Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Siobhan Weare is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Siobhan Weare.


International Journal of Law in Context | 2017

‘Oh you're a guy, how could you be raped by a woman, that makes no sense’: towards a case for legally recognising and labelling ‘forced-to-penetrate’ cases as rape

Siobhan Weare

The existing legal definition of rape in England and Wales is gendered, only recognising men as offenders. The law also only recognises as victims of rape those who are penetrated by a penis, either vaginally, anally or orally. This therefore excludes the female perpetrator–male victim paradigm, and more specifically those cases where male victims are ‘forced to penetrate’ female perpetrators. This paper argues that consideration needs to be given to legally recognising and thus labelling forced-to-penetrate cases as rape. Applying a methodology that draws upon the lived experiences of male victims, it is argued that there are significant similarities between compelled-penetration cases and those cases legally recognised as rape, not only because they both involve non-consensual penile penetration, but because there are clear similarities in the aggressive strategies used by perpetrators and the subsequent harms experienced by victims.


Archives of Sexual Behavior | 2018

From Coercion to Physical Force: Aggressive Strategies Used by Women Against Men in “Forced-to-Penetrate” Cases in the UK

Siobhan Weare

Abstract“Forced-to-penetrate” cases involve a man being forced-to-penetrate, with his penis and without his consent, a woman’s vagina, anus, or mouth. This article presents the first quantitative and qualitative research findings regarding such cases in the UK, exploring aggressive strategies used by women, as reported by 154 men who experienced them. The most frequently used strategies include coercion, taking advantage of men’s intoxication, and the use of force and threats of physical harm. Novel evidence is presented of women combining multiple strategies within the same incident. The article also argues that some of the strategies used by women are particularly “gendered,” with them taking advantage of their roles as women. The findings presented here raise questions for criminal justice professionals working in the area of sexual violence, as well as highlighting the need for future research.


Laws | 2013

“The Mad”, “The Bad”, “The Victim”: Gendered Constructions of Women Who Kill within the Criminal Justice System

Siobhan Weare


International journal for the semiotics of law | 2017

Bad, Mad or Sad? Legal Language, Narratives, and Identity Constructions of Women Who Kill their Children in England and Wales

Siobhan Weare


Archive | 2014

The socio-legal response(s) to women who kill : a proposed model for acknowledging their agency

Siobhan Weare; Alisdair Gillespie; Sarah Beresford


International journal for the semiotics of law | 2018

Mother, Monster, Mrs, I: A critical evaluation of gendered naming strategies in English sentencing remarks of women who kill

Siobhan Weare


Archive | 2017

Forced-to-penetrate cases : Lived experiences of men - Baseline Research Findings

Siobhan Weare


Archive | 2016

Corpus linguistic approaches to women who kill: explorations of gendered identities and agency in sentencing remarks

Siobhan Weare


Archive | 2016

Women who kill: a legal-linguistic analysis of identityconstruction after homicide

Siobhan Weare


Archive | 2016

Corpus linguistics, law and women who kill: anintersection around homicide

Siobhan Weare

Collaboration


Dive into the Siobhan Weare's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge