Srihari S. Naidu

2011 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines

Writing committee me tions to which their s ply; see Appendix ACCF/AHATask Fo Surgeons Representa tative. Heart Rhythm ography and Int Echocardiography Re ciety of America Rep resentative. kkACCF/ Task Force member d This document was app Board of Trustees and ordinating Committee gery, American Soc Cardiology, Heart Fa for Cardiovascular A geons approved the d The American Associat as follows: Gersh BJ Naidu SS, Nishimura Bernard J. Gersh, MB, ChB, DPhil, FACC, FAHA, Co-Chair* Barry J. Maron, MD, FACC, CoChair* Robert O. Bonow, MD, MACC, FAHA, Joseph A. Dearani, MD, FACC,§,k Michael A. Fifer, MD, FACC, FAHA,* Mark S. Link, MD, FACC, FHRS,* Srihari S. Naidu, MD, FACC, FSCAI,* Rick A. Nishimura, MD, FACC, FAHA, Steve R. Ommen, MD, FACC, FAHA, Harry Rakowski, MD, FACC, FASE,** Christine E. Seidman, MD, FAHA, Jeffrey A. Towbin, MD, FACC, FAHA, James E. Udelson, MD, FACC, FASNC, and Clyde W. Yancy, MD, FACC, FAHAkk

2011 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines Developed in Collaboration With the American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Failure Society of America, Heart Rhythm Society, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons

Alice K. Jacobs, MD, FACC, FAHA, Chair, 2009–2011; Sidney C. Smith, Jr, MD, FACC, FAHA, Immediate Past Chair, 2006–2008[¶¶][1]; Jeffrey L. Anderson, MD, FACC, FAHA, Chair-Elect; Nancy M. Albert, PhD, CCNS, CCRN, FAHA; Christopher E. Buller, MD, FACC[¶¶][1]; Mark A. Creager, MD, FACC, FAHA;

2011 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Executive Summary

2011;58;2703-2738; originally published online Nov 8, 2011; J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. W. Yancy Rakowski, Christine E. Seidman, Jeffrey A. Towbin, James E. Udelson, and Clyde Fifer, Mark S. Link, Srihari S. Naidu, Rick A. Nishimura, Steve R. Ommen, Harry Bernard J. Gersh, Barry J. Maron, Robert O. Bonow, Joseph A. Dearani, Michael A. Thoracic Surgeons Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Failure Society of America, Heart Rhythm Society, of Thoracic Surgery, American Society of Echocardiography, American Society Developed in Collaboration With the American Association for Guidelines Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Cardiomyopathy: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of 2011 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Hypertrophic This information is current as of May 14, 2012 http://content.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/full/58/25/2703 located on the World Wide Web at: The online version of this article, along with updated information and services, is

2015 SCAI/ACC/HFSA/STS clinical expert consensus statement on the use of percutaneous mechanical circulatory support devices in cardiovascular care: Endorsed by the American Heart Assocation, the Cardiological Society of India, and Sociedad Latino Americana de Cardiologia intervencion; Affirmation of value by the Canadian Association of Interventional Cardiology-Association Canadienne de Cardiologie d'intervention

Although historically the intra-aortic balloon pump has been the only mechanical circulatory support device available to clinicians, a number of new devices have become commercially available and have entered clinical practice. These include axial flow pumps, such as Impella(®); left atrial to femoral artery bypass pumps, specifically the TandemHeart; and new devices for institution of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. These devices differ significantly in their hemodynamic effects, insertion, monitoring, and clinical applicability. This document reviews the physiologic impact on the circulation of these devices and their use in specific clinical situations. These situations include patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention, those presenting with cardiogenic shock, and acute decompensated heart failure. Specialized uses for right-sided support and in pediatric populations are discussed and the clinical utility of mechanical circulatory support devices is reviewed, as are the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association clinical practice guidelines.

2011 ACCF/AHA guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

Bernard J. Gersh, MB, ChB, DPhil, FACC, FAHA, Co-Chair*†; Barry J. Maron, MD, FACC, Co-Chair*†; Robert O. Bonow, MD, MACC, FAHA‡; Joseph A. Dearani, MD, FACC§ ; Michael A. Fifer, MD, FACC, FAHA*†; Mark S. Link, MD, FACC, FHRS*¶; Srihari S. Naidu, MD, FACC, FSCAI*#; Rick A. Nishimura, MD, FACC, FAHA†; Steve R. Ommen, MD, FACC, FAHA†; Harry Rakowski, MD, FACC, FASE†**; Christine E. Seidman, MD, FAHA†; Jeffrey A. Towbin, MD, FACC, FAHA††; James E. Udelson, MD, FACC, FASNC‡‡§§; Clyde W. Yancy, MD, FACC, FAHA

The Current Use of Impella 2.5 in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock: Results from the USpella Registry

Objectives To evaluate the periprocedural characteristics and outcomes of patients supported with Impella 2.5 prior to percutaneous coronary intervention (pre-PCI) versus those who received it after PCI (post-PCI) in the setting of cardiogenic shock (CS) complicating an acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Background Early mechanical circulatory support may improve outcome in the setting of CS complicating an AMI. However, the optimal timing to initiate hemodynamic support has not been well characterized. Methods Data from 154 consecutive patients who underwent PCI and Impella 2.5 support from 38 US hospitals participating in the USpella Registry were included in our study. The primary end-point was survival to discharge. Secondary end-points included assessment of patients’ hemodynamics and in-hospital complications. A multivariate regression model was used to identify independent predictors for mortality. Results Both groups were comparable except for diabetes (P = 0.02), peripheral vascular disease (P = 0.008), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (P = 0.05), and prior stroke (P = 0.04), all of which were more prevalent in the pre-PCI group. Patients in the pre-PCI group had more lesions (P = 0.006) and vessels (P = 0.01) treated. These patients had also significantly better survival to discharge compared to patients in the post-PCI group (65.1% vs.40.7%, P = 0.003). Survival remained favorable for the pre-PCI group after adjusting for potential confounding variables. Initiation of support prior to PCI with Impella 2.5 was an independent predictor of in-hospital survival (Odds ratio 0.37, 95% confidence interval: 0.17–0.79, P = 0.01) in multivariate analysis. The incidence of in-hospital complications included in the secondary end-point was similar between the 2 groups. Conclusions The results of our study suggest that early initiation of hemodynamic support prior to PCI with Impella 2.5 is associated with more complete revascularization and improved survival in the setting of refractory CS complicating an AMI.

Real-world use of the Impella 2.5 circulatory support system in complex high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: The USpella Registry

Objectives: We report on the real‐world, multicenter experience of the Impella 2.5 circulatory support system during high‐risk PCI, a subset of the larger USpella Registry. Background: Standard of care for most patients with compromised ventricular function with multivessel or high‐risk coronary lesions has been coronary artery bypass grafting. In poor operative candidates, high‐risk PCI is increasingly considered, despite an increased risk for periprocedural hemodynamic compromise. Methods: 175 consecutive patients who underwent high‐risk PCI with prophylactic support of the Impella 2.5 were evaluated. The primary safety endpoint was the incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 30 days. Secondary endpoints included safety and efficacy related to the device and patient outcomes, including survival at 12 months. Results: Overall angiographic revascularization was successful in 99% of patients and in 90% of those with multivessel revascularization, resulting in a reduction of the mean SYNTAX score post‐PCI from 36 ± 15 to 18 ± 15 (P < 0.0001) and an improvement of the ejection fraction (from 31 ± 15% to 36 ± 14%, P < 0.0001). In 51% of patients, the functional status improved by one or more NYHA class (P < 0.001). At 30‐day follow‐up, the rate of MACE was 8%, and survival was 96%, 91%, and 88% at 30 days, 6 months, and 12 months, respectively. Conclusions: The use of Impella 2.5 in high‐risk PCI appeared feasible and safe in the real‐world setting. The utilization of the Impella 2.5 was successful, resulting in favorable short‐ and midterm angiographic, procedural and clinical outcomes.

Novel Percutaneous Cardiac Assist Devices The Science of and Indications for Hemodynamic Support

Progress made in cardiovascular treatment over the past several decades has been impressive. Combined invasive and pharmacological treatment strategies have improved clinical outcome in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), as well as in those treated for acute myocardial infarction and decompensated heart failure. In the case of acute myocardial infarction, dramatic reductions in the progression to cardiogenic shock and the rates of reinfarction and mortality have been seen.1,–,3 In particular, in-hospital survival has improved by as much as 10 absolute percentage points, and cardiogenic shock after myocardial infarction has been cut in half.3,4 In addition, primary prevention strategies such as pharmacotherapy and aggressive risk factor modification have made significant headway in reducing the incidence of a first coronary event.4 Thus, not only do fewer patients present with acute myocardial infarction, but associated mortality has declined. The improved survival after myocardial infarction, however, has resulted in more patients living with systolic dysfunction and associated congestive heart failure.5 Heart failure, indeed, is now the major cardiovascular disease that drives hospital admissions and produces significant patient morbidity.6 This is not to say that progress has not been made in the realm of congestive heart failure, however. Both invasive (implantable devices and revascularization) and pharmacological (β-blockers and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system antagonists) therapies have improved outcome, including quality of life, heart failure symptoms, ventricular function, and survival.7,–,10 Finally, PCI outcomes have seen dramatic improvements since the initial angioplasties performed in the late 1970s. In particular, the development of bare metal stents and, more recently, drug-coated stents, modern angioplasty balloon catheters and equipment, and safer while more effective antiplatelet therapy has improved procedural success and reduced mortality.11 Indeed, patients with higher degrees of multivessel disease, as well as concomitant …

Hirudin Reduces Tissue Factor Expression in Neointima After Balloon Injury in Rabbit Femoral and Porcine Coronary Arteries

BACKGROUND Tissue factor (TF) is a transmembrane glycoprotein that, after binding to factor VII/VIIa, initiates the extrinsic coagulation pathway, resulting in thrombin generation and its sequelae. Thrombin has been shown to induce TF mRNA in endothelium, monocytes, and smooth muscle cells, further perpetuating the thrombogenic cycle. This study was designed to determine the effect of specific inhibition of thrombin by recombinant hirudin (r-hirudin) on TF distribution after balloon angioplasty in the cholesterol-fed rabbit femoral artery and porcine coronary artery models. METHODS AND RESULTS Thirty-five femoral arteries from 32 cholesterol-fed New Zealand White rabbits and 84 coronary arteries from 55 Yorkshire-Albino swine were studied by use of a recently developed in situ method of TF localization based on digoxigenin labeling of recombinant factor VIIa (Dig-VIIa), with correlative studies of TF immunoreactivity by use of anti-rabbit (AP-1) or anti-human (sTF) antibodies. At sites of balloon angioplasty in rabbit femoral or pig coronary arteries (double or single injury), TF-antibody and Dig-VIIa staining were noted in association with endothelial cells, smooth muscle cells, and foam cells and within the fibrous tissue matrix primarily of the adventitia and neointima. Staining was significantly greater after balloon angioplasty than in vessels that had not undergone angioplasty but was similar after single and double balloon injury. Animals treated with r-hirudin (rabbits, 1 mg/kg bolus plus 2-hour infusion; pigs, 1 mg/kg bolus plus 0.7 mg x kg(-1) x d(-1) infusion for 14 days with implantable pump) had diminished TF-antibody and Dig-VIIa staining 28 days after balloon angioplasty compared with controls (bolus heparin only). This effect was more prominent on the neointima and was more striking in the porcine than the rabbit model. CONCLUSIONS TF expression, persistent 1 month after balloon angioplasty in rabbit femoral arteries and porcine coronary arteries, is attenuated by specific thrombin inhibition with hirudin. These results suggest that thrombin inhibition, in addition to its effect on acute thrombus formation and its effect on luminal narrowing by plaque in experimental animals, may result in a prolonged reduction in thrombogenicity of the restenotic plaque through this effect on TF expression.

Contemporary Incidence and Predictors of Stent Thrombosis and Other Major Adverse Cardiac Events in the Year After XIENCE V Implantation: Results From the 8,061-Patient XIENCE V United States Study

OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to identify predictors of clinical events after XIENCE V (Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, California) stenting. BACKGROUND The XIENCE V USA (XIENCE V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System [EECSS] USA Post-Approval) study is a prospective, multicenter, Food and Drug Administration-required post-approval study to examine safety and effectiveness in real-world settings. After an initial 5,062 patients, 2,999 more were included as part of the DAPT (Dual Antiplatelet Therapy) trial (total n = 8,061). METHODS One-year clinical events, including stent thrombosis (ST), cardiac death/myocardial infarction (MI), target lesion failure, and target lesion revascularization, were adjudicated according to Academic Research Consortium criteria, with ST and cardiac death/MI as primary and co-primary endpoints. Demographic, clinical, and procedural variables were assessed by multivariable analysis. A time-dependent covariate assessed the association between DAPT usage and ST. RESULTS Roughly 61% were off-label; 85.6% remained on DAPT without interruption through 1 year. Incidences of definite/probable ST, cardiac death/MI, target lesion failure, and target lesion revascularization were 0.80% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.61% to 1.03%), 7.1% (95% CI: 6.51% to 7.68%), 8.9% (95% CI: 8.30% to 9.60%), and 4.3% (95% CI: 3.82% to 4.75%), respectively. Several independent clinical and angiographic predictors were identified for each outcome. Predictors of ST included DAPT interruption ≤ 30 days (hazard ratio [HR]: 8.63, 95% CI: 2.69 to 27.73, p = 0.0003), renal insufficiency (HR: 3.72, 95% CI: 1.71 to 8.09, p = 0.0009), and total stent length (HR: 1.30, 95% CI: 1.16 to 1.47, p < 0.0001). A DAPT interruption >30 days was not predictive of ST. CONCLUSIONS In this large, real-world population, XIENCE V demonstrated low event rates at 1 year, with several independent predictors. Early DAPT interruption (≤ 30 days) was the most potent predictor of ST, whereas delayed interruption (>30 days) was not predictive. (XIENCE V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System [EECSS] USA Post-Approval Study; NCT00676520).