involved endocervical margin (P = 0.001), lesion grade in the cone (P = 0.004), high-grade lesion in the colposcopic biopsy (P = 0.023), age (P = 0.029), and HSIL in PAP smear (P = 0.029). CONCLUSIONS These data suggest that posttreatment follow-up should include both the PAP test and HPV detection techniques for early detection of any patients at increased risk for disease recurrence and progression, because of persistent oncogenic HPV types.

p16INK4A expression is related to grade of CIN and high-risk human papillomavirus but does not predict virus clearance after conization or disease outcome

The role of p16INK4a as a marker of HR-HPV and in the diagnosis of CIN has been well established, but its predictive value in the clearance of the virus after CIN treatment and its use as a prognostic marker of cervical cancer has not been studied. A series of 302 archival samples, including 150 squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) and 152 CIN lesions, were subjected to immunohistochemical staining for p16INK4a and HPV testing using PCR with three primer sets (MY09/11, GP5+/GP6+, SPF). Follow-up data were available of 88 SCC patients, and 67 of the CIN lesions had been followed-up with serial PCR after conization. HR-HPV types were closely associated with CIN (OR 19.12; 95%CI 2.31–157.81) and SCC (OR 27.25; 95%CI 3.28–226.09). There was a significant linear relationship between the lesion grade and intensity of p16INK4a staining (p = 0.0001). The expression of p16INK4a was also closely related to HR-HPV (p = 0.0001). p16INK4a staining was a 100% specific indicator of CIN, with 100% PPV, and showed 83.5% sensitivity and 80.1% PPV in detecting HR-HPV. However, p16INK4a staining did not predict clearance/persistence of HR-HPV after treatment of CIN. Similarly, despite a slightly more favorable survival in women with strong/intense p16INK4a staining in univariate analysis, p16INK4a expression was not an independent prognostic predictor in multivariate survival (Cox) analysis. After adjustment for p16INK4a staining, HR-HPV, histological grade, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage, and age, only the last two were significant prognostic predictors (p = 0.0001 and p = 0.003, respectively). The present data confirm the role of p16INK4a as a highly specific marker of CIN and HR-HPV type, but expression of this protein does not seem to be of any prognostic value in cervical cancer or in predicting the clearance of HR-HPV after treatment of CIN. We speculate that different subgroups of cervical cancer are characterized by aberrant p16INK4a/cyclin D/Rb pathways that are due to different mechanisms that can be mutually exclusive.

Distribution and viral load of type specific HPVs in different cervical lesions as detected by PCR-ELISA.

Aims—To investigate the distribution and viral load of the most prevalent high risk human papillomavirus (HPV) types 16, 18, 31, 33, and 45 and low risk HPV types 6 and 11 in a variety of cervical lesions. Methods—One hundred and seventy six cytological specimens from women with different cervical lesions were investigated. For an accurate standardisation of the sample, cervical cells were counted and a volume of the cell suspension processed by polymerase chain reaction-enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (PCR-ELISA). Semiquantitative determinations were achieved in relation to an external reference titration curve. Results—HPV DNA was detected in 60.2% of the samples. HPV-16 was the prevalent genotype (57.6%), followed by HPV-33, HPV-31, HPV-6, HPV-18, and HPV-45. HPV-11 was not detected. HPV-16 showed a pronounced increase in prevalence with the evolution of cervical disease. Semiquantitative evaluation of the results showed that only HPV-16 DNA could reach very high values (> 1000 genome copies/cell) and a very high HPV-16 load correlated with the severity of cervical disease. Conclusions—Only HPV-16 load appears to be associated with the severity of cervical disease.

Survivin as a Marker of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia and High-Risk Human Papillomavirus and a Predictor of Virus Clearance and Prognosis in Cervical Cancer

We analyzed survivin as a marker of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) and a predictor of HPV clearance and disease outcome in cervical cancer in 302 samples (squamous cell carcinomas [SCCs], 150; CIN lesions, 152) by immunohistochemical staining with survivin antibody and HPV testing using polymerase chain reaction. HR-HPV types were associated closely with CIN and SCC. There was a significant linear relationship between grade and intensity of survivin expression (P = .0001). Survivin overexpression also was associated strongly with HR-HPV type (P = .0001). Multivariate regression analysis revealed survivin and p16(INK4a) as equally strong independent predictors of HR-HPV. Deregulated survivin expression did not predict clearance or persistence of HR-HPV after treatment of CIN or survival in cervical cancer in univariate (P = .417) or multivariate analysis. After adjustment for HR-HPV, stage, age, and tumor grade in the Cox regression model, only stage (P = .0001) and age (P = .0001) remained independent prognostic predictors. Survivin seems to be an early marker of cervical carcinogenesis. Up-regulated survivin expression was an independent predictor of HR-HPV in cervical lesions, most plausibly explained by its normal transcriptional repression by wild-type p53 being eliminated by HR-HPV E6 oncoprotein.

Cervical and hysteroscopic injection for identification of sentinel lymph node in endometrial cancer

OBJECTIVES The aims of our study were to evaluate the possibility of identifying the sentinel lymph node (SLN) in patients with endometrial cancer (EC) and to directly compare two injection techniques, cervical and hysteroscopic injection. METHODS Fifty-four patients with endometrial carcinoma, clinical stages I and II, were submitted to complete surgical staging through laparoscopy, as recommended by FIGO in 1988. For the mapping procedure the patients were divided into two groups of injection: the cervical injection group and hysteroscopic injection group. Technetium (Tc) 99m radiocolloid was used as tracer. RESULTS Intraoperative detection rate of SLN was 70% in cervical group and 65% in the hysteroscopic group (p=n.s.). In the cervical group, all patients had SLN in the pelvis only and the mean SLN removed was 18 (range 2-26). In the hysteroscopic group, all patients had SNLs in the pelvis and two patients had SLN both in the pelvis and above the bifurcation of the aorta. Mean pelvic SLN removed was 20 (range 8-42). CONCLUSIONS Our data shows that it is possible to identify the SLN in tumours of the endometrium. Both cervical and hysteroscopic techniques are feasible but the hysteroscopic procedure might represent the only method able to highlight the complete lymphatic drainage of the uterus as suggested by the presence of paraaortic positive SLN only in this group.

Activation of the ERK/MAP kinase pathway in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia is related to grade of the lesion but not to high-risk human papillomavirus, virus clearance, or prognosis in cervical cancer.

We subjected 302 archival samples (150 squamous cell carcinomas [SCCs] and 152 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia [CIN] lesions) to immunohistochemical staining with extracellular signal-regulated kinase-1 (ERK1) antibody and human papillomavirus (HPV) testing with 3 primer sets. Follow-up data were available for all SCC cases and 67 CIN cases. High-risk (HR) HPV types were associated with CIN (odds ratio [OR], 19.12; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.31-157.81) and SCC (OR, 27.25; 95% CI, 3.28226.09). There was a significant linear relationship between lesion grade and ERK1 staining intensity (P = .0001). ERK1 staining was a 100% specific indicator of CIN, with a 100% positive predictive value, but a poor predictor of HR HPV. ERK1 expression did not predict clearance or persistence of HR HPV after CIN treatment. ERK1 staining did not significantly predict survival in cervical cancer in univariate (P = .915) or multivariate analysis. After adjustment for HR HPV, stage, age, and tumor grade in the Cox regression model, only stage (P = .0001) and age (P = .002) remained independent prognostic factors. ERK1 expression seems to be an early marker of cervical carcinogenesis. ERK1 overexpression is not a specific marker of HR-HPV in CIN and cervical cancer, nor does it predict virus clearance after CIN treatment or disease outcome in cervical cancer.

Correlation of high-risk human papillomavirus genotypes persistence and risk of residual or recurrent cervical disease after surgical treatment

The evidence on genotype‐specific risk in women infected with human papillomavirus (HPV) with normal cytology and the importance of the distinction of high‐risk (HR)‐HPV genotypes in the management of low‐grade lesions suggest that the distinction of HR‐HPV genotypes has the potential to improve the follow‐up of patients treated for high‐grade cervical lesions. The aims of this study were to define the persistence of the different HR‐HPV in the follow‐up of surgical treated women, to detect the changes of genotypes from the pre‐ to the post‐operative status, and to evaluate whether genotype‐specific persistence can predict the development of residual or recurrent disease during the follow‐up. HR‐HPV detection and genotyping was carried out by the Linear Array HPV Genotyping Test® on cervical cytological samples from 72 women treated by surgery. The 6‐month post‐operative HPV status was correlated with the pre‐operative HPV genotype and with the residual or recurrent disease within 24 months. It was observed that the residual or recurrent disease in women with persistence of HPV 16 and/or HPV 18 was higher (82.4%) than in women with persistence of at least one HR‐HPV type of group 2 (HPV 31, 33, 35, 45, 52, and 58) (66.7%) and at least one type of group 3 (HPV 39, 51, 56, 59, 68, 26, 53, 66, 73, and 82) (14.3%). These data defined HR‐HPV groups for the risk of progression of disease and suggested that the identification of persistent infection with different HR‐HPV genotypes has the potential to improve the management of these patients. J. Med. Virol. 80:1434–1440, 2008.

Aberrant expression of VEGF-C is related to grade of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and high risk HPV, but does not predict virus clearance after treatment of CIN or prognosis of cervical cancer

Aims: Increased angiogenesis leads to invasion in cervical cancer. Vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGFs) are involved in angiogenesis, but molecular links to the most important aetiological agent, human papillomavirus (HPV), need clarifying. Material/Methods: Archival samples—150 squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) and 152 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) lesions—were examined immunohistochemically for anti-VEGF-C antibody and for HPV by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Follow up data were available for all SCC cases, and 67 CIN lesions were monitored with serial PCR to assess HPV clearance/persistence after treatment. Results: High risk (HR) HPV types were closely associated with CIN (odds ratio, 19.12; 95% confidence interval, 2.31 to 157.81) and SCC (27.25; 3.28 to 226.09). There was a linear increase of VEGF-C expression—weak in CIN1 and intense in CIN3 and SCC (20.49; 8.69 to 48.26). VEGF-C upregulation was a sensitive (93.5%; 95% CI, 90.1% to 96.9%) marker of HR-HPV type (4.70; 2.17 to 10.21), but lost its significance in multivariate regression—p16INK4a and survivin were equally strong independent predictors of HR-HPV. Aberrant expression of VEGF-C did not predict clearance/persistence of HR-HPV after treatment of CIN. In cervical cancer, VEGF-C had no prognostic value in univariate or multivariate survival analysis. After adjustment for HR-HPV, FIGO stage, age, and tumour grade, only FIGO stage and age remained independent prognostic predictors. Conclusions: VEGF-C is an early marker of cervical carcinogenesis, with linearly increasing expression starting from low grade CIN. VEGF-C expression is closely related to HR-HPV in cervical lesions, probably because of its p53 independent upregulation by the E6 oncoprotein of HR-HPV.

Disruption of HPV 16 E1 and E2 genes in precancerous cervical lesions

The presence of HPV 16 E1 and E2 genes was detected in cervical cytological samples using polymerase chain reaction assays. A total of 48 samples were analyzed from patients with HPV 16 infections associated with 13 low-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and 35 high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Disruption/deletion sites, within E1 and E2 genes, were detected using 6 primer pairs spanning the entire gene sequences. This technique is not able to recognize mixed DNA forms (integrated plus episomal DNA); therefore, it detects only the presence of pure integrated DNA. Both E1 and E2 genes were detected in 84.6% and in 62.9% of low and high-grade lesions, respectively. The rate of samples with disrupted/deleted genes was significantly higher in high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia than in low-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (P<0.05). In high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia the disruption/deletion pattern involved both E1 and E2 genes and E2 gene was always involved, while in the low grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia only E1 gene was involved. In conclusion, in high-grade cervical lesions E2 gene seems a suitable target to identify HPV 16 DNA integration into cellular genome.