Solomon Tesfaye

Diabetic neuropathies: Update on definitions, diagnostic criteria, estimation of severity, and treatments

Preceding the joint meeting of the 19th annual Diabetic Neuropathy Study Group of the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (NEURODIAB) and the 8th International Symposium on Diabetic Neuropathy in Toronto, Canada, 13–18 October 2009, expert panels were convened to provide updates on classification, definitions, diagnostic criteria, and treatments of diabetic peripheral neuropathies (DPNs), autonomic neuropathy, painful DPNs, and structural alterations in DPNs.

Vascular factors and metabolic interactions in the pathogenesis of diabetic neuropathy

Abstract. Diabetes mellitus is a major cause of peripheral neuropathy, commonly manifested as distal symmetrical polyneuropathy. This review examines evidence for the importance of vascular factors and their metabolic substrate from human and animal studies. Diabetic neuropathy is associated with risk factors for macrovascular disease and with other microvascular complications such as poor metabolic control, dyslipidaemia, body mass index, smoking, microalbuminuria and retinopathy. Studies in human and animal models have shown reduced nerve perfusion and endoneurial hypoxia. Investigations on biopsy material from patients with mild to severe neuropathy show graded structural changes in nerve microvasculature including basement membrane thickening, pericyte degeneration and endothelial cell hyperplasia. Arterio-venous shunting also contributes to reduced endoneurial perfusion. These vascular changes strongly correlate with clinical defects and nerve pathology. Vasodilator treatment in patients and animals improves nerve function. Early vasa nervorum functional changes are caused by the metabolic insults of diabetes, the balance between vasodilation and vasoconstriction is altered. Vascular endothelium is particularly vulnerable, with deficits in the major endothelial vasodilators, nitric oxide, endothelium-derived hyperpolarising factor and prostacyclin. Hyperglycaemia and dyslipidaemia driven oxidative stress is a major contributor, enhanced by advanced glycation end product formation and polyol pathway activation. These are coupled to protein kinase C activation and ω-6 essential fatty acid dysmetabolism. Together, this complex of interacting metabolic factors accounts for endothelial dysfunction, reduced nerve perfusion and function. Thus, the evidence emphasises the importance of vascular dysfunction, driven by metabolic change, as a cause of diabetic neuropathy, and highlights potential therapeutic approaches. [Diabetologia (2001) 44: 1973–1988]

Prevalence of diabetic peripheral neuropathy and its relation to glycaemic control and potential risk factors: the EURODIAB IDDM Complications Study

Summary The EURODIAB IDDM Complications Study involved the examination of 3250 randomly selected insulin-dependent diabetic patients, from 31 centres in 16 European countries. Part of the examination included an assessment of neurological function including neuropathic symptoms and physical signs, vibration perception threshold, tests of autonomic function and the prevalence of impotence. The prevalence of diabetic neuropathy across Europe was 28 % with no significant geographical differences. Significant correlations were observed between the presence of diabetic peripheral neuropathy with age (p < 0.05), duration of diabetes (p < 0.001), quality of metabolic control (p < 0.001), height (p < 0.01), the presence of background or proliferative diabetic retinopathy (p < 0.01), cigarette smoking (p < 0.001), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (p < 0.001) and the presence of cardiovascular disease (p < 0.05), thus confirming previous associations. New associations have been identified from this study – namely with elevated diastolic blood pressure (p < 0.05), the presence of severe ketoacidosis (p < 0.001), an increase in the levels of fasting triglyceride (p < 0.001), and the presence of microalbuminuria (p < 0.01). All the data were adjusted for age, duration of diabetes and HbA1c. Although alcohol intake correlated with absence of leg reflexes and autonomic dysfunction, there was no overall association of alcohol consumption and neuropathy. The reported problems of impotence were extremely variable between centres, suggesting many cultural and attitudinal differences in the collection of such information in different European countries. In conclusion, this study has identified previously known and new potential risk factors for the development of diabetic peripheral neuropathy. [Diabetologia (1996) 39: 1377–1384]

Surrogate Markers of Small Fiber Damage in Human Diabetic Neuropathy

Surrogate markers of diabetic neuropathy are being actively sought to facilitate the diagnosis, measure the progression, and assess the benefits of therapeutic intervention in patients with diabetic neuropathy. We have quantified small nerve fiber pathological changes using the technique of intraepidermal nerve fiber (IENF) assessment and the novel in vivo technique of corneal confocal microscopy (CCM). Fifty-four diabetic patients stratified for neuropathy, using neurological evaluation, neurophysiology, and quantitative sensory testing, and 15 control subjects were studied. They underwent a punch skin biopsy to quantify IENFs and CCM to quantify corneal nerve fibers. IENF density (IENFD), branch density, and branch length showed a progressive reduction with increasing severity of neuropathy, which was significant in patients with mild, moderate, and severe neuropathy. CCM also showed a progressive reduction in corneal nerve fiber density (CNFD) and branch density, but the latter was significantly reduced even in diabetic patients without neuropathy. Both IENFD and CNFD correlated significantly with cold detection and heat as pain thresholds. Intraepidermal and corneal nerve fiber lengths were reduced in patients with painful compared with painless diabetic neuropathy. Both IENF and CCM assessment accurately quantify small nerve fiber damage in diabetic patients. However, CCM quantifies small fiber damage rapidly and noninvasively and detects earlier stages of nerve damage compared with IENF pathology. This may make it an ideal technique to accurately diagnose and assess progression of human diabetic neuropathy.

Cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy in diabetes: clinical impact, assessment, diagnosis, and management

The Cardiovascular Autonomic Neuropathy (CAN) Subcommittee of the Toronto Consensus Panel on Diabetic Neuropathy worked to update CAN guidelines, with regard to epidemiology, clinical impact, diagnosis, usefulness of CAN testing, and management. CAN is the impairment of cardiovascular autonomic control in the setting of diabetes after exclusion of other causes. The prevalence of confirmed CAN is around 20%, and increases up to 65% with age and diabetes duration. Established risk factors for CAN are glycaemic control in type 1 and a combination of hypertension, dyslipidaemia, obesity, and glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes. CAN is a risk marker of mortality and cardiovascular morbidity, and possibly a progression promoter of diabetic nephropathy. Criteria for CAN diagnosis and staging are: (1) one abnormal cardiovagal test result identifies possible or early CAN; (2) at least two abnormal cardiovagal test results are required for definite or confirmed CAN; and (3) the presence of orthostatic hypotension in addition to abnormal heart rate test results identifies severe or advanced CAN. Progressive stages of CAN are associated with increasingly worse prognosis. CAN assessment is relevant in clinical practice for (1) diagnosis of CAN clinical forms, (2) detection and tailored treatment of CAN clinical correlates (e.g. tachycardia, orthostatic hypotension, non‐dipping, QT interval prolongation), (3) risk stratification for diabetic complications and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, and (4) modulation of targets of diabetes therapy. Evidence on the cost‐effectiveness of CAN testing is lacking. Apart from the preventive role of intensive glycaemic control in type 1 diabetes, recommendations cannot be made for most therapeutic approaches to CAN. Copyright

Advances in the epidemiology, pathogenesis and management of diabetic peripheral neuropathy

Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) affects up to 50% of patients with diabetes and is a major cause of morbidity and increased mortality. Its clinical manifestations include painful neuropathic symptoms and insensitivity, which increases the risk for burns, injuries and foot ulceration.

Sural nerve pathology in diabetic patients with minimal but progressive neuropathy

Aims/hypothesisThe early pathological features of human diabetic neuropathy are not clearly defined. Therefore we quantified nerve fibre and microvascular pathology in sural nerve biopsies from diabetic patients with minimal neuropathy.MethodsTwelve diabetic patients underwent detailed assessment of neuropathy and fascicular sural nerve biopsy at baseline, with repeat assessment of neuropathy 8.7±0.6 years later.ResultsAt baseline, neuropathic symptoms, neurological deficits, quantitative sensory testing, cardiac autonomic function and peripheral nerve electrophysiology showed minimal abnormality, which deteriorated at follow-up. Myelinated fibre density, fibre and axonal area, and g-ratio were normal but teased fibre studies showed paranodal abnormalities (p<0.001), segmental demyelination (p<0.01) and remyelination (p<0.01) without axonal degeneration. Unassociated Schwann cell profile density (p<0.04) and unmyelinated axon density (p<0.001) were increased and axon diameter was decreased (p<0.007). Endoneurial capillaries demonstrated basement membrane thickening (p<0.006), endothelial cell hyperplasia (p<0.004) and a reduction in luminal area (p<0.007).Conclusions/interpretationThe early pathological features of human diabetic neuropathy include an abnormality of the myelinated fibre Schwann cell and unmyelinated fibre degeneration with regeneration. These changes are accompanied by a significant endoneurial microangiopathy.

Electrical spinal-cord stimulation for painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy.

BACKGROUND Conventional treatment for painful peripheral diabetic neuropathy is largely symptomatic and often ineffective, with unacceptable side-effects. We tested electrical spinal-cord stimulation for the management of chronic neuropathic pain. METHODS Ten diabetic patients who did not respond to conventional treatment (mean age 51 [SD 9.3] years, six with type II diabetes, mean duration of diabetes 12 [6.3] years, mean duration of neuropathy 5 [2.1] years) were studied. The electrode was implanted in the thoracic/lumbar epidural space. Immediate neuropathic pain relief was assessed by visual analogue scale (VAS) after connecting the electrode, in a random order, to a percutaneous electrical stimulator or to a placebo stimulator. Exercise tolerance was assessed on a treadmill. FINDINGS Eight subjects had statistically significant pain relief with the electrical stimulator (p < 0.02) and were therefore converted to a permanent system. Statistically significant relief of both background and peak neuropathic pain was achieved at 3 months (n = 7, p = 0.016), at 6 months (n = 7, p = 0.03), and at the end of the study (14 months, n = 7, background pain p = 0.06, peak pain p = 0.03). One patient died 2 months after the start of the study of unrelated cause while continuing to benefit from treatment and another patient ceased to benefit at 4 months. McGill pain questionnaire scores with the stimulator turned off did not change significantly from baseline scores, indicating that the severity of the underlying pain was unaltered. However, with the stimulator turned on, there was a statistically significant (p < 0.05) improvement in all four components of the score, by the end of the study. At the end of the study, six patients continued to gain significant pain relief and used the stimulator as the sole treatment for their neuropathic pain. For example, median background and peak pain scores at the end of study, were, respectively, 77 and 81 with the stimulator off and 23 and 20 with the stimulator on. Exercise tolerance significantly improved at 3 months (n = 7, median % increase 85 [IQR, 62-360], p = 0.015) and at 6 months (n = 6, 163 [61-425], p = 0.0007). Electrophysiological tests, vibration perception-threshold, and glycaemic control were unchanged. INTERPRETATION Electrical spinal-cord stimulation offers a new and effective way of relieving chronic diabetic neuropathic pain and improves exercise tolerance. The technique should be considered in patients with neuropathic pain who do not respond to conventional treatment.

Vascular factors in diabetic neuropathy

SummaryDespite considerable research we still do not have a comprehensive explanation for the pathogenesis of diabetic neuropathy. Although chronic hyperglycaemia is almost certainly involved, it is not known whether the primary pathology is metabolic, microvascular, or an interaction between the two. Hyperglycaemia-induced polyol pathway hyperactivity associated with nerve sorbitol accumulation and myo-inositol depletion may play a part in the genesis of diabetic neuropathy. The case for microvascular disease in diabetic neuropathy is now strong. Fibre loss in human sural nerve is multifocal, suggesting ischaemia. The degree of vessel disease has been related to the severity of neuropathy. People with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease develop the so called “hypoxic neuropathy” in which similar microvascular changes occur as in diabetic neuropathy. In rats with experimental diabetic neuropathy nerve blood flow is reduced and oxygen supplementation or vasodilator treatment improved the deterioration in conduction velocity and nerve blood flow. Similarly, in human diabetic neuropathy, there is impaired nerve blood flow, epineurial arterio-venous shunting and a reduction in sural nerve oxygen tension. At what stage during the development of nerve damage these changes occur is yet to be determined.

Charcot neuroarthropathy in diabetes mellitus.

Abstract. Charcot neuroarthropathy has been recognised for over 130 years and yet it remains a major cause of morbidity for patients with diabetes mellitus and a continuing challenge for physicians. It is rare but it seems to be increasing in prevalence and this provides hope that with larger studies it will soon be possible to clarify the natural history and optimal treatment regimens. The underlying cause is thought to be trauma in a neuropathic foot that leads to a complex series of pathological processes culminating in bone and joint destruction and subsequent deformity. The acute reaction is often misdiagnosed and many patients present late with established deformity. Even when the diagnosis is considered at an early stage there are no definitive criteria or tests to confirm charcot neuroarthropathy and a high index of suspicion is necessary in any diabetic patient with a swollen warm foot in the presence of somatic or autonomic neuropathy. Treatment has traditionally involved the use of various methods to avoid weight bearing but recent work has begun to suggest that bisphosphonates might be able to arrest the acute process. In the long term, treatment involves a multidisciplinary approach aimed at providing appropriate footwear to reduce plantar pressures and avoid foot ulceration; in some circumstances this involves surgical correction of deformities before adequate footwear can be supplied. Further studies of the emerging treatments for Charcot neuroarthropathy are needed to provide long-term outcome data on morbidity and deformity.