Sozo Itoh

The effect on immunocytes of anodic oxide titanium after hydrothermal treatment.

All dental root implants come in contact with the oral epithelium, and many complex factors are found to arise in this region. In order to perform a successful dental root implantation, it is necessary to clarify the interaction of the dental root implant material with the host defense mechanisms involved in the specific and nonspecific immune responses to many antigens in oral bacteria and their components. Recently, focusing on developing the dental root implant, the Nikon Corporation improved the surface characteristics of pure titanium even further by developing a hydroxyapatite (HA) layer formed on an anodic titanium oxide film containing Ca and P via hydrothermal treatment (SA treatment). However, since little is known about the effect of SA-treated pure titanium (HA/Ti) on the defense mechanisms of the oral membrane epithelium, we investigated (1) the in vitro proliferation of murine splenic B lymphocytes on the surface of HA/Ti in the presence of three lipopolysaccharide (LPS) concentrations and (2) interleukin-1alpha (IL-1alpha) production by the reaction of human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBM cells) on the surface of HA/Ti under the same concentrations. After culture, murine splenic lymphocytes were measured by uptake of 3H-thymidine, and cytokine release (IL-1alpha) from PBM cells was measured by ELISA. Results showed that HA/Ti had hardly any effect on the LPS-induced proliferation of B lymphocytes and IL-1alpha production. In vitro investigations of the effects of HA/Ti on the LPS-induced proliferation of murine splenic B lymphocytes and IL-1alpha from PBM cells might be a useful way of elucidating the defense mechanism between implants and the oral epithelium.

Clinical evaluation of a dental color analysis system: The Crystaleye Spectrophotometer®

PURPOSE To evaluate the clinical performance of the Crystaleye Spectrophotometer(®), a dental color analysis system. METHODS Three color-measuring devices (Crystaleye Spectrophotometer(®), CAS-ID1, MSC-2000) were tested and the differences in color measurements among them were evaluated using Scheffes F-test. Color measurements with the Crystaleye Spectrophotometer(®) were repeated 10 times by the same operator. The color difference (ΔE) between the first and tenth measurements was calculated. The Crystaleye Spectrophotometer(®) was used to measure the color of the maxillary left central incisor under two conditions (light and dark) and the effect of exterior lighting was analyzed to assess the accuracy of measurements. Furthermore, five different operators performed color measurements, and ΔE among the three devices was calculated. The ΔE between the target tooth and the crown of a single maxillary central incisor crown fabricated using data from the Crystaleye Spectrophotmeter(®) was calculated. Color differences between prebleaching and postbleaching were also analyzed with the Crystaleye Spectrophotometer(®) using the parameters ΔE, ΔL*, Δa*, and Δb*. RESULTS The data from the three spectrophotometers were not significantly different. The ΔE during repeated color measurements by the same operator was 0.6. The ΔE between light and dark conditions was 0.9. The data from the five operators were not significantly different. The mean ΔE value between the target tooth and the fabricated crown was 1.2 ± 0.4, and the mean ΔE value between prebleaching and postbleaching was 3.7 ± 1.0. CONCLUSIONS The Crystaleye Spectrophotometer(®) is an easy-to-use color analysis system producing accurate color measurements under clinical conditions.