Sivabalan Vasudavan

Submucous Cleft Palate and Velopharyngeal Insufficiency: Comparison of Speech Outcomes Using Three Operative Techniques by One Surgeon

Objective Our purpose was to compare speech outcomes among three primary procedures for symptomatic submucous cleft palate (SMCP): two-flap palatoplasty with muscular retropositioning, double-opposing Z-palatoplasty, or pharyngeal flap. Design Retrospective review. Setting Tertiary hospital. Patients, Participants All children with SMCP treated by the senior author between 1984 and 2008. Interventions One of three primary procedures: two-flap palatoplasty with muscular retropositioning, double-opposing Z-palatoplasty, or pharyngeal flap. Main outcome Measures Speech outcome and need for a secondary operation were analyzed among procedures. Success was defined as normal or borderline competent velopharyngeal function. Failure was defined as persistent borderline insufficiency or velopharyngeal insufficiency with recommendation for a secondary operation. Results We identified 58 patients with SMCP who were treated for velopharyngeal insufficiency. We found significant differences in median age at operation among the procedures (p < .001). Two-flap palatoplasty with muscular retropositioning (n = 24), double-opposing Z-palatoplasty (n = 19), and pharyngeal flap (n = 15) were performed at a median of 2.5, 3.6, and 9.5 years, respectively. There were significant differences in success among procedures (p = .018). Normal or borderline competent function was achieved in 6/20 (30%) patients who underwent two-flap palatoplasty, 10/15 (67%) following double-opposing Z-palatoplasty, and 11/12 (92%) following pharyngeal flap. Among patients treated with palatoplasty, success was independent of age at operation (p = .16). Conclusions Double-opposing Z-palatoplasty is more effective than two-flap palatoplasty with muscular retropositioning. For children older than 4 years, primary pharyngeal flap is also highly successful but equally so as a secondary operation and can be reserved, if necessary, following double-opposing Z-palatoplasty.

Nasolabial Soft Tissue Changes After Le Fort I Advancement

PURPOSE To identify the nasolabial soft tissue changes that occur after Le Fort I advancement. MATERIALS AND METHODS A prospective study of patients who had Le Fort I advancement at the Childrens Hospital Boston from 2005 to 2007. The pre- and postoperative anthropometeric nasolabial measurements were recorded by a single examiner. RESULTS A total of 37 patients with a mean age of 18.6 years at the time of operation and a mean follow-up of 12.6 months were recruited. Nearly one half of the study sample (16 of 37) had cleft lip/palate. Direct anthropometry showed a reduction of the nasal length by 1.3 mm while the nasal tip protrusion increased by 1.1 mm. The nasofrontal angle decreased by 9.8° and the upper lip moved forward by 4.15 mm, reflecting the advancement in the maxilla. The height of the cutaneous upper lip increased by 0.4 mm. No significant differences were found in the soft tissue response observed between the cleft and noncleft subjects. CONCLUSIONS Le Fort I advancement produces elevation of the nasal tip, as seen by a reduction in the nasal length, an increase in the nasal tip protrusion, and a concomitant reduction in the nasofrontal angle. Additionally, the cutaneous lip height increased, most likely due to an unfurling of the upper lip.

Craniofacial Growth in Patients With FGFR3Pro250Arg Mutation After Fronto-Orbital Advancement in Infancy

Background: The facial features of children with FGFR3Pro250Arg mutation (Muenke syndrome) differ from those with the other eponymous craniosynostotic disorders. We documented midfacial growth and position of the forehead after fronto-orbital advancement (FOA) in patients with the FGFR3 mutation. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all patients who had an FGFR3Pro250Arg mutation and craniosynostosis. Only patients who had FOA in infancy or early childhood were included. The clinical records were evaluated for type of sutural fusion; midfacial hypoplasia and other clinical data, including age at operation; type of procedures and fixation (wire vs resorbable plate); frequency of frontal readvancement, forehead augmentation, midfacial advancement; and complications. Preoperative and postoperative sagittal orbital-globe relationship was measured by direct anthropometry. Outcome of FOA was graded according to the Whittaker classification as category I, no revision; category II, minor revisions, that is, foreheadplasty; category III, alternative bony work; category IV; redo of initial procedure (ie, secondary FOA). Midfacial position was determined by clinical examination and lateral cephalometry. Results: A total of 21 study patients with Muenke syndrome (8 males and 13 females) were analyzed. The types of craniosynostosis were bilateral coronal (n = 15), of which 3 also had concurrent sagittal fusion, and unilateral coronal (n = 5). Two patients had early endoscopic suturectomy, but later required FOA. Mean age at FOA was 22.9 months (range, 3-128 months). Secondary FOA was necessary in 40% of patients (n = 8), and secondary foreheadplasty in 25% (n = 5) of patients. No frontal revisions were needed in the remaining 35% of patients (n = 7). Mean age at initial FOA was significantly younger in the group requiring repeat FOA or foreheadplasty compared with patients who did not require revision (P < 0.05). Location of synostosis, type of fixation, and bone grafting did not significantly affect the need for revision. Only 30% (n = 6) of patients developed midfacial retrusion. Conclusions: The frequency of frontal revision in patients with Muenke syndrome who had FOA in infancy and early childhood is lower than previously reported. Age at forehead advancement inversely correlated with the incidence of relapse and need for secondary frontal procedures. Midfacial retrusion is relatively uncommon in FGFR3Pro250Arg patients.

Three-Dimensional Analysis of Nasal Symmetry Following Primary Correction of Unilateral Cleft Lip Nasal Deformity

Objective To evaluate nasal symmetry using three-dimensional photogrammetry following primary tip rhinoplasty with or without an internal splint in patients with unilateral complete cleft lip/palate. Design We captured three-dimensional images of patients with unilateral complete cleft lip/palate who underwent nasolabial repair by rotation-advancement of the lip and primary tip rhinoplasty, either with or without an internal resorbable splint, and normal control subjects. We assessed nasal symmetry by identifying the plane of maximum symmetry and the root-mean-square deviation between native and reflected surfaces. Patients/Participants We imaged 38 controls and 38 subjects with repaired unilateral complete cleft lip/palate (20 with, 18 without an internal splint). Results Nasal asymmetry root-mean-square deviation clustered between 0.19 and 0.50 mm (median = 0.24 ± 0.08 mm) for controls; whereas, those with repaired unilateral complete cleft lip/palate ranged from 0.4 to 1.5 mm (median = 0.75 ± 0.40 mm). Although root-mean-square deviation ranges overlapped, patients with repaired unilateral complete cleft lip/palate had significantly greater asymmetry than controls (P < .001). We found no difference in asymmetry between patients with or without an internal splint (P = .5). Conclusions Three-dimensional photogrammetry was used to successfully compare symmetry among different patient and control groups. Although “normal” nasal symmetry was attained in some patients following cleft lip/nasal repair, most had persistent asymmetry compared with normal controls. Placement of a resorbable internal splint did not improve symmetry in patients with unilateral complete cleft lip/palate.

Randomized trials published in the journal of dental research are cited more often compared with those in other top-tier non-specialty-specific dental journals.

BACKGROUND AND AIM Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are viewed as the gold standard for clinical research. Oftentimes the citation counts serve as an important measure for assessing the significance of an RCT to promote the dissemination of science. This study attempts to identify the factors associated with the number of times RCTs are cited within the first 24 months since publication. MATERIALS AND METHODS RCTs published between January 1, 2002, and November 30, 2006, in 4 journals (Journal of Dental Research, European Journal of Oral Sciences, Journal of Dentistry, and Clinical Oral Investigations) were selected for analysis. Citation counts of RCTs in the first 24 months since publication was the outcome variable. The independent variables included journal of publication, geographic region of origin of study, number of authors, financial support, number of references, presentation of a statistically significant result, and if the study was conducted on animals. Bivariate associations between the outcome and independent variables were examined by Kruskal-Wallis test, Mann-Whitney U test, and Spearman rank correlations where appropriate. A multivariable negative binomial regression model was also built to examine the association. RESULTS A total of 163 RCTs were selected for analysis. The mean citation count for the first 24 months count was 2.61. Close to 20% of RCTs were not cited even once in this observation period. RCTs published in the highest impact factor journal (Journal of Dental Research) tended to be cited most often (P < .05). CONCLUSION Based on our initial analysis of 4 journals, publishing randomized trials in high-impact journals will likely provide better dissemination of research findings.