Sonia Yip

Precision Medicine for Advanced Pancreas Cancer: The Individualized Molecular Pancreatic Cancer Therapy (IMPaCT) Trial

Purpose: Personalized medicine strategies using genomic profiling are particularly pertinent for pancreas cancer. The Individualized Molecular Pancreatic Cancer Therapy (IMPaCT) trial was initially designed to exploit results from genome sequencing of pancreatic cancer under the auspices of the International Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC) in Australia. Sequencing revealed small subsets of patients with aberrations in their tumor genome that could be targeted with currently available therapies. Experimental Design: The pilot stage of the IMPaCT trial assessed the feasibility of acquiring suitable tumor specimens for molecular analysis and returning high-quality actionable genomic data within a clinically acceptable timeframe. We screened for three molecular targets: HER2 amplification; KRAS wild-type; and mutations in DNA damage repair pathways (BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, ATM). Results: Tumor biopsy and archived tumor samples were collected from 93 patients and 76 were screened. To date 22 candidate cases have been identified: 14 KRAS wild-type, 5 cases of HER2 amplification, 2 mutations in BRCA2, and 1 ATM mutation. Median time from consent to the return of validated results was 21.5 days. An inability to obtain a biopsy or insufficient tumor content in the available specimen were common reasons for patient exclusion from molecular analysis while deteriorating performance status prohibited a number of patients from proceeding in the study. Conclusions: Documenting the feasibility of acquiring and screening biospecimens for actionable molecular targets in real time will aid other groups embarking on similar trials. Key elements include the need to better prescreen patients, screen more patients, and offer more attractive clinical trial options. Clin Cancer Res; 21(9); 2029–37. ©2015 AACR.

Regorafenib for the Treatment of Advanced Gastric Cancer (INTEGRATE): A Multinational Placebo-Controlled Phase II Trial

PURPOSE We evaluated the activity of regorafenib, an oral multikinase inhibitor, in advanced gastric adenocarcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS We conducted an international (Australia and New Zealand, South Korea, and Canada) randomized phase II trial in which patients were randomly assigned at a two-to-one ratio and stratified by lines of prior chemotherapy for advanced disease (one v two) and region. Eligible patients received best supportive care plus regorafenib 160 mg or matching placebo orally on days 1 to 21 of each 28-day cycle until disease progression or prohibitive adverse events occurred. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Final analysis included data to December 31, 2014. RESULTS A total of 152 patients were randomly assigned from November 7, 2012, to February 25, 2014, yielding 147 evaluable patients (regorafenib, n = 97; placebo, n = 50). Baseline characteristics were balanced. Median PFS significantly differed between groups (regorafenib, 2.6 months; 95% CI, 1.8 to 3.1 and placebo, 0.9 months; 95% CI, 0.9 to 0.9; hazard ratio [HR], 0.40; 95% CI, 0.28 to 0.59; P < .001). The effect was greater in South Korea than in Australia, New Zealand, and Canada combined (HR, 0.12 v 0.61; interaction P < .001) but consistent across age, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, primary site, lines of chemotherapy, peritoneal metastasis presence, number of metastatic sites, and plasma vascular endothelial growth factor A. A survival trend in favor of regorafenib was seen (median, 5.8 months; 95% CI, 4.4 to 6.8 v 4.5 months; 95% CI, 3.4 to 5.2; HR, 0.74; P = .147). Twenty-nine patients assigned to placebo received open-label regorafenib after disease progression. Regorafenib toxicity was similar to that previously reported. CONCLUSION In this phase II trial, regorafenib was effective in prolonging PFS in refractory advanced gastric adenocarcinoma. Regional differences were found, but regorafenib was effective in both regional groups. A phase III trial is planned.

Single-agent irinotecan or 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (FOLFIRI) as second-line chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer; results of a randomised phase II study (DaVINCI) and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND Second-line treatment with irinotecan for advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer prolongs survival. It is uncertain whether irinotecan is better administered with 5-fluorouracil or alone in patients previously treated with a fluoropyrimidine. We compared toxicity (particularly diarrhoea), quality of life, and efficacy of combination chemotherapy and irinotecan in these patients. METHODS In DaVINCI, a randomised phase II trial, patients with advanced colorectal cancer were randomly allocated to: Combination therapy (FOLFIRI), irinotecan (180 mg/m(2) IV over 90 min, day 1), 5-fluorouracil (400mg/m(2) IV bolus and 2400 mg/m(2) by 46-hour infusion from day 1) and folinic acid (20mg/m(2) IV bolus, day 1), 2-weekly; or Single-agent, irinotecan (350 mg/m(2) IV over 90 min), 3-weekly. Toxicity was evaluated every treatment cycle; QOL and response 6-weekly. Analysis was by intention to treat. The trial, amended from a larger factorial design, was terminated early due to slow recruitment. Results were also combined with other second-line irinotecan trials. FINDINGS We randomised 44 patients to combination and 45 to single agent. Eight patients in the irinotecan arm and 4 in the combination arm had grade 3/4 diarrhoea (P=0.24). Treatment groups did not differ significantly in overall QOL changes, response rate or progression free or overall-survival. In a systematic review of 29 trials of second-line irinotecan-based treatment, single-agent irinotecan was associated with more diarrhoea and alopecia than the combination but efficacy was similar. INTERPRETATION Combination treatment compared with single-agent irinotecan reduces alopecia and diarrhoea without compromising efficacy on clinical outcomes. Both regimens remain as reasonable treatment options. FUNDING Research grant (Pfizer).

EVERSUN: a phase 2 trial of alternating sunitinib and everolimus as first-line therapy for advanced renal cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND We hypothesised that alternating inhibitors of the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) and mammalian target of rapamycin pathways would delay the development of resistance in advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS A single-arm, two-stage, multicentre, phase 2 trial to determine the activity, feasibility, and safety of 12-week cycles of sunitinib 50 mg daily 4 weeks on / 2 weeks off, alternating with everolimus 10 mg daily for 5 weeks on / 1 week off, until disease progression or prohibitive toxicity in favourable or intermediate-risk aRCC. The primary end point was proportion alive and progression-free at 6 months (PFS6m). The secondary end points were feasibility, tumour response, overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs). The correlative objective was to assess biomarkers and correlate with clinical outcome. RESULTS We recruited 55 eligible participants from September 2010 to August 2012. DEMOGRAPHICS mean age 61, 71% male, favourable risk 16%, intermediate risk 84%. Cycle 2 commenced within 14 weeks for 80% of participants; 64% received ≥22 weeks of alternating therapy; 78% received ≥22 weeks of any treatment. PFS6m was 29/55 (53%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 40% to 66%). Tumour response rate was 7/55 (13%; 95% CI 4% to 22%, all partial responses). After median follow-up of 20 months, 47 of 55 (86%) had progressed with a median progression-free survival of 8 months (95% CI 5-10), and 30 of 55 (55%) had died with a median OS of 17 months (95% CI 12-undefined). AEs were consistent with those expected for each single agent. No convincing prognostic biomarkers were identified. CONCLUSIONS The EVERSUN regimen was feasible and safe, but its activity did not meet pre-specified values to warrant further research. This supports the current approach of continuing anti-VEGF therapy until progression or prohibitive toxicity before changing treatment. AUSTRALIAN NEW ZEALAND CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRY ACTRN12609000643279.

A phase I and II trial of epirubicin, cisplatin, 24-hour infusion 5 fluorouracil and sodium folinate in patients with advanced esophagogastric carcinomas.

Aim:  Advanced esophagogastric carcinoma has a poor prognosis. Palliative chemotherapy provides a survival advantage and improved quality of life. Epirubicin, cisplatin and continuous infusional 5‐fluorouracil (5‐FU) (ECF) is a well‐established chemotherapy regimen but a continuous chemotherapy infusion is not always feasible or acceptable.

805TiPRANDOMISED PHASE 3 TRIAL OF ENZALUTAMIDE IN ANDROGEN DEPRIVATION THERAPY WITH RADIATION THERAPY FOR HIGH RISK, CLINICALLY LOCALISED, PROSTATE CANCER: ENZARAD (ANZUP 1303)

ABSTRACT Background: Background: Adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) including a luteinising hormone releasing hormone analogue (LHRHA) is standard of care given before during and after radiotherapy for localised prostate cancer (PC) at high risk of recurrence. Enzalutamide is a new second generation androgen receptor (AR) inhibitor that is more potent and binds with a higher affinity to the AR than conventional non-steroidal anti-androgens (NSAA) and improves survival in metastatic castration-resistant PC. We hypothesise that the incorporation of enzalutamide in adjuvant ADT, given before, during and after radiation therapy for localised PC at high risk of recurrence, will further improve outcomes. Aim: To determine the effectiveness of enzalutamide as part of adjuvant ADT with a LHRHA in men planned for radiotherapy for localised PC at high risk of recurrence. Trial design: Open label, randomised, stratified, 2-arm, phase 3 intergroup trial Eligibility: Localised PC, high risk of recurrence, suitable for EBRT with curative intent Stratification: Gleason 8-10, T3-4, PSA >20, study site Endpoints: Overall survival (Primary), Cause-specific survival, PSA PFS, Clinical PFS, HRQOL, Adverse events, ICER Accrual: 800 participants. 2 yrs accrual + 5.5 years minimum f/up. 80% power to detect a 33% reduction in the hazard of death assuming a 5-year survival rate of 76% amongst controls. Participants will be randomised 1:1 to enzalutamisde 160mg daily for 24 months versus conventional NSAA for first 6 months. Background treatment for all participants: LHRHA for 24 months and EBRT (78Gy/39F) starting after week 16. Study assessments are at baseline, weeks 4, 12, 16, 20 and 24, then 3-4 monthly until year 5, 6-monthly until year 7, then annually. Imaging with CT/MRI and bone scan at baseline and then as clinically indicated. Tertiary correlative objectives include the identification of prognostic / predictive biomarkers from archival tumour tissue, and from fasting bloods collected at baseline, 24 weeks, 5 years, and first evidence of progression. Email: enzarad@ctc.usyd.edu.au Website: http://www.anzup.org.au/ Disclosure: C. Sweeney: Consulting with honoraria to declare with Asetallas, Janssen and Sanofi; P. Nguyen: Consulted for Medivation (

Abstract CT210: Precision medicine for advanced pancreas cancer: the individualized molecular pancreatic cancer therapy (IMPaCT) trial

Proceedings: AACR 106th Annual Meeting 2015; April 18-22, 2015; Philadelphia, PA Background: The Individualized Molecular Pancreatic Cancer Therapy (IMPaCT) trial is designed to exploit results from whole genome sequencing of pancreatic cancer collected under the auspices of the ICGC in Australia. Results showed that small subsets of patients had actionable changes in their tumor genome that could be druggable with currently available therapies. Only 7% of cases were found to be KRAS wildtype, and this phenotype may enrich for susceptibility to EGFR inhibition. Her2 positivity occurs in 2% and may confer sensitivity to Her inhibition. Tumors displaying defects in the DNA damage repair pathway (∼5%) respond to DNA damaging chemotherapy. Trial Design: The IMPaCT trial has recently been amended to a single arm pilot study of first line molecularly guided therapy for advanced pancreas cancer. Patients are permitted to begin their first cycle of chemotherapy with gemcitabine with or without nab-paclitaxel while awaiting molecular results. We screen potential patients for the three molecular targets: Her2 amplification: trastuzumab + gemcitabine; KRAS wildtype: erlotinib + gemcitabine; and DNA damage: platinum-based chemotherapy. In our initial cohort of patients who underwent resection with curative intent, 70% recurred. Recurrence occurred 16m after initial surgery. Collection of tissue commenced in 2009. The first site to open was in April 2013 by which time, only 8 patients for whom we had complete sequence data and actionable mutations were still alive, so we changed the trial to screen de novo metastatic patients. Using the WGS data, we constructed a custom sequencing panel to use DNA extracted from FFPE core biopsies to screen in real time for mutations in KRAS, BRCA2, BRCA1, PALB2 and ATM. Her2 screening is undertaken with IHC and FISH. We have screened 89 cases in 18m, 8 have relevant molecular targets. The average time from biopsy to delivery of results is 21d. 2 of the 8 eligible cases have commenced precision therapy on trial. Citation Format: Lorraine Chantrill, Skye Simpson, Amber Johns, Mona Martyn-Smith, Angela Chou, Clare Watson, Adnan Nagrial, Venessa Chin, Lucille Sebastian, Sonia Yip, John Simes, Nick Pavlakis, Peter Grimison, Ray Asghari, Sandra Harvey, Andrew Biankin. Precision medicine for advanced pancreas cancer: the individualized molecular pancreatic cancer therapy (IMPaCT) trial. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr CT210. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-CT210

1628TiPPRECISION MEDICINE FOR ADVANCED PANCREAS CANCER: EARLY LESSONS LEARNED FROM NEGOTIATING THE PITFALLS OF A MOLECULAR THERAPEUTICS TRIAL IN A POOR PROGNOSIS CANCER

ABSTRACT Background: The Individualized Molecular Pancreatic Cancer Therapy (IMPaCT) trial was designed to exploit results from whole genome sequencing of pancreatic cancer collected under the auspices of the ICGC in Australia. Results showed that small subsets of patients had actionable changes in their tumor genome that could be druggable with currently available therapies. 93% of cases analyzed harbored a KRAS mutation, KRAS wildtype phenotype may enrich for susceptibility to EGFR inhibition. Her2 positivity occurs in 2% and may confer sensitivity to Her inhibition. Tumors displaying defects in the DNA damage repair pathway (∼5%) respond to DNA damaging chemotherapy. Trial design: The IMPaCT trial is a randomized phase 2 study of first line molecularly guided therapy against standard therapy with gemcitabine in advanced pancreas cancer. We screen potential patients for the three molecular targets: Her2 amplification: trastuzumab+gemcitabine; KRAS wildtype: erlotinib+gemcitabine; and DNA damage: mitomycin C+5-fluorouracil chemotherapy. If a patients tumour has one of these signals, they consent to be randomized to precision treatment tailored for them or standard therapy with gemcitabine. For analysis, the precision treatment arm will be considered as a whole and compared to the standard therapy arm. In our initial cohort of patients who underwent resection with curative intent, 70% recurred. Recurrence occurred on average 16m after initial surgery. Collection of tissue commenced in 2009. The first site to open was in June 2013 by which time, only 6 patients for whom we had complete sequence data and actionable mutations were still alive, so we changed the trial to screen de novo metastatic patients. Using the WGS data, we constructed a custom sequencing panel for DNA extracted from FFPE core biopsies to screen for mutations in KRAS, BRCA2, BRCA1, PALB2 and ATM. Her2 screening is undertaken with IHC and FISH. We have screened 49 cases, and found 10 with relevant molecular targets, 5 of whom were eligible. The average time from biopsy to delivery of results is 23d, an amendment has allowed patients to commence standard therapy whilst waiting for the results of molecular analysis. The IMPaCT trial is breaking new ground in the treatment of pancreas cancer. Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

872TiPANZUP 1302: A RANDOMISED PHASE 3 TRIAL OF ACCELERATED VERSUS STANDARD BEP CHEMOTHERAPY FOR PATIENTS WITH INTERMEDIATE AND POOR-RISK METASTATIC GERM CELL TUMOURS (P3BEP)

ABSTRACT Background: Bleomycin, Etoposide, Cisplatin (BEP) administered 3-weekly x 4 remains standard 1st line chemotherapy for intermediate- and poor-risk metastatic germ cell tumours (GCTs). High-dose chemotherapy and more complex regimens (eg VIP, T-BEP) have failed to improve cure rates and are more toxic. Accelerating regimens of standard chemotherapy by giving them 2-weekly rather than 3-weekly has improved cure rates in other cancers where more complex or higher-dose regimens failed. Aim: To determine if accelerated BEP is superior to standard BEP as 1st line chemotherapy for intermediate and poor risk metastatic GCTs. Trial design: Open-label, randomised, stratified 2-arm multicentre, 2 stage, phase 3 clinical trial. The primary endpoint for stage I of the trial (n = 150) is complete response rate, and for the complete trial (n = 500) is progression-free survival (PFS). A sample size of 150 and 500 patients gives >80% power to detect a 20% improvement in response rates and 7% absolute improvement in 2yr PFS, respectively. Participants: Males aged 16-45years with intermediate or poor-risk metastatic GCTs for 1st line chemotherapy. Planned expansion to include children aged 11+ and females. Regimen: Participants are randomised 1:1 to “standard BEP” or “accelerated BEP”: Timing of BEP accelerated vs standard Week 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Standard EP EP EP EP B B B B B B B B B B B B Accelerated EP EP EP EP B B B B B B B B B B B B E-Etoposide 100mg/m2 D1-5; P-Cisplatin25mg/m2 D1-5; B-Bleomycin 30000 IU weekly; Peg G-CSF 6mg s/c given on D6 post EP in both arms Assessments: Weekly during BEP. Initial response assessment at 30-day safety assessment. Final response assessment at 6 months from randomisation or after all post-chemotherapy intervention is completed. Follow-up 3-monthly for 2 years from randomisation, then 6-monthly to 5 years, then annually. Tissue and blood collection for translational substudies Current status: In start-up phase or open to recruitment at 25 sites in Australia & New Zealand. International trial groups invited to participate. Email: p3bep@ctc.usyd.edu.au Webstite: http://www.anzup.org.au/ Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Abstract A75: The IMPaCT trial: Individualised Molecular Pancreatic Cancer Therapy. A pilot, randomized, open label Phase II trial assessing first line treatment with gemcitabine or personalized treatment based on tumour molecular signature in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.

Background: Less than 5% of patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer survive to 5 years and there have been no major improvements in outcomes over the last 20 years. The use of treatments targeted according to the molecular phenotype of individual tumours may result in improved response and survival compared to standard therapy. Methods: The IMPaCT trial is a multidisciplinary collaboration between the AGITG, NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Sydney Catalyst, and the Kinghorn Cancer Centre at Garvan Institute of Medical Research, which houses the Australian Pancreatic Cancer Genome Initiative (APGI). Patients who have available sequence data will be screened for actionable molecular phenotypes and randomized 1:1 to receive standard therapy (gemcitabine) or personalized treatment. Recruitment to the IMPaCT trial is based on the following defined molecular phenotypes: HER2/neu overexpression: personalized treatment with gemcitabine + trastuzumab; BRCA1, BRCA2, and PALB2 mutations: personalized treatment with 5-FU and mitomycin C; Kras wildtype: personalized treatment with gemcitabine + erlotinib. The study will be conducted in two parts: an initial 20 patient pilot trial across 4 Australian sites assessing feasibility, followed by an additional 70 patients to assess progression (90 patients in total). The pilot study is now open and active. Results: The novel trial design involves personalized treatment, where therapies are assigned based on a defined molecular phenotype, in a standard care setting. Stratifying randomization for individual molecular signatures will provide evidence, albeit in small numbers, for confirmation in a larger Phase III trial and broader clinical applicability. Additionally, the study offers the opportunity to explore a number of unique tertiary/correlative objectives, including the planned examination of circulating DNA as a surrogate of survival. Conclusion: The IMPaCT trial exemplifies a strong collaboration between basic scientists, clinicians and clinical trial investigators to illustrate the promises and challenges facing the development and successful testing of personalized therapeutic strategies. Citation Information: Mol Cancer Ther 2013;12(11 Suppl):A75. Citation Format: Lorraine Chantrill, Amber Johns, Adnan Nagrial, Venessa Chin, Angela Chou, Mark Pinese, Scott Mead, Val Gebski, Katrin Sjoquist, Chee Lee, Sonia Yip, Danielle Miller, Lucille Sebastian, Ray Asghari, Sandra Harvey, Nick Pavlakis, Sanjay Mukhedkar, Peter Grimison, David Miller, John Pearson, Nicola Waddell, Sean Grimmond, John Simes, Andrew Biankin. The IMPaCT trial: Individualised Molecular Pancreatic Cancer Therapy. A pilot, randomized, open label Phase II trial assessing first line treatment with gemcitabine or personalized treatment based on tumour molecular signature in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference: Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2013 Oct 19-23; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2013;12(11 Suppl):Abstract nr A75.