Simon Donnelly

Severe gangrene in a patient with anti-RNP positive limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis/rheumatoid arthritis overlap syndrome caused by vasculopathy and vasculitis

In this paper, we describe a case of a male patient with anti-U1RNP positive limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis/rheumatoid arthritis overlap syndrome, who presented acutely with rapidly progressive digital ischemia, which lead to extensive gangrene. Management with conventional vasodilator therapy was unsuccessful. There were constitutional symptoms and a marked inflammatory response in the absence of evidence of infection, implying a component of vasculitis underlying the presentation. Treatment with immunosuppression and intravenous immunoglobulin led to resolution of the inflammatory process with no further progression of tissue necrosis. Here we discuss pertinent issues raised by the case, including the management of digital ischemia and gangrene in this context and the relevance of the anti-U1RNP in systemic sclerosis overlap syndromes.

Teriparatide and vertebral fracture healing in Ankylosing Spondylitis

Summary Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) are four times more likely to sustain spinal fractures. Due to the associated risk of neurological complications treatment is complex. We present the case of a 56-year-old Caucasian gentleman with AS who sustained a fracture of T2 vertebra following a traumatic hyperextension injury. He declined surgery in fear of complications and started treatment with subcutaneous Teriparatide at a dose of 20 mg daily for six months. There was complete healing of the vertebral fracture at 6 months without any complications. This case is unique as complete healing was achieved without preceding surgical intervention. Further exploration of the use of Teriparatide in spinal fractures in patients with AS is recommended to support the theories generated by this and other existing cases in the literature.

Randomised, prospective, non-blinded pilot study comparing the effect of intramuscular steroid injections and intralesional steroid injections in the management of tennis elbow

Background Tennis elbow is an overuse injury affecting people performing repetitive forearm movements. It is a soft tissue disorder that causes significant disability and pain. The aim of the study was to establish that an intramuscular steroid injection is effective in the short-term pain relief and functional improvement of tennis elbow. The severity of pain at the injection site was monitored to determine whether the intramuscular injection is better tolerated than the intralesional injection. Methods and results 19 patients, who had no treatment for tennis elbow in the preceding 3 months, were recruited from Whipps Cross University Hospital, London, and were randomised to receive either 80 mg of intramuscular Depo-Medrone or 40 mg of intralesional Depo-Medrone injection. Blinding proved difficult as the injection sites differed and placebo arms were not included in the study. A Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE) Questionnaire and a 10-point Likert scale were used to assess primary outcome. Six weeks after the treatment, there was a reduction in pain, improvement in function and total PRTEE scores in both intramuscular and intralesional groups (p=0.008) using a 95% CI for mean treatment difference of −26 to +16 points. A statistically significant result (p=0.001) in favour of intramuscular causing less pain at the injection site was noted. Conclusion Non-inferiority of intramuscular to intralesional injections was not confirmed; however, the intramuscular injection proved to be effective in reducing tennis elbow-related symptoms and was found less painful at the site of injection at the time of administration. Trial registration number EUDRACT Number: 2010-022131-11. REC Number: 10/H0718/76 (NRES, Central London REC 1).