Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Srinivas G. Rao.
The Journal of Rheumatology | 2009
Philip J. Mease; Daniel J. Clauw; R. Michael Gendreau; Srinivas G. Rao; Jay D. Kranzler; Wei Chen; Robert H. Palmer
Objective. To evaluate the safety and efficacy of milnacipran, a dual norepinephrine and serotonin reuptake inhibitor, in the treatment of fibromyalgia (FM). Methods. A 27-week, randomized, double-blind, multicenter study compared milnacipran 100 and 200 mg/day with placebo in the treatment of 888 patients with FM. Two composite responder definitions were used to classify each patient’s individual response to therapy. “FM responders” concurrently satisfied response criteria for improvements in pain (visual analog scale 24-h morning recall), patient global impression of change (PGIC), and physical functioning (SF-36 Physical Component Summary); while “FM pain responders” concurrently satisfied response criteria for improvements in pain and PGIC. Results. At the primary endpoint, after 3-month stable dose treatment, a significantly higher percentage of milnacipran-treated patients met criteria as FM responders versus placebo (milnacipran 200 mg/day, p = 0.017; milnacipran 100 mg/day, p = 0.028). A significantly higher percentage of patients treated with milnacipran 200 mg/day also met criteria as FM pain responders versus placebo (p = 0.032). Significant pain reductions were observed after Week 1 with both milnacipran doses. At 15 weeks, milnacipran 200 mg/day led to significant improvements over placebo in pain (realtime, daily and weekly recall; all measures, p < 0.05), PGIC (p < 0.001), fatigue (p = 0.016), cognition (p = 0.025), and multiple SF-36 domains. Milnacipran was safe and well tolerated by the majority of patients during 27 weeks of treatment; nausea and headache were the most common adverse events. Conclusion. Milnacipran is safe and effective for the treatment of multiple symptoms of FM.
Biological Psychiatry | 2003
S.Neil Vaishnavi; Charles B. Nemeroff; Susan J. Plott; Srinivas G. Rao; Jay D. Kranzler; Michael J. Owens
BACKGROUND Though selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors have revolutionized the field of psychiatry with demonstrated efficacy in affective and anxiety disorders with minimal side effects, norepinephrine-serotonin reuptake inhibitors may provide efficacy similar to tricyclic antidepressants without the adverse side effects associated with tricyclic antidepressants. METHODS The affinity and selectivity of milnacipran, duloxetine, venlafaxine, citalopram, amitriptyline, and nortriptyline were determined for the human serotonin, norepinephrine, and dopamine transporters. RESULTS Both milnacipran and duloxetine were potent inhibitors of serotonin and norepinephrine uptake. Unlike duloxetine and venlafaxine, milnacipran appears serotonin transporter selective in binding (ratio = 2.61) and norepinephrine transporter selective in uptake (ratio =.45). CONCLUSIONS Milnaciprans binding and uptake inhibition profile more closely resembles that of the tricyclic antidepressants than that of duloxetine. Whether these differences observed in vitro manifest themselves in vivo is not clear.
Human Psychopharmacology-clinical and Experimental | 2004
Olivier Vitton; Michael Gendreau; Judy Gendreau; Jay D. Kranzler; Srinivas G. Rao
Sleep | 2008
Nathaniel S. Marshall; Brendon J. Yee; Anup V. Desai; Peter R. Buchanan; Keith Wong; Renee Crompton; Kerri L. Melehan; Nadene Zack; Srinivas G. Rao; R. Michael Gendreau; Jay D. Kranzler; Ronald R. Grunstein
Archive | 2003
Jay D. Kranzler; Srinivas G. Rao
Archive | 2003
Srinivas G. Rao; Jay D. Kranzler
Psychopharmacology Bulletin | 2002
Jay D. Kranzler; Judy Gendreau; Srinivas G. Rao
Drugs of Today | 2004
Srinivas G. Rao; Daniel J. Clauw
Archive | 2005
Srinivas G. Rao; Jay D. Kranzler; Jeffery J. Anderson
Archive | 2003
Srinivas G. Rao; Jay D. Kranzler