Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Stan Bühne is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Stan Bühne.


international conference on requirements engineering | 2005

Modelling requirements variability across product lines

Stan Bühne; Kim Lauenroth; Klaus Pohl

The explicit definition of variability in software product lines is a key difference between the development of single software systems and software product line engineering. More and more companies maintain several software product lines which focus on different types of products, market segments, and/or domains. Those product lines typically share commonalities and variability. The companies thus face the problem of managing communality and variability across different product lines. In this paper, we identify essential requirements for the documentation of requirements variability across product lines. We propose a meta model for structuring the variability information, sketch a prototypical realisation for managing variability across product lines in DOORS, and illustrate the use of the meta model in a small example. We further report on experiences made with the proposed variability modelling approach.


International Workshop on Software Product-Family Engineering | 2003

Exploring the Context of Product Line Adoption

Stan Bühne; Gary J. Chastek; Timo Käkölä; Peter Knauber; Linda M. Northrop; Steffen Thiel

To successfully adopt a product line approach an organization needs to define its adoption goals, conceive a strategy, and implement a plan to achieve those goals. This process is repeated for each business unit and individual affected by the product line adoption. This paper describes how the characteristics of the market, organization, business unit, and individual influence product line adoption goals, strategies, and plans.


software product lines | 2006

Scenario-Based Application Requirements Engineering

Stan Bühne; Günter Halmans; Kim Lauenroth; Klaus Pohl

In domain requirements engineering, common and variable requirements are defined for reuse in application requirements engineering. The identification and definition of requirements for reuse has been introduced in Chap. 4. This chapter focuses on application requirements engineering, where a multitude of application requirements specifications can be developed by reusing the requirements artifacts that were defined in domain engineering. If the application stakeholders have specific requirements that cannot be fulfilled by the product line (further called application specific requirements), either the Abstract


ieee international conference on requirements engineering | 2004

Defining requirements at different levels of abstraction

Stan Bühne; Günter Halmans; Klaus Pohl; Matthias Weber; Henning Kleinwechter; Thomas Wierczoch

Requirements engineering for complex software intensive systems has become a major challenge in many software development projects. Especially the automotive industry experiences the increasing complexity of software in vehicles, during the last years. An actual premium vehicle, for instance embodies up to hundred electronic control units (ECU) with easily a few hundred features, each. Beneath the definition of abstract features, an electronic control unit is described by different goals, scenarios, requirements, and constraints. To create a manageable and traceable requirements specification for complex systems that enables the change and reuse of requirements, many companies claim assistance for a seamless specification of requirements. To satisfy this claim necessary requirements-artefacts and abstraction levels have to be defined. Further the interrelations between different requirements-artefacts of one, and among different abstraction levels have to be analyzed and defined. Recent research in this area has shown the benefits of goals and scenarios in addition to traditional requirements. Moreover, several researchers and practitioners have already researched the interrelations between goals and scenarios. However these works do not focus on the interrelationships of goals, scenarios, and requirements on different abstraction levels. In a joint project with DaimlerChrysler and the Software Systems Engineering Group at the University of Duisburg-Essen, we introduced goals, scenarios, and requirements on different abstraction levels and applied it in the context of a development project at DaimlerChrysler.


Feature Interactions in Telecommunications and Software Systems VIII. | 2005

Considering Feature Interactions in Product Lines: Towards the Automatic Derivation of Dependencies between Product Variants.

Andreas Metzger; Stan Bühne; Kim Lauenroth; Klaus Pohl


Model-Based Engineering of Embedded Systems | 2005

Domain Requirements Engineering

Stan Bühne; Klaus Pohl


Modellierung | 2004

Anforderungsorientierte Variabilitätsmodellierung für Software-Produktfamilien.

Stan Bühne; Günter Halmans; Klaus Pohl


INFORMATIK 2004 - Informatik verbindet (34. Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V.).: Lecture Notes in Informatics (LNI) | 2004

Anforderungsmanagement in der Automobilindustrie: Variabilität in Zielen, Szenarien und Anforderungen.

Stan Bühne; Kim Lauenroth; Klaus Pohl


Softwaretechnik-trends | 2004

Zentrale Variabilitätsmodellierung für Requirements Artefakte in der Produktlinienentwicklung.

Stan Bühne; Günter Halmans; Kim Lauenroth; Klaus Pohl


Archive | 2004

Why is it not Sufficient to Model Requirements Variability with Feature Models? 1

Stan Bühne; Kim Lauenroth; Klaus Pohl

Collaboration


Dive into the Stan Bühne's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Klaus Pohl

University of Duisburg-Essen

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Kim Lauenroth

University of Duisburg-Essen

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Günter Halmans

University of Duisburg-Essen

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Gary J. Chastek

Carnegie Mellon University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Linda M. Northrop

Carnegie Mellon University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Timo Käkölä

University of Jyväskylä

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Andreas Metzger

University of Duisburg-Essen

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge