Simon Rice

'Are we there yet?' Measuring human rights sensibilities

Evaluation of human rights laws needs to go beyond measurable activity and outputs, and should try to assess the existence and strength of an underlying human rights sensibility among those for whom human rights laws are an available tool. This article responds to Arthurs and Arnold’s (2005) critique of the Canadian Charter, describing a pilot study that explores the feasibility of establishing indicators for knowledge and use of, and attitudes towards, human rights legislation. The study was conducted among legal and social service professionals in the Australian Capital Territory and the State of Victoria, and demonstrates that it is possible to devise a simple and meaningful instrument for measuring human rights sensibilities and tracking changes to them over time. Such monitoring may assist in assessing the long-term success of human rights legislation in fostering the internalisation of human rights norms.

'It's a Discrimination Law Julia, but Not as We Know It': Part 3-1 of the Fair Work Act

At first glance, Part 3–1 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) seems to overlap with long-established anti-discrimination laws, offering protection against adverse, attribute-based conduct in employment. On close analysis, however, it turns out to be a new and quite different regime. Although the Fair Work Act offers a simple alternative to dated and complicated anti-discrimination laws, its provisions are at times overly-simple, raising uncertainty about how they will operate. Our analysis leads us to conclude that the approach to discrimination protection in the Fair Work Act, while an important addition to the remedies available to Australian workers, is compromised by failing to take account of lessons learned in the long history of anti-discrimination law.

New Directions for Law in Australia

1 Professor, Law School, University of Queensland. 2 Joan Rydon, ‘The Electorate’ in John Wilkes (ed), Forces in Australian Politics (Angus & Robertson, 1963) 184. 3 Holmdahl v AEC (No 2) [2012] SASFC 110. See Anne Twomey, ‘Compulsory Voting in a Representative Democracy: Choice, Compulsion and the Maximisation of Participation in Australian Elections’ (2014) 13 Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal 283. 4 Josh Butler, ‘David Leyonhjelm Proposes Abolishing Compulsory Voting’, Huffington Post, 2 March 2016 (Leyonhjelm is a libertarian senator). Voluntary Voting for Referendums in Australia: Old Wine, New BottleProof exists that Law Reform Commissions can still discharge a distinct and effective role in the reform of law and legal policy. In February 2017, some months after the essays that make up this important book were presented at an Australian National University Conference, the Attorney General issued terms of reference for an inquiry by the Australian Law Reform Commission (ALRC) into the incarceration rate of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. Judge Matthew Myers was appointed part time Commissioner, an expert advisory panel of academics and practitioners was installed, discussion paper drawing together the findings of previous inquiries was issued in July, 149 consultations were undertaken in the community, 121 submissions were received and by December an incisive and plainly written report analysing the causes and including 35 recommendations for reducing the rate of incarceration was delivered.Anyone looking at the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) would be justified in thinking that company law in Australia was both wholly statutory and an instrument of public regulation. Although Anglo-Australian company law may have originally grown out of the law of partnership and been built, largely by the courts, from the material of the private law, the growth over the last 30 years in the complexity, range of matters covered and sheer volume of the Corporations Act would seem to confirm the intuition that Australia’s company law is now both statutory and public. However, while there is no denying the shift in the source of company law, the particular form corporate regulation now takes is actually making Australian company law more, rather than less, private.1 Professor, Faculty of Law, Monash University. 2 R v Birmingham & Gloucester Railway Co (1842) 3 QB 223. 3 US Department of Justice, ‘Siemens AG and Three Subsidiaries Plead Guilty to Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Violations and Agree to Pay

Retreat from injustice : human rights law in Australia

450 Million in Combined Criminal Fines’ (Press Release, 15 December 2008). Improving the Effectiveness of Corporate Criminal Liability: Old Challenges in a Transnational World1 Lecturer, Business School, Charles Darwin University; PhD candidate, School of Politics and International Relations, ANU. This research is supported by an Australian Government Research Training Program (RTP) Scholarship. 2 Australian Council of Social Service (ACOSS), Inequality in Australia 2015: A Nation Divided (Sydney, 2015) 8, www.acoss.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Inequality_in_Australia_ FINAL.pdf (viewed 24 April 2016). 3 Factor income is the income arising from the factors of production – land, labour and capital. For the changes in shares over time, see Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS), ‘Income at Current Prices, December Quarter 2015’ in ABS, 5206.0 – Australian National Accounts: National Income, Expenditure and Product, Dec 2015, www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/ abs@.nsf/Latestproducts/ 5206.0Main%20 Features 4Dec%2