Siobhan O’Neill
Cork University Hospital
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Siobhan O’Neill.
Emergency Radiology | 2012
Patrick D Mc Laughlin; Siobhan O’Neill; Noel Fanning; Anne Marie Mc Garrigle; Owen J. O’Connor; Gerry Wyse; Michael M. Maher
Tablet devices have recently been used in radiological image interpretation because they have a display resolution comparable to desktop LCD monitors. We identified a need to examine tablet display performance prior to their use in preliminary interpretation of radiological images. We compared the spatial and contrast resolution of a commercially available tablet display with a diagnostic grade 2 megapixel monochrome LCD using a contrast detail phantom. We also recorded reporting discrepancies, using the ACR RADPEER system, between preliminary interpretation of 100 emergency CT brain examinations on the tablet display and formal review on a diagnostic LCD. The iPad display performed inferiorly to the diagnostic monochrome display without the ability to zoom. When the software zoom function was enabled on the tablet device, comparable contrast detail phantom scores of 163 vs 165 points were achieved. No reporting discrepancies were encountered during the interpretation of 43 normal examinations and five cases of acute intracranial hemorrhage. There were seven RADPEER2 (understandable) misses when using the iPad display and 12 with the diagnostic LCD. Use of software zoom in the tablet device improved its contrast detail phantom score. The tablet allowed satisfactory identification of acute CT brain findings, but additional research will be required to examine the cause of “understandable” reporting discrepancies that occur when using tablet devices.
Journal of Health Psychology | 2016
Karen O’Leary; Siobhan O’Neill; Samantha Dockray
Cortisol is increasingly included in examinations of mindfulness intervention effects as an indicator of efficacy; however, the association of cortisol and mindfulness has yet to be rigorously evaluated. A systematic review of six studies examining mindfulness intervention effects on cortisol was conducted. Inconsistent results were found for mindfulness effects on cortisol. Significant changes in cortisol levels were observed in within-participants studies but not observed in randomised controlled trial designs. Mindfulness may influence cortisol, but findings are inconclusive. Mindfulness pathways and methodological differences influence variations in mindfulness effects. Robust protocols are needed to adequately examine mindfulness effects on cortisol.
Clinics and Research in Hepatology and Gastroenterology | 2011
Siobhan O’Neill; Owen J. O’Connor; Sebastian McWilliams; Fergus Shanahan; Michael M. Maher
Exposure to ionising radiation as a result of diagnostic imaging is increasing among patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), primarily due to the more widespread use of computed tomography (CT). The potentially harmful effects of ionising radiation are a major cause for concern and radiologists, technologists and referring physicians who have a responsibility to the patient to ensure judicious use of those imaging modalities which result in exposure to ionising radiation and, when imaging is necessary, to ensure that a diagnostic quality imaging examination is acquired with lowest possible radiation exposure. This can be achieved by limiting the use of those imaging studies which involve ionising radiation to clinical situations where they are likely to change management, by implementing advances in low-dose CT technology, and, where feasible, by using alternative imaging modalities, such as ultrasonography or magnetic resonance imaging, which avoid radiation exposure.
European Journal of Radiology Open | 2016
Kevin P. Murphy; Lee Crush; Siobhan O’Neill; James Foody; Micheál Breen; Adrian P. Brady; Paul J. Kelly; Derek G. Power; Paul Sweeney; Jackie Bye; Owen J. O’Connor; Michael M. Maher; Kevin O’Regan
Highlights • Radiologists should endeavour to minimise radiation exposure to patients with testicular cancer.• Iterative reconstruction algorithms permit CT imaging at lower radiation doses.• Image quality for reduced-dose CT–MBIR is at least comparable to conventional dose.• No loss of diagnostic accuracy apparent with reduced-dose CT–MBIR.
Clinical Radiology | 2012
Kevin O’Regan; Owen J. O’Connor; Siobhan O’Neill; P.D. Mc Laughlin; Alan N. Desmond; Sebastian McWilliams; Eamonn M. M. Quigley; Fergus Shanahan; Michael M. Maher
AIM To determine the diagnostic yield and clinical value of plain film of the abdomen (PFA) in Crohns disease (CD) patients and to determine whether performance of PFA yields definitive diagnostic information or whether additional imaging examinations are required. MATERIALS AND METHODS One hundred and seventy-seven CD patients underwent 643 PFAs during the period September 1992 to August 2008. Two radiologists blinded to the clinical details independently evaluated individual PFAs and/or their reports for abnormal findings using the following criteria: normal, small bowel (SB) findings; colonic findings, acute CD complications, extra-colonic findings; global assessment/impression. The results of additional imaging studies performed within 5 days of PFA were recorded and findings were analysed. RESULTS A mean of 3.6 (range 1-22) PFAs was performed per patient during the study period. Almost 70% of films were normal (n = 449). SB abnormalities were detected in 21.8% (n = 140) PFAs; most commonly dilated loops (18.8%, n = 121) and mucosal oedema (5%, n = 32). Colonic abnormalities were present in 11.4% (n = 73); most commonly mucosal oedema (7.5%, n = 48) and dilated loops (5%, n = 32). Four cases of pneumoperitoneum were detected. There was no case of toxic megacolon. There was one case in which intra-abdominal abscess/collection was suspected and two cases of obstruction/ileus. Extracolonic findings (renal calculi, sacro-iliitis, etc.) were identified in 7.5% (n = 48). PFAs were followed by additional abdominal imaging within 5 days of PFA in 273/643 (42.5%) of cases. CONCLUSION Despite the high rates of utilization of PFA in CD patients, there is a low incidence of abnormal findings (32.5%). Many of the findings are non-specific and clinically irrelevant and PFA is frequently followed by additional abdominal imaging examinations.
World Journal of Radiology | 2016
Fiachra Moloney; Daniel Fama; Maria Twomey; Ruth O’Leary; Conor Houlihane; Kevin P. Murphy; Siobhan O’Neill; Owen J. O’Connor; Dorothy Breen; Michael M. Maher
AIM To quantify cumulative effective dose of intensive care unit (ICU) patients attributable to diagnostic imaging. METHODS This was a prospective, interdisciplinary study conducted in the ICU of a large tertiary referral and level 1 trauma center. Demographic and clinical data including age, gender, date of ICU admission, primary reason for ICU admission, APACHE II score, length of stay, number of days intubated, date of death or discharge, and re-admission data was collected on all patients admitted over a 1-year period. The overall radiation exposure was quantified by the cumulative effective radiation dose (CED) in millisieverts (mSv) and calculated using reference effective doses published by the United Kingdom National Radiation Protection Board. Pediatric patients were selected for subgroup-analysis. RESULTS A total of 2737 studies were performed in 421 patients. The total CED was 1704 mSv with a median CED of 1.5 mSv (IQR 0.04-6.6 mSv). Total CED in pediatric patients was 74.6 mSv with a median CED of 0.07 mSv (IQR 0.01-4.7 mSv). Chest radiography was the most commonly performed examination accounting for 83% of all studies but only 2.7% of total CED. Computed tomography (CT) accounted for 16% of all studies performed and contributed 97% of total CED. Trauma patients received a statistically significant higher dose [median CED 7.7 mSv (IQR 3.5-13.8 mSv)] than medical [median CED 1.4 mSv (IQR 0.05-5.4 mSv)] and surgical [median CED 1.6 mSv (IQR 0.04-7.5 mSv)] patients. Length of stay in ICU [OR = 1.12 (95%CI: 1.079-1.157)] was identified as an independent predictor of receiving a CED greater than 15 mSv. CONCLUSION Trauma patients and patients with extended ICU admission times are at increased risk of higher CEDs. CED should be minimized where feasible, especially in young patients.
World Journal of Radiology | 2017
Maria Twomey; Hannah Fleming; Fiachra Moloney; Kevin P. Murphy; Lee Crush; Siobhan O’Neill; Oisin Flanagan; Karl James; Conor Bogue; Owen J. O’Connor; Michael M. Maher
AIM To evaluate the association between C-reactive protein (CRP) and radiological evidence of lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) in infants. METHODS All patients aged less than 4 years who presented with suspected lower respiratory tract infection, who received a peri-presentation chest radiograph and CRP blood measurement over an 18-mo period were included in the study. Age, gender, source of referral, CRP, white cell count, neutrophil count along with the patients’ symptoms and radiologist’s report were recorded. RESULTS Three hundred and eleven patients met the inclusion criteria. Abnormal chest radiographs were more common in patients with elevated CRP levels (P < 0.01). Radiologic signs of LRTI were identified in 73.7% of chest radiographs when a patient had a CRP level between 50-99 mg/L. CRP levels were a better predictor of positive chest radiograph findings for those aged greater than I year compared to those 1 year or less. CONCLUSION CRP may be used in patients with suspected LRTI diagnosis to select those who are likely to have positive findings on chest radiograph, thus reducing unnecessary chest radiographs.
European Radiology | 2013
Siobhan O’Neill; Patrick D Mc Laughlin; Lee Crush; Owen J. O’Connor; Sebastian R Mc Williams; Orla F. Craig; Anne Marie Mc Garrigle; Fiona O’Neill; Jackie Bye; Max F. Ryan; Fergus Shanahan; Michael M. Maher
World Journal of Surgery | 2012
D. P. O’Leary; D. O’Neill; Patrick D. McLaughlin; Siobhan O’Neill; E. Myers; Michael M. Maher; H. P. Redmond
BMC Nephrology | 2015
Sinead Kinsella; Kevin P. Murphy; Micheal Breen; Siobhan O’Neill; Patrick D. McLaughlin; Joe Coyle; Conor Bogue; Fiona O’Neill; Niamh Moore; AnneMarie McGarrigle; Michael G. Molloy; Michael M. Maher; Joseph A. Eustace