Simon E. Hufton
National Institute for Biological Standards and Control
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Simon E. Hufton.
FEBS Letters | 2003
Twan van den Beucken; Henk Pieters; Mieke Steukers; Marcel van der Vaart; Robert Charles Ladner; Hennie R. Hoogenboom; Simon E. Hufton
We report for the first time the affinity maturation of Fab antibody fragments using fluorescent‐activated cell sorting (FACS) of yeast‐displayed repertoires. A single yeast display vector which enables the inducible expression of an anchored heavy chain and a soluble light chain has been constructed. The assembly and functional display on the yeast cell surface of Fab antibodies specific for different protein targets has been demonstrated by flow cytometry and immunofluorescence microscopy. We have affinity matured a Fab antibody specific for the tetravalent antigen streptavidin using FACS of yeast‐displayed repertoires diversified by error‐prone polymerase chain reaction. A panel of variants with up to 10.7‐fold improvement in affinity was obtained after selection. Two leading clones, R2H10 (3.2 nM) and R3B1 (5.5 nM), had mutations in light chain complementarity determining region 1 LC‐CDR1 (H34R) and LC‐CDR3 (Y96H or Y96F) and gave a 10.7‐fold and 6.3‐fold affinity improvement over the starting antibody, respectively. The ability to efficiently affinity mature Fab antibodies is an important component of the antibody development pipeline and we have shown that yeast display is an efficient method for this purpose.
Journal of Immunology | 2012
Christina Ball; Bernard Fox; Simon E. Hufton; Giles Sharp; Stephen Poole; Richard Stebbings; David Eastwood; Lucy Findlay; Paul Parren; Robin Thorpe; Adrian Bristow; Susan J. Thorpe
The unexpected outcome of the clinical trial of the superagonistic CD28 mAb TGN1412 (IgG4κ) continues to stimulate interest. We show that TGN1412 binds similarly to human and cynomolgus macaque FcγR, eliminating the possibility that differences in Fc-mediated interactions with FcγR contributed to the failure of preclinical testing in macaques to predict toxicity in humans. The influence of the Fc domain and C region structure on the in vitro functional activity of TGN1412 was investigated using F(ab′)2 and Fab fragments derived from TGN1412 recovered from the trial and recombinant TGN1412 subclass variants and mutants. Superagonistic activity, as measured by cytokine release and proliferation, was assessed by exposing PBMCs to immobilized mAbs/fragments or to aqueous mAbs/fragments in the presence of HUVEC monolayers. Removing the Fc generally curtailed or abolished PBMC activation. However, eliminating detectable FcγR-binding of the IgG4 by mutation (L235E) did not abrogate activity. Stabilizing the “wild-type” IgG4 hinge (S228P) enhanced activity without increasing FcγR binding, which could only partially be explained by inhibition of Fab arm–exchange. Subclass switching the IgG4 mAb to IgG1 decreased activity, whereas switching to IgG2 markedly increased activity. We conclude that the C region strongly influences in vitro CD28-mediated superagonistic signaling. Superagonism requires an intact Fc, as shown by the absence of activity of TGN1412 Fab and F(ab′)2 fragments, but, notably, appears to be relatively independent of FcγR-binding properties. We propose that the Fc, potentially through restricting flexibility, maintains a favorable V region conformation to allow superagonistic activity. These findings have important implications for Ab design strategies.
PLOS ONE | 2014
Simon E. Hufton; Paul Risley; Christina Ball; Diane Major; Othmar G. Engelhardt; Stephen Poole
The response to the 2009 A(H1N1) influenza pandemic has highlighted the need for additional strategies for intervention which preclude the prior availability of the influenza strain. Here, 18 single domain VHH antibodies against the 2009 A(H1N1) hemagglutinin (HA) have been isolated from a immune alpaca phage displayed library. These antibodies have been grouped as having either (i) non-neutralising, (ii) H1N1 restricted neutralising or (iii) broad cross-subtype neutralising activity. The ability to neutralise different viral subtypes, including highly pathogenic avian influenza (H5N1), correlated with the absence of hemagglutination inhibition activity, loss of binding to HA at acid pH and the absence of binding to the head domain containing the receptor binding site. This data supports their binding to epitopes in the HA stem region and a mechanism of action other than blocking viral attachment to cell surface receptors. After conversion of cross-neutralising antibodies R1a-B6 and R1a-A5 into a bivalent format, no significant enhancement in neutralisation activity was seen against A(H1N1) and A(H5N1) viruses. However, bivalent R1a-B6 showed an 18 fold enhancement in potency against A(H9N2) virus and, surprisingly, gained the ability to neutralise an A(H2N2) virus. This demonstrates that cross-neutralising antibodies, which make lower affinity interactions with the membrane proximal stem region of more divergent HA sub-types, can be optimised by bivalency so increasing their breadth of anti-viral activity. The broad neutralising activity and favourable characteristics, such as high stability, simple engineering into bivalent molecules and low cost production make these single domain antibodies attractive candidates for diagnostics and immunotherapy of pandemic influenza.
PLOS ONE | 2016
Tiziano Gaiotto; Simon E. Hufton
Cross-neutralising monoclonal antibodies against influenza hemagglutinin (HA) are of considerable interest as both therapeutics and diagnostic tools. We have recently described five different single domain antibodies (nanobodies) which share this cross-neutralising activity and suggest their small size, high stability, and cleft binding properties may present distinct advantages over equivalent conventional antibodies. We have used yeast display in combination with deep mutational scanning to give residue level resolution of positions in the antibody-HA interface which are crucial for binding. In addition, we have mapped positions within HA predicted to have minimal effect on antibody binding when mutated. Our cross-neutralising nanobodies were shown to bind to a highly conserved pocket in the HA2 domain of A(H1N1)pdm09 influenza virus overlapping with the fusion peptide suggesting their mechanism of action is through the inhibition of viral membrane fusion. We also note that the epitope overlaps with that of CR6261 and F10 which are human monoclonal antibodies in clinical development as immunotherapeutics. Although all five nanobodies mapped to the same highly conserved binding pocket we observed differences in the size of the epitope footprint which has implications in comparing the relative genetic barrier each nanobody presents to a rapidly evolving influenza virus. To further refine our epitope map, we have re-created naturally occurring mutations within this HA stem epitope and tested their effect on binding using yeast display. We have shown that a D46N mutation in the HA2 stem domain uniquely interferes with binding of R2b-E8. Further testing of this substitution in the context of full length purified HA from 1918 H1N1 pandemic (Spanish flu), 2009 H1N1 pandemic (swine flu) and highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1 demonstrated binding which correlated with D46 whereas binding to seasonal H1N1 strains carrying N46 was absent. In addition, our deep sequence analysis predicted that binding to the emerging H1N1 strain (A/Christchurch/16/2010) carrying the HA2-E47K mutation would not affect binding was confirmed experimentally. This demonstrates yeast display, in combination with deep sequencing, may be able to predict antibody reactivity to emerging influenza strains so assisting in the preparation for future influenza pandemics.
Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis | 2017
Shalom A. Gurjar; Jeremy P. Derrick; Rebecca J. Dearman; Robin Thorpe; Simon E. Hufton; Ian Kimber; Meenu Wadhwa
&NA; Traditional antibody dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) assays use donor derived natural killer (NK) or peripheral blood mononuclear cells, but donor genetic variability and the technically challenging nature of the assay means that alternative in vitro assay formats are required. We explored the utility of two reporter gene cell lines, the J2 and J9, as surrogate effector cells for ADCC assays. Both express the ADCC relevant Fc&ggr; receptor CD16, crosslinking of which leads to firefly luciferase expression. For anti‐CD20 rituximab and anti‐HER2 trastuzumab (both IgG1 monoclonal antibodies, mAbs) a dose dependent firefly luciferase response was observed exclusively in the presence of their respective targets, representing the molecular interaction which potentiates ADCC activity. Importantly, both surrogate effector and NK cell based assays gave statistically similar values for rituximab ADCC activity. Increased engagement with target cell bound mAbs was determined to be cytotoxic for the J2 and J9 cell lines at the assay end point (at which luciferase expression is measured). However, use of the J9 cells containing the constitutively expressed renilla luciferase gene enabled data normalisation and corrected for fluctuations in both cell number and viability providing an advantage over currently available surrogate effector cell‐lines. Abrogated ADCC activity with IgG4 mAbs, but enhanced activity with an IgG1 non‐fucosylated mAb, was seen with the J9 cell line, as expected. Additionally, two rituximab products (biosimilars in development) with similar binding by flow cytometry, N‐glycan profiles using HPLC and CD16 binding by surface plasmon resonance showed comparable ADCC activity to Mabthera. The ADCC activity of another anti‐CD20 mAb, ofatumumab, reported only with primary cell based assays to date was also measured. This is the first report of a dual reporter gene based ADCC assay. Graphical abstract Figure. No caption available. HighlightsSurrogate effector cells reflect ADCC activity of mAbs as seen with primary cells.Additional constitutively expressed gene accounts for variability in cell number.Useful tool for assessing ADCC activity of novel and biosimilar mAbs in development.
Gene | 2004
Lydia Blaise; Anita Wehnert; Mieke Steukers; Twan van den Beucken; Hennie R. Hoogenboom; Simon E. Hufton
Archive | 2005
Clive R. Wood; Daniel T. Dransfield; Henk Pieters; Rene Hoet; Simon E. Hufton
Archive | 2004
Simon E. Hufton; Rene Hoet; Henk Pieters
Archive | 2005
Clive R. Wood; Daniel T. Dransfield; Henk Pieters; Rene Hoet; Simon E. Hufton
Archive | 2005
Clive R. Wood; Daniel T. Dransfield; Henk Pieters; Rene Hoet; Simon E. Hufton