Silvy Lachance

High incidence of herpes zoster in nonmyeloablative hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Although the use of nonmyeloablative (NMA) hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) regimens has expanded in the past decade, little data exist to support antiviral prophylaxis to prevent herpes zoster (HZ) in recipients who are seropositive for varicella-zoster virus in this population. The present study examined the clinical features, incidence, and risk factors for HZ in a homogeneous cohort of NMA allogeneic HSCT recipients. We conducted a retrospective cohort study assessing all patients who underwent sibling NMA HSCT at Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital (Montreal) between July 2000 and December 2008. All patients received the same conditioning regimen, immunoprophylaxis, and graft-versus-host disease therapy. The diagnosis of HZ was defined clinically. Factors associated with HZ were identified using a Cox proportional hazards model. A total of 179 patients were followed for a median of 33 months (interquartile range, 21-59). HZ developed in 66 patients (37%) at a median of 8.3 months post-HSCT; the incidence rate was 175 cases/1000 person-years. The estimated cumulative HZ incidence was 27% at 1 year, 36% at 2 years, and 44% at 3 years. Thoracic dermatomes were most frequently involved (30%); dissemination occurred in 5 patients. No deaths resulted from HZ, but 23% of patients developed postherpetic neuralgia. In multivariate analysis, reactivation of cytomegalovirus and herpes simplex virus was associated with a reduced likelihood of HZ (hazard ratio, 0.54 and 0.33, respectively). Antiviral prophylaxis or treatment for cytomegalovirus and herpes simplex virus reactivations were protective against HZ. The incidence of HZ in our cohort of NMA HSCT recipients is similar to the incidence reported in HSCT recipients who received a myeloablative conditioning regimen. Given the observed high risk, we conclude that recommendations for antiviral prophylaxis should apply, at least for the first year, to the NMA HSCT population as well.

Tandem Autologous–Allogeneic Nonmyeloablative Sibling Transplantation in Relapsed Follicular Lymphoma Leads to Impressive Progression-Free Survival with Minimal Toxicity

Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) prolongs survival in patients with relapsed follicular lymphoma. ASCT is usually not curative, however. Myeloablative allogeneic transplantation has produced long-term survival at a cost of significant transplantation-related mortality (TRM), whereas reduced-intensity transplantation entails less TRM but has a higher relapse rate. We thus initiated a protocol consisting of ASCT followed by nonmyeloablative allogeneic transplantation (NMT) for relapsed follicular lymphoma to mimic myeloablative allogeneic transplantation without the associated toxicity. The NMT was non-T cell-depleted, and all donors were HLA-identical siblings. We report results in 27 patients with a median age of 49 years (range, 34-65 years). Five patients demonstrated histological progression toward an aggressive lymphoma. The patients had received a median of 3 lines of previous therapy. Disease status before ASCT included 8 patients in complete remission, 14 in partial remission, and 5 refractory. Five patients developed grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease, and 20 patients developed chronic graft-versus-host disease requiring systemic therapy. With a median follow-up of 39 months after NMT, overall survival and progression-free survival were 96% at 3 years. We conclude that the combined ASCT-NMT strategy appears to be safe, with excellent progression-free survival even in refractory and transformed cases. This novel approach warrants further investigation in larger prospective studies.

Opportunities and challenges for the cellular immunotherapy sector: a global landscape of clinical trials

Global investments in cellular immunotherapies reflect their curative potential. Our landscape of clinical trials will aid developers, investors, adopters and payers in planning for adoption and implementation along realistic time horizons. Trend data enable stakeholders to adapt their business models and capacity to bring immunotherapies to the clinic. For cancer, trends suggest a shift from cancer vaccines to adoptive cellular transfer, alongside a focus on solid tumors. Academic centers, mainly in the USA, lead in early-phase clinical trials and target identification; but industry involvement has increased fourfold over the past two decades. Trends indicate an increasingly personalized approach to onco-immunology, which raises challenges for cost-effective manufacturing and delivery models. Overcoming these challenges provides opportunities for innovative biotechnology firms.

Tools for the Precision Medicine Era: How to Develop Highly Personalized Treatment Recommendations from Cohort and Registry Data Using Q-Learning

Q-learning is a method of reinforcement learning that employs backwards stagewise estimation to identify sequences of actions that maximize some long-term reward. The method can be applied to sequential multiple-assignment randomized trials to develop personalized adaptive treatment strategies (ATSs)-longitudinal practice guidelines highly tailored to time-varying attributes of individual patients. Sometimes, the basis for choosing which ATSs to include in a sequential multiple-assignment randomized trial (or randomized controlled trial) may be inadequate. Nonrandomized data sources may inform the initial design of ATSs, which could later be prospectively validated. In this paper, we illustrate challenges involved in using nonrandomized data for this purpose with a case study from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research registry (1995-2007) aimed at 1) determining whether the sequence of therapeutic classes used in graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis and in refractory graft-versus-host disease is associated with improved survival and 2) identifying donor and patient factors with which to guide individualized immunosuppressant selections over time. We discuss how to communicate the potential benefit derived from following an ATS at the population and subgroup levels and how to evaluate its robustness to modeling assumptions. This worked example may serve as a model for developing ATSs from registries and cohorts in oncology and other fields requiring sequential treatment decisions.

More Haste, Less Speed: Could Public–Private Partnerships Advance Cellular Immunotherapies?

Cellular immunotherapies promise to transform cancer care. However, they must overcome serious challenges, including: (1) the need to identify and characterize novel cancer antigens to expand the range of therapeutic targets; (2) the need to develop strategies to minimize serious adverse events, such as cytokine release syndrome and treatment-related toxicities; and (3) the need to develop efficient production/manufacturing processes to reduce costs. Here, we discuss whether these challenges might better be addressed through forms of public–private research collaborations, including public–private partnerships (PPPs), or whether these challenges are best addressed by way of standard market transactions. We reviewed 14 public–private relationships and 25 underlying agreements for the clinical development of cancer cellular immunotherapies in the US. Most were based on bilateral research agreements and pure market transactions in the form of service contracts and technology licenses, which is representative of the commercialization focus of the field. We make the strategic case that multiparty PPPs may better advance cancer antigen discovery and characterization and improved cell processing/manufacturing and related activities. In the rush toward the competitive end of the translational continuum for cancer cellular immunotherapy and the attendant focus on commercialization, many gaps have appeared in our understanding of cellular biology, immunology, and bioengineering. We conclude that the model of bilateral agreements between leading research institutions and the private sector may be inadequate to efficiently harness the interdisciplinary skills and knowledge of the public and private sectors to bring these promising therapies to the clinic for the benefit of cancer patients.