Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Sora C. Yoon is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Sora C. Yoon.


Radiology | 2014

Radiogenomic Analysis of Breast Cancer: Luminal B Molecular Subtype Is Associated with Enhancement Dynamics at MR Imaging

Maciej A. Mazurowski; Jing Zhang; Lars J. Grimm; Sora C. Yoon; James I. Silber

PURPOSE To investigate associations between breast cancer molecular subtype and semiautomatically extracted magnetic resonance (MR) imaging features. MATERIALS AND METHODS Imaging and genomic data from the Cancer Genome Atlas and the Cancer Imaging Archive for 48 patients with breast cancer from four institutions in the United States were used in this institutional review board approval-exempt study. Computer vision algorithms were applied to extract 23 imaging features from lesions indicated by a breast radiologist on MR images. Morphologic, textural, and dynamic features were extracted. Molecular subtype was determined on the basis of genomic analysis. Associations between the imaging features and molecular subtype were evaluated by using logistic regression and likelihood ratio tests. The analysis controlled for the age of the patients, their menopausal status, and the orientation of the MR images (sagittal vs axial). RESULTS There is an association (P = .0015) between the luminal B subtype and a dynamic contrast material-enhancement feature that quantifies the relationship between lesion enhancement and background parenchymal enhancement. Cancers with a higher ratio of lesion enhancement rate to background parenchymal enhancement rate are more likely to be luminal B subtype. CONCLUSION The luminal B subtype of breast cancer is associated with MR imaging features that relate the enhancement dynamics of the tumor and the background parenchyma.


Spine | 2005

Accuracy of computerized frameless stereotactic image-guided pedicle screw placement into previously fused lumbar spines.

Moe R. Lim; Federico P. Girardi; Sora C. Yoon; Russel C. Huang; Frank P. Cammisa

Study Design. A retrospective chart and radiographic review of 122 pedicle screws placed with computerized stereotactic image-guidance into posterolateral fusion masses. Objectives. To determine the accuracy rate of computerized stereotactic image-guided pedicle screw placement in previously fused lumbar spines. Summary of Background Data. Placement of pedicle screws into a previously fused lumbar spine is challenging. The normal anatomic landmarks used to determine the starting point and trajectory of the screws have either been removed or are obscured by the fusion mass. Computerized frameless stereotaxis provides precise intraoperative real time multiplanar image-guidance and may be valuable in this clinical situation. Methods. Computerized frameless stereotactic image-guidance was used to place pedicle screws into 78 consecutive patients with prior lumbar spine fusions. Postoperative computed tomography was available on 35 patients (231 screws). One hundred and twenty-two screws were placed into fusion masses. Pedicle cortical perforations were characterized by the direction (medial, inferior, lateral, or superior) and magnitude (in 2-mm increments) of perforation. Results. Five (4.1%) of the 122 pedicle screws placed into previously fused levels were found to have unintentional cortical violations. There were 1 superior (<2 mm), 1 medial (<2 mm), and 3 lateral perforations (<2, 4, and 6 mm). None of these perforations led to clinically apparent radicular pain or weakness. No pedicle screws required revision for malpositioning. Conclusions. The accuracy rate of stereotactic image-guided pedicle screw placement into previously fused lumbar spine levels is 96%. Computerized stereotactic image-guidance may have particular application in situations in which posterior element anatomy is altered, such as in the presence of a prior fusion mass.


Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography | 2006

Does the CT whirl sign really predict small bowel volvulus?: Experience in an oncologic population.

Marc J. Gollub; Sora C. Yoon; Lachlan Mcg. Smith; Chaya S. Moskowitz

The objective of this study was to determine the sensitivity of the CT “whirl sign” for the diagnosis of small bowel volvulus in patients who present with a clinical suspicion of intestinal obstruction. Between January 2002 and September 2004, 1,493 CT scans performed in 1,213 patients suspected of having small bowel obstruction were retrospectively reviewed by one attending radiologist with gastrointestinal subspecialization and one senior radiology resident. Multislice helical CT scans were performed after oral and intravenous contrast administration. All CT scans showing a combined vessel and bowel whirl appearance were identified. Other features recorded included the number of degrees of whirl rotation, direction of rotation, presence of bowel obstruction, and signs of ischemia. Diagnoses were determined at either surgery or clinicoradiographic follow-up. Surgical follow-up was available in 174 of the 1,213 patients. There were 460 males and 753 females ranging in age from 1 to 95 years (mean 59 years). A whirl sign was found in 33 of the 1,493 CT scans by reader 1 and in 13 of the 1,493 CT scans by reader 2. In 11 patients, surgery revealed small bowel volvulus (0.9%). Reader 1 detected 7 of the 11 volvuli (sensitivity 64%, specificity 98%, positive predictive value 21%, negative predictive value 99.7%). Reader 2 detected 3 of the 11 volvuli (sensitivity 27%, specificity 99%, positive predictive value 23%, negative predictive value 99.5%). The CT scans of the four remaining patients with volvulus not initially recognized by either reader were re-reviewed and were felt to contain whirl signs. Most patients with small bowel volvulus can be identified on CT through detection of a whirl sign. However, most whirl signs detected on CT will not prove to be indicative of small bowel volvulus.


Academic Radiology | 2015

Abbreviated Screening Protocol for Breast MRI: A Feasibility Study

Lars J. Grimm; Mary Scott Soo; Sora C. Yoon; Connie Kim; Sujata V. Ghate; Karen S. Johnson

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES To compare the performance of two shortened breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocols to a standard MRI protocol for breast cancer screening. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act compliant, institutional review board-approved pilot study, three fellowship-trained breast imagers evaluated 48 breast MRIs (24 normal, 12 benign, and 12 malignant) selected from a high-risk screening population. MRIs were presented in three viewing protocols, and a final Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System assessment was recorded for each case. The first shortened protocol (abbreviated 1) included only fat-saturated precontrast T2-weighted, precontrast T1-weighted, and first pass T1-weighted postcontrast sequences. The second shortened protocol (abbreviated 2) included the abbreviated 1 protocol plus the second pass T1-weighted postcontrast sequence. The third protocol (full), reviewed after a 1-month waiting period, included a nonfat-saturated T1-weighted sequence, fat-saturated T2-weighted, precontrast T1-weighted, and three or four dynamic postcontrast sequences. Interpretation times were recorded for the abbreviated 1 and full protocols. Sensitivity and specificity were compared via a chi-squared analysis. This pilot study was designed to detect a 10% difference in sensitivity with a power of 0.8. RESULTS There was no significant difference in sensitivity between the abbreviated 1 (86%; P = .22) or abbreviated 2 (89%; P = .38) protocols and the full protocol (95%). There was no significant difference in specificity between the abbreviated 1 (52%; P = 1) or abbreviated 2 (45%; P = .34) protocols and the full protocol (52%). The abbreviated 1 and full protocol interpretation times were similar (2.98 vs. 3.56 minutes). CONCLUSIONS In this pilot study, reader performance comparing two shortened breast MRI protocols to a standard protocol in a screening cohort were similar, suggesting that a shortened breast MRI protocol may be clinically useful, warranting further investigation.


Current Opinion in Pediatrics | 2004

Symptomatic spondylolysis: diagnosis and treatment.

Moe R. Lim; Sora C. Yoon; Daniel W. Green

Purpose of review Approximately 35% of adolescents experience back pain. In athletic adolescents, spondylolysis is the most common offending cause. With growing numbers of adolescents participating in sports with higher levels of intensity, spondylolysis is becoming an increasingly common clinical problem. Recent findings A recent report demonstrated the benign natural history of asymptomatic spondylolysis. However, long-term follow-up studies of patients who experience painful spondylolysis as adolescents remain unavailable. Modern imaging modalities have led to earlier diagnosis with greater accuracy. Conservative management with bracing continues to be a mainstay of treatment. In patients who are not helped by conservative therapy, recent studies have demonstrated the satisfactory long-term results of surgical repair. Summary The long-term sequelae of symptomatic spondylolysis and unhealed pars defects require investigation. MRI promises to be a valuable tool for diagnosis and clinical stratification, but further studies are necessary to demonstrate its clinical utility.


Radiology | 2009

Cancer Cases from ACRIN Digital Mammographic Imaging Screening Trial: Radiologist Analysis with Use of a Logistic Regression Model

Etta D. Pisano; Suddhasatta Acharyya; Elodia B. Cole; Helga S. Marques; Martin J. Yaffe; Meredith Blevins; Emily F. Conant; R. Edward Hendrick; Janet K. Baum; Laurie L. Fajardo; Roberta A. Jong; Marcia Koomen; Cherie M. Kuzmiak; Yeonhee Lee; Dag Pavic; Sora C. Yoon; Wittaya Padungchaichote; Constantine Gatsonis

PURPOSE To determine which factors contributed to the Digital Mammographic Imaging Screening Trial (DMIST) cancer detection results. MATERIALS AND METHODS This project was HIPAA compliant and institutional review board approved. Seven radiologist readers reviewed the film hard-copy (screen-film) and digital mammograms in DMIST cancer cases and assessed the factors that contributed to lesion visibility on both types of images. Two multinomial logistic regression models were used to analyze the combined and condensed visibility ratings assigned by the readers to the paired digital and screen-film images. RESULTS Readers most frequently attributed differences in DMIST cancer visibility to variations in image contrast--not differences in positioning or compression--between digital and screen-film mammography. The odds of a cancer being more visible on a digital mammogram--rather than being equally visible on digital and screen-film mammograms--were significantly greater for women with dense breasts than for women with nondense breasts, even with the data adjusted for patient age, lesion type, and mammography system (odds ratio, 2.28; P < .0001). The odds of a cancer being more visible at digital mammography--rather than being equally visible at digital and screen-film mammography--were significantly greater for lesions imaged with the General Electric digital mammography system than for lesions imaged with the Fischer (P = .0070) and Fuji (P = .0070) devices. CONCLUSION The significantly better diagnostic accuracy of digital mammography, as compared with screen-film mammography, in women with dense breasts demonstrated in the DMIST was most likely attributable to differences in image contrast, which were most likely due to the inherent system performance improvements that are available with digital mammography. The authors conclude that the DMIST results were attributable primarily to differences in the display and acquisition characteristics of the mammography devices rather than to reader variability.


American Journal of Surgery | 2009

Breast self-examination: defining a cohort still in need

Lee G. Wilke; Gloria Broadwater; Sarah Rabiner; Elizabeth Owens; Sora C. Yoon; Sujata V. Ghate; Victoria Scott; Ruth Walsh; Jay A. Baker; Mary Scott Soo; Catherine Ibarra-Drendall; April Stouder; Stephanie Robertson; Abbey C. Barron; Victoria L. Seewaldt

BACKGROUND The value of breast self-examination (BSE) to detect early breast cancer is controversial. METHODS Within an institutional review board-approved prospective study, 147 high-risk women were enrolled from 2004 to 2007. Yearly clinical examination, BSE teaching, and mammography were performed simultaneously followed by interval breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Women underwent additional BSE teaching at 6 months. Women reporting a mass on BSE underwent clinical evaluation. RESULTS Fourteen breast cancers were detected in 12 women. BSE detected 6/14 breast cancers versus 6/14 detected by MRI and 2/14 by mammography. Of 24 masses detected by BSE, 6/24 were malignant. The sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value of BSE to detect breast cancer were 58.3%, 87.4%, and 29.2%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value of a Breast Image Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) score of >or=4 on MRI were 66.7%, 88.9%, and 34.8%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS BSE detects new breast cancers in high-risk women undergoing screening mammogram, CBE, and yearly breast MRI.


American Journal of Roentgenology | 2016

Men (and Women) in Academic Radiology: How Can We Reduce the Gender Discrepancy?

Lars J. Grimm; Jennifer Ngo; Etta D. Pisano; Sora C. Yoon

OBJECTIVE There is a chronic gender imbalance in academic radiology departments, which could limit our fields ability to foster creative, productive, and innovative environments. We recently reviewed 51 major academic radiology faculty rosters and discovered that 34% of academic radiologists are women, but only 25% of vice chairs and section chiefs and 9% of department chairs are women. CONCLUSION Active intervention is needed to correct this imbalance, which should start with awareness of the issue, exposing medical students to radiology early in their training, and implementing better mentorship programs for female radiologists.


American Journal of Roentgenology | 2015

Interobserver Variability Between Breast Imagers Using the Fifth Edition of the BI-RADS MRI Lexicon.

Lars J. Grimm; Andy L. Anderson; Jay A. Baker; Karen S. Johnson; Ruth Walsh; Sora C. Yoon; Sujata V. Ghate

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to assess the interobserver variability of users of the MRI lexicon in the fifth edition of the BI-RADS atlas. MATERIALS AND METHODS Three breast imaging specialists reviewed 280 routine clinical breast MRI findings reported as BI-RADS category 3. Lesions reported as BI-RADS 3 were chosen because variability in the use of BI-RADS descriptors may influence which lesions are classified as probably benign. Each blinded reader reviewed every study and recorded breast features (background parenchymal enhancement) and lesion features (lesion morphology, mass shape, mass margin, mass internal enhancement, nonmass enhancement distribution, nonmass enhancement internal enhancement, enhancement kinetics) according to the fifth edition of the BI-RADS lexicon and provided a final BI-RADS assessment. Interobserver variability was calculated for each breast and lesion feature and for the final BI-RADS assessment. RESULTS Interobserver variability for background parenchymal enhancement was fair (ĸ = 0.28). There was moderate agreement on lesion morphology (ĸ = 0.53). For masses, there was substantial agreement on shape (ĸ = 0.72), margin (ĸ = 0.78), and internal enhancement (ĸ = 0.69). For nonmass enhancement, there was substantial agreement on distribution (ĸ = 0.69) and internal enhancement (ĸ = 0.62). There was slight agreement on lesion kinetics (ĸ = 0.19) and final BI-RADS assessment (ĸ = 0.11). CONCLUSION There is moderate to substantial agreement on most MRI BI-RADS lesion morphology descriptors, particularly mass and nonmass enhancement features, which are important predictors of malignancy. Considerable disagreement remains, however, among experienced readers whether to follow particular findings.


Academic Radiology | 2015

Whole Breast Ultrasound: Comparison of the Visibility of Suspicious Lesions with Automated Breast Volumetric Scanning Versus Hand-Held Breast Ultrasound

Cherie M. Kuzmiak; Eun Young Ko; Laura A. Tuttle; Doreen Steed; Donglin Zeng; Sora C. Yoon

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES To assess how well radiologists visualize relevant features of lesions seen with automated breast volumetric scanning (ABVS) in comparison to hand-held breast ultrasound in women going to breast biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS Twenty-five subjects were recruited from women who were scheduled to undergo a breast biopsy for at least one Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System four or five lesion identified in a diagnostic setting. In this institutional review board-approved study, the subjects underwent imaging of the breast(s) of concern using a dedicated system that allowed both hand-held breast ultrasound and ABVS. Five experienced breast radiologists reviewed the 30 lesions in 25 subjects in a reader study. Each reader was asked to specify the lesion type, size, imaging features, Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System, and suspicion of malignancy and to compare the lesion characteristics of shape and margins between the two modalities. RESULTS Seven (23.3%) masses were malignant and 23 (76.4%) were benign. Across all lesions regardless of size or final pathology, there was no significant difference in sensitivity or specificity (P > .15) between the two modalities. For malignant lesions, the reader visualization confidence scores between the two ultrasound modalities were not significantly different (P > .1). However, analysis for nonmalignant cases showed a statistically significant increase in reader visualization confidence in lesion shape and margins (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS Radiologists showed increased confidence in visualization of benign masses and equal confidence in suspicious masses with ABVS imaging. This information could help decrease the need for additional hand-held imaging after automated whole breast ultrasound.

Collaboration


Dive into the Sora C. Yoon's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Cherie M. Kuzmiak

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge