Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Sophia Frentzas is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Sophia Frentzas.


Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology | 2011

Treatment with olaparib in a patient with PTEN-deficient endometrioid endometrial cancer

Martin Forster; Konstantin J. Dedes; S. Sandhu; Sophia Frentzas; Rebecca Kristeleit; Alan Ashworth; Christopher J. Poole; Britta Weigelt; Stan B. Kaye; L. Rhoda Molife

Background. A 58-year-old woman presented with metastatic endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma after being previously treated with surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy for early-stage endometrial cancer. She had received several lines of chemotherapy for multiple relapses over 9 years and displayed a profound sensitivity to platinum-containing regimens.Investigation. CT scans demonstrated progressing liver, lung and peritoneal metastases and MRI detected multiple intracerebral metastases.Diagnosis. New brain metastases secondary to progressive endometrioid endometrial carcinoma.Management. On the basis of her sensitivity to repeated platinum treatment she was treated with the oral poly(ADP)-ribose polymerase (PARP) 1 inhibitor olaparib as part of a phase I trial. Repeat MRI scan at week 10 of treatment showed a significant reduction in the size of the brain metastases without steroid treatment or radiotherapy and the patient reported subjective improvement in tumor-related symptoms. After 8 months of olaparib treatment the patient developed objective disease progression. The tumor biopsy was negative for somatic BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations, but displayed loss of PTEN, which has been suggested to be another predictive marker for sensitivity to PARP inhibitors. The patient remained alive for 10 months after completing olaparib, having gone on to derive further clinical benefit from repeat exposure to platinum-based therapy.


Nature Medicine | 2016

Vessel co-option mediates resistance to anti-angiogenic therapy in liver metastases

Sophia Frentzas; Eve Simoneau; Victoria L. Bridgeman; Peter B. Vermeulen; Shane Foo; Eleftherios Kostaras; Mark R. Nathan; Andrew Wotherspoon; Zu Hua Gao; Yu Shi; Gert Van den Eynden; Frances Daley; Clare Peckitt; Xianming Tan; Ayat Salman; Anthoula Lazaris; Patrycja Gazinska; Tracy J. Berg; Zak Eltahir; Laila Ritsma; Jacco van Rheenen; Alla Khashper; Gina Brown; Hanna Nyström; Malin Sund; Steven Van Laere; Evelyne Loyer; Luc Dirix; David Cunningham; Peter Metrakos

The efficacy of angiogenesis inhibitors in cancer is limited by resistance mechanisms that are poorly understood. Notably, instead of through the induction of angiogenesis, tumor vascularization can occur through the nonangiogenic mechanism of vessel co-option. Here we show that vessel co-option is associated with a poor response to the anti-angiogenic agent bevacizumab in patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases. Moreover, we find that vessel co-option is also prevalent in human breast cancer liver metastases, a setting in which results with anti-angiogenic therapy have been disappointing. In preclinical mechanistic studies, we found that cancer cell motility mediated by the actin-related protein 2/3 complex (Arp2/3) is required for vessel co-option in liver metastases in vivo and that, in this setting, combined inhibition of angiogenesis and vessel co-option is more effective than the inhibition of angiogenesis alone. Vessel co-option is therefore a clinically relevant mechanism of resistance to anti-angiogenic therapy and combined inhibition of angiogenesis and vessel co-option might be a warranted therapeutic strategy.


Angiogenesis | 2012

Contrasting effects of sunitinib within in vivo models of metastasis

Jonathan C. Welti; Thomas Powles; Shane Foo; Morgane Gourlaouen; Natasha Preece; Julie Foster; Sophia Frentzas; Demelza Bird; Kevin Sharpe; Antoinette van Weverwijk; David Robertson; Julie Soffe; Janine T. Erler; Roberto Pili; Caroline J. Springer; Stephen J. Mather; Andrew R. Reynolds

Sunitinib is a potent and clinically approved tyrosine kinase inhibitor that can suppress tumour growth by inhibiting angiogenesis. However, conflicting data exist regarding the effects of this drug on the growth of metastases in preclinical models. Here we use 4T1 and RENCA tumour cells, which both form lung metastases in Balb/c mice, to re-address the effects of sunitinib on the progression of metastatic disease in mice. We show that treatment of mice with sunitinib prior to intravenous injection of tumour cells can promote the seeding and growth of 4T1 lung metastases, but not RENCA lung metastases, showing that this effect is cell line dependent. However, increased metastasis occurred only upon administration of a very high sunitinib dose, but not when lower, clinically relevant doses were used. Mechanistically, high dose sunitinib led to a pericyte depletion effect in the lung vasculature that correlated with increased seeding of metastasis. By administering sunitinib to mice after intravenous injection of tumour cells, we demonstrate that while sunitinib does not inhibit the growth of 4T1 lung tumour nodules, it does block the growth of RENCA lung tumour nodules. This contrasting response was correlated with increased myeloid cell recruitment and persistent vascularisation in 4T1 tumours, whereas RENCA tumours recruited less myeloid cells and were more profoundly devascularised upon sunitinib treatment. Finally, we show that progression of 4T1 tumours in sunitinib treated mice results in increased hypoxia and increased glucose metabolism in these tumours and that this is associated with a poor outcome. Taken together, these data suggest that the effects of sunitinib on tumour progression are dose-dependent and tumour model-dependent. These findings have relevance for understanding how anti-angiogenic agents may influence disease progression when used in the adjuvant or metastatic setting in cancer patients.


The Journal of Pathology | 2017

Vessel co-option is common in human lung metastases and mediates resistance to anti-angiogenic therapy in preclinical lung metastasis models

Victoria L. Bridgeman; P. Vermeulen; Shane Foo; Agnes Bilecz; Frances Daley; Eleftherios Kostaras; Mark R. Nathan; Elaine Wan; Sophia Frentzas; Thomas Schweiger; Balazs Hegedus; Konrad Hoetzenecker; Ferenc Rényi-Vámos; Elizabeth A. Kuczynski; Naveen S. Vasudev; James Larkin; Martin Gore; Harold F. Dvorak; Sándor Paku; Robert S. Kerbel; Balazs Dome; Andrew R. Reynolds

Anti‐angiogenic therapies have shown limited efficacy in the clinical management of metastatic disease, including lung metastases. Moreover, the mechanisms via which tumours resist anti‐angiogenic therapies are poorly understood. Importantly, rather than utilizing angiogenesis, some metastases may instead incorporate pre‐existing vessels from surrounding tissue (vessel co‐option). As anti‐angiogenic therapies were designed to target only new blood vessel growth, vessel co‐option has been proposed as a mechanism that could drive resistance to anti‐angiogenic therapy. However, vessel co‐option has not been extensively studied in lung metastases, and its potential to mediate resistance to anti‐angiogenic therapy in lung metastases is not established. Here, we examined the mechanism of tumour vascularization in 164 human lung metastasis specimens (composed of breast, colorectal and renal cancer lung metastasis cases). We identified four distinct histopathological growth patterns (HGPs) of lung metastasis (alveolar, interstitial, perivascular cuffing, and pushing), each of which vascularized via a different mechanism. In the alveolar HGP, cancer cells invaded the alveolar air spaces, facilitating the co‐option of alveolar capillaries. In the interstitial HGP, cancer cells invaded the alveolar walls to co‐opt alveolar capillaries. In the perivascular cuffing HGP, cancer cells grew by co‐opting larger vessels of the lung. Only in the pushing HGP did the tumours vascularize by angiogenesis. Importantly, vessel co‐option occurred with high frequency, being present in >80% of the cases examined. Moreover, we provide evidence that vessel co‐option mediates resistance to the anti‐angiogenic drug sunitinib in preclinical lung metastasis models. Assuming that our interpretation of the data is correct, we conclude that vessel co‐option in lung metastases occurs through at least three distinct mechanisms, that vessel co‐option occurs frequently in lung metastases, and that vessel co‐option could mediate resistance to anti‐angiogenic therapy in lung metastases. Novel therapies designed to target both angiogenesis and vessel co‐option are therefore warranted.


The Journal of Pathology | 2015

Mechanism of tumour vascularization in experimental lung metastases.

Vanessza Szabó; Edina Bugyik; Katalin Dezso; Nora Ecker; Péter Nagy; József Tímár; József Tóvári; Viktoria Laszlo; Victoria L. Bridgeman; Elaine Wan; Sophia Frentzas; P. Vermeulen; Andrew R. Reynolds; Balazs Dome; Sándor Paku

The appearance of lung metastases is associated with poor outcome and the management of patients with secondary pulmonary tumours remains a clinical challenge. We examined the vascularization process of lung metastasis in six different preclinical models and found that the tumours incorporated the pre‐existing alveolar capillaries (ie vessel co‐option). During the initial phase of vessel co‐option, the incorporated capillaries were still sheathed by pneumocytes, but these incorporated vessels subsequently underwent different fates dependent on the model. In five of the models examined (B16, HT1080, HT25, C26, and MAT B‐III), the tumour cells gradually stripped the pneumocytes from the vessels. These dissected pneumocytes underwent fragmentation, but the incorporated microvessels survived. In the sixth model (C38), the tumour cells failed to invade the alveolar walls. Instead, they induced the development of vascularized desmoplastic tissue columns. Finally, we examined the process of arterialization in lung metastases and found that they became arterialized when their diameter grew to exceed 5 mm. In conclusion, our data show that lung metastases can vascularize by co‐opting the pulmonary microvasculature. This is likely to have important clinical implications, especially with respect to anti‐angiogenic therapies. Copyright


British Journal of Cancer | 2013

A study of the decision outcomes and financial costs of multidisciplinary team meetings (MDMs) in oncology.

P B De Ieso; Jermaine Coward; I Letsa; Ulrike Schick; M Nandhabalan; Sophia Frentzas; Martin Gore

Background:The benefits of multidisciplinary working in oncology are now accepted as the norm and widely accepted as being pivotal to the delivery of optimal cancer care. Central to this are the multidisciplinary meetings (MDMs) and we have evaluated decision outcomes and financial costs of these.Methods:We reviewed the electronic patient records of 551 newly referred patients, discussed at 14 tumour site-specific MDMs for adult solid tumours and lymphoma (paediatric oncology and acute leukaemia were excluded) over a 1-month period, a total of 52 MDMs were studied. In addition, the records of a further 81 patients from 10 different MDMs were reviewed where the treating consultant had clearly recorded their opinion of how the patient should be managed and this was compared with the final MDM’s consensus view. We also costed the MDMs utilising two different methodologies.Results:The mean age of the 551 patients in the study was 62 years. In all, 536 (97.3%) patients were treatment naive before MDM discussion and 15 (2.7%) had prior treatment. Median time to treatment after the MDM was 16 days. In 535 (97.1%) cases, the MDM discussions were clearly documented, 16 (2.9%) were not clearly documented. In total, 319 (57.9%) patients were discussed once, and 232 (42.1%) were re-discussed (one to six occasions). In 62 (12.7%) patients, there were delays in MDM discussion, 30 (48.4%) were related to radiology, 26 (41.9%) to histopathology and 6 (9.7%) a combination of both. Adherence to the MDM management plan decision occurred 503 times (91.3%) with 48 (8.7%) deviations. In the smaller cohort of 81 patients, the consultant management plan and MDM consensus was compatible 71 (87.6%) times. On four occasions, there were major alterations in management while six were minor. The cost per month of our MDMs ranged from £2192 to £10 050 (median £5136) with total cost of £80 850 per month and the cost per new patient discussed was £415.Conclusion:Adherence to MDM decisions by health-care professionals occurs in the majority of patients. MDMs are costly, which may have relevance in the currently challenged health-care financial environment. There is a need to improve MDM efficiency without losing the considerable benefits associated with regular MDMs.


Molecular Cancer Therapeutics | 2016

Preclinical Evidence That Trametinib Enhances the Response to Antiangiogenic Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Renal Cell Carcinoma

Victoria L. Bridgeman; Elaine Wan; Shane Foo; Mark R. Nathan; Jonathan C. Welti; Sophia Frentzas; P. Vermeulen; Natasha Preece; Caroline J. Springer; Thomas Powles; Paul Nathan; James Larkin; Martin Gore; Naveen S. Vasudev; Andrew R. Reynolds

Sunitinib and pazopanib are antiangiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) used to treat metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). However, the ability of these drugs to extend progression-free and overall survival in this patient population is limited by drug resistance. It is possible that treatment outcomes in RCC patients could be improved by rationally combining TKIs with other agents. Here, we address whether inhibition of the Ras-Raf-MEK-ERK1/2 pathway is a rational means to improve the response to TKIs in RCC. Using a xenograft model of RCC, we found that tumors that are resistant to sunitinib have a significantly increased angiogenic response compared with tumors that are sensitive to sunitinib in vivo. We also observed significantly increased levels of phosphorylated ERK1/2 in the vasculature of resistant tumors, when compared with sensitive tumors. These data suggested that the Ras-Raf-MEK-ERK1/2 pathway, an important driver of angiogenesis in endothelial cells, remains active in the vasculature of TKI-resistant tumors. Using an in vitro angiogenesis assay, we identified that the MEK inhibitor (MEKI) trametinib has potent antiangiogenic activity. We then show that, when trametinib is combined with a TKI in vivo, more effective suppression of tumor growth and tumor angiogenesis is achieved than when either drug is utilized alone. In conclusion, we provide preclinical evidence that combining a TKI, such as sunitinib or pazopanib, with a MEKI, such as trametinib, is a rational and efficacious treatment regimen for RCC. Mol Cancer Ther; 15(1); 172–83. ©2015 AACR.


British Journal of Cancer | 2017

International consensus guidelines for scoring the histopathological growth patterns of liver metastasis

Pieter-Jan van Dam; Eric P. van der Stok; Laure-Anne Teuwen; Gert Van den Eynden; Martin Illemann; Sophia Frentzas; A. W. Majeed; Rikke L. Eefsen; Robert R.J. Coebergh van den Braak; Anthoula Lazaris; Maria Celia Fernandez; Boris Galjart; Ole Didrik Laerum; Roni F. Rayes; Dirk J. Grünhagen; Michelle Van de paer; Yves Sucaet; Hardeep Singh Mudhar; Michael Schvimer; Hanna Nyström; Mark Kockx; Nigel C. Bird; Fernando Vidal-Vanaclocha; Peter Metrakos; Eve Simoneau; Cornelis Verhoef; Luc Dirix; Steven Van Laere; Zu-Hua Gao; Pnina Brodt

Background:Liver metastases present with distinct histopathological growth patterns (HGPs), including the desmoplastic, pushing and replacement HGPs and two rarer HGPs. The HGPs are defined owing to the distinct interface between the cancer cells and the adjacent normal liver parenchyma that is present in each pattern and can be scored from standard haematoxylin-and-eosin-stained (H&E) tissue sections. The current study provides consensus guidelines for scoring these HGPs.Methods:Guidelines for defining the HGPs were established by a large international team. To assess the validity of these guidelines, 12 independent observers scored a set of 159 liver metastases and interobserver variability was measured. In an independent cohort of 374 patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRCLM), the impact of HGPs on overall survival after hepatectomy was determined.Results:Good-to-excellent correlations (intraclass correlation coefficient >0.5) with the gold standard were obtained for the assessment of the replacement HGP and desmoplastic HGP. Overall survival was significantly superior in the desmoplastic HGP subgroup compared with the replacement or pushing HGP subgroup (P=0.006).Conclusions:The current guidelines allow for reproducible determination of liver metastasis HGPs. As HGPs impact overall survival after surgery for CRCLM, they may serve as a novel biomarker for individualised therapies.


Oncology | 2011

Outcomes of patients with metastatic melanoma treated with molecularly targeted agents in phase I clinical trials.

Montserrat Blanco Codesido; Andre T. Brunetto; Sophia Frentzas; Victor Moreno Garcia; Dionysis Papadatos-Pastos; Joanna Vitfell Pedersen; Leonardo Trani; M. Puglisi; L. Rhoda Molife; Udai Banerji

Introduction: First-line treatment options utilizing chemotherapy and cytokine-based treatments for patients with metastatic melanoma (MM) are unsatisfactory. We analyzed the clinical outcomes of patients with MM treated in phase I trials of novel agents. We hypothesized that patients included in phase I clinical trials did not have worse outcomes than with the chemotherapy and cytokine-based first-line treatment. Methods: Data of patients with MM treated at The Drug Development Unit between 2004 and 2010 were collected. The response rate (RR) and time to progression (TTP) for first-line therapy were compared to those of phase I trial therapy. Patients acted as their own controls for statistical analyses. Results: Sixty-five patients were treated in 31 phase I trials. First-line treatment included dacarbazine or temozolomide in 58 (89%) cases and interferon-α in 5 patients (8%) and cisplatin-based treatment in 2 patients (3%). There was no significant difference in either the RR (11 vs. 14%, p = 0.87) or TTP (90 vs. 53 days, p = 0.15) in patients treated with first-line treatment versus phase I treatment, respectively. Conclusion: Phase I clinical trials of molecularly targeted agents show clinical activity that is not dissimilar to that of treatment with existing chemotherapy and cytokine-based treatment.


Cancer Research | 2014

Abstract 2997: Vessel co-option in colorectal cancer liver metastases mediates resistance to VEGF-targeted therapy

Sophia Frentzas; Victoria L. Thompson; Peter B. Vermeulen; Shane Foo; Gina Brown; David Cunningham; Andrew R. Reynolds

The purpose of this study is to: (1) examine whether vessel co-option is associated with a lack of response to anti-angiogenic therapy in advanced colorectal cancer patients, (2) identify whether inhibition of pathways associated with vessel co-option sensitizes to anti-angiogenic therapy in vivo. Sprouting angiogenesis is the process whereby new blood vessels are induced to sprout from existing vessels. The growth of metastatic tumors is considered to require sprouting angiogenesis. This hypothesis has driven the development and clinical application of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) targeted agents, such as bevacizumab. However, responses to such agents in cancer patients, including metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC), are variable. It is not currently clear why this is the case and we have no way of selecting patients suitable for such therapies. Importantly, it is now evident that tumors can also utilize a number of putative ‘VEGF-independent’ angiogenesis mechanisms, the existence of which may limit the efficacy of VEGF-targeted therapy. One such mechanism is ‘vessel co-option,’ whereby tumors engulf existing local blood vessels as they invade into surrounding host tissue. Published studies have reported that this mechanism occurs in ∼28-30% of CRC liver metastases. Here we present data from a retrospective study of patients with CRC liver metatases that were treated with bevacizumab. We demonstrate that, in this patient cohort, the presence of vessel co-option in liver metastases was strongly associated with lack of response to bevacizumab. We also show that a similar result is observed in a mouse model of colorectal cancer liver metastasis. Interestingly, when we disable actin nucleation activity in colorectal cancer cells, vessel co-option is compromised and sensitivity to VEGF-targeted therapy is restored in vivo. These data demonstrate a potential role for vessel co-option as a negative predictive biomarker for anti-angiogenic therapy and also have consequences for the development of novel therapies for targeting tumor angiogenesis. Citation Format: Sophia Frentzas, Victoria L. Thompson, Peter B. Vermeulen, Shane Foo, Gina Brown, David Cunningham, Andrew R. Reynolds. Vessel co-option in colorectal cancer liver metastases mediates resistance to VEGF-targeted therapy. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2014 Apr 5-9; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2014;74(19 Suppl):Abstract nr 2997. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2014-2997

Collaboration


Dive into the Sophia Frentzas's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Andrew R. Reynolds

Institute of Cancer Research

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Shane Foo

Institute of Cancer Research

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Andre T. Brunetto

The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Elaine Wan

Institute of Cancer Research

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mark R. Nathan

Institute of Cancer Research

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Martin Gore

The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

P. Vermeulen

Institute of Cancer Research

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Caroline J. Springer

Institute of Cancer Research

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David Cunningham

The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge