Stacey McCraw
University of New South Wales
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Stacey McCraw.
Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders | 2010
Nicole A. Kochan; Michael Breakspear; Melissa J. Slavin; Michael Valenzuela; Stacey McCraw; Henry Brodaty; Perminder S. Sachdev
Aim: To investigate dynamic changes in functional brain activity in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) in response to a graded working memory (WM) challenge with increasing memory load. Methods: In an event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study, 35 MCI and 22 cognitively normal subjects performed a visuospatial associative WM task with 3 load levels. Potential performance differences were controlled for by individually calibrating the number of items presented at each load. Results: An interaction between group and WM load was observed during stimulus encoding. At lower loads, greater activity in the right anterior cingulate and right precuneus was observed in MCI subjects. As the load increased to higher levels, reduced activation in these regions and greater deactivation in the posterior cingulate-medial precuneus were observed in MCI compared to control subjects. Stronger expression of load-related patterns of activation and deactivation in MCI subjects was associated with greater clinical severity and a more abnormal pattern of performance variability. Conclusion: Patterns of overactivation, underactivation and deactivation during successful encoding in MCI subjects were dependent on WM load. This type of graded cognitive challenge may operate like a ‘memory stress test’ in MCI and may be a useful biomarker of disease at the predementia stage.
Journal of Affective Disorders | 2013
Gordon Parker; Stacey McCraw; Dusan Hadzi-Pavlovic; Kathryn Fletcher
BACKGROUND While there have been many studies comparing direct and indirect costs engendered individually and nationally by those with unipolar (UP) and bipolar (BP) disorders, there has been no previous study comparing costs across the bipolar I (BP I) and bipolar II (BP II) disorders. METHODS We examine direct and indirect costs attributable to a mood disorder in a sample of 44 BP I, 102 BP II and 279 UP patients attending a tertiary referral clinic, and with comparable illness durations of some 20 years and comparable treatment durations. We calculated direct and indirect costs incurred for their lifetime of illness based on relevant cost structures, in Australian dollars. RESULTS The mean lifetime indirect costs for BP I patients was
Journal of Affective Disorders | 2013
Gordon Parker; Rebecca Graham; Dusan Hadzi-Pavlovic; Stacey McCraw; Michael Hong; Paul Friend
134,318, as against
Journal of Affective Disorders | 2014
Stacey McCraw; Gordon Parker; Rebecca Graham; Howe Synnott; Philip B. Mitchell
76,821 for BP II and
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica | 2015
Gordon Parker; Stacey McCraw
68,347 for UP patients, joining with respective health care costs of
Psychiatry Research-neuroimaging | 2014
Gordon Parker; Kathryn Fletcher; Stacey McCraw; Michael Hong
26,353,
Journal of Affective Disorders | 2017
Gordon Parker; Stacey McCraw
17,580 and
Comprehensive Psychiatry | 2014
David Gilfillan; Gordon Parker; Elizabeth Sheppard; Vijaya Manicavasagar; Amelia Paterson; Bianca Blanch; Stacey McCraw
27, 237, to generate total costs of
Psychiatry Research-neuroimaging | 2015
Gordon Parker; Stacey McCraw; Dusan Hadzi-Pavlovic
160,671/BP I patient,
Psychiatry Research-neuroimaging | 2018
Adam Bayes; Rebecca Graham; Gordon Parker; Stacey McCraw
94,401/BP II patient and