Sofia C. Masri

Normal left ventricular myocardial thickness for middle aged and older subjects with SSFP cardiac MR: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis

Background— Increased left ventricular myocardial thickness (LVMT) is a feature of several cardiac diseases. The purpose of this study was to establish standard reference values of normal LVMT with cardiac magnetic resonance and to assess variation with image acquisition plane, demographics, and left ventricular function. Methods and Results— End-diastolic LVMT was measured on cardiac magnetic resonance steady-state free precession cine long and short axis images in 300 consecutive participants free of cardiac disease (169 women; 65.6±8.5 years) of the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis cohort. Mean LVMT on short axis images at the mid-cavity level was 5.3±0.9 mm and 6.3±1.1 mm for women and men, respectively. The average of the maximum LVMT at the mid-cavity for women/men was 7/9 mm (long axis) and 7/8 mm (short axis). Mean LVMT was positively associated with weight (0.02 mm/kg; P=0.01) and body surface area (1.1 mm/m2; P<0.001). No relationship was found between mean LVMT and age or height. Greater mean LVMT was associated with lower left ventricular end-diastolic volume (0.01 mm/mL; P<0.01), a lower left ventricular end-systolic volume (−0.01 mm/mL; P=0.01), and lower left ventricular stroke volume (−0.01 mm/mL; P<0.05). LVMT measured on long axis images at the basal and mid-cavity level were slightly greater (by 6% and 10%, respectively) than measurements obtained on short axis images; apical LVMT values on long axis images were 20% less than those on short axis images. Conclusions— Normal values for wall thickness are provided for middle-aged and older subjects. Normal LVMT is lower for women than men. Observed values vary depending on the imaging plane for measurement.

Normal left ventricular myocardial thickness for middle-aged and older subjects with steady-state free precession cardiac magnetic resonance: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis.

Background— Increased left ventricular myocardial thickness (LVMT) is a feature of several cardiac diseases. The purpose of this study was to establish standard reference values of normal LVMT with cardiac magnetic resonance and to assess variation with image acquisition plane, demographics, and left ventricular function. Methods and Results— End-diastolic LVMT was measured on cardiac magnetic resonance steady-state free precession cine long and short axis images in 300 consecutive participants free of cardiac disease (169 women; 65.6±8.5 years) of the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis cohort. Mean LVMT on short axis images at the mid-cavity level was 5.3±0.9 mm and 6.3±1.1 mm for women and men, respectively. The average of the maximum LVMT at the mid-cavity for women/men was 7/9 mm (long axis) and 7/8 mm (short axis). Mean LVMT was positively associated with weight (0.02 mm/kg; P=0.01) and body surface area (1.1 mm/m2; P<0.001). No relationship was found between mean LVMT and age or height. Greater mean LVMT was associated with lower left ventricular end-diastolic volume (0.01 mm/mL; P<0.01), a lower left ventricular end-systolic volume (−0.01 mm/mL; P=0.01), and lower left ventricular stroke volume (−0.01 mm/mL; P<0.05). LVMT measured on long axis images at the basal and mid-cavity level were slightly greater (by 6% and 10%, respectively) than measurements obtained on short axis images; apical LVMT values on long axis images were 20% less than those on short axis images. Conclusions— Normal values for wall thickness are provided for middle-aged and older subjects. Normal LVMT is lower for women than men. Observed values vary depending on the imaging plane for measurement.

Systematic donor selection review process improves cardiac transplant volumes and outcomes

BACKGROUND Heart transplant remains the definitive therapy for advanced heart failure patients but is limited by organ availability. We identified a large number of donor hearts from our organ procurement organization (OPO) being exported to other regions. METHODS We engaged a multidisciplinary team including transplant surgeons, cardiologists, and our OPO colleagues to identify opportunities to improve our center-specific organ utilization rate. We performed a retrospective analysis of donor offers before and after institution of a novel review process. RESULTS Each donor offer made to our program was reviewed on a monthly basis from July 2013 to June 2014 and compared with the previous year. This review process resulted in a transplant utilization rate of 28% for period 1 versus 49% for period 2 (P = .007). Limiting the analysis to offers from our local OPO changed our utilization rate from 46% to 75% (P = .02). Transplant volume increased from 22 to 35 between the 2 study periods. Thirty-day and 1-year mortality were unchanged over the 2 periods. A total of 58 hearts were refused by our center and transplanted at other centers. During period 1, the 30-day and 1-year survival rates for recipients of those organs were 98% and 90%, respectively, comparable with our historical survival data. CONCLUSIONS The simple process of systematically reviewing donor turndown events as a group tended to reduce variability, increase confidence in expanded criteria for donors, and resulted in improved donor organ utilization and transplant volumes.

Toward Genetics-Driven Early Intervention in Dilated Cardiomyopathy: Design and Implementation of the DCM Precision Medicine Study

Background— The cause of idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is unknown by definition, but its familial subtype is considered to have a genetic component. We hypothesize that most idiopathic DCM, whether familial or nonfamilial, has a genetic basis, in which case a genetics-driven approach to identifying at-risk family members for clinical screening and early intervention could reduce morbidity and mortality. Methods— On the basis of this hypothesis, we have launched the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute- and National Human Genome Research Institute-funded DCM Precision Medicine Study, which aims to enroll 1300 individuals (600 non-Hispanic African ancestry, 600 non-Hispanic European ancestry, and 100 Hispanic) who meet rigorous clinical criteria for idiopathic DCM along with 2600 of their relatives. Enrolled relatives will undergo clinical cardiovascular screening to identify asymptomatic disease, and all individuals with idiopathic DCM will undergo exome sequencing to identify relevant variants in genes previously implicated in DCM. Results will be returned by genetic counselors 12 to 14 months after enrollment. The data obtained will be used to describe the prevalence of familial DCM among idiopathic DCM cases and the genetic architecture of idiopathic DCM in multiple ethnicity–ancestry groups. We will also conduct a randomized controlled trial to test the effectiveness of Family Heart Talk, an intervention to aid family communication, for improving uptake of preventive screening and surveillance in at-risk first-degree relatives. Conclusions— We anticipate that this study will demonstrate that idiopathic DCM has a genetic basis and guide best practices for a genetics-driven approach to early intervention in at-risk relatives. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT03037632.

Radiation recall reaction causing cardiotoxicity

Radiation recall phenomenon is a tissue reaction that develops within a previously irradiated area, precipitated by the subsequent administration of certain chemotherapeutic agents. It commonly affects the skin, but can also involve internal organs with functional consequences. To our best knowledge, this phenomenon has never been reported as a complication on the heart and should be consider as a potential cause of cardiotoxicity.

Evolving Concepts in Diagnosis and Management of Cardiogenic Shock

Despite efforts at early revascularization in acute coronary syndrome and advancing technologies in the field of temporary mechanical circulatory support (TMCS), the mortality from cardiogenic shock (CS) remains very high. Treatment of these patients involves understanding the trajectory of the condition and making complex decisions regarding the appropriate selection of medical and device therapies. The current definition of CS is not universally applicable and defines shock in absolute terms. CS should be thought of as a continuum rather than a binary diagnosis and is best defined as a clinical syndrome of tissue hypoperfusion resulting from cardiac dysfunction. Early intervention with appropriate timing and selection of apposite TMCS device may be the key to improving outcomes. TMCS device selection is a complex process requiring consideration of the severity of CS, patient-specific risks, technical limitations, overall goals of care, and assessment of futility of care. In this review, we discuss identification and pathophysiology of CS, and critically review acute management strategies, both medical and mechanical therapies and outline areas that need further investigation.

Risk assessment of patients with clinical manifestations of cardiac sarcoidosis with positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging

BACKGROUND Prior studies have shown that late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) on cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) confer incremental risk assessment in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis (CS). However, the incremental prognostic value of the combined use of LGE and FDG compared to either test alone has not been investigated, and this is the aim of the present study. METHODS Retrospective observational study of 56 symptomatic patients with high clinical suspicion for CS who underwent LGE-CMR and FDG-PET and were followed for the occurrence of death and/or malignant ventricular arrhythmias (VA). RESULTS The combination of PET and CMR yielded the following groups: 1) LGE-negative/normal-PET (n=20), 2) LGE-positive/abnormal-FDG (n=20), and 3) LGE-positive/normal FDG (n=16). After a median follow-up of 2.6years (IQR 1.2-4.1), 16 patients had events (7 deaths, 10 VA). All, but 1, events occurred in patients with LGE. LGE-positive/abnormal-FDG (7 events, HR 10.1 [95% CI 1.2-84]; P=0.03) and LGE-positive/normal-FDG (8 events, HR 13.3 [1.7-107]; P=0.015) patients had comparable risk of events compared to the reference LGE-negative/normal-PET group. In adjusted Cox-regression analysis, presence of LGE (HR 18.1 [1.8-178]; P=0.013) was the only independent predictor of events. CONCLUSION CS patients with LGE alone or in association with FDG were at similar risk of future events, which suggests that outcomes may be driven by the presence of LGE (myocardial fibrosis) and not FDG (inflammation).

Normal Left Ventricular Myocardial Thickness for Middle-Aged and Older Subjects With Steady-State Free Precession Cardiac Magnetic ResonanceClinical Perspective

Background— Increased left ventricular myocardial thickness (LVMT) is a feature of several cardiac diseases. The purpose of this study was to establish standard reference values of normal LVMT with cardiac magnetic resonance and to assess variation with image acquisition plane, demographics, and left ventricular function. Methods and Results— End-diastolic LVMT was measured on cardiac magnetic resonance steady-state free precession cine long and short axis images in 300 consecutive participants free of cardiac disease (169 women; 65.6±8.5 years) of the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis cohort. Mean LVMT on short axis images at the mid-cavity level was 5.3±0.9 mm and 6.3±1.1 mm for women and men, respectively. The average of the maximum LVMT at the mid-cavity for women/men was 7/9 mm (long axis) and 7/8 mm (short axis). Mean LVMT was positively associated with weight (0.02 mm/kg; P=0.01) and body surface area (1.1 mm/m2; P<0.001). No relationship was found between mean LVMT and age or height. Greater mean LVMT was associated with lower left ventricular end-diastolic volume (0.01 mm/mL; P<0.01), a lower left ventricular end-systolic volume (−0.01 mm/mL; P=0.01), and lower left ventricular stroke volume (−0.01 mm/mL; P<0.05). LVMT measured on long axis images at the basal and mid-cavity level were slightly greater (by 6% and 10%, respectively) than measurements obtained on short axis images; apical LVMT values on long axis images were 20% less than those on short axis images. Conclusions— Normal values for wall thickness are provided for middle-aged and older subjects. Normal LVMT is lower for women than men. Observed values vary depending on the imaging plane for measurement.

Middle-aged and older subjects with steady-state free precession cardiac magnetic resonance the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis

Background— Increased left ventricular myocardial thickness (LVMT) is a feature of several cardiac diseases. The purpose of this study was to establish standard reference values of normal LVMT with cardiac magnetic resonance and to assess variation with image acquisition plane, demographics, and left ventricular function. Methods and Results— End-diastolic LVMT was measured on cardiac magnetic resonance steady-state free precession cine long and short axis images in 300 consecutive participants free of cardiac disease (169 women; 65.6±8.5 years) of the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis cohort. Mean LVMT on short axis images at the mid-cavity level was 5.3±0.9 mm and 6.3±1.1 mm for women and men, respectively. The average of the maximum LVMT at the mid-cavity for women/men was 7/9 mm (long axis) and 7/8 mm (short axis). Mean LVMT was positively associated with weight (0.02 mm/kg; P=0.01) and body surface area (1.1 mm/m2; P<0.001). No relationship was found between mean LVMT and age or height. Greater mean LVMT was associated with lower left ventricular end-diastolic volume (0.01 mm/mL; P<0.01), a lower left ventricular end-systolic volume (−0.01 mm/mL; P=0.01), and lower left ventricular stroke volume (−0.01 mm/mL; P<0.05). LVMT measured on long axis images at the basal and mid-cavity level were slightly greater (by 6% and 10%, respectively) than measurements obtained on short axis images; apical LVMT values on long axis images were 20% less than those on short axis images. Conclusions— Normal values for wall thickness are provided for middle-aged and older subjects. Normal LVMT is lower for women than men. Observed values vary depending on the imaging plane for measurement.