Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Sima Sandhu is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Sima Sandhu.


BMC Public Health | 2011

Good practice in health care for migrants: views and experiences of care professionals in 16 European countries

Stefan Priebe; Sima Sandhu; Sónia Dias; Andrea Gaddini; Tim Greacen; Elisabeth Ioannidis; Ulrike Kluge; Allan Krasnik; Majda Lamkaddem; Vincent Lorant; Rosa Puigpinós i Riera; Attila Sárváry; Joaquim Soares; Mindaugas Stankunas; Christa Straßmayr; Kristian Wahlbeck; Marta Welbel; Marija Bogic

BackgroundHealth services across Europe provide health care for migrant patients every day. However, little systematic research has explored the views and experiences of health care professionals in different European countries. The aim of this study was to assess the difficulties professionals experience in their service when providing such care and what they consider constitutes good practice to overcome these problems or limit their negative impact on the quality of care.MethodsStructured interviews with open questions and case vignettes were conducted with health care professionals working in areas with high proportion of migrant populations in 16 countries. In each country, professionals in nine primary care practices, three accident and emergency hospital departments, and three community mental health services (total sample = 240) were interviewed about their views and experiences in providing care for migrant patients, i.e. from first generation immigrant populations. Answers were analysed using thematic content analysis.ResultsEight types of problems and seven components of good practice were identified representing all statements in the interviews. The eight problems were: language barriers, difficulties in arranging care for migrants without health care coverage, social deprivation and traumatic experiences, lack of familiarity with the health care system, cultural differences, different understandings of illness and treatment, negative attitudes among staff and patients, and lack of access to medical history. The components of good practice to overcome these problems or limit their impact were: organisational flexibility with sufficient time and resources, good interpreting services, working with families and social services, cultural awareness of staff, educational programmes and information material for migrants, positive and stable relationships with staff, and clear guidelines on the care entitlements of different migrant groups. Problems and good care components were similar across the three types of services.ConclusionsHealth care professionals in different services experience similar difficulties when providing care to migrants. They also have relatively consistent views on what constitutes good practice. The degree to which these components already are part of routine practice varies. Implementing good practice requires sufficient resources and organisational flexibility, positive attitudes, training for staff and the provision of information.


Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology | 2013

Experiences with treating immigrants: a qualitative study in mental health services across 16 European countries

Sima Sandhu; Neele V. Bjerre; Marie Dauvrin; Sónia Dias; Andrea Gaddini; Tim Greacen; Elisabeth Ioannidis; Ulrike Kluge; Natasja Koitzsch Jensen; Majda Lamkaddem; Rosa Puigpinós i Riera; Zsigmond Kósa; Ulla Wihlman; Mindaugas Stankunas; Christa Straßmayr; Kristian Wahlbeck; Marta Welbel; Stefan Priebe

PurposeWhile there has been systematic research on the experiences of immigrant patients in mental health services within certain European countries, little research has explored the experiences of mental health professionals in the delivery of services to immigrants across Europe. This study sought to explore professionals’ experiences of delivering care to immigrants in districts densely populated with immigrants across Europe.MethodsForty-eight semi-structured interviews were conducted with mental health care professionals working in 16 European countries. Professionals in each country were recruited from three areas with the highest proportion of immigrants. For the purpose of this study, immigrants were defined as first-generation immigrants born outside the country of current residence, including regular immigrants, irregular immigrants, asylum seekers, refugees and victims of human trafficking. Interviews were transcribed and analysed using thematic analysis.ResultsThe interviews highlighted specific challenges to treating immigrants in mental health services across all 16 countries including complications with diagnosis, difficulty in developing trust and increased risk of marginalisation.ConclusionsAlthough mental health service delivery varies between and within European countries, consistent challenges exist in the experiences of mental health professionals delivering services in communities with high proportions of immigrants. Improvements to practice should include training in reaching appropriate diagnoses, a focus on building trusting relationships and measures to counter marginalisation.


BMC Research Notes | 2012

Health care for irregular migrants: pragmatism across Europe. A qualitative study

Marie Dauvrin; Vincent Lorant; Sima Sandhu; W. Devillé; Hamidou Dia; Sónia Dias; Andrea Gaddini; Elisabeth Ioannidis; Natasja Koitzsch Jensen; Ulrike Kluge; R. Mertaniemi; Rosa Puigpinós i Riera; Attila Sárváry; Christa Straßmayr; Mindaugas Stankunas; Joaquim Soares; Marta Welbel; Stefan Priebe

BackgroundHealth services in Europe face the challenge of delivering care to a heterogeneous group of irregular migrants (IM). There is little empirical evidence on how health professionals cope with this challenge. This study explores the experiences of health professionals providing care to IM in three types of health care service across 16 European countries.ResultsSemi-structured interviews were conducted with health professionals in 144 primary care services, 48 mental health services, and 48 Accident & Emergency departments (total n = 240). Although legal health care entitlement for IM varies across countries, health professionals reported facing similar issues when caring for IM. These issues include access problems, limited communication, and associated legal complications. Differences in the experiences with IM across the three types of services were also explored. Respondents from Accident & Emergency departments reported less of a difference between the care for IM patients and patients in a regular situation than did respondents from primary care and mental health services. Primary care services and mental health services were more concerned with language barriers than Accident & Emergency departments. Notifying the authorities was an uncommon practice, even in countries where health professionals are required to do this.ConclusionsThe needs of IM patients and the values of the staff appear to be as important as the national legal framework, with staff in different European countries adopting a similar pragmatic approach to delivering health care to IM. While legislation might help to improve health care for IM, more appropriate organisation and local flexibility are equally important, especially for improving access and care pathways.


PLOS ONE | 2015

Overcoming Barriers to Skills Training in Borderline Personality Disorder: A Qualitative Interview Study

Kirsten Barnicot; Laura Couldrey; Sima Sandhu; Stefan Priebe

Despite evidence suggesting that skills training is an important mechanism of change in dialectical behaviour therapy, little research exploring facilitators and barriers to this process has been conducted. The study aimed to explore clients’ experiences of barriers to dialectical behaviour therapy skills training and how they felt they overcame these barriers, and to compare experiences between treatment completers and dropouts. In-depth qualitative interviews were conducted with 40 clients with borderline personality disorder who had attended a dialectical behaviour therapy programme. A thematic analysis of participants’ reported experiences found that key barriers to learning the skills were anxiety during the skills groups and difficulty understanding the material. Key barriers to using the skills were overwhelming emotions which left participants feeling unable or unwilling to use them. Key ways in which participants reported overcoming barriers to skills training were by sustaining their commitment to attending therapy and practising the skills, personalising the way they used them, and practising them so often that they became an integral part of their behavioural repertoire. Participants also highlighted a number of key ways in which they were supported with their skills training by other skills group members, the group therapists, their individual therapist, friends and family. Treatment dropouts were more likely than completers to describe anxiety during the skills groups as a barrier to learning, and were less likely to report overcoming barriers to skills training via the key processes outlined above. The findings of this qualitative study require replication, but could be used to generate hypotheses for testing in further research on barriers to skills training, how these relate to dropout, and how they can be overcome. The paper outlines several such suggestions for further research.


BMC Psychiatry | 2016

Adaptation of the Quality Indicator for Rehabilitative Care (QuIRC) for use in mental health supported accommodation services (QuIRC-SA).

Helen Killaspy; Sarah White; Sarah Dowling; Joanna Krotofil; Peter McPherson; Sima Sandhu; Maurice Arbuthnott; Sarah Curtis; Gerard Leavey; Stefan Priebe; Geoff Shepherd; Michael King

BackgroundNo standardised tools for assessing the quality of specialist mental health supported accommodation services exist. To address this, we adapted the Quality Indicator for Rehabilitative care-QuIRC-that was originally developed to assess the quality of longer term inpatient and community based mental health facilities. The QuIRC, which is completed by the service manager and gives ratings of seven domains of care, has good psychometric properties.MethodsFocus groups with staff of the three main types of supported accommodation in the UK (residential care, supported housing and floating outreach services) were carried out to identify potential amendments to the QuIRC. Additional advice was gained from consultation with three expert panels, two of which comprised service users with lived experience of mental health and supported accommodation services. The amended QuIRC (QuIRC-SA) was piloted with a manager of each of the three service types. Item response variance, inter-rater reliability and internal consistency were assessed in a random sample of 52 services. Factorial structure and discriminant validity were assessed in a larger random sample of 87 services.ResultsThe QuIRC-SA comprised 143 items of which only 18 items showed a narrow range of response and five items had poor inter-rater reliability. The tool showed good discriminant validity, with supported housing services generally scoring higher than the other two types of supported accommodation on most domains. Exploratory factor analysis showed that the QuIRC-SA items loaded onto the domains to which they had been allocated.ConclusionsThe QuIRC-SA is the first standardised tool for quality assessment of specialist mental health supported accommodation services. Its psychometric properties mean that it has potential for use in research as well as audit and quality improvement programmes. A web based application is being developed to make it more accessible which will produce a printable report for the service manager about the performance of their service, comparison data for similar services and suggestions on how to improve service quality.


BMC Psychiatry | 2016

Development and psychometric properties of the client's assessment of treatment scale for supported accommodation (CAT-SA).

Sima Sandhu; Helen Killaspy; Joanna Krotofil; Peter McPherson; Isobel Harrison; Sarah Dowling; Maurice Arbuthnott; Sarah Curtis; Michael King; Gerard Leavey; Geoff Shepherd; Stefan Priebe

BackgroundPatient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) are important for evaluating mental health services. Yet, no specific PROM exists for the large and diverse mental health supported accommodation sector. We aimed to produce and validate a PROM specifically for supported accommodation services, by adapting the Client’s Assessment of Treatment Scale (CAT) and assessing its psychometric properties in a large sample.MethodsFocus groups with service users in the three main types of mental health supported accommodation services in the United Kingdom (residential care, supported housing and floating outreach) were conducted to adapt the contents of the original CAT items and assess the acceptability of the modified scale (CAT-SA). The CAT-SA was then administered in a survey to service users across England. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha. Convergent validity was tested through correlations with subjective quality of life and satisfaction with accommodation, as measured by the Manchester Short Assessment of Quality of Life (MANSA).ResultsAll seven original items of the CAT were regarded as relevant to appraisals of mental health supported accommodation services, with only slight modifications to the wording required. In the survey, data were obtained from 618 clients. The internal consistency of the CAT-SA items was 0.89. Mean CAT-SA scores were correlated with the specific accommodation item on the MANSA (rs = 0.37, p˂.001).ConclusionsThe content of the CAT-SA has relevance to service users living in mental health supported accommodation. The findings from our large survey show that the CAT-SA is acceptable across different types of supported accommodation and suggest good psychometric properties. The CAT-SA appears a valid and easy to use PROM for service users in mental health supported accommodation services.


BMC Health Services Research | 2017

Intentions and experiences of effective practice in mental health specific supported accommodation services: a qualitative interview study

Sima Sandhu; Stefan Priebe; Gerard Leavey; Isobel Harrison; Joanna Krotofil; Peter McPherson; Sarah Dowling; Maurice Arbuthnott; Sarah Curtis; Michael King; Geoff Shepherd; Helen Killaspy

BackgroundDeinstitutionalisation in Europe has led to the development of community-based accommodation for people with mental health problems. The type, setting, and intensity of support provided vary and the costs are substantial. Yet, despite the large investment in these services, there is little clarity on their aims and outcomes or how they are regarded by staff and the clients.MethodsWe interviewed 30 staff and 30 clients from the three main types of supported accommodation in England (residential care, supported housing, floating outreach) to explore their perspectives on the purpose of these services, and the components of care considered most helpful. The interviews were coded and analysed using thematic analysis.ResultsThere were generally consistent understandings amongst clients and staff across service types on the goals and purposes of supported accommodation services as: building independence and confidence; supporting people with their mental health; and providing safety and stability. We also noted a competing theme of anxiety about the continuity of support when clients move on from a service. Themes on the experience of what aided effective practice centred on: the supportive presence of others; incremental steps to progress; working together to avoid deskilling and dependency; feeling known and personally understood; tailoring support for social and community engagement; and building confidence through encouragement.ConclusionsThe findings provide an understanding of the commonalities in service approach, and goals of clients in these services, as well as the facilitators of goal attainment. However, they also highlight a common tension between providing safe and supportive living environments, whilst also promoting independence and facilitating rehabilitative change.


BMJ Open | 2017

Why involve families in acute mental healthcare? A collaborative conceptual review

Aysegul Dirik; Sima Sandhu; Domenico Giacco; Katherine Barrett; Gerry Bennison; Sue Collinson; Stefan Priebe

Objectives Family involvement is strongly recommended in clinical guidelines but suffers from poor implementation. To explore this topic at a conceptual level, a multidisciplinary review team including academics, clinicians and individuals with lived experience undertook a review to explore the theoretical background of family involvement models in acute mental health treatment and how this relates to their delivery. Design A conceptual review was undertaken, including a systematic search and narrative synthesis. Included family models were mapped onto the most commonly referenced underlying theories: the diathesis–stress model, systems theories and postmodern theories of mental health. Common components of the models were summarised and compared. Lastly, a thematic analysis was undertaken to explore the role of patients and families in the delivery of the approaches. Setting General adult acute mental health treatment. Results Six distinct family involvement models were identified: Calgary Family Assessment and Intervention Models, ERIC (Equipe Rapide d’Intervention de Crise), Family Psychoeducation Models, Family Systems Approach, Open Dialogue and the Somerset Model. Findings indicated that despite wide variation in the theoretical models underlying family involvement models, there were many commonalities in their components, such as a focus on communication, language use and joint decision-making. Thematic analysis of the role of patients and families identified several issues for implementation. This included potential harms that could emerge during delivery of the models, such as imposing linear ‘patient–carer’ relationships and the risk of perceived coercion. Conclusions We conclude that future staff training may benefit from discussing the chosen family involvement model within the context of other theories of mental health. This may help to clarify the underlying purpose of family involvement and address the diverse needs and world views of patients, families and professionals in acute settings.


Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology | 2016

What does dependency on community mental health services mean? A conceptual review with a systematic search

Tommaso Bonavigo; Sima Sandhu; Elisabetta Pascolo-Fabrici; Stefan Priebe

PurposeAlthough community mental health services aim to support patients’ autonomy and independence, they have repeatedly been criticised for making patients dependent. Yet, it remains often unclear what exactly is meant with dependency in this context. This review aimed to identify the meaning of the term dependency on community services in the literature.MethodsA systematic search and conceptual review of papers where dependency is used in the context of community mental health services. Narrative synthesis was used to identify thematic concepts linked to dependency in these settings.ResultsFifteen papers met the inclusion criteria. The analysis identified five different concepts of dependency on community mental health services: dislocation from the outside world; inflexibility and lack of freedom; obligation as resentment or appreciation; living with or without meaningful activities; and security.ConclusionsThe findings suggest that, distinct from the exclusively negative connotation of the term dependency in a conventional medical context, dependency on community mental health services contains both negative and positive aspects. The different aspects might guide the future evaluation of the care provided in such services.


The Lancet Psychiatry | 2016

Quality of life, autonomy, satisfaction, and costs associated with mental health supported accommodation services in England: a national survey

Helen Killaspy; Stefan Priebe; Stephen Bremner; Paul McCrone; Sarah Dowling; Isobel Harrison; Joanna Krotofil; Peter McPherson; Sima Sandhu; Maurice Arbuthnott; Sarah Curtis; Gerard Leavey; Geoff Shepherd; Sandra Eldridge; Michael King

Collaboration


Dive into the Sima Sandhu's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Stefan Priebe

Queen Mary University of London

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Helen Killaspy

University College London

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Joanna Krotofil

University College London

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Michael King

University College London

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Peter McPherson

University College London

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Sarah Dowling

University College London

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mindaugas Stankunas

Lithuanian University of Health Sciences

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Isobel Harrison

University College London

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge