Simone Inkrot

Titration to target dose of bisoprolol vs. carvedilol in elderly patients with heart failure: the CIBIS‐ELD trial

Various beta‐blockers with distinct pharmacological profiles are approved in heart failure, yet they remain underused and underdosed. Although potentially of major public health importance, whether one agent is superior in terms of tolerability and optimal dosing has not been investigated. The aim of this study was therefore to compare the tolerability and clinical effects of two proven beta‐blockers in elderly patients with heart failure.

Comparison of self-care behaviors of heart failure patients in 15 countries worldwide

OBJECTIVE Clinicians worldwide seek to educate and support heart failure patients to engage in self-care. We aimed to describe self-care behaviors of patients from 15 countries across three continents. METHODS Data on self-care were pooled from 5964 heart failure patients from the United States, Europe, Australasia and South America. Data on self-care were collected with the Self-care of Heart Failure Index or the European Heart Failure Self-care Behavior Scale. RESULTS In all the samples, most patients reported taking their medications as prescribed but exercise and weight monitoring were low. In 14 of the 22 samples, more than 50% of the patients reported low exercise levels. In 16 samples, less than half of the patients weighed themselves regularly, with large differences among the countries. Self-care with regard to receiving an annual flu shot and following a low sodium diet varied most across the countries. CONCLUSION Self-care behaviors are sub-optimal in heart failure patients and need to be improved worldwide. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Interventions that focus on specific self-care behaviors may be more effective than general educational programs. Changes in some health care systems and national policies are needed to support patients with heart failure to increase their self-care behavior.

Heart rate following short‐term beta‐blocker titration predicts all‐cause mortality in elderly chronic heart failure patients: insights from the CIBIS‐ELD trial

Beta‐blockers (BBs) improve outcomes in heart failure. Results from the Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study in Elderly (CIBIS‐ELD) trial previously demonstrated the feasibility of heart rate, not maximum dose, as a treatment goal. In this pre‐specified analysis, we investigated the prognostic value of achieved heart rate after BB optimization on long‐term mortality.

Is target dose the treatment target? Uptitrating beta-blockers for heart failure in the elderly

BACKGROUND Guideline-recommended beta-blocker (BB) target doses for patients with chronic heart failure can often not be reached. This secondary analysis of the CIBIS-ELD trial was carried out to better understand reasons for not achieving target doses. METHODS Changes in heart rate (HR) and other parameters during a 12-week up-titration period in 302 BB naïve patients were evaluated in the subgroups achieving 12.5, 25, 50, and 100% of the target dose (groups 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively). RESULTS Achieved doses predominantly depended on baseline HR (means 68, 74, 76, and 84 bpm in groups 1-4, respectively, P<0.001). HR was consistently reduced with each dose level to 65, 63, and 62 bpm in groups 1-3 and to 71 bpm in group 4 (P<0.001). When adjusted for baseline, HR reduction achieved in group 3 was better than in group 4 (difference -5.4 bpm, P<0.05). More patients in groups 3/4 than in groups 1/2 improved in NYHA class (P = 0.01). NTproBNP increased by 38% in group 4 (P<0.01) but not in the others (P<0.05 between groups). Changes in blood pressure, six-minute walk distance and self-rated health were comparable in all groups. CONCLUSIONS The desired effect of HR reduction appears to be a predominant limitation for BB up-titration. Vice versa, achieving the target dose may be a sign of insufficient response rather than successful treatment. In view of these results and the well-known importance of HR for survival, not target doses, but HR control should be given priority in BB treatment for heart failure.

Effect of beta blockade on natriuretic peptides and copeptin in elderly patients with heart failure and preserved or reduced ejection fraction: Results from the CIBIS-ELD trial☆ , ☆☆

BACKGROUND We sought to investigate the effect of beta-blocker (BB) up-titration on serum levels of NT-proBNP and copeptin in patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced (HFREF) or preserved ejection fraction (HFPEF). METHODS Serial measurements of NT-proBNP and copeptin were obtained after initiation of BB up-titration in 219 elderly patients with HFREF or HFPEF. RESULTS After initial increasing trend of NT-proBNP at 6 weeks in HFREF patients, there was a subsequent decrease at 12 weeks of BB treatment up-titration (p=0.003), while no difference was found compared to baseline levels. In contrast to NT-proBNP, there was a continuous decreasing trend of copeptin in HFREF patients (at 12 weeks: p=0.026). In HFPEF patients, NT-proBNP significantly decreased (p=0.043) compared to copeptin after 12 weeks of BB up-titration. CONCLUSIONS After 12 weeks of BB optimization copeptin might reflect successful up-titration faster than NT-proBNP in HFREF, while the opposite was found in patients with HFPEF.

Determinants of Change in Quality of Life in the Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study in Elderly (CIBIS-ELD)☆

OBJECTIVE Little is known about parameters that lead to improvement in QoL in individual patients. We analysed the data of the Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study in Elderly (CIBIS-ELD) in order to answer the question of how and to what extent change in health-related QoL during up-titration with bisoprolol vs. carvedilol is influenced by clinical and psychosocial factors in elderly patients with heart failure. METHODS This is a QoL analysis of CIBIS-ELD, an investigator-initiated multi-center randomised phase III trial in elderly patients (65 years or older) with moderate to severe heart failure. Clinical parameters such as New York Heart Association functional class, heart rate, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), 6-min walk distance, as well as the physical and psychosocial component scores on the short-form QoL health survey (SF36) and depression were recorded at baseline and at the final study visit. RESULTS Full baseline and follow-up QoL data were available for 589 patients (292 in the bisoprolol and 297 in the carvedilol group). Mean physical and psychosocial QoL improved significantly during treatment. In regression analyses, changes in both SF36 component scores from baseline to follow-up were mainly predicted by baseline QoL and depression as well as change in depression over time. Changes in cardiac severity markers were significantly weaker predictors. CONCLUSION Mean QoL increased during up-titration of bisoprolol and carvedilol. Both baseline depression and improvement in depression over time are associated with greater improvement in QoL more strongly than changes in cardiac severity measures.

Self-rated health predicts adverse events during beta-blocker treatment: The CIBIS-ELD randomised trial analysis ☆

BACKGROUND Self-rated health (SRH) predicts outcome in patients with heart failure. Beta-blockers are known to improve health-related quality of life and reduce mortality in such patients. We aimed to evaluate the relation between SRH and adverse events during titration of beta-blockers in elderly patients with heart failure. METHODS The cardiac insufficiency bisoprolol study in the elderly (CIBIS-ELD) is a multicentre, double-blind trial, in which 883 patients aged ≥ 65 years with chronic heart failure (73 ± 6 years, 38% women, left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] 42% ± 14%) were randomised to bisoprolol or carvedilol. SRH was assessed at baseline and after 12 weeks, using a 5-grade descriptive scale: excellent, very good, good, fair, and poor. RESULTS Median SRH at baseline and follow-up was good, but more patients reported fair/poor SRH at baseline (36% vs. 30%, p = 0.012). Women, beta-blocker-naïve patients, patients in NYHA class III/IV and those with PHQ-9 score ≥ 12 were more likely to report fair/poor baseline SRH (p < 0.001 for all). During follow-up, SRH improved in 34% of patients and worsened in 8% (p < 0.001). Adverse events were experienced by 64% patients and 38% experienced > 1 adverse event or serious adverse event, with higher prevalence in lower SRH categories. In a multivariate logistic regression model, SRH, age, distance achieved on the 6-min walk test and LVEF >45% predicted adverse events (p < 0.05 for all). CONCLUSIONS SRH is an independent predictor of adverse events during titration of beta-blockers and correlates with the proportion and number of adverse events per patient.

Poor self-rated health predicts mortality in patients with stable chronic heart failure

Aims: In heart failure, a holistic approach incorporating the patient’s perspective is vital for prognosis and treatment. Self-rated health has strong associations with adverse events and short-term mortality risk, but long-term data are limited. We investigated the predictive value of two consecutive self-rated health assessments with regard to long-term mortality in a large, well characterised sample of elderly patients with stable chronic heart failure. Methods and results: We measured self-rated health by asking ‘In general, would you say your health is: 1, excellent; 2, very good; 3, good; 4, fair; 5, poor?’ twice: at baseline and the end of a 12-week beta-blocker up-titration period in the CIBIS-ELD trial. Mortality was assessed in an observational follow-up after 2–4 years. A total of 720 patients (mean left ventricular ejection fraction 45±12%, mean age 73±5 years, 36% women) rated their health at both time points. During long-term follow-up, 144 patients died (all-cause mortality 20%). Fair/poor self-rated health in at least one of the two reports was associated with increased mortality (hazard ratio 1.42 per level; 95% confidence interval 1.16–1.75; P<0.001). It remained independently significant in multiple Cox regression analysis, adjusted for N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NTproBNP), heart rate and other risk prediction covariates. Self-rated health by one level worse was as predictive for mortality as a 1.9-fold increase in NTproBNP. Conclusion: Poor self-rated health predicts mortality in our long-term follow-up of patients with stable chronic heart failure, even after adjustment for established risk predictors. We encourage clinicians to capture patient-reported self-rated health routinely as an easy to assess, clinically meaningful measure and pay extra attention when self-rated health is poor.

Beta-blocker tolerability in elderly heart failure patients.

Beta-blocker therapy is well established for patients with chronic heart failure. In clinical practice, questions of tolerability and recommended target dose therapy remain important topics.

N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide and long-term mortality in non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy

ZusammenfassungZIEL: N-Terminales Pro-B-Typ Natriuretisches Peptid (NT-proBNP) ist ein starker Prädiktor für Sterblichkeit bei Patienten mit akuter und chronischer Herzinsuffizienz bedingt durch eine ischämische Herzerkrankung. Hingegen ist die prognostische Aussagekraft bei Patienten mit nicht-ischämischer Herzerkrankung weit weniger etabliert. Wir haben daher den Zusammenhang von NT-proBNP Serumspiegeln und Langzeit-Sterblichkeit von Patienten mit nicht-ischämischer Kardiomyopathie untersucht. METHODEN: Bei 156 Patienten, die sich mit einer invasiv gesicherten nicht-ischämischen Herzinsuffizienz in unserer Klinik vorstellten, wurden die NT-proBNP Serumspiegel bestimmt. Die Gesamtsterblichkeitsrate wurde im Rahmen eines mittleren Beobachtungszeitraums von 8.9 Jahren erhoben. ERGEBNISSE: Unter Verwendung eines proportionalen Cox Risiko Models konnte in multivariaten Analysen NT-proBNP und der linksventrikuläre diastolische Durchmesser als Prädiktoren für kardial bedingte Sterblichkeit mit einer geschätzten Hazard Ratio von 2.76 (95 % KI: 1.53, 4.98) und 1.06 (95 % KI: 1.02, 1.10) beobachtet werden. SCHLUSSFOLGERUNG: In dieser bisher längsten Nachbeobachtung eignete sich NT-proBNP auch bei Patienten mit nicht-ischämischer Kardiomyopathie als Risikoprädiktor für Sterblichkeit und war einer Beurteilung nach der New York Heart Association Klasse und der linksventrikulären Ejektionsfraktion überlegen.SummaryAIM: The inactive N-terminal fragment of B-type natriuretic peptide is a strong predictor of mortality among patients with acute and chronic heart failure secondary to ischaemic heart disease. Its prognostic utility in patients with non-ischaemic heart disease is not well established. We therefore assessed the relationship of N-terminal proBNP levels and long-term mortality in patients with non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy. METHODS: N-terminal proBNP was measured in serum samples of 156 patients who presented to a single academic centre with worsening heart failure secondary to non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy. The rate of death from all causes was determined after a mean follow-up of 8.9 years. RESULTS: Multivariate analyses, using Cox proportional hazards models, established NT-proBNP and left ventricular diastolic diameter as predictors for cardiac mortality with estimated hazard ratios of 2.76 (95% confidence interval: 1.53, 4.98) and 1.06 (95% confidence interval: 1.02, 1.10), respectively. CONCLUSION: This to date longest-term analysis of N-terminal proBNP and mortality in patients with proven non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy confirms this cardiac-specific biomarker as powerful, independent risk predictor. It is a superior prognostic determinant to New York Heart Association functional class and left ventricular ejection fraction.