Sima Hay
St George's Hospital
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Sima Hay.
BMJ | 2010
Pippa Oakeshott; Sally Kerry; Adamma Aghaizu; Helen Atherton; Sima Hay; David Taylor-Robinson; Ian Simms; Phillip Hay
Objective To determine whether screening and treating women for chlamydial infection reduces the incidence of pelvic inflammatory disease over the subsequent 12 months. Design Randomised controlled trial. Setting Common rooms, lecture theatres, and student bars at universities and further education colleges in London. Participants 2529 sexually active female students, mean age 21 years (range 16-27). Intervention Participants completed a questionnaire and provided self taken vaginal swabs, with follow-up after one year. Samples were randomly allocated to immediate testing and treatment for chlamydial infection, or storage and analysis after a year (deferred screening controls). Main outcome measure Incidence of clinical pelvic inflammatory disease over 12 months. Results Baseline prevalence of chlamydia was 5.4% (68/1254) in screened women and 5.9% (75/1265) in controls. 94% (2377/2529) of women were followed up after 12 months. The incidence of pelvic inflammatory disease was 1.3% (15/1191) in screened women compared with 1.9% (23/1186) in controls (relative risk 0.65, 95% confidence interval 0.34 to 1.22). Seven of 74 control women (9.5%, 95% confidence interval 4.7% to 18.3%) who tested positive for chlamydial infection at baseline developed pelvic inflammatory disease over 12 months compared with one of 63 (1.6%) screened women (relative risk 0.17, 0.03 to 1.01). However, most episodes of pelvic inflammatory disease occurred in women who tested negative for chlamydia at baseline (79%, 30/38). 22% (527/2377) of women reported being tested independently for chlamydia during the trial. Conclusion Although some evidence suggests that screening for chlamydia reduces rates of pelvic inflammatory disease, especially in women with chlamydial infection at baseline, the effectiveness of a single chlamydia test in preventing pelvic inflammatory disease over 12 months may have been overestimated. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00115388.
British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology | 2004
Pippa Oakeshott; Phillip Hay; David Taylor-Robinson; Sima Hay; Sally Kerry; Jørgen Skov Jensen
Mycoplasma genitalium is associated with cervicitis and pelvic inflammatory disease but little is known about its role in pregnancy. We investigated the prevalence of M. genitalium by polymerase chain reaction assay on urine specimens from 1216 pregnant women (mean age 31years) presenting before 10 weeks of gestation in 32 general practices. The prevalence of M. genitalium was 0.7% (6/915, 95% CI 0.1–1.2). It was more common in women aged <20 years, women of Afro‐Caribbean or black African ethnic origin, women in social classes 3–5 and single women. Only one woman with M. genitalium infection miscarried, and none of those followed up to term had a preterm birth, although the numbers were small. The low prevalence of M. genitalium infection suggests it is unlikely to be an important risk factor in adverse pregnancy outcome in healthy women in the community.
BMJ | 1998
Pippa Oakeshott; Sally Kerry; Sima Hay; Phillip Hay
We thank the participating general practitioners. Contributors: BA coordinated the primary study hypothesis and the core ideas, designed the protocol, obtained approval from the ethics committee, coordinated inclusion of patients, scanned the data, and coordinated the interpretation of results and writing of the paper. Ly discussed the primary hypothesis, core ideas, analysis, and protocol design and participated in the interpretation of results and writing of the paper. JKM discussed the hypothesis and ideas, led the analysis of the samples obtained, participated in the interpretation of results, and edited the paper. FO discussed the hypothesis and core ideas and par› ticipated in the protocol design, coordination of contact with the general practitioners, the interpretation of results, and the writ› ing of the paper. FO is the guarantor of the paper. Funding: University of Aarhus, Denmark and Nycomed
Trials | 2008
Pippa Oakeshott; Sally Kerry; Helen Atherton; Adamma Aghaizu; Sima Hay; David Taylor-Robinson; Ian Simms; Phillip Hay
BackgroundPelvic inflammatory disease (PID) is common and can lead to tubal factor infertility, ectopic pregnancy or chronic pelvic pain. Despite major UK government investment in the National Chlamydia Screening Programme, evidence of benefit remains controversial. The main aim of this trial was to investigate whether screening and treatment of chlamydial infection reduced the incidence of PID over 12 months. Secondary aims were to conduct exploratory studies of the role of bacterial vaginosis (BV) in the development of PID and of the natural history of chlamydial infection.DesignRandomised controlled trial with follow up after 12 months.Setting non-healthcareCommon rooms and lecture theatres at 20 universities and further education colleges in Greater London.Participants2500 sexually active female students were asked to complete a questionnaire on sexual health and provide self-administered vaginal swabs and smears.InterventionVaginal swabs from intervention women were tested for chlamydia by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and those infected referred for treatment. Vaginal swabs from control women were stored and analysed after a year. Vaginal smears were Gram stained and analysed for BV.Main outcome measureIncidence of clinical PID over 12 months in intervention and control groups. Possible cases of PID will be identified from questionnaires and record searches. Confirmation of the diagnosis will be done by detailed review of medical records by three independent researchers blind to whether the woman is in intervention or control group.Trial registrationClinical Trials NCT 00115388
BMJ | 2002
Pippa Oakeshott; Phillip Hay; Sima Hay; Frances Steinke; Elizabeth Rink; Sally Kerry
British Journal of General Practice | 2004
Pippa Oakeshott; Sally Kerry; Sima Hay; Phillip Hay
British Journal of General Practice | 2002
Pippa Oakeshott; Phillip Hay; Sima Hay; Frances Steinke; Elizabeth Rink; Brenda Thomas; Penny Oakeley; Sally Kerry
Family Practice | 2006
Stella Ivaz; Sarah Brennan; Sally C Dean; Sima Hay; Phillip Hay; Sally Kerry; Pippa Oakeshott
Family Practice | 2000
Pippa Oakeshott; Sally Kerry; Sima Hay; Phillip Hay
Family Practice | 2004
Sima Hay; Phillip Hay; Pippa Oakeshott