Sophie E. Polo

Reshaping Chromatin after DNA Damage: The Choreography of Histone Proteins

DNA damage signaling and repair machineries operate in a nuclear environment, where DNA is wrapped around histone proteins and packaged into chromatin. Understanding how chromatin structure is restored together with the DNA sequence during DNA damage repair has been a topic of intense research. Indeed, chromatin integrity is central to cell functions and identity. Yet, chromatin shows remarkable plasticity in response to DNA damage. This review presents our current knowledge of chromatin dynamics in the mammalian cell nucleus in response to DNA-double strand breaks and UV lesions. I provide an overview of the key players involved in regulating histone dynamics in damaged chromatin regions, focusing on histone chaperones and their concerted action with histone modifiers, chromatin remodelers and repair factors. I also discuss how these dynamics contribute to reshaping chromatin and, by altering the chromatin landscape, may affect the maintenance of epigenetic information.

Chromatin dynamics after DNA damage: The legacy of the access–repair–restore model

Eukaryotic genomes are packaged into chromatin, which is the physiological substrate for all DNA transactions, including DNA damage and repair. Chromatin organization imposes major constraints on DNA damage repair and thus undergoes critical rearrangements during the repair process. These rearrangements have been integrated into the “Access-Repair-Restore” (ARR) model, which provides a molecular framework for chromatin dynamics in response to DNA damage. Here, we take a historical perspective on the elaboration of this model and describe the molecular players involved in damaged chromatin reorganization in human cells. In particular, we present our current knowledge of chromatin assembly coupled to DNA damage repair, focusing on the role of histone variants and their dedicated chaperones. Finally, we discuss the impact of chromatin rearrangements after DNA damage on chromatin function and epigenome maintenance.

Epigenome Maintenance in Response to DNA Damage

Summary Organism viability relies on the stable maintenance of specific chromatin landscapes, established during development, that shape cell functions and identities by driving distinct gene expression programs. Yet, epigenome maintenance is challenged during transcription, replication and repair of DNA damage, all of which elicit dynamic changes in chromatin organization. Here, we review recent advances that have shed light on the specialized mechanisms contributing to the restoration of epigenome structure and function after DNA damage in the mammalian cell nucleus. By drawing a parallel with epigenome maintenance during replication, we explore emerging concepts and highlight open issues in this rapidly growing field. In particular, we present our current knowledge of molecular players that support the coordinated maintenance of genome and epigenome integrity in response to DNA damage, and we highlight how nuclear organization impacts genome stability. Finally, we discuss possible functional implications of epigenome plasticity in response to genotoxic stress.

Blurring the line between the DNA damage response and transcription: The importance of chromatin dynamics

DNA damage interferes with the progression of transcription machineries. A tight coordination of transcription with signaling and repair of DNA damage is thus critical for safeguarding genome function. This coordination involves modulations of chromatin organization. Here, we focus on the central role of chromatin dynamics, in conjunction with DNA Damage Response (DDR) factors, in controlling transcription inhibition and restart at sites of DNA damage in mammalian cells. Recent work has identified chromatin modifiers and histone chaperones as key regulators of transcriptional activity in damaged chromatin regions. Conversely, the transcriptional state of chromatin before DNA damage influences both DNA damage signaling and repair. We discuss the importance of chromatin plasticity in coordinating the interplay between the DDR and transcription, with major implications for cell fate maintenance.

Chromatin plasticity in response to DNA damage: the shape of things to come

DNA damage poses a major threat to cell function and viability by compromising both genome and epigenome integrity. The DNA damage response indeed operates in the context of chromatin and relies on dynamic changes in chromatin organization. Here, we review the molecular bases of chromatin alterations in response to DNA damage, focusing on core histone mobilization in mammalian cells. Building on our current view of nucleosome dynamics in response to DNA damage, we highlight open challenges and avenues for future development. In particular, we discuss the different levels of regulation of chromatin plasticity during the DNA damage response and their potential impact on cell function and epigenome maintenance.

Methods for studying chromatin assembly coupled to DNA repair

In the eukaryotic nucleus, the DNA repair machinery operates on chromatin-embedded DNA substrates. Currently, a favored model for DNA repair into chromatin involves the transient disruption of chromatin organization to facilitate access of the repair machinery to DNA lesions. Importantly, this model implies that, in addition to DNA repair, a subsequent step is necessary to restore a proper chromatin structure. To study this latter step, we describe here methods for simultaneously analyzing chromatin assembly and DNA repair both in vitro and in vivo. Several cell-free systems have been developed that reproduce both DNA repair and nucleosome assembly. These in vitro systems are based on the use of defined damaged DNA. Two complementary assays are routinely used: (i) with circular DNA molecules, one can monitor in a combined analysis both repair synthesis and plasmid supercoiling; (ii) with immobilized damaged DNA, one follows specific protein interactions including histone deposition. In addition, in vivo assays have been designed to monitor the recruitment of chromatin assembly factors onto damaged chromatin either at a global level over the whole cell nucleus or locally at sites of DNA damage. Combination of these approaches provides powerful tools to gain insights into the mechanism by which chromatin organization can be restored after repair of DNA lesions.

DNA damage leaves its mark on chromatin

DNA organization into chromatin has a major influence on the cellular response to DNA damage. Recent studies in various systems ranging from yeast to human cells stress the importance of chromatin not simply as a barrier to DNA repair processes but also as an active contributor to the DNA damage response. Indeed, modulations of chromatin organization involving various degrees of rearrangements, such as histone modifications and even nucleosome displacement, can promote efficient repair and also participate in checkpoint signaling. Here, we survey recent progress in delineating how chromatin rearrangements provide crosstalk with the DNA damage response. In particular, we highlight new data on histone dynamics at damage sites and discuss their functional importance for the stable propagation of specific chromatin states.

Real-Time Tracking of Parental Histones Reveals Their Contribution to Chromatin Integrity Following DNA Damage

Summary Chromatin integrity is critical for cell function and identity but is challenged by DNA damage. To understand how chromatin architecture and the information that it conveys are preserved or altered following genotoxic stress, we established a system for real-time tracking of parental histones, which characterize the pre-damage chromatin state. Focusing on histone H3 dynamics after local UVC irradiation in human cells, we demonstrate that parental histones rapidly redistribute around damaged regions by a dual mechanism combining chromatin opening and histone mobilization on chromatin. Importantly, parental histones almost entirely recover and mix with new histones in repairing chromatin. Our data further define a close coordination of parental histone dynamics with DNA repair progression through the damage sensor DDB2 (DNA damage-binding protein 2). We speculate that this mechanism may contribute to maintaining a memory of the original chromatin landscape and may help preserve epigenome stability in response to DNA damage.

Imaging local deposition of newly synthesized histones in UVC-damaged chromatin.

DNA damage not only jeopardizes genome integrity but also challenges the well-organized association of DNA with histone proteins into chromatin, which is key for regulating gene expression and cell functions. The extent to which the original chromatin structure is altered after repair of DNA lesions is thus a critical issue. Dissecting histone dynamics at sites of DNA damage has provided mechanistic insights into chromatin plasticity in response to genotoxic stress. Here, we present an experimental protocol for visualizing the deposition of newly synthesized histone H3 variants at sites of UVC damage in human cells that couples SNAP-tag based labeling of new histones with local UVC irradiation of cells through micropore filters.

Switching genes to silent mode near DNA double‐strand breaks

Transcription is tightly regulated in response to DNA damage. Rapid and transient pausing of RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) is indeed critical to restrict the production of aberrant transcripts from damaged loci and to prevent deleterious collisions between transcription and repair machineries. Yet, how DNA lesions signal to the transcription machinery to coordinate DNA repair with transcriptional silencing is not fully elucidated. In this issue of EMBO Reports, Awwad et al bring a new piece to the puzzle by identifying the negative transcription elongation factor NELF as a critical player in this process. They demonstrate that NELF is recruited to DNA double‐strand breaks (DSBs) near transcriptionally active genes in a poly(ADP‐ribose)‐ and RNAPII‐dependent manner to promote transcriptional repression and facilitate DSB repair.