Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Sophie Duraffour is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Sophie Duraffour.


The Lancet | 2015

Efficacy and effectiveness of an rVSV-vectored vaccine expressing Ebola surface glycoprotein: interim results from the Guinea ring vaccination cluster-randomised trial

Ana Maria Henao-Restrepo; Ira M. Longini; Matthias Egger; Natalie E Dean; W. John Edmunds; Anton Camacho; Miles W. Carroll; Moussa Doumbia; B. Draguez; Sophie Duraffour; Godwin Enwere; Rebecca F. Grais; Stephan Günther; Stefanie Hossmann; Mandy Kader Kondé; Souleymane Kone; Eeva Kuisma; Myron M. Levine; Sema Mandal; Gunnstein Norheim; Ximena Riveros; Aboubacar Soumah; Sven Trelle; Andrea S Vicari; Conall H. Watson; Sakoba Keita; Marie Paule Kieny; John-Arne Røttingen

BACKGROUND A recombinant, replication-competent vesicular stomatitis virus-based vaccine expressing a surface glycoprotein of Zaire Ebolavirus (rVSV-ZEBOV) is a promising Ebola vaccine candidate. We report the results of an interim analysis of a trial of rVSV-ZEBOV in Guinea, west Africa. METHODS For this open-label, cluster-randomised ring vaccination trial, suspected cases of Ebola virus disease in Basse-Guinée (Guinea, west Africa) were independently ascertained by Ebola response teams as part of a national surveillance system. After laboratory confirmation of a new case, clusters of all contacts and contacts of contacts were defined and randomly allocated 1:1 to immediate vaccination or delayed (21 days later) vaccination with rVSV-ZEBOV (one dose of 2 × 10(7) plaque-forming units, administered intramuscularly in the deltoid muscle). Adults (age ≥18 years) who were not pregnant or breastfeeding were eligible for vaccination. Block randomisation was used, with randomly varying blocks, stratified by location (urban vs rural) and size of rings (≤20 vs >20 individuals). The study is open label and masking of participants and field teams to the time of vaccination is not possible, but Ebola response teams and laboratory workers were unaware of allocation to immediate or delayed vaccination. Taking into account the incubation period of the virus of about 10 days, the prespecified primary outcome was laboratory-confirmed Ebola virus disease with onset of symptoms at least 10 days after randomisation. The primary analysis was per protocol and compared the incidence of Ebola virus disease in eligible and vaccinated individuals in immediate vaccination clusters with the incidence in eligible individuals in delayed vaccination clusters. This trial is registered with the Pan African Clinical Trials Registry, number PACTR201503001057193. FINDINGS Between April 1, 2015, and July 20, 2015, 90 clusters, with a total population of 7651 people were included in the planned interim analysis. 48 of these clusters (4123 people) were randomly assigned to immediate vaccination with rVSV-ZEBOV, and 42 clusters (3528 people) were randomly assigned to delayed vaccination with rVSV-ZEBOV. In the immediate vaccination group, there were no cases of Ebola virus disease with symptom onset at least 10 days after randomisation, whereas in the delayed vaccination group there were 16 cases of Ebola virus disease from seven clusters, showing a vaccine efficacy of 100% (95% CI 74·7-100·0; p=0·0036). No new cases of Ebola virus disease were diagnosed in vaccinees from the immediate or delayed groups from 6 days post-vaccination. At the cluster level, with the inclusion of all eligible adults, vaccine effectiveness was 75·1% (95% CI -7·1 to 94·2; p=0·1791), and 76·3% (95% CI -15·5 to 95·1; p=0·3351) with the inclusion of everyone (eligible or not eligible for vaccination). 43 serious adverse events were reported; one serious adverse event was judged to be causally related to vaccination (a febrile episode in a vaccinated participant, which resolved without sequelae). Assessment of serious adverse events is ongoing. INTERPRETATION The results of this interim analysis indicate that rVSV-ZEBOV might be highly efficacious and safe in preventing Ebola virus disease, and is most likely effective at the population level when delivered during an Ebola virus disease outbreak via a ring vaccination strategy. FUNDING WHO, with support from the Wellcome Trust (UK); Médecins Sans Frontières; the Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs through the Research Council of Norway; and the Canadian Government through the Public Health Agency of Canada, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, International Development Research Centre, and Department of Foreign Affairs, Trade and Development.


The Lancet | 2017

Efficacy and Effectiveness of an rVSV-Vectored Vaccine in Preventing Ebola Virus Disease: Final Results from the Guinea Ring Vaccination, Open-Label, Cluster-Randomised Trial (Ebola Ça Suffit!)

Ana Maria Henao-Restrepo; Anton Camacho; Ira M. Longini; Conall H. Watson; W. John Edmunds; Matthias Egger; Miles W. Carroll; Natalie E Dean; Ibrahima Dina Diatta; Moussa Doumbia; B. Draguez; Sophie Duraffour; Godwin Enwere; Rebecca F. Grais; Stephan Günther; Pierre-Stéphane Gsell; Stefanie Hossmann; Sara Viksmoen Watle; Mandy Kader Kondé; Sakoba Keita; Souleymane Kone; Eewa Kuisma; Myron M. Levine; Sema Mandal; Thomas Mauget; Gunnstein Norheim; Ximena Riveros; Aboubacar Soumah; Sven Trelle; Andrea S Vicari

Summary Background rVSV-ZEBOV is a recombinant, replication competent vesicular stomatitis virus-based candidate vaccine expressing a surface glycoprotein of Zaire Ebolavirus. We tested the effect of rVSV-ZEBOV in preventing Ebola virus disease in contacts and contacts of contacts of recently confirmed cases in Guinea, west Africa. Methods We did an open-label, cluster-randomised ring vaccination trial (Ebola ça Suffit!) in the communities of Conakry and eight surrounding prefectures in the Basse-Guinée region of Guinea, and in Tomkolili and Bombali in Sierra Leone. We assessed the efficacy of a single intramuscular dose of rVSV-ZEBOV (2×107 plaque-forming units administered in the deltoid muscle) in the prevention of laboratory confirmed Ebola virus disease. After confirmation of a case of Ebola virus disease, we definitively enumerated on a list a ring (cluster) of all their contacts and contacts of contacts including named contacts and contacts of contacts who were absent at the time of the trial team visit. The list was archived, then we randomly assigned clusters (1:1) to either immediate vaccination or delayed vaccination (21 days later) of all eligible individuals (eg, those aged ≥18 years and not pregnant, breastfeeding, or severely ill). An independent statistician generated the assignment sequence using block randomisation with randomly varying blocks, stratified by location (urban vs rural) and size of rings (≤20 individuals vs >20 individuals). Ebola response teams and laboratory workers were unaware of assignments. After a recommendation by an independent data and safety monitoring board, randomisation was stopped and immediate vaccination was also offered to children aged 6–17 years and all identified rings. The prespecified primary outcome was a laboratory confirmed case of Ebola virus disease with onset 10 days or more from randomisation. The primary analysis compared the incidence of Ebola virus disease in eligible and vaccinated individuals assigned to immediate vaccination versus eligible contacts and contacts of contacts assigned to delayed vaccination. This trial is registered with the Pan African Clinical Trials Registry, number PACTR201503001057193. Findings In the randomised part of the trial we identified 4539 contacts and contacts of contacts in 51 clusters randomly assigned to immediate vaccination (of whom 3232 were eligible, 2151 consented, and 2119 were immediately vaccinated) and 4557 contacts and contacts of contacts in 47 clusters randomly assigned to delayed vaccination (of whom 3096 were eligible, 2539 consented, and 2041 were vaccinated 21 days after randomisation). No cases of Ebola virus disease occurred 10 days or more after randomisation among randomly assigned contacts and contacts of contacts vaccinated in immediate clusters versus 16 cases (7 clusters affected) among all eligible individuals in delayed clusters. Vaccine efficacy was 100% (95% CI 68·9–100·0, p=0·0045), and the calculated intraclass correlation coefficient was 0·035. Additionally, we defined 19 non-randomised clusters in which we enumerated 2745 contacts and contacts of contacts, 2006 of whom were eligible and 1677 were immediately vaccinated, including 194 children. The evidence from all 117 clusters showed that no cases of Ebola virus disease occurred 10 days or more after randomisation among all immediately vaccinated contacts and contacts of contacts versus 23 cases (11 clusters affected) among all eligible contacts and contacts of contacts in delayed plus all eligible contacts and contacts of contacts never vaccinated in immediate clusters. The estimated vaccine efficacy here was 100% (95% CI 79·3–100·0, p=0·0033). 52% of contacts and contacts of contacts assigned to immediate vaccination and in non-randomised clusters received the vaccine immediately; vaccination protected both vaccinated and unvaccinated people in those clusters. 5837 individuals in total received the vaccine (5643 adults and 194 children), and all vaccinees were followed up for 84 days. 3149 (53·9%) of 5837 individuals reported at least one adverse event in the 14 days after vaccination; these were typically mild (87·5% of all 7211 adverse events). Headache (1832 [25·4%]), fatigue (1361 [18·9%]), and muscle pain (942 [13·1%]) were the most commonly reported adverse events in this period across all age groups. 80 serious adverse events were identified, of which two were judged to be related to vaccination (one febrile reaction and one anaphylaxis) and one possibly related (influenza-like illness); all three recovered without sequelae. Interpretation The results add weight to the interim assessment that rVSV-ZEBOV offers substantial protection against Ebola virus disease, with no cases among vaccinated individuals from day 10 after vaccination in both randomised and non-randomised clusters. Funding WHO, UK Wellcome Trust, the UK Government through the Department of International Development, Médecins Sans Frontières, Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs (through the Research Council of Norways GLOBVAC programme), and the Canadian Government (through the Public Health Agency of Canada, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, International Development Research Centre and Department of Foreign Affairs, Trade and Development).


Clinical Infectious Diseases | 2016

Resurgence of Ebola virus disease in Guinea linked to a survivor with virus persistence in seminal fluid for more than 500 days

Boubacar Diallo; Daouda Sissoko; Nicholas J. Loman; Hadja Aïssatou Bah; Hawa Bah; Mary Claire Worrell; Lya Saidou Conde; Ramata Sacko; Samuel Mesfin; Angelo Loua; Jacques Katomba Kalonda; Ngozi A Erondu; Benjamin A. Dahl; Susann Handrick; Ian Goodfellow; Luke W. Meredith; Matt Cotten; Umaru Jah; Raoul Emeric Guetiya Wadoum; Pierre E. Rollin; N'Faly Magassouba; D. Malvy; Xavier Anglaret; Miles W. Carroll; Raymond Bruce Aylward; Mamoudou H. Djingarey; Abdoulaye Diarra; Pierre Formenty; Sakoba Keita; Stephan Günther

We report on an Ebola virus disease (EVD) survivor who showed Ebola virus in seminal fluid 531 days after onset of disease. The persisting virus was sexually transmitted in February 2016, about 470 days after onset of symptoms, and caused a new cluster of EVD in Guinea and Liberia.


Nature | 2017

Virus genomes reveal factors that spread and sustained the Ebola epidemic

Gytis Dudas; Luiz Max Carvalho; Trevor Bedford; Andrew J. Tatem; Guy Baele; Nuno Rodrigues Faria; Daniel J. Park; Jason T. Ladner; Armando Arias; Danny A. Asogun; Filip Bielejec; Sarah Caddy; Matthew Cotten; Jonathan D’ambrozio; Simon Dellicour; Antonino Di Caro; Joseph W. Diclaro; Sophie Duraffour; Michael J. Elmore; Lawrence S. Fakoli; Ousmane Faye; Merle L. Gilbert; Sahr M. Gevao; Stephen K. Gire; Adrianne Gladden-Young; Andreas Gnirke; Augustine Goba; Donald S. Grant; Bart L. Haagmans; Julian A. Hiscox

The 2013–2016 West African epidemic caused by the Ebola virus was of unprecedented magnitude, duration and impact. Here we reconstruct the dispersal, proliferation and decline of Ebola virus throughout the region by analysing 1,610 Ebola virus genomes, which represent over 5% of the known cases. We test the association of geography, climate and demography with viral movement among administrative regions, inferring a classic ‘gravity’ model, with intense dispersal between larger and closer populations. Despite attenuation of international dispersal after border closures, cross-border transmission had already sown the seeds for an international epidemic, rendering these measures ineffective at curbing the epidemic. We address why the epidemic did not spread into neighbouring countries, showing that these countries were susceptible to substantial outbreaks but at lower risk of introductions. Finally, we reveal that this large epidemic was a heterogeneous and spatially dissociated collection of transmission clusters of varying size, duration and connectivity. These insights will help to inform interventions in future epidemics.


Nature | 2016

Unique human immune signature of Ebola virus disease in Guinea

Paula Ruibal; Lisa Oestereich; Anja Lüdtke; Beate Becker-Ziaja; David M. Wozniak; Romy Kerber; Miša Korva; Mar Cabeza-Cabrerizo; Joseph Akoi Bore; Fara Raymond Koundouno; Sophie Duraffour; Romy Weller; Anja Thorenz; Eleonora Cimini; Domenico Viola; Chiara Agrati; Johanna Repits; Babak Afrough; Lauren A. Cowley; Didier Ngabo; Julia Hinzmann; Marc Mertens; Inês Vitoriano; Christopher H. Logue; Jan Peter Boettcher; Elisa Pallasch; Andreas Sachse; Amadou Bah; Katja Nitzsche; Eeva Kuisma

Despite the magnitude of the Ebola virus disease (EVD) outbreak in West Africa, there is still a fundamental lack of knowledge about the pathophysiology of EVD. In particular, very little is known about human immune responses to Ebola virus. Here we evaluate the physiology of the human T cell immune response in EVD patients at the time of admission to the Ebola Treatment Center in Guinea, and longitudinally until discharge or death. Through the use of multiparametric flow cytometry established by the European Mobile Laboratory in the field, we identify an immune signature that is unique in EVD fatalities. Fatal EVD was characterized by a high percentage of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells expressing the inhibitory molecules CTLA-4 and PD-1, which correlated with elevated inflammatory markers and high virus load. Conversely, surviving individuals showed significantly lower expression of CTLA-4 and PD-1 as well as lower inflammation, despite comparable overall T cell activation. Concomitant with virus clearance, survivors mounted a robust Ebola-virus-specific T cell response. Our findings suggest that dysregulation of the T cell response is a key component of EVD pathophysiology.


PLOS Pathogens | 2010

Vaccinia virus-encoded ribonucleotide reductase subunits are differentially required for replication and pathogenesis.

Don B. Gammon; Branawan Gowrishankar; Sophie Duraffour; Graciela Andrei; Chris Upton; David H. Evans

Ribonucleotide reductases (RRs) are evolutionarily-conserved enzymes that catalyze the rate-limiting step during dNTP synthesis in mammals. RR consists of both large (R1) and small (R2) subunits, which are both required for catalysis by the R12R22 heterotetrameric complex. Poxviruses also encode RR proteins, but while the Orthopoxviruses infecting humans [e.g. vaccinia (VACV), variola, cowpox, and monkeypox viruses] encode both R1 and R2 subunits, the vast majority of Chordopoxviruses encode only R2 subunits. Using plaque morphology, growth curve, and mouse model studies, we investigated the requirement of VACV R1 (I4) and R2 (F4) subunits for replication and pathogenesis using a panel of mutant viruses in which one or more viral RR genes had been inactivated. Surprisingly, VACV F4, but not I4, was required for efficient replication in culture and virulence in mice. The growth defects of VACV strains lacking F4 could be complemented by genes encoding other Chordopoxvirus R2 subunits, suggesting conservation of function between poxvirus R2 proteins. Expression of F4 proteins encoding a point mutation predicted to inactivate RR activity but still allow for interaction with R1 subunits, caused a dominant negative phenotype in growth experiments in the presence or absence of I4. Co-immunoprecipitation studies showed that F4 (as well as other Chordopoxvirus R2 subunits) form hybrid complexes with cellular R1 subunits. Mutant F4 proteins that are unable to interact with host R1 subunits failed to rescue the replication defect of strains lacking F4, suggesting that F4-host R1 complex formation is critical for VACV replication. Our results suggest that poxvirus R2 subunits form functional complexes with host R1 subunits to provide sufficient dNTPs for viral replication. Our results also suggest that R2-deficient poxviruses may be selective oncolytic agents and our bioinformatic analyses provide insights into how poxvirus nucleotide metabolism proteins may have influenced the base composition of these pathogens.


Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy | 2007

Activities of Several Classes of Acyclic Nucleoside Phosphonates against Camelpox Virus Replication in Different Cell Culture Models

Sophie Duraffour; Robert Snoeck; Marcela Krečmerová; Joost van den Oord; Rita Vos; Antonín Holý; Jean-Marc Crance; Daniel Garin; Erik De Clercq; Graciela Andrei

ABSTRACT Camelpox virus (CMLV) is the closest known virus to variola virus. Here we report on the anti-CMLV activities of several acyclic nucleoside phosphonates (ANPs) related to cidofovir [(S)-1-(3-hydroxy-2-phosphonomethoxypropyl)cytosine (HPMPC; Vistide)] against two CMLV strains, CML1 and CML14. Cytopathic effect (CPE) reduction assays performed with human embryonic lung fibroblast monolayers revealed the selectivities of the first two classes of ANPs (cHPMPA, HPMPDAP, and HPMPO-DAPy) and of the hexadecyloxyethyl ester of 1-{[(5S)-2-hydroxy-2-oxido-1,4,2-dioxaphosphinan-5-yl]methyl}-5-azacytosine (HDE-cHPMP-5-azaC), belonging to the newly synthesized ANPs, which are HPMP derivatives containing a 5-azacytosine moiety. The inhibitory activities of ANPs against both strains were also confirmed with primary human keratinocyte (PHK) monolayers, despite the higher toxicity of those molecules on growing PHKs. Virus yield assays confirmed the anti-CML1 and anti-CML14 efficacies of the compounds selected for the highest potencies in CPE reduction experiments. Ex vivo studies were performed with a 3-dimensional model of human skin, i.e., organotypic epithelial raft cultures of PHKs. It was ascertained by histological evaluation, as well as by virus yield assays, that CMLV replicated in the human skin equivalent. HPMPC and the newly synthesized ANPs proved to be effective at protecting the epithelial cells against CMLV-induced CPE. Moreover, in contrast to the toxicity on PHK monolayers, signs of toxicity in the differentiated epithelium were seen only at high ANP concentrations. Our results demonstrate that compounds belonging to the newly synthesized ANPs, in addition to cidofovir, represent promising candidates for the treatment of poxvirus infections.


The Lancet Global Health | 2017

Persistence and clearance of Ebola virus RNA from seminal fluid of Ebola virus disease survivors: a longitudinal analysis and modelling study

Daouda Sissoko; Sophie Duraffour; Romy Kerber; Jacques Seraphin Kolié; Abdoul Habib Beavogui; Alseny Modet Camara; Géraldine Colin; Toni Rieger; Lisa Oestereich; Bernadett Pályi; Stephanie Wurr; Jeremie Guedj; Thi Huyen Tram Nguyen; Rosalind M. Eggo; Conall H. Watson; W. John Edmunds; Joseph Akoi Bore; Fara Raymond Koundouno; Mar Cabeza-Cabrerizo; Lisa L. Carter; Liana Eleni Kafetzopoulou; Eeva Kuisma; Janine Michel; Livia Victoria Patrono; Natasha Y. Rickett; Katrin Singethan; Martin Rudolf; Angelika Lander; Elisa Pallasch; Sabrina Bockholt

BACKGROUND By January, 2016, all known transmission chains of the Ebola virus disease (EVD) outbreak in west Africa had been stopped. However, there is concern about persistence of Ebola virus in the reproductive tract of men who have survived EVD. We aimed to use biostatistical modelling to describe the dynamics of Ebola virus RNA load in seminal fluid, including clearance parameters. METHODS In this longitudinal study, we recruited men who had been discharged from three Ebola treatment units in Guinea between January and July, 2015. Participants provided samples of seminal fluid at follow-up every 3-6 weeks, which we tested for Ebola virus RNA using quantitative real-time RT-PCR. Representative specimens from eight participants were then inoculated into immunodeficient mice to test for infectivity. We used a linear mixed-effect model to analyse the dynamics of virus persistence in seminal fluid over time. FINDINGS We enrolled 26 participants and tested 130 seminal fluid specimens; median follow up was 197 days (IQR 187-209 days) after enrolment, which corresponded to 255 days (228-287) after disease onset. Ebola virus RNA was detected in 86 semen specimens from 19 (73%) participants. Median duration of Ebola virus RNA detection was 158 days after onset (73-181; maximum 407 days at end of follow-up). Mathematical modelling of the quantitative time-series data showed a mean clearance rate of Ebola virus RNA from seminal fluid of -0·58 log units per month, although the clearance kinetic varied greatly between participants. Using our biostatistical model, we predict that 50% and 90% of male survivors clear Ebola virus RNA from seminal fluid at 115 days (90% prediction interval 72-160) and 294 days (212-399) after disease onset, respectively. We also predicted that the number of men positive for Ebola virus RNA in affected countries would decrease from about 50 in January 2016, to fewer than 1 person by July, 2016. Infectious virus was detected in 15 of 26 (58%) specimens tested in mice. INTERPRETATION Time to clearance of Ebola virus RNA from seminal fluid varies greatly between individuals and could be more than 13 months. Our predictions will assist in decision-making about surveillance and preventive measures in EVD outbreaks. FUNDING This study was funded by European Unions Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme, Directorate-General for International Cooperation and Development of the European Commission, Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale (INSERM), German Research Foundation (DFG), and Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking.


Genome Biology | 2017

Transcriptomic Signatures Differentiate Survival from Fatal Outcomes in Humans Infected with Ebola Virus

Xuan Liu; Emily Speranza; César Muñoz-Fontela; Sam Haldenby; Natasha Y. Rickett; Isabel García-Dorival; Yongxiang Fang; Yper Hall; Elsa-Gayle Zekeng; Anja Lüdtke; Dong Xia; Romy Kerber; Ralf Krumkamp; Sophie Duraffour; Daouda Sissoko; John Kenny; Nichola Rockliffe; E. Diane Williamson; Thomas R. Laws; Magassouba N’Faly; David A. Matthews; Stephan Günther; Andrew R. Cossins; Armand Sprecher; John H. Connor; Miles W. Carroll; Julian A. Hiscox

BackgroundIn 2014, Western Africa experienced an unanticipated explosion of Ebola virus infections. What distinguishes fatal from non-fatal outcomes remains largely unknown, yet is key to optimising personalised treatment strategies. We used transcriptome data for peripheral blood taken from infected and convalescent recovering patients to identify early stage host factors that are associated with acute illness and those that differentiate patient survival from fatality.ResultsThe data demonstrate that individuals who succumbed to the disease show stronger upregulation of interferon signalling and acute phase responses compared to survivors during the acute phase of infection. Particularly notable is the strong upregulation of albumin and fibrinogen genes, which suggest significant liver pathology. Cell subtype prediction using messenger RNA expression patterns indicated that NK-cell populations increase in patients who survive infection. By selecting genes whose expression properties discriminated between fatal cases and survivors, we identify a small panel of responding genes that act as strong predictors of patient outcome, independent of viral load.ConclusionsTranscriptomic analysis of the host response to pathogen infection using blood samples taken during an outbreak situation can provide multiple levels of information on both disease state and mechanisms of pathogenesis. Host biomarkers were identified that provide high predictive value under conditions where other predictors, such as viral load, are poor prognostic indicators. The data suggested that rapid analysis of the host response to infection in an outbreak situation can provide valuable information to guide an understanding of disease outcome and mechanisms of disease.


Antiviral Research | 2010

Epithelial raft cultures for investigations of virus growth, pathogenesis and efficacy of antiviral agents

G. Andrei; Sophie Duraffour; J. J. van den Oord; Robert Snoeck

The organotypic epithelial raft cultures, originally developed to study keratinocytes differentiation, represent a novel approach to the study of viruses able to infect epithelial cells. Organotypic epithelial raft cultures accurately reproduce the process of epithelial differentiation in vitro and can be prepared from normal keratinocytes, explanted epithelial tissue, or established cell lines. This culture system permits cells to proliferate and fully differentiate at the air-liquid interface on a dermal-equivalent support. Normal primary human keratinocytes (PHKs) stratify and fully differentiate in a manner similar to the normal squamous epithelial tissues, while transformed cell lines exhibit dysplastic morphologies similar to the (pre)neoplastic lesions seen in vivo. This three-dimensional (3D) culture system provides an essential tool for investigations of virus growth, virus-host cell interactions, for the genetic analysis of viral proteins and regulatory sequences, and for the evaluation of antiviral agents. The 3D epithelial cultures have proven a breakthrough in the research on papillomaviruses, since their life cycle is strictly linked to the differentiation of the host epithelium. In the last years, several reports have shown the usefulness of the 3D epithelial cultures for the study of other viruses that target at least during a part of their life cycles epithelial cells. The 3D epithelial cultures allow the analysis of virus-host cell interactions in stratified epithelia that more closely resemble the in vivo situation. In this review we describe the advances on research on 3D epithelial cultures for the study of virus growth and pathogenesis of different families of viruses, including papilloma-, herpes-, pox-, adeno-, and parvoviruses.

Collaboration


Dive into the Sophie Duraffour's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Graciela Andrei

Katholieke Universiteit Leuven

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Robert Snoeck

Katholieke Universiteit Leuven

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Joost van den Oord

Katholieke Universiteit Leuven

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Daniel Garin

École Normale Supérieure

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Stephan Günther

Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Dimitrios Topalis

Katholieke Universiteit Leuven

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Natacha Coen

Rega Institute for Medical Research

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Romy Kerber

Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Kurt Vermeire

Rega Institute for Medical Research

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge