Srikanth Bellary

Premature cardiovascular events and mortality in south Asians with type 2 diabetes in the United Kingdom Asian Diabetes Study - effect of ethnicity on risk

Abstract Background/Aim: People of south Asian origin have an excessive risk of morbidity and mortality from cardiovascular disease. We examined the effect of ethnicity on known risk factors and analysed the risk of cardiovascular events and mortality in UK south Asian and white Europeans patients with type 2 diabetes over a 2 year period. Methods: A total of 1486 south Asian (SA) and 492 white European (WE) subjects with type 2 diabetes were recruited from 25 general practices in Coventry and Birmingham, UK. Baseline data included clinical history, anthropometry and measurements of traditional risk factors – blood pressure, total cholesterol, HbA1c. Multiple linear regression models were used to examine ethnicity differences in individual risk factors. Ten-year cardiovascular risk was estimated using the Framingham and UKPDS equations. All subjects were followed up for 2 years. Cardiovascular events (CVD) and mortality between the two groups were compared. Trial registration number: ISRCTN 38297969. Findings: Significant differences were noted in risk profiles between both groups. After adjustment for clustering and confounding a significant ethnicity effect remained only for higher HbA1c (0.50 [0.22 to 0.77]; P = 0.0004) and lower HDL (−0.09 [−0.17 to −0.01]; P = 0.0266). Baseline CVD history was predictive of CVD events during follow-up for SA (P < 0.0001) but not WE (P = 0.189). Mean age at death was 66.8 (11.8) for SA vs. 74.2 (12.1) for WE, a difference of 7.4 years (95% CI 1.0 to 13.7 years), P = 0.023. The adjusted odds ratio of CVD event or death from CVD was greater but not significantly so in SA than in WE (OR 1.4 [0.9 to 2.2]). Limitations: Fewer events in both groups and short period of follow-up are key limitations. Longer follow-up is required to see if the observed differences between the ethnic groups persist. Conclusion: South Asian patients with type 2 diabetes in the UK have a higher cardiovascular risk and present with cardiovascular events at a significantly younger age than white Europeans. Enhanced and ethnicity specific targets and effective treatments are needed if these inequalities are to be reduced.

Inhaled insulin (Exubera ® ): combining efficacy and convenience

The pulmonary route, due to its rich vascularity, large surface area and immunotolerant characteristics, may be an ideal target for drug delivery. Although the inhaled route has been used to deliver drugs used in the management of respiratory disorders, success with peptide delivery has been limited by poor bioavailability. Recent advances in technology have overcome these barriers and have enabled new delivery devices to be developed. Insulin is the first peptide to be delivered successfully by this route and the first of the inhaled insulin delivery devices (Exubera®) has now been approved for clinical use. In clinical trials it has been shown to be effective, apparently safe and a preferred alternative to subcutaneously injected meal-time insulin. This new technology offers great convenience to patients needing insulin treatment. While it will considerably reduce the number of injections needed by people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes, it should also encourage more patients to start insulin treatment earlier. The potential benefits from improved adherence and better glycaemic control with this insulin are also significant.

Review: Inhaled insulin: overcoming barriers to insulin therapy?

Inhaled insulin is a new route of insulin delivery that can be used in the treatment of type 1 and type 2 diabetes. It offers an alternative and additional means of insulin administration, and has been received with particular satisfaction by patients who dislike injections. Trials indicate that inhaled insulin can be used effectively for pre-meal bolus intensification of treatment. Pre-meal inhaled insulin with Exubera® has shown faster absorption and similar duration of action to regular subcutaneous insulin with an overall similar glucodynamic effect. Although bioavailability is lower, mainly due to losses in the upper airways, this is compensated for by dose. The commonest side effect reported with inhaled insulin, as with subcutaneous insulin, was hypoglycaemia, almost a quarter of patients noted a cough which settled with continued treatment. Increased antibody titres and changes in lung function return to normal on discontinuation of inhaled insulin. Quality of life scores indicate patient preference for inhaled versus injected insulin, thus increased choice may improve adherence to treatment regimens. However, true cost:benefit analyses have to be undertaken as do studies in children, smokers and people with respiratory conditions, e.g. asthma. Br J Diabetes Vasc Dis 2006;6:103‐08

Replication of European GWAS-derived type 2 diabetes susceptibility SNPs in Pakistani populations

Background and aims: The association between type 2 diabetes and different forms of cognitive impairment is well established. The mechanism behind the association is however still unrevealed. We ha ...