Solveig Fure

Ten-Year Incidence of Tooth Loss and Dental Caries in Elderly Swedish Individuals

There has been a significant reduction in edentulism and the elderly retain more teeth into old age. The 10-year incidence of tooth loss, coronal and root caries was studied in a random sample of inhabitants of Göteborg, who were 55, 65 and 75 years old at baseline. Of the 208 persons examined at baseline, 102 (49%) participated in the follow-up examination: 56, 37 and 9, respectively, in the different age groups of 65, 75 and 85 years. In addition, for the purpose of time-trend comparisons, a new random sample of 98 individuals aged 55 years was examined. The mean numbers of remaining teeth were 24, 23, 17 and 14, respectively, in the age groups of 55, 65, 75 and 85. The corresponding mean numbers at baseline were 23, 19 and 17, respectively, in those subjects who were then 55, 65 and 75 years old. Forty-eight percent had lost no teeth during the 10-year period, while 13% had lost more than 2 teeth. The major reason for tooth extraction was dental caries and it was found in 60% of all cases. The incidence of coronal caries decreased, while that of root caries increased with age (p < 0.01). Comparing the same age groups, the frequency of root caries had decreased during the 10-year period. It could be concluded from this study that elderly people were determined to retain their teeth for as long as possible, but dental caries may be a problem among the very old.

Five-Year Incidence of Caries, Salivary and Microbial Conditions in 60-, 70- and 80-Year-Old Swedish Individuals

The 5-year incidence of dental caries in a random sample of 60-, 70- and 80-year-old inhabitants of Göteborg was related to salivary and microbial conditions. Of the 208 persons examined at baseline, 148 (71%) participated in the follow-up examination; 69, 51 and 28, respectively, in the different age groups. The study revealed that 27% of the participants had not developed any carious lesions during the 5-year period and that the incidence of coronal and root caries increased with age. In the 60-year-olds, 2.5% of the susceptible coronal and root surfaces, respectively, had decayed, while the corresponding figures for the 80-year-olds were 8.8% for coronal surfaces and 9.8% for root surfaces. In all, 18% had an unstimulated saliva secretion rate of below 0.1 ml/min and 14% had a stimulated secretion rate of < 0.7 ml/min, with a mean rate which decreased with increasing age from 2.0 to 1.6 and 1.3 ml/min (p = 0.02). The overall salivary counts of lactobacilli and mutans streptococci, particularly the subspecies of Streptococcus sobrinus, had increased during the period. In the respective age groups of 60, 70 and 80 years, 15, 39 and 39% had a mutans streptococci count of ≥ 106 CFU/ml in saliva and the corresponding figures for ≥ 105 lactobacilli counts were 22, 31 and 43%. In the stepwise regression analysis, it was found that age, salivary levels of mutans streptococci and lactobacilli and number of teeth were the best predictors of the incidence of root caries. In conclusion, these observations indicate that there is an increased risk of dental caries with age owing to unfavourable microbial and salivary conditions.

Evaluation of Carisolv™ for the Chemo–Mechanical Removal of Primary Root Caries in vivo

The objective of this study was to evaluate a new chemo–mechanical method (Carisolv™) for the removal of primary root caries in vivo in terms of efficiency, treatment time and patient perception. Thirty–eight patients participated in an open, randomised and controlled study. Of the 60 root carious lesions included, 34 were randomised for chemo–mechanical treatment and 26 for drilling. A within–subject comparison was used whenever the patient had two cavities, which was the case for 22 subjects. All the Carisolv–treated cavities became caries free, as did all but one of those treated with drilling, as judged by an independent examiner. Only 4 of 34 patients asked for anaesthesia in the Carisolv group compared with 6 of 26 patients in the drilling group. Of those who did not use anaesthesia, 12 individuals in the drilling group experienced some pain compared with none in the chemo–mechanical group (p<0.001). The mean treatment time for the Carisolv method was 5.9 ± 2.2 min, compared with 4.5 ± 2.0 min for drilling; time for anaesthesia excluded (p<0.05). No negative reactions or adverse effects were recorded during the study. All 55 teeth examined in the 1–year follow–up were found to be sensitive using an electric pulp tester, and there was no difference regarding the condition of fillings between the lesions treated with Carisolv and drilling. It can be concluded that root caries can be effectively removed using the Carisolv method. The longer treatment time was compensated by less need for anaesthesia.

Five-Year Incidence of Coronal and Root Caries in 60-, 70- and 80-Year-Old Swedish Individuals

The 5-year incidence of caries was studied in a random sample of 60-, 70- and 80-year-old inhabitants of Göteborg, with 69, 51 and 28 individuals in the different age groups. One aim of the study was to introduce a root caries index (DMFRS%) in which the missing root surfaces are taken into account. This study, as well as other recent studies, has shown that dental caries is the main reason for tooth extraction. The study also revealed that coronal and root caries occurred more frequently in elderly than younger people and the incidence of root caries was positively correlated with coronal caries (r = 0.3, p < 0.001) and negatively correlated with the number of remaining teeth (r = 0.4, p < 0.0001). The 5-year DMFRS% increment values increased with advancing age from 2.7 involved root surfaces per 100 susceptible ones in the 60-year-olds to 4.8 in the 70-year-olds and 10.7 in the 80-year-olds. It should be mentioned, however, that only people able to come to the clinic were enrolled in the study and an analysis of the attrition bias indicated that oral health may be worse in those who are too ill to participate. The frequent utilization of dental care among the participants was reflected in the finding of several new fillings and prosthetic crowns. Most of the very elderly people with carious lesions at baseline, however, had developed new lesions at the margins of the newly made restorations.