Siri Rostoft Kristjansson

Comprehensive geriatric assessment can predict complications in elderly patients after elective surgery for colorectal cancer: A prospective observational cohort study

OBJECTIVE To examine the association between the outcomes of a pre-operative comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) and the risk of severe post-operative complications in elderly patients electively operated for colorectal cancer. METHODS One hundred seventy-eight consecutive patients ≥ 70 years electively operated for all stages of colorectal cancer were prospectively examined. A pre-operative CGA was performed, and patients were categorized as fit, intermediate, or frail. The main outcome measure was severe complications within 30 days of surgery. RESULTS Twenty-one patients (12%) were categorized as fit, 81 (46%) as intermediate, and 76 (43%) as frail. Eighty-three patients experienced severe complications, including three deaths; 7/21 (33%) of fit patients, 29/81 (36%) of intermediate patients and 47/76 (62%) of frail patients (p=0.002). Increasing age and ASA classification were not associated with complications in this series. CONCLUSION CGA can identify frail patients who have a significantly increased risk of severe complications after elective surgery for colorectal cancer.

Frailty measures, inflammatory biomarkers and post-operative complications in older surgical patients

of the Edmonton Frail Scale. Age Ageing 2006; 35: 526–9. 15. Dasgupta M, Rolfson DB, Stolee P, Borrie MJ, Speechley M. Frailty is associated with postoperative complications in older adults with medical problems. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2009; 48: 78–83. 16. Rockwood K, Mitnitski A. Frailty in relation to the accumulation of deficits. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2007; 62A: 722–7. 17. Searle S, Mitnitski A, Gahbauer E, Gill T, Rockwood K. A standard procedure for creating a frailty index. BMC Geriatr 2008; 8: 24. 18. SAS Institute Inc. SAS Version 9.1.3. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc., 2003. 19. Gaugler JE, Duval S, Anderson KA, Kane RL. Predictors of nursing home admission in the U.S.: a meta-analysis. BMC Geriatr 2007; 7: 13. 20. Rockwood K, Mitnitski A. Limits to deficit accumulation in elderly people. Mach Ageing Dev 2006; 127: 494–6. 21. Markle-Reid M, Weir R, Browne G, Roberts J, Gafni A, Henderson S. Health promotion for frail older home care clients. J Adv Nurs 2006; 54: 381–95.

Frailty indicators and functional status in older patients after colorectal cancer surgery

OBJECTIVES The number of older survivors from colorectal cancer is increasing, but little is known regarding long-term consequences of cancer treatment in this patient group. Physical function is an important outcome for older patients, affecting both autonomy and quality of life. We aimed to investigate physical function in older patients with colorectal cancer before and after surgery, and to examine the role of individual frailty indicators as predictors of functional decline. MATERIAL AND METHODS We present 16-28 months follow-up data of older patients after elective surgery for colorectal cancer. During a home-visit, physical function was evaluated by activities of daily living (ADL), instrumental activities of daily living (IADL), the timed up-and-go (TUG) test, and grip strength. Measurements were compared with those obtained preoperatively using the Wilcoxon signed rank test. Frailty indicators were dichotomized and implemented in logistic regression models to explore their associations to a decline in the physical function scores. RESULTS Eighty-four patients were included and the median age was 82 years. There was a significant decrease in ADL (p = 0.04) and IADL scores (p ≤ 0.001) at follow-up. We found no associations between frailty indicators and the risk of decline in physical functioning. CONCLUSION In our population of older patients with surgically treated colorectal cancer, there was a significant decline in ADL- and IADL-scores at follow-up. No change was found in TUG or grip strength, and frailty indicators did not predict decline in physical function.

Surgical risk and post-operative complications in older unfit cancer patients

Surgeons have always dealt with elderly cancer patients, but understanding frailty and tailoring treatment is a new achievement endeavour. Mounting evidence is resulting in the introduction of geriatric assessment into clinical practice. Particularly, undernourishment should be assessed and corrected in order to avoid emergency situations whenever possible.

Geriatric assessment is superior to oncologists’ clinical judgement in identifying frailty

Background:Frailty is a syndrome associated with increased vulnerability and an important predictor of outcomes in older cancer patients. Systematic assessments to identify frailty are seldom applied, and oncologists’ ability to identify frailty is scarcely investigated.Methods:We compared oncologists’ classification of frailty (onc-frail) based on clinical judgement with a modified geriatric assessment (mGA), and investigated associations between frailty and overall survival. Patients ⩾70 years referred for medical cancer treatment were eligible. mGA-frailty was defined as impairment in at least one of the following: daily activities, comorbidity, polypharmacy, physical function or at least one geriatric syndrome (cognitive impairment, depression, malnutrition, falls).Results:Three hundred and seven patients were enroled, 288 (94%) completed the mGA, 286 (93%) were rated by oncologists. Median age was 77 years, 56% had metastases, 85% performance status (PS) 0–1. Overall, 104/286 (36%) were onc-frail and 140/288 (49%) mGA-frail, the agreement was fair (kappa value 0.30 (95% CI 0.19; 0.41)), and 67 mGA-frail patients who frequently had localised disease, good PS and received curative treatment, were missed by the oncologists. Only mGA-frailty was independently prognostic for survival (HR 1.61, 95% CI 1.14; 2.27; P=0.007).Conclusions:Systematic assessment of geriatric domains is needed to aid oncologists in identifying frail patients with poor survival.

Preoperative Risk Assessment

Surgical excision and/or cytoreduction currently represent the treatment of choice for most gynecological tumors, regardless of the patients’ age. A robust body of evidence supports this. Despite operative complications and mortality, long-term cancer-related survival may be significantly improved by an aggressive surgical approach in the older age group as it is for younger women.

A Practical Mini-Guide to Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment

The Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) is a practical tool used by geriatricians in their daily work. Unfortunately, there is no such thing as an internationally standardized CGA, but we will present some of the tools that are most frequently used in the field of geriatric oncology.