Sonia Leadmon

Comparable efficacy and lower cost of PBSC mobilization with intermediate-dose cyclophosphamide and G-CSF compared with plerixafor and G-CSF in patients with multiple myeloma treated with novel therapies

Studies comparing the efficacy and cost of stem cell mobilization with intermediate-dose CY (ID-CY) and G-CSF against plerixafor and G-CSF, specifically in multiple myeloma (MM) patients treated in the novel therapy era, are not available. Eighty-eight consecutive patients undergoing mobilization with ID-CY (3–4 g/m2) and G-CSF (n=55) were compared with patients receiving plerixafor and G-CSF (n=33). Compared with plerixafor, ID-CY use was associated with higher median peak peripheral blood CD34+ cell count (68 vs 160 cells/μL, P<0.001), and CD34+ cell yield on day 1 of collection (6.9 × 106 vs 11.7 × 106 cells/kg, P<0.001). Total CD34+ cell yield was significantly higher in the ID-CY patients (median collection 16.6 × 106 vs 11.6 × 106 cells/kg; P<0.001). ID-CY use was associated with significantly more frequent episodes of febrile neutropenia (16.3% vs 0%; P=0.02), intravenous antibiotic use (16.3% vs 3%; P=0.03) and hospitalizations (P=0.02). The average total cost of mobilization in the plerixafor group was significantly higher compared with the ID-CY group (

Peripheral blood stem cell mobilization in multiple myeloma patients treat in the novel therapy-era with plerixafor and G-CSF has superior efficacy but significantly higher costs compared to mobilization with low-dose cyclophosphamide and G-CSF

28 980 vs

Higher busulfan dose intensity does not improve outcomes of patients undergoing allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation following fludarabine, busulfan-based reduced toxicity conditioning.

22 504.8; P=0.001). Our data indicate robust stem cell mobilization in MM patients treated with novel agents, with G-CSF and either ID-CY or plerixafor. When compared with plerixafor, ID-CY-containing mobilization was associated with significantly lower average total mobilization costs.

Predictors and Impact of Thirty-Day Readmission on Patient Outcomes and Health Care Costs after Reduced-Toxicity Conditioning Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

Studies comparing the efficacy and cost of peripheral blood stem and progenitor cells mobilization with low‐dose cyclophosphamide (LD‐CY) and granulocyte‐colony stimulating factor (G‐CSF) against plerixafor and G‐CSF, in multiple myeloma (MM) patients treated in the novel therapy‐era are not available. Herein, we report mobilization outcomes of 107 patients who underwent transplantation within 1‐year of starting induction chemotherapy with novel agents. Patients undergoing mobilization with LD‐CY (1.5 gm/m2) and G‐CSF (n = 74) were compared against patients receiving plerixafor and G‐CSF (n = 33). Compared to plerixafor, LD‐CY was associated with a significantly lower median peak peripheral blood CD34+ cell count (68/µL vs. 36/µL, P = 0.048), and lower CD34+ cell yield on day 1 of collection (6.9 × 106/kg vs. 2.4 × 106/kg, P = 0.001). Six patients (8.1%) in the LD‐CY group experienced mobilization failure, compared to none in the plerixafor group. The total CD34+ cell yield was significantly higher in the plerixafor group (median 11.6 × 106/kg vs. 7 × 106/kg; P‐value = 0.001). Mobilization with LD‐CY was associated with increased (albeit statistically non‐significant) episodes of febrile neutropenia (5.4% vs. 0%; P = 0.24), higher use of intravenous antibiotics (6.7% vs. 3%; P = 0.45), and need for hospitalizations (9.4% vs. 3%; P = 0.24). The average total cost of mobilization in the plerixafor group was significantly higher compared to the LD‐CY group (

Incidence and Pattern of Graft-Versus-Host Disease in Patients Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation After Non-Myeloablative Conditioning with Total Lymphoid Irradiation and Antithymocyte Globulin

28,980 vs.

Higher infused CD34+ cell dose and overall survival in patients undergoing in vivo T-cell depleted, but not t-cell repleted, allogeneic peripheral blood hematopoietic cell transplantation

19,626.5 P‐value < 0.0001). In conclusion, in MM plerixafor‐based mobilization has superior efficacy, but significantly higher mobilization costs compared to LD‐CY mobilization. Our data caution against the use of LD‐CY in MM patients for mobilization, especially after induction with lenalidomide‐containing regimens. J. Clin. Apheresis 28:359–367, 2013.

Intermediate-Dose versus Low-Dose Cyclophosphamide and Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor for Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Mobilization in Patients with Multiple Myeloma Treated with Novel Induction Therapies

We evaluated the impact of busulfan dose intensity in patients undergoing reduced toxicity/intensity conditioning allogeneic transplantation in a multicenter retrospective study of 112 consecutive patients. Seventy‐five patients were conditioned with busulfan (0.8 mg/kg/dose IV × 8 doses), fludarabine (30 mg/m2/day, days −7 to −3), and 6 mg/kg of ATG [reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) group], while 37 patients received a more‐intense conditioning with busulfan (130 mg/m2/day IV, days −6 to −3), fludarabine (40 mg/m2/day, days −6 to −3) and 6 mg/kg of ATG [reduced toxicity conditioning (RTC) group]. At baseline both groups were matched for median age, unrelated donor allografts, and human leukocyte antigen‐mismatched allografts. More patients in RIC group had high‐risk disease, and higher median comorbidity index. There were no graft rejections. Median time to neutrophil (17 days vs. 15 days; p = 0.003) and platelet engraftment (16 days vs. 11 days; p < 0.001) was significantly longer in the RIC group. RTC group had significantly more bacterial (62.2% vs. 32%; p = 0.004) and fungal infections (13.5% vs. 1.3% p = 0.01). For RIC and RTC groups rates of grades II–IV acute GVHD (34% vs. 40%; p‐value = 0.54), and chronic GVHD (45% vs. 57%; p‐value = 0.30) were not significantly different. In similar order at 1 year the cumulative‐incidence of non‐relapse mortality (NRM; 12% vs. 21%; p‐value = 0.21) and relapse rates (38% vs. 39%; p = 0.96) were not significantly different. Patients in RIC and RTC groups had similar 1‐year overall survival (61% vs. 50%, p = 0.11) and progression‐free survival (50% vs. 36%, p‐value = 0.39). Our data suggest that the merits of higher busulfan dose intensity in the context of fludarabine/busulfan‐based RTC may be offset by higher early morbidity. Copyright

Hematopoietic Progenitor Cell Mobilization with “Just-in-Time” Plerixafor Approach is a Cost Effective Alternative to Routine Plerixafor Use

Thirty-day readmission (30-DR) has become an important quality-of-care measure. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) presents a medical setting with higher readmission rates. We analyzed factors affecting 30-DR and its impact on patient outcomes and on health care costs in 91 patients who underwent reduced-toxicity conditioning (RTC) allo-HCT with fludarabine and busulfan. The patient cohort was divided into 2: the readmission group (R-gp) or the no-readmission group (NR-gp). Overall, 38% (n = 35) required readmission with a median time to readmission of 14 days. In multivariate analysis, only documented infection during the index admission predicted 30-DR, P = .01. With a median follow-up of 18 months (range, 1 to 69) for surviving patients, the 2-year overall survival was 49% and 58% in the R-gp and NR-gp respectively, P = .48. The 1-year nonrelapse mortality in R-gp and NR-gp was 18% and 13% respectively, P = .43. The median post-transplantation hospital charges in the R-gp and NR-gp were

Higher Busulfan Dose Intensity Does Not Improve Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation (AHCT) Following Fludarabine/Busulfan/Atg (FBA)-Based Reduced Toxicity Conditioning (RTC)

85,115 (range,

Impact of body mass index (BMI) on plerixafor efficacy during hematopoietic progenitor cell (HPC) mobilization.

32,015 to