Soudani Marghli

Once daily oral ofloxacin in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation requiring mechanical ventilation: a randomised placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND The role of antibiotics in treatment of patients with moderate exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is uncertain, but such treatment might be useful in very severe episodes. Our objective was to assess the effects of ofloxacin in patients with exacerbations of COPD who required mechanical ventilation. METHODS We did a prospective, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in 93 patients with acute exacerbation of COPD who required mechanical ventilation. Patients were randomly assigned to receive oral ofloxacin 400 mg once daily (n=47) or placebo (46) for 10 days. Primary endpoints were death in hospital and need for an additional course of antibiotics, both separately and in combination. Analysis was by intention to treat. FINDINGS Three patients dropped out of the study. Two (4%) patients receiving ofloxacin died in hospital and ten (22%) did so in the placebo group (absolute risk reduction 17.5%, 95% CI 4.3-30.7, p=0.01). Treatment with ofloxacin significantly reduced the need for additional courses of antibiotics (28.4%, 12.9-43.9, p=0.0006). The combined frequency of death in hospital and need for additional antibiotics was significantly lower in patients assigned to ofloxacin than in those receiving placebo (45.9%, 29.1-62.7, p<0.0001). The duration of mechanical ventilation and hospital stay was significantly shorter in the ofloxacin group than in the placebo group (absolute difference 4.2 days, 95% CI 2.5-5.9; and 9.6 days, 3.4-12.8, respectively). INTERPRETATION New fluoroquinolones, such as ofloxacin, are beneficial in the treatment of COPD exacerbation requiring mechanical ventilation.

Prediction value of the Canadian CT head rule and the New Orleans criteria for positive head CT scan and acute neurosurgical procedures in minor head trauma: a multicenter external validation study.

STUDY OBJECTIVE The New Orleans Criteria and the Canadian CT Head Rule have been developed to decrease the number of normal computed tomography (CT) results in mild head injury. We compare the performance of both decision rules for identifying patients with intracranial traumatic lesions and those who require an urgent neurosurgical intervention after mild head injury. METHODS This was an observational cohort study performed between 2008 and 2011 on patients with mild head injury who were aged 10 years or older. We collected prospectively clinical head CT scan findings and outcome. Primary outcome was need for neurosurgical intervention, defined as either death or craniotomy, or the need of intubation within 15 days of the traumatic event. Secondary outcome was the presence of traumatic lesions on head CT scan. New Orleans Criteria and Canadian CT Head Rule decision rules were compared by using sensitivity specifications and positive and negative predictive value. RESULTS We enrolled 1,582 patients. Neurosurgical intervention was performed in 34 patients (2.1%) and positive CT findings were demonstrated in 218 patients (13.8%). Sensitivity and specificity for need for neurosurgical intervention were 100% (95% confidence interval [CI] 90% to 100%) and 60% (95% CI 44% to 76%) for the Canadian CT Head Rule and 82% (95% CI 69% to 95%) and 26% (95% CI 24% to 28%) for the New Orleans Criteria. Negative predictive values for the above-mentioned clinical decision rules were 100% and 99% and positive values were 5% and 2%, respectively, for the Canadian CT Head Rule and New Orleans Criteria. Sensitivity and specificity for clinical significant head CT findings were 95% (95% CI 92% to 98%) and 65% (95% CI 62% to 68%) for the Canadian CT Head Rule and 86% (95% CI 81% to 91%) and 28% (95% CI 26% to 30%) for the New Orleans Criteria. A similar trend of results was found in the subgroup of patients with a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 15. CONCLUSION For patients with mild head injury, the Canadian CT Head Rule had higher sensitivity than the New Orleans Criteria, with higher negative predictive value. The question of whether the use of the Canadian CT Head Rule would have a greater influence on head CT scan reduction requires confirmation in real clinical practice.

A canine study of immunotherapy in scorpion envenomation

ObjectiveTo evaluate the effects of scorpion venom and antivenom in experimental envenomation.DesignProspective, controlled animal study.SettingUniversity research laboratorySubjectsTwenty-nine anesthetized and ventilated dogs.InterventionsThe first group of animals had venom alone (0.05 mg/kg). Animals from the second group had simultaneous administration of 10 ml of scorpion antivenom (SAV). In the third and fourth groups, 10 ml and 40 ml SAV, respectively, were injected 10 min following venom.Measurements and resultsHemodynamic parameters using right heart catheter were recorded and dosage of catecholamines, neuropeptide Y (NPY), endothelin-1, and atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) were performed at baseline and during 60 min following envenomation. In the control group, at 5 min, there was a sharp increase in pulmonary artery occluded pressure (PAOP, from 2 mmHg to 23 mmHg), mean arterial pressure (MAP, from 125 mmHg to 212 mmHg) and systemic vascular resistance (SVR, from 2,450 dyn sec-1 m5 to 5,775 dyn sec-1 m5, P<0.05 for all). Heart rate, cardiac output, and stroke volume decreased. There was a 40-fold increase in epinephrine and norepinephrine plasma concentrations. Circulating NPY and ANP dosages increased too. PAOP and MAP decreased thereafter to reach baseline levels. Simultaneous administration of SAV with venom totally offset the hallmarks of scorpion envenomation. Delayed administration of SAV at any dosage failed to alter the features of scorpion envenomation.ConclusionWhile simultaneous administration of SAV and scorpion venom is effective in preventing scorpion envenomation-related manifestations, delayed administration of SAV, either at standard or elevated dosages, failed to alter any of the scorpion envenomation features.

Accuracy of Two Scores in the Diagnosis of Stroke Subtype in a Multicenter Cohort Study

STUDY OBJECTIVE The distinction between hemorrhagic and ischemic stroke has critical implications for management. For that purpose, clinical scores have been proposed to be used in areas with limited health care resources where brain computed tomographic (CT) scan is not readily available. We conducted this study to evaluate the predictive value of the Allen and Siriraj scores in the differential diagnosis of stroke subtypes. METHODS We prospectively collected data for 4 years on the clinical characteristics of patients with stroke in a multicenter study. For all patients, we calculated the Allen and the Siriraj scores and we assessed their accuracy in predicting stroke subtypes with receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves. RESULTS We assessed 1,023 patients. Of these, 82.7% (n=846) had ischemic stroke. The area under the ROC curve was higher for Siriraj score compared with the Allen score (0.780 versus 0.702; P=.04). Using the original cutoff points, Siriraj score has a sensitivity for the diagnosis of hemorrhage of 60% and a specificity of 95%; the corresponding values for the Allen score are 55% and 70%, respectively. The negative predictive value was higher for Siriraj score compared to the Allen score (90% versus 80%). The diagnosis of stroke subtype was best predicted at Siriraj score less than -4. CONCLUSION Siriraj score is a valid and useful tool for predicting stroke subtype in a clinical setting in which financial constraints make systematic brain CT scan unfeasible.

Standard versus Newer Antibacterial Agents in the Treatment of Severe Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Randomized Trial of Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole versus Ciprofloxacin

BACKGROUND. Although the use of antibiotics in the treatment of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is largely accepted, controversy remains regarding whether the choice of antibiotic has any impact on outcome. Our aim was to compare the effects of the combination of trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole and ciprofloxacin in patients treated for severe COPD exacerbation requiring mechanical ventilation. METHODS. In a randomized, double-blind trial, we included 170 patients with an acute exacerbation of COPD requiring mechanical ventilation. Enrolled patients received trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (n = 85) or ciprofloxacin (n = 85) for 10 days. Main outcomes were hospital death and need for an additional course of antibiotics. Secondary outcomes were duration of mechanical ventilation, length of hospital stay, and exacerbation-free interval. RESULTS. Combined hospital death and additional antibiotic prescription rates were similar in the 2 groups (16.4% vs 15.3% for trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole group vs ciprofloxacin group; difference, 1.1%; 95% confidence interval [CI] -9.8% to 12.0%; P = .832). Hospital death occurred in 7 patients (8.2%) receiving trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and 8 patients (9.4%) receiving ciprofloxacin (difference, -1.2%; 95% CI, -9.7 to 7.3; P = .90). The need for an additional antibiotic course was observed in 8 patients in the trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole group and 5 patients in the ciprofloxacin group (difference, 2.3%; 95% CI, -5.4 to 10.0; P = .549). The mean exacerbation-free interval (+/- standard deviation) was similar in both treatment groups (83 +/- 25 vs 79 +/- 22 for the trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole group vs ciprofloxacin group; difference, 4 days; 95% CI, -15 to 19 days; P = .41). Duration of mechanical ventilation and hospital stay was not significantly different between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS. In patients with acute exacerbation of COPD requiring mechanical ventilation, efficacy of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole was not inferior to ciprofloxacin. Trial registration. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00791505.

Magnesium sulfate versus ipratropium bromide in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation: a randomized trial.

Treatment with short-acting &bgr;2-agonists for exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) results in clinical improvement. It has not been established whether combining short-acting &bgr;2-agonists to other bronchodilators is more effective than &bgr;2-agonists alone. We conducted a study in patients presenting to the emergency department with exacerbation of COPD. They were randomized to receive nebulized ipratropium bromide (IB group; n = 62) or combined nebulized and intravenous bolus of magnesium sulfate (MgSO4 group; n = 62). All nebulized drugs were administered at 30-minute intervals for 2 hours. Primary outcome included hospital admission, endotracheal intubation, and hospital death rates. Secondary outcome measures were improvement in peak expiratory flow, dyspnea score, and arterial blood gas changes within the first 3 hours. There were no significant differences in primary outcome between MgSO4 and IB groups. Patients given IB average 32 L greater improvement in peak expiratory flow rate compared with magnesium sulfate (95% confidence interval, 19–43 L) at 180 minutes. Simultaneously, there was a significant reduction in PaCO2 compared with baseline values in IB group but not in MgSO4 group. There was a statistically nonsignificant trend toward a decrease in dyspnea score in both groups although adverse events were similar. Although the improvement in peak expiratory flow rate and arterial blood gas favored nebulized IB over magnesium sulfate, there was a nonsignificant difference between both drugs with regard to hospital admission, intubation, and hospital death rates in patients with COPD treated in the emergency department for acute exacerbation.

Inaccuracy of Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction and Global Registry in Acute Coronary Events scores in predicting outcome in ED patients with potential ischemic chest pain

PURPOSE The Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) and the Global Registry in Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) scores were largely evaluated and validated in stratifying risk of cardiovascular events in patients with chest pain and acute coronary syndrome. Our objective was to compare these 2 scores in predicting outcome in emergency department (ED) patients with undifferentiated chest pain. MATERIALS AND METHODS This was a prospective cohort study including patients presenting to 4 EDs with chest pain with nondiagnostic or normal ECG. For all included patients (n = 3125), TIMI and GRACE scores were calculated. Follow-up was conducted at 30-day and 1-year post-ED index admission to identify major adverse events. Main outcome included all cause mortality, acute coronary syndrome, and coronary non-ED planned revascularization. Prognostic performance of the scores was assessed by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. RESULTS We reported 285 (9.1%) major adverse events at 30 days and 436 (13.9%) at 1 year. In patients with low TIMI (≤2) and GRACE (<109) scores, a significant proportion had major adverse events at 30 days (5% and 7.5%, respectively) and 1 year (7.9% and 12.9%, respectively). Area under ROC curve at 30 days was 0.66 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.62-0.71) vs 0.57 (95% CI, 0.53-0.62), respectively, for TIMI and GRACE scores. At 1 year, the area under ROC was 0.67 (95% CI, 0.62-0.71) and 0.65 (95% CI, 0.60-0.70), respectively, for TIMI and GRACE scores. CONCLUSIONS The TIMI and GRACE scores are not valid in short- and long-term risk stratification in our chest pain patients.

Value of Plethysmographic Pulse Amplitude Ratio With Valsalva Maneuver in Identifying Left Ventricular Dysfunction During COPD Exacerbation

BACKGROUND: Left-ventricular dysfunction associated with COPD exacerbation is frequently underestimated. We tested whether finger plethysmography waveform change during the Valsalva maneuver could aid in the distinction between patients with COPD exacerbation with and without left-ventricular dysfunction. METHODS: We included 102 subjects with COPD exacerbation and 51 subjects with acute heart failure admitted to the emergency department for acute dyspnea. Measurements of the plethysmographic pulse amplitude ratio under the Valsalva maneuver were obtained. The value of the plethysmographic pulse amplitude ratio in diagnosing left-ventricular dysfunction in COPD exacerbation subjects was quantified using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves. Diagnostic performance of the plethysmographic pulse amplitude ratio was compared with the Boston score, and the net reclassification improvement was calculated to determine the incremental value in detecting left-ventricular dysfunction. RESULTS: Values of the plethysmographic pulse amplitude ratio were higher in COPD exacerbation subjects with left-ventricular dysfunction compared with those without left-ventricular dysfunction (0.78 vs 0.38, P = .01) but not significantly different from those of the acute heart failure group (0.78). There was a significant correlation between plethysmographic pulse amplitude ratio values and brain natriuretic peptide serum levels. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the plethysmographic pulse amplitude ratio to detect left-ventricular dysfunction among subjects with COPD exacerbation was significantly higher compared with that of the Boston score (0.92 vs 0.76, P = .02). Exposure to plethysmographic pulse amplitude ratio values increased the overall accuracy from Boston score-based predictions of left-ventricular dysfunction and provided a net reclassification improvement of 17.3%. CONCLUSIONS: An increased plethysmographic pulse amplitude ratio associated with COPD exacerbation is a good predictor of left-ventricular dysfunction. This simple and noninvasive index could help emergency department physicians to detect or rule out left-ventricular dysfunction in patients with COPD exacerbation who are able to perform the Valsalva maneuver. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration NCT01619540.)

systolic time intervals combined with Valsalva maneuver for the diagnosis of left ventricular dysfunction in COPD exacerbations

Background The goal of this study was to determine the value of systolic time intervals and their change during Valsalva maneuver (VM) in the diagnosis of left ventricular dysfunction (LVD) in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD). Methods We included 166 patients admitted to the emergency department for AECOPD. Measurement of systolic time intervals included electromechanical activation time (EMAT), left ventricular ejection time (LVET), and EMAT/LVET ratio. These were performed at baseline and during the first strain phase of the VM using a computerized phonoelectrocardiographic method. The diagnosis of LVD was determined on the basis of clinical examination, echocardiography, and brain natriuretic peptide. The values of systolic time intervals were compared between patients with and without LVD; their diagnostic performance was assessed using the area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Results Patients with LVD (n=95) had a significantly higher EMAT and lower LVET and EMAT/LVET ratio compared to patients without LVD (n=71); the area under ROC curve was 0.79, 0.88, and 0.90, respectively, for EMAT, LVET, and EMAT/LVET ratio. All baseline systolic time intervals changed significantly during VM in patients without LVD but they did not change in patients with LVD. The area under ROC curve increased to 0.84 and 0.93, respectively, for EMAT and EMAT/LVET ratio but did not change for LVET. Conclusion Simple and noninvasive measurements of systolic time intervals combined with VM could be helpful to detect or rule out LVD in patients admitted to the emergency room for COPD excacerbation. The EMAT/LVET ratio seems to have the best diagnostic value.

Non-invasive pressure support ventilation and CPAP in cardiogenic pulmonary edema: reply to Templier et al.

Dear Editor, We would like to thank Dr. Templier and colleagues [1] for their interest in our study [2]. They estimate that resolution time in our population is particularly long. Nonetheless, for objective interpretation and to understand the discrepancies observed between our results and those of previous studies it is necessary to take into consideration severity and clinical characteristics of the different patient groups. Indeed, most of our patients did not receive any specific treatment before their inclusion in the study which means that for many of them there is a substantial delay that could adversely influence clinical outcome. In contrast, in 48% of the patients included in the study published by Templier and colleagues [3] drug treatment was started before the introduction of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). In addition, compared to patients included in that study, our patients had more comorbidities. It is true that resolution time can be related to the quality of medical treatment. However, this would be unlikely to explain our results as we used a standardized approach in the management of patients with cardiogenic pulmonary edema (CPE) according to current recommendations including those related to oxygen therapy. In our opinion, the main explanation for differences in resolution time between studies is related to the different definitions used. In the study by Moritz and colleagues [4], resolution time was reached and CPAP was discontinued when the patient’s breathing frequency had decreased to less than 25 breaths/min and arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2) exceeded 90% on oxygen set at 6 L/min, or when the same criteria were obtained on fraction of inspired oxygen (FIO2) = 50% under bilevel PAP. In our study, the threshold was more restrictive requiring an arterial oxygen saturation above 96% under lower O2 supplementation (less than 3 L/min and FIO2 less than 35% for the CPAP and non-invasive pressure support ventilation (NIPSV), respectively). We do not agree with the suggestion that the CPAP system should be used with oxygen as the unique gas source whatever the patient’s need. We think that oxygen therapy should be adjusted to provide the lowest amount needed to keep SaO2 above 90% because, over this level, there is no significant benefit regarding the fact that the SaO2– PaO2 relationship is within the flat part of the curve. Moreover, in some patients with obstructive disease history, the risk of inducing acute hypercapnia could not be totally excluded [5]. Therefore, maintaining the arterial oxygen saturation just over 90% is a safer approach than aiming for disproportionately higher oxygen saturations and is unlikely to compromise tissue oxygen delivery. The physiological principles that underlie this advice have been known for almost half a century.