Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Sonia M. Tikoo is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Sonia M. Tikoo.


Science | 2012

A long-lived lunar core dynamo.

Erin K. Shea; Benjamin P. Weiss; William S. Cassata; David L. Shuster; Sonia M. Tikoo; Jérôme Gattacceca; Timothy L. Grove; Michael D Fuller

Magnetic Moon It has long been suspected that the Moon once had a core-dynamo magnetic field. Shea et al. (p. 453) describe a lunar basalt brought back by Apollo 11 that records evidence for a strong dynamo on the Moon 3.7 billion years ago. This study, together with a previous study of different lunar rock, implies that a lunar core dynamo existed between 4.2 and 3.7 billion years ago, which extends the known lifetime of the lunar dynamo by 500 million years. Analysis of a lunar basalt sample suggests that a lunar core dynamo existed between 4.2 and 3.7 billion years ago. Paleomagnetic measurements indicate that a core dynamo probably existed on the Moon 4.2 billion years ago. However, the subsequent history of the lunar core dynamo is unknown. Here we report paleomagnetic, petrologic, and 40Ar/39Ar thermochronometry measurements on the 3.7-billion-year-old mare basalt sample 10020. This sample contains a high-coercivity magnetization acquired in a stable field of at least ~12 microteslas. These data extend the known lifetime of the lunar dynamo by 500 million years. Such a long-lived lunar dynamo probably required a power source other than thermochemical convection from secular cooling of the lunar interior. The inferred strong intensity of the lunar paleofield presents a challenge to current dynamo theory.


Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2008

Gigantism in unique biogenic magnetite at the Paleocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum

Dirk Schumann; Timothy D. Raub; Robert E. Kopp; Jean-Luc Guerquin-Kern; Ting-Di Wu; Isabelle Rouiller; Aleksey V. Smirnov; S. Kelly Sears; Uwe Lücken; Sonia M. Tikoo; Reinhard Hesse; Joseph L. Kirschvink; Hojatollah Vali

We report the discovery of exceptionally large biogenic magnetite crystals in clay-rich sediments spanning the Paleocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum (PETM) in a borehole at Ancora, NJ. Aside from previously described abundant bacterial magnetofossils, electron microscopy reveals novel spearhead-like and spindle-like magnetite up to 4 μm long and hexaoctahedral prisms up to 1.4 μm long. Similar to magnetite produced by magnetotactic bacteria, these single-crystal particles exhibit chemical composition, lattice perfection, and oxygen isotopes consistent with an aquatic origin. Electron holography indicates single-domain magnetization despite their large crystal size. We suggest that the development of a thick suboxic zone with high iron bioavailability—a product of dramatic changes in weathering and sedimentation patterns driven by severe global warming—drove diversification of magnetite-forming organisms, likely including eukaryotes.


Science | 2014

The lunar dynamo.

Benjamin P. Weiss; Sonia M. Tikoo

BACKGROUND It is unknown whether the Moon has a fully differentiated and melted structure with a metallic core or retains a partially primordial, unmelted interior. The differentiation history of the Moon is manifested by its record of past magnetism (paleomagnetism). Although the Moon today does not have a global magnetic field, the discovery of remanent magnetization in lunar rocks and in the lunar crust demonstrated that there was a substantial lunar surface field billions of years ago. However, the origin, intensity, and lifetime of this field have been uncertain. As a result, it has been unclear whether this magnetization was produced by a dynamo in the Moon’s advecting metallic core or by fields generated externally to the Moon. Establishing whether the Moon formed a core dynamo would have major implications for understanding its interior structure, thermal history, and mechanism of formation, as well for our understanding of the physics of planetary magnetic field generation. The interior structure of the Moon and the lunar dynamo. New magnetic measurements of lunar rocks have demonstrated that the ancient Moon generated a dynamo magnetic field in its advecting liquid metallic core (innermost red shell). This dynamo may have been driven by convection, possibly powered by crystallization of the core (innermost red sphere) and/or stirring from the solid mantle (thick green shell). The magnetic field was recorded as magnetization by rocks on the lunar surface. [Image created by Hernán Cañellas] The interior structure of the Moon and the lunar dynamo. New magnetic measurements of lunar rocks have demonstrated that the ancient Moon generated a dynamo magnetic field in its advecting liquid metallic core (innermost red shell). This dynamo may have been driven by convection, possibly powered by crystallization of the core (innermost red sphere) and/or stirring from the solid mantle (thick green shell). The magnetic field was recorded as magnetization by rocks on the lunar surface. [Image created by Hernán Cañellas] ADVANCES A new generation of laboratory magnetic studies of lunar rocks and spacecraft measurements of lunar crustal magnetic fields have produced major advances in our understanding of the evolution of ancient magnetic fields on the Moon. It has now been established that a dynamo magnetic field likely existed on the Moon from at least 4.5 billion to 3.56 billion years ago, with an intensity similar to that at the surface of Earth today. The field then declined by at least an order of magnitude by 3.3 billion years ago. The early epoch of high field intensities may require an exceptionally energetic power source such as mechanical stirring from mantle precession. The extended history of the lunar dynamo appears to demand long-lived power sources such as mantle precession and core crystallization. OUTLOOK Measurements of the intensity of the ancient lunar dynamo have shown that it was surprisingly intense and long-lived. The next phase of lunar magnetic exploration will be to obtain more accurate measurements of field paleointensities and to determine when the dynamo initiated and finally disappeared. This will be coupled with the continued development of magnetohydrodynamic models for characterizing mechanical and other unusual dynamo mechanisms and further investigations into the thermal, structural, and geodynamical history of the lunar core and mantle. The eventual availability of absolutely oriented samples and in situ spacecraft measurements of bedrock should enable the first measurements of the paleo-orientation of lunar magnetic fields. Such directional data could determine the lunar field’s geometry and reversal frequency, as well as constrain ancient local and global-scale tectonic events. The inductive generation of magnetic fields in fluid planetary interiors is known as the dynamo process. Although the Moon today has no global magnetic field, it has been known since the Apollo era that the lunar rocks and crust are magnetized. Until recently, it was unclear whether this magnetization was the product of a core dynamo or fields generated externally to the Moon. New laboratory and spacecraft measurements strongly indicate that much of this magnetization is the product of an ancient core dynamo. The dynamo field persisted from at least 4.25 to 3.56 billion years ago (Ga), with an intensity reaching that of the present Earth. The field then declined by at least an order of magnitude by ∼3.3 Ga. The mechanisms for sustaining such an intense and long-lived dynamo are uncertain but may include mechanical stirring by the mantle and core crystallization. Lunar magnetism persisted via dynamo Today the Moon has no magnetic field, but this was not always the case. Remnant magnetization in lunar rock and crust samples indicates that substantial fields existed billions of years ago. Weiss and Tikoo review how modern magnetic studies have established that these fields were powered by a magnetic dynamo that lasted from 4.2 to 3.56 billion years ago. However, the possible mechanics behind the dynamo, such as mantle precession or core crystallization, remain under investigation. To find out how and when the dynamo came and went now requires improvements in magnetohydrodynamic models and more accurate paleointensity measurements, possibly even those that show the field direction. Science, this issue 10.1126/science.1246753


Journal of Geophysical Research | 2014

A wet, heterogeneous lunar interior: Lower mantle and core dynamo evolution

Alexander J. Evans; Maria T. Zuber; Benjamin P. Weiss; Sonia M. Tikoo

While recent analyses of lunar samples indicate the Moon had a core dynamo from at least 4.2–3.56 Ga, mantle convection models of the Moon yield inadequate heat flux at the core-mantle boundary to sustain thermal core convection for such a long time. Past investigations of lunar dynamos have focused on a generally homogeneous, relatively dry Moon, while an initial compositionally stratified mantle is the expected consequence of a postaccretionary lunar magma ocean. Furthermore, recent re-examination of Apollo samples and geophysical data suggests that the Moon contains at least some regions with high water content. Using a finite element model, we investigate the possible consequences of a heterogeneously wet, compositionally stratified interior for the evolution of the Moon. We find that a postoverturn model of mantle cumulates could result in a core heat flux sufficiently high to sustain a dynamo through 2.5 Ga and a maximum surface, dipolar magnetic field strength of less than 1 μT for a 350-km core and near ∼2 μT for a 450-km core. We find that if water was transported or retained preferentially in the deep interior, it would have played a significant role in transporting heat out of the deep interior and reducing the lower mantle temperature. Thus, water, if enriched in the lower mantle, could have influenced core dynamo timing by over 1.0 Gyr and enhanced the vigor of a lunar core dynamo. Our results demonstrate the plausibility of a convective lunar core dynamo even beyond the period currently indicated by the Apollo samples.


Journal of Geophysical Research | 2015

Preservation and detectability of shock-induced magnetization

Sonia M. Tikoo; Jérôme Gattacceca; Nicholas L. Swanson-Hysell; Benjamin P. Weiss; Clément Suavet; Cécile Cournède

Author(s): Tikoo, Sonia M; Gattacceca, Jerome; Swanson-Hysell, Nicholas L; Weiss, Benjamin P; Suavet, Clement; CournA¨de, Cecile


Science Advances | 2017

A two-billion-year history for the lunar dynamo

Sonia M. Tikoo; Benjamin P. Weiss; David L. Shuster; Clément Suavet; Huapei Wang; Timothy L. Grove

Paleomagnetic evidence suggests the lunar dynamo persisted beyond 2.5 Ga, requiring an exceptionally long-lived power source. Magnetic studies of lunar rocks indicate that the Moon generated a core dynamo with surface field intensities of ~20 to 110 μT between at least 4.25 and 3.56 billion years ago (Ga). The field subsequently declined to <~4 μT by 3.19 Ga, but it has been unclear whether the dynamo had terminated by this time or just greatly weakened in intensity. We present analyses that demonstrate that the melt glass matrix of a young regolith breccia was magnetized in a ~5 ± 2 μT dynamo field at ~1 to ~2.5 Ga. These data extend the known lifetime of the lunar dynamo by at least 1 billion years. Such a protracted history requires an extraordinarily long-lived power source like core crystallization or precession. No single dynamo mechanism proposed thus far can explain the strong fields inferred for the period before 3.56 Ga while also allowing the dynamo to persist in such a weakened state beyond ~2.5 Ga. Therefore, our results suggest that the dynamo was powered by at least two distinct mechanisms operating during early and late lunar history.


Journal of Geophysical Research | 2015

Magnetism of a very young lunar glass

Jennifer Buz; Benjamin P. Weiss; Sonia M. Tikoo; David L. Shuster; Jérôme Gattacceca; Timothy L. Grove

Recent paleomagnetic studies of Apollo samples have established that a core dynamo existed on the Moon from at least 4.2 to 3.56u2009billion years (Ga). Because there is no lunar dynamo today, a longstanding mystery has been the origin of magnetization in very young lunar samples ( 10u2009μT) core dynamo field nor impact-generated fields.


Earth and Planetary Science Letters | 2014

Decline of the lunar core dynamo

Sonia M. Tikoo; Benjamin P. Weiss; William S. Cassata; David L. Shuster; Jérôme Gattacceca; Eduardo A. Lima; Clément Suavet; Francis Nimmo; Michael D Fuller


Earth and Planetary Science Letters | 2012

Magnetic fidelity of lunar samples and implications for an ancient core dynamo

Sonia M. Tikoo; Benjamin P. Weiss; Jennifer Buz; Eduardo A. Lima; Erin K. Shea; Gabriela Melo; Timothy L. Grove


Journal of Geophysical Research | 2015

Magnetism of a very young lunar glass: MAGNETISM OF A VERY YOUNG LUNAR GLASS

Jennifer Buz; Benjamin P. Weiss; Sonia M. Tikoo; David L. Shuster; Jérôme Gattacceca; Timothy L. Grove

Collaboration


Dive into the Sonia M. Tikoo's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Benjamin P. Weiss

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David L. Shuster

Berkeley Geochronology Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Timothy L. Grove

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Clément Suavet

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jennifer Buz

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Eduardo A. Lima

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Erin K. Shea

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Joseph L. Kirschvink

California Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Michael D Fuller

University of Hawaii at Manoa

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge