Sónia Barroso

Vanadium Diaminebis(phenolate) Complexes: Syntheses, Structures, and Reactivity in Sulfoxidation Catalysis

Vanadium diaminebis(phenolate) complexes of the general formulas [LVCl(THF)] (L = Me(2)NCH(2)CH(R)N(CH(2)-2-O-3,5-C(6)H(2)(t)Bu(2))(2), where R = H, Me) and [LV(O)X] [X = Cl; R = H (2), Me (3), O(i)Pr (4), (mu-O)V(O)L (5)] are described. All compounds display octahedral geometry and trans-O(Ph) coordination. For compounds 2, 3, and 5, only one isomer, presenting the V=O ligand trans to the tripodal nitrogen, was formed, while for 4, two isomers were observed by NMR in solution. The UV-vis and circular dichroism spectra of 2 and 3 display very intense charge-transfer transition bands from the phenolate donors to the vanadium, which are in agreement with the (51)V low-field shifts observed. All vanadium(V) complexes were tested as thioanisole sulfoxidation catalysts, revealing very high selectivity when H(2)O(2) was used as the oxidant. However, no enantioselectivity was observed even when enantiopure 3 was used as the catalyst precursor. (1)H and (51)V NMR studies were conducted for the reactions of 2 with aqueous solutions of H(2)O(2) in methanol-d(4) and in acetonitrile-d(3); 2 reacts with the solvents, leading to [LV(O)OMe], by replacement of Cl by MeO in methanol, and to a new vanadium aminebis(phenolate) complex, where the dimethylamine fragment of the original ligand L was replaced by CH(3)CN. In either case, (51)V NMR spectra suggest the formation of peroxovanadium species upon the addition of a H(2)O(2) solution. The subsequent addition of thioanisole to the methanol-d(4) solution leads to regeneration of the original complex.

Amino Alcohol-Derived Reduced Schiff Base VIVO and VV Compounds as Catalysts for Asymmetric Sulfoxidation of Thioanisole with Hydrogen Peroxide

We report the synthesis and characterization of several amino alcohol-derived reduced Schiff base ligands (AORSB) and the corresponding V(IV)O and V(V) complexes. Some of the related Schiff base variants (amino alcohol derived Schiff base = AOSB) were also prepared and characterized. With some exceptions, all compounds are formulated as dinuclear compounds {V(IV)O(L)}(2) in the solid state. Suitable crystals for X-ray diffraction were obtained for two of the AORSB compounds, as well as a rare X-ray structure of a chiral V(IV)O compound, which revealed a dinuclear {V(IV)O(AOSB)}(2) structure with a rather short V-V distance of 3.053(9) Å. Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR), (51)V NMR, and density functional theory (DFT) studies were carried out to identify the intervenient species prior to and during catalytic reactions. The quantum-chemical DFT calculations were important to determine the more stable isomers in solution, to explain the EPR data, and to assign the (51)V NMR chemical shifts. The V(AORSB) and V(AOSB) complexes were tested as catalysts in the oxidation of thioanisole, with H(2)O(2) as the oxidant in organic solvents. In general, high conversions of sulfoxide were obtained. The V(AOSB) systems exhibited greater activity and enantioselectivity than their V(AORSB) counterparts. Computational and spectroscopic studies were carried out to assist in the understanding of the mechanistic aspects and the reasons behind such marked differences in activity and enantioselectivity. The quantum-chemical calculations are consistent with experimental data in the assessment of the differences in catalytic activity between V(AOSB) and V(AORSB) peroxido variants because the V(AORSB) peroxido transition states correspond to ca. 22 kJ/mol higher energy activation barriers than their V(AOSB) counterparts.

A new conformer of 1,4,7-tris(p-tolylsulfonyl)-1,4,7-triazacyclononane.

A second polymorphic form (form II) of the previously reported 1,4,7-tris(p-tolylsulfonyl)-1,4,7-triazacyclononane (form I), C(27)H(33)N(3)O(6)S(3), is presented. The molecular structures of the two forms display very different conformations, thus prompting the two forms to crystallize in two different space groups and exhibit quite diverse crystal structure assemblies. Form I crystallizes in the triclinic space group P\overline{1}, while form II crystallizes in the monoclinic space group P2(1)/n. The main differences between the two molecular structures are the conformations of the p-tosyl groups relative to each other and to the macrocyclic ring. The resulting crystal packing displays no classical hydrogen bonds, but different supramolecular synthons give rise to different packing motifs.