Silvia Magni-Manzoni

Development and validation of a composite disease activity score for juvenile idiopathic arthritis

OBJECTIVE To develop and validate a composite disease activity score for juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), the Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score (JADAS). METHODS The JADAS includes 4 measures: physician global assessment of disease activity, parent/patient global assessment of well-being, active joint count, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate. These variables are part of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30 (Pedi 30), Pedi 50, and Pedi 70 criteria for improvement. Validation analyses were conducted on >4,500 patients and included assessment of construct validity, discriminant validity, and responsiveness to change. Three versions of the JADAS were tested based on 71-joint (range 0-101), 27-joint (range 0-57), or 10-joint (range 0-40) counts. Statistical performances of the JADAS were compared with those of 2 rheumatoid arthritis composite scores, the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28) and the Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI). RESULTS The JADAS demonstrated good construct validity, yielding strong correlations with JIA activity measures not included in the score and moderate correlations with the Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire. Correlations obtained for the 3 JADAS versions were comparable, but superior to those yielded by the DAS28 and CDAI. The area under the curve of the JADAS predicted long-term disease outcome, measured as radiographic progression over 3 years. In 2 clinical trials, the JADAS discriminated well between ACR Pedi 30, Pedi 50, and Pedi 70 response and revealed strong responsiveness to clinical change. CONCLUSION The JADAS was found to be a valid instrument for assessment of disease activity in JIA and is potentially applicable in standard clinical care, observational studies, and clinical trials.

Long-term outcome and prognostic factors of juvenile dermatomyositis: A multinational, multicenter study of 490 patients

To investigate the long‐term outcome and prognostic factors of juvenile dermatomyositis (DM) through a multinational, multicenter study.

Macrophage activation syndrome in juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus: A multinational multicenter study of thirty‐eight patients

OBJECTIVE To describe the clinical and laboratory features of macrophage activation syndrome as a complication of juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). METHODS Cases of juvenile SLE-associated macrophage activation syndrome were provided by investigators belonging to 3 pediatric rheumatology networks or were found in the literature. Patients who had evidence of macrophage hemophagocytosis on bone marrow aspiration were considered to have definite macrophage activation syndrome, and those who did not have such evidence were considered to have probable macrophage activation syndrome. Clinical and laboratory findings in patients with macrophage activation syndrome were contrasted with those of 2 control groups composed of patients with active juvenile SLE without macrophage activation syndrome. The ability of each feature to discriminate macrophage activation syndrome from active disease was evaluated by calculating sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. RESULTS The study included 38 patients (20 with definite macrophage activation syndrome and 18 with probable macrophage activation syndrome). Patients with definite and probable macrophage activation syndrome were comparable with regard to all clinical and laboratory features of the syndrome, except for a greater frequency of lymphadenopathy, leukopenia, and thrombocytopenia in patients with definite macrophage activation syndrome. Overall, clinical features had better specificity than sensitivity, except for fever, which was highly sensitive but had low specificity. Among laboratory features, the best sensitivity and specificity was achieved using hyperferritinemia, followed by increased levels of lactate dehydrogenase, hypertriglyceridemia, and hypofibrinogenemia. Based on the results of statistical analysis, preliminary diagnostic guidelines for macrophage activation syndrome in juvenile SLE were developed. CONCLUSION Our findings indicate that the occurrence of unexplained fever and cytopenia, when associated with hyperferritinemia, in a patient with juvenile SLE should raise the suspicion of macrophage activation syndrome. We propose preliminary guidelines for this syndrome in juvenile SLE to facilitate timely diagnosis and correct classification of patients.

Comparison of Clinical Versus Ultrasound-Determined Synovitis in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

OBJECTIVE To compare clinical evaluation and ultrasonography (US) in the assessment of joint synovitis in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). METHODS Thirty-two patients underwent clinical evaluation of 52 joints by 2 pediatric rheumatologists. Joints were assessed for swelling, tenderness/pain on motion, and restricted motion. The same joints were scanned independently by an experienced sonographer for synovial hyperplasia, joint effusion, and power Doppler (PD) signal. RESULTS In total, 1,664 joints were assessed both clinically and with US. On clinical examination, 98 joints (5.9%) were swollen, 59 joints (3.5%) were tender, and 40 joints (2.4%) had restricted motion. On US evaluation, 125 joints (7.5%) had synovial hyperplasia, 153 joints (9.2%) had joint effusion, and 53 joints (3.2%) had PD signal. A total of 104 (6.3%) and 167 (10%) joints had clinical and US synovitis, respectively. Of the 1,560 clinically normal joints, 86 (5.5%) had subclinical synovitis (i.e., had synovitis on US). US led to classifying 5 patients as having polyarthritis who were classified as having oligoarthritis or were found to have no synovitis on clinical evaluation. US variables were moderately correlated with clinical measures of joint swelling, but poorly correlated with those of joint tenderness/pain on motion and restricted motion. Overall, correlations were lower for PD signal than for synovial hyperplasia and joint effusion. CONCLUSION We found that subclinical synovitis as detected by US is common in children with JIA. This finding may have important implications for patient classification and may affect the choice of the optimal therapeutic strategy in individual patients.

A New Approach to Clinical Care of Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: The Juvenile Arthritis Multidimensional Assessment Report

Objective. To develop and test a new multidimensional questionnaire for assessment of children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) in standard clinical care. Methods. The Juvenile Arthritis Multidimensional Assessment Report (JAMAR) includes 15 parent or patient-centered measures or items that assess well-being, pain, functional status, health-related quality of life, morning stiffness, disease activity, disease status and course, joint disease, extraarticular symptoms, side effects of medications, therapeutic compliance, and satisfaction with illness outcome. The JAMAR is proposed for use as both a proxy-report and a patient self-report, with the suggested age range of 7–18 years for use as a self-report. From March 2007 to September 2009, the questionnaire was completed by the parents of 618 children with JIA in 1814 visits and by 332 children in 749 visits. Results. The JAMAR was found to be feasible and to possess face and content validity. All parents and children reported that the questionnaire was simple and easy to understand. Completion and scoring appeared to be quick, requiring < 15 minutes. There were very few missing data. Parents’ proxy-reported and children’s self-reported data were remarkably concordant. The JAMAR provided thorough information for the study patients about recent medical history and current health status. It performed similarly across different children’s ages and characterized the level of disease activity and disability well. Conclusion. The development of the JAMAR introduces a new approach in pediatric rheumatology practice. This new questionnaire may help enhance the quality of care of children with JIA.

Antinuclear antibody–positive patients should be grouped as a separate category in the classification of juvenile idiopathic arthritis

OBJECTIVE We undertook this study to test the hypothesis that in the International League of Associations for Rheumatology (ILAR) classification of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), patients with similar characteristics can be classified into different categories. We sought to investigate whether antinuclear antibody (ANA)-positive patients having disease in the ILAR categories of oligoarthritis, rheumatoid factor-negative polyarthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and undifferentiated arthritis share homogeneous features and to compare these features with those of ANA-negative patients having the same categories of disease. METHODS We identified JIA patients who had been followed up during a 22-year period. ANA positivity was defined as ≥2 positive results at a titer of ≥1:160. Demographic and clinical features were recorded retrospectively and compared between ANA-positive and ANA-negative patients. RESULTS Of a total of 971 patients, 711 were ANA positive, 149 were ANA negative, and 111 had an indeterminate ANA status. Patients with indeterminate ANA status were excluded. ANA-positive patients in the different ILAR categories were similar in terms of age at disease presentation, female-to-male ratio, and frequency of asymmetric arthritis and iridocyclitis. Compared with ANA-positive patients, the ANA-negative group was older at disease presentation and had a lower prevalence of females, a lower frequency of iridocyclitis and asymmetric arthritis, a greater number of affected joints over time, and a different pattern of arthritis. The close relationship between the presence of ANAs and younger age at disease presentation, female predominance, asymmetric arthritis, development of iridocyclitis, lower number of affected joints over time, and lack of hip involvement was also confirmed by multivariate and multiple correspondence analysis. CONCLUSION Our findings substantiate the hypothesis that ANA-positive patients classified into different JIA categories by current ILAR criteria constitute a homogeneous patient population.

Development and validation of a preliminary definition of minimal disease activity in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis

OBJECTIVE To develop and validate a definition of minimal disease activity (MDA) in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). METHODS The clinical charts of JIA patients followed over a 16-year period were reviewed to identify visits with high disease activity and MDA, defined on the basis of therapeutic decisions made by the attending physician. For each JIA activity measure recorded at the time of the visit, the cutoff value that best identified states of MDA was calculated by means of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. A definition of MDA for oligoarthritis and polyarthritis was set up after testing the relative power of each variable in a multivariate analysis. Validation procedures included assessment of discriminant and construct validity. RESULTS The definition that resulted from the analyses led to establish that a state of MDA could be defined as the presence of a physician global assessment < or =2.5 cm and a swollen joint count of 0 in patients with oligoarthritis; and as the presence of a physician global assessment < or =3.4 cm, a parent global assessment < or =2.1 cm, and a swollen joint count < or =1 in patients with polyarthritis. Validation procedures demonstrated that the MDA definition had good discriminant and construct validity in the context of both observational studies and controlled trials. CONCLUSION We developed a preliminary definition of MDA in patients with JIA that represents a useful treatment target state and is proposed for inclusion as an outcome measure in future observational studies and clinical trials in patients with JIA.

Evaluation of 21-Numbered Circle and 10-Centimeter Horizontal Line Visual Analog Scales for Physician and Parent Subjective Ratings in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

Objective. To evaluate the measurement properties of 21-numbered circle visual analog scales (VAS) and traditional 10-cm horizontal line VAS for physician and parent subjective ratings in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). Methods. We studied 2 patient samples in whom physician global rating of overall disease activity, parent global rating of the child’s overall well-being, and parent rating of intensity of child’s pain were performed using traditional 10-cm horizontal line VAS (n = 397) or 21-numbered circle VAS (n = 471). The measurement performances of the 2 VAS formats were examined by assessing construct validity, score distribution, responsiveness to change over time, and minimal clinically important difference (MCID). Results. Most Spearman correlations with other JIA outcome measures yielded by 21-numbered circle VAS were greater than those obtained with 10-cm horizontal line VAS, revealing that the circle VAS format has better construct validity. Ceiling effects (i.e., score = 0) for physician and parent global ratings were 43.7% and 32.9%, respectively, on 21-numbered circle VAS, and 31.6% and 35.3%, respectively, on 10-cm horizontal line VAS. Responsiveness of 21-numbered circle VAS was good (standardized response mean > 0.8) or moderate (standardized response mean > 0.6) among patients classified as improved or worsened, respectively, by the physician or the parent. Overall, MCID values for 21-numbered circle VAS tended to be greater for worsening than for improvement. Conclusion. The 21-numbered circle VAS are a suitable alternative to the 10-cm horizontal line VAS and may facilitate incorporation of physician and parent subjective ratings in standard clinical practice.

Phagocyte-specific S100 proteins and high-sensitivity C reactive protein as biomarkers for a risk-adapted treatment to maintain remission in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a comparative study

Objectives Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is a chronic inflammatory joint disease affecting children. Even if remission is successfully induced, about half of the patients experience a relapse after stopping anti-inflammatory therapy. The present study investigated whether patients with JIA at risk of relapse can be identified by biomarkers even if clinical signs of disease activity are absent. Methods Patients fulfilling the criteria of inactive disease on medication were included at the time when all medication was withdrawn. The phagocyte activation markers S100A12 and myeloid-related proteins 8/14 (MRP8/14) were compared as well as the acute phase reactant high-sensitivity C reactive protein (hsCRP) as predictive biomarkers for the risk of a flare within a time frame of 6 months. Results 35 of 188 enrolled patients experienced a flare within 6 months. Clinical or standard laboratory parameters could not differentiate between patients at risk of relapse and those not at risk. S100A12 and MRP8/14 levels were significantly higher in patients who subsequently developed flares than in patients with stable remission. The best single biomarker for the prediction of flare was S100A12 (HR 2.81). The predictive performance may be improved if a combination with hsCRP is used. Conclusions Subclinical disease activity may result in unstable remission (ie, a status of clinical but not immunological remission). Biomarkers such as S100A12 and MRP8/14 inform about the activation status of innate immunity at the molecular level and thereby identify patients with unstable remission and an increased risk of relapse.

Macrophage migration inhibitory factor in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis

OBJECTIVE To evaluate serum and synovial fluid (SF) levels of macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) and in vitro MIF production by peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). METHODS Serum, SF, and culture supernatant levels of MIF were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Production of MIF by PBMCs was investigated by culturing PBMCs in the absence or presence of 2 different concentrations of concanavalin A. RESULTS Serum MIF levels were increased in patients with JIA, and the highest levels were present in patients with systemic-onset JIA. In systemic-onset JIA, serum levels of MIF correlated with the persistence of systemic features and the number of active joints. PBMCs from patients with systemic-onset JIA, when cultured under unstimulated conditions or at suboptimal stimulation, released higher amounts of MIF compared with those from patients with oligoarticular-onset JIA or healthy controls. MIF levels in the SF of patients with systemic-onset JIA were significantly higher than those in patients with oligoarticular-onset JIA. In individual joints, in both systemic-onset JIA and oligoarticular-onset JIA, SF MIF levels were inversely correlated with the duration of the clinical remission induced by intraarticular administration of triamcinolone hexacetonide. CONCLUSION MIF appears to be a relevant cytokine in the pathogenesis of JIA, particularly in systemic-onset JIA.